Quantcast
Channel: climate change denier
Viewing all 74 articles
Browse latest View live

Citing DeSmogBlog Series, "FrackNation" Screening Cancelled by MN Film Festival

$
0
0

FrackNation,” the documentary film about hydraulic fracturing (“fracking”) with close conservative movement ties, recently had its showing cancelled at Winona, Minnesota's annual Frozen River Film Festival (FRFF).

Citing DeSmogBlog's two-partinvestigative series published in May 2013 on “FrackNation,” FRFF Director Mike Kennedy told the Winona Post his rationale for cancelling the film is that it was, “pretty apparent they were paid to make these movies to counter Gasland [Part II].”

“DeSmogBlog.com appears to be the main source of allegations that 'FrackNation' was industry-funded,” wrote the Post. “DeSmogBlog claims connections between [film Co-Director Phelim] McAleer and conservative groups, industry groups help[ing] promote the film after its was made, and the fact that McAleer directed an industry-funded documentary in the past, as proof that 'FrackNation' is cut from the same cloth.”

The cancellation has caused a major kerfuffle in conservative media circles, covered by outlets ranging from Fox News, Fox BusinessThe Blaze TVTown Hall, Watchdog.orgHot Air and others. McAleer was a featured guest on “Fox and Friends” on January 23. 

FrackNation issued a press statement in response to the cancellation, spawning the conservative media backlash. 

“The film festival organizers seem to hate alternative points of view, they seem to want to quash diversity. They seem to be scared of the truth,” McAleer said in the press statement. “Basically the Frozen River Film Festival organizers have given in to bullying and taken the easy way out and censored a film that might offend environmental elites who think they know best.”

But an email exchange** provided by film festival organizers to DeSmogBlog shows, far from a case of censorship, “FrackNation” did not agree to the standard operating procedure for screening the film. In turn, festival organizers decided they wouldn't screen it.

“FrackNation” Rises to Prominence

Co-Directed by Magdalena Segieda, Ann McElhinney and McAleer, “FrackNation” came out a few months before the release of Josh Fox's “Gasland: Part II” and around the same time as Gus Van Sant's Hollywood film critical of fracking, “Promised Land,” starring Matt Damon. 

Since its release, “FrackNation” has done many screenings nationwide for state-level Americans for Prosperity (AFP) groups. AFP is a front group founded and bankrolled by the Koch Brothers, David and Charles Koch. It's also done many screenings for oil and gas industry trade associations. 

“FrackNation” also played in front of the U.S. House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology in February 2013, which Dave Weigel of Slate reported “around 40 Republican staffers and members of Congress” attended. 

In contrast, Josh Fox was arrested at the same Committee's hearing a month earlier while filming for his then upcoming film for “unlawful entry.”

Missing Context: “FrackNation” Snubs Festival Screening Terms

McAleer's claim is that “FrackNation” has been bludgeoned into silence by the FRFF organizers. 

“What country am I living in?,” he asked rhetorically in an interview with the Winona Post. “I thought that this was America. I thought that people actually appreciated dissent.” 

But that's not the whole story, according to FRFF organizers, who said it's the festival's standard operating procedure that film representatives come for post-film discussions and question-and-answer sessions. 

“Upon original acceptance we stated that a filmmaker attend with the film and join in a moderated public forum, as engagement is an important part of our mission,” reads a press release they posted on Facebook about canceling the film's screening. “We offered to pay travel and lodging to anyone from the film who could attend. They declined to send someone, so we will not be screening the film.”

FRFF provided DeSmogBlog the email exchange between Festival Director Crystal Hegge and “FrackNation” co-director Magdalena Segieda outlined in FRFF's press release.  

“Is there anyone associated with the film that could come to the festival?,” Hegge asked in a December 19 email. “If no one from the film can come to the festival I may have to rethink my arrangement because there will be a lot of dead time in this particular theater without a Q&A or panel.”

Segieda responded, but didn't address the possibility of the “FrackNation” screening being canceled if a film spokesperson couldn't attend the festival.  

“Unfortunately, no one from the FrackNation team would be able to come,” wrote Segieda in a December 20 email. “Let me know when you set the the time, I will wait for your laurel to start promoting the screening.”

FRFF told DeSmogBlog it had a local frac sand industry sponsor give $1,000 to the film festival to support a member of the “FrackNation” team coming to the film festival.

But after Segieda informed Hegge that “FrackNation” couldn't comply with FRFP's request that they participate in a post-screening panel and after “FrackNation” asked for $10,000 from the sponsor according to Kennedy, the sponsor pulled out. From there, it was game over for screening the film at FRFF

Initially, Kennedy envisioned a “Super Bowl” of fracking documentaries to take place at FRFF, with a debate between to ensue between McAleer and Fox. Fox couldn't make it out.

But in his place, Calvin Tillman the former Mayor of Dish, Texas featured in the second “Gasland” — will be on-site as a representative and speaker for the film, according to Kennedy. 

Film Fest Organizers Not Backing Down

Despite the backlash by the “FrackNation” team, FRFF organizers say they won't back down. 

They told the Winona Post, “true documentaries are independently funded,” pointing out that its role model film festivals, Telluride Mountain Film Festival and Sundance Film Festival have both also snubbed “FrackNation” and concluded, “there is a growing national consensus that the film does not qualify as a documentary.”

In place of screening “FrackNation,” FRFF is hosting a forum titled “Documentaries Today: My Fact Your Fiction,” which will center around the fine line between factual documentary film and propaganda documentary-style film.

Asked if he thought the post-cancellation was manufactured and deceptive, Kennedy told DeSmogBlog, “let's just say it was likely well thought out and coordinated and leave it there.”

**Update**: In an email interview with “FrackNation” Co-Director Magdalena Segieda, DeSmogBlog has learned additional emails were exchanged (published here with Segieda's permission) after December 20 between the film festival coordinators and Segieda.

These emails weren't included in the initial batch sent to DeSmogBlog by the festival organizers. In a January 7 email, Film Festival Director Crystal Hegge informed Segieda the film screening would be at 10:00 AM on January 26.

“Thanks - do you have a laurel by any chance so I can start promoting the screening on our social media?,” Segieda wrote in response to Hegge's email.

After Hegge told Segieda all she had was a “generic laurel,” on January 10, a week passed. Then, according to the email exchange provided to DeSmogBlog by Segieda, Hegge emailed Segieda to say they had to cancel the screening a week later on January 17.

“I am writing to inform you that we will not be showing FRACKNATION during our 2014 festival,” Hegge wrote. “Due to the high quantity of films at the festival we have decided not to show this feature film without a filmmaker attendant. Thank you for your submission and please consider us in the future.”

It didn't take long for Segieda to respond. 

“But we have already published and promoted the screening with time and address to thousands of our fans on our social media,” Segieda wrote less than ten minutes later in a response email. “I have also just finished create (sic) a promo poster attached here and was going to push it out over the next couple of days.”

Asked about the discrepency in the story versions between the two camps, Phelim McAleer provided this statement to DeSmogBlog:

It is unfair that the Frozen River Film Festival has cancelled the FrackNation screening and misrepresented the true situation in the media. I think its clear that they have caved to political pressure and as a result there will not be diversity of opinion and ideas at the festival. This is not what a film festival should be about.


Gulf Stream: Williams Suspends Bluegrass Gas Export Pipeline, Announces New Export Line

$
0
0

Right before the champagne bottles began popping for activists engaged in a grassroots struggle to halt the construction of Williams Companies' prospective Bluegrass Pipeline project — which the company suspended indefinitely in an April 28 press release — Williams had already begun raining on the parade.

The pipeline industry giant took out the trash on Friday, April 25, announcing its intentions to open a new Louisiana pipeline named Gulf Trace.

Akin to TransCanada's ANR Pipeline recently reported on by DeSmogBlog, Gulf Trace is not entirely “new,” per se. Rather, it's the retooling of a pipeline system already in place, in this case Williams' Transco Pipeline system

The retooling has taken place in the aftermath of Cheniere's Sabine Pass LNG export facility receiving the first ever final gas export permit from the U.S. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) during the fracking era.

Williams' Transco Pipeline System; Photo Credit: William Huston

Both ANR and Gulf Trace will feed into Sabine Pass, the Louisiana-based LNG export terminal set to open for business in late 2015Also like ANR, Transco will transform into a gas pipeline flowing in both directions, “bidirectional” in industry lingo.

Bluegrass, if ever built, also would transport fracked gas to the Gulf Coast export markets. But instead of LNG, Bluegrass is a natural gas liquids pipeline (NGL)

“The project…is designed to connect [NGLs] produced in the Marcellus-Utica areas in the U.S. Northeast with domestic and export markets in the U.S. Gulf Coast,” it explained in an April 28 press release announcing the project's suspension. 

With Bluegrass tossed to the side for now, Williams already announced in a press release that the company has launched an open season to examine industry interest in Gulf Trace. It closes on May 8, 2014.

“Although we recognized the suspension of the Bluegrass could impact non-conventional drilling here in Western Pennsylvania, we should all know better than to get too excited about this announcement,” Carrie Hahn, a Pennsylvania-based activist told DeSmogBlog. “There is too much at stake here for them to give up that easily.”

The announcement follows in the aftermath of the flurry of federal-level lobbying activity by Williams during the first quarter of 2014. 

Williams Spends Big Lobbying for Exports

First-quarter lobbying disclosure forms indicate Williams spent $450,000 lobbying at the federal level for both shale gas exports and pipeline permitting issues. It has done so utilizing both its in-house lobbyists and outside lobbying firms.

In-House Lobbyists 

In-house, Williams spent $410,000 on its own to advocate for gas exports and pipeline permitting issues during the first quarter. Williams' lobbying efforts were headed by its vice president for governmental affairs, Deborah Lawrence and director of governmental affairs, Glenn Jackson.

Outside Lobbying Firms

No smart corporation makes a big announcement of this sort without first greasing the skids and Williams is no different in that regard, utilizing the age-old government-industry revolving door to curry favor.

In that vein, meet Ryan, MacKinnon, Vasapoli and Berzok, LLP, which Williams paid $40,000 to lobby on its behalf during the first quarter.

Lobbyist Thomas Ryan formerly served as chief counsel for the U.S. House Energy & Commerce Committee. That committee has pushed forward shale gas exports in a big way so far in 2014. Ryan is one of the lobbyists listed on the firm's first-quarter disclosure form on the Williams file.

Jeffrey MacKinnon, another lobbyist listed on the firm's lobbying disclosure form, also has close ties to the Energy & Commerce Committee. MacKinnon formerly served as legislative director for U.S. Rep. Joe Barton (R-TX), the climate change denier and former chairman of the Energy & Commerce Committee.


U.S. Rep. Joe Barton: Photo Credit: Wikimedia Commons

Add Joseph Vasapoli to the list, as well. 

Vasapoli, who helped write the Energy Policy Act of 2005 that transformed fracking into a widespread practice in the U.S., formerly served as Republican Counsel for the Energy & Commerce Committee. He also has spent time working at both FERC and the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), the two federal agencies responsible for overseeing the LNG export permit process.

The other three lobbyists listed on Ryan, MacKinnon, Vasapoli and Berzok, LLP's disclosure form for the work it did on behalf of Williams — Matthew Berzok, Nick Kolovos and Jeffrey Mortier — also passed through the revolving door as former staffers for congressional members who were on the Energy & Commerce Committee.

“Empire State of Mind:” New York Connection

Burgos and Associates, also registered to lobby on behalf of Williams at the federal level, is a New York City-based firm at the center of a February 2013 investigation published on DeSmogBlog on the New York Fracking Scandal.

The episode earned the unflattering name because New York Governor Andrew Cuomo, who has the final say over whether the floodgates will be opened for fracking the Marcellus Shale in his state, has a powerful aide named Larry Schwartz.

Schwartz, DeSmog revealed, has thousands of dollars worth of investments in Williams Companies and other companies standing to gain if fracking goes forward in New York.

And in New York, like at the federal level, Burgos and Associates lobbies on behalf of Williams.

Not coincidentally, the powerful Tonio Burgos owns Burgos and Associates and is the former aide to Andrew Cuomo's father, Gov. Mario Cuomo.

Burgos was described by the Chicago Tribune in a 1993 article as Mario Cuomo's “patronage chief.” He was also identified in 2012 by The Wall Street Journal as “one of [Andrew] Cuomo's closest outside advisers and top fund-raisers.”

A reminder: Williams' Transco runs from New York and the northeast down to the Gulf.

Transco is connected to fracked gas produced in Marcellus Shale via the company's Springville Pipeline and its proposed Constitution Pipeline, which is set to connect to Springville when if and when it opens for business in 2015 or 2016.

Williams' Constiution Pipeline and Springville Pipeline; Photo Credit: William Huston

In short, New York — a state geographically distant from Louisiana, Gulf Trace and Sabine Pass LNG—is directly connected to Williams' latest export pipeline announcement both via its lobbyists and Williams' gas pipeline empire.

And so while fracking has yet to commence in the Empire State, that doesn't mean the shale gas industry doesn't have an increasingly heavy footprint there, as it proceeds with business as usual by using an “empire state of mind.” 

Photo Credit: ShutterstockOleksandr Kalinichenko

Revealed: Former Energy in Depth Spokesman John Krohn Now at U.S. EIA Promoting Fracking

$
0
0

For those familiar with U.S. Energy Information Administration's (EIA) work, objectivity and commitment to fact based on statistics come to mind. Yet as Mark Twain once put it, “There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics.”

That's where John Krohn comes into play. A former spokesman for the gas industry front group Energy in Depth (EID), Krohn now works on the Core Team for EIA's “Today in Energy!“ 

Krohn has been at EIA since at least January 2014, when his name first appeared on the EIA website. On his Twitter account, he describes himself as an EIA communications manager.

As DeSmog revealed in February 2011, Energy In Depth was launched with a heavy injection of funding from oil and gas industry goliaths such as BP, Halliburton, Chevron, Shell and XTO Energy (now owned by ExxonMobil).

With its public relations efforts conducted by FTI Consulting, EID now serves as a key pro-industry front group promoting unfettered hydraulic fracturing (“fracking”) to the U.S. public.

Krohn follows in the footsteps through the government-industry revolving door of the man President Barack Obama named to head the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) for his second term, former Massachusetts Institute of Technology “frackademic,” Ernest Moniz. DOE is the parent agency for EIA

Further, EIA Administrator Adam Sieminski, another second-term appointee of President Obama, also passed through the same revolving door as Krohn and Moniz in his pathway to heading EIA. He formerly worked in the world of oil and gas finance. 

“From 1998 to 2005, he served as the director and energy strategist for Deutsche Bank's global oil and gas equity team,” his EIA biography explains. “Prior to that, from 1988 to 1997, Mr. Sieminski was the senior energy analyst for NatWest Securities in the United States, covering the major U.S. international integrated oil companies.”

Adam Sieminski, U.S. Energy Information Administration Administrator; Photo Credit: U.S.EIA

The revolving door, though, is as American as apple pie. What makes the Krohn appointment more alarming to some observers: what this means in the context of the potential looming shale gas and oil bubble.

This revelation comes after EIA downgraded its Monterey Shale oil reserves estimate from 13.7 billion barrels to 600 million barrels, a 96-percent decrease

EIA: “Seriously Exaggerating Shale Gas Production”

In February 2013, Post Carbon Institute fellow David Hughes authored the report, “Drill Baby, Drill.” The report sounded the alarm about a potential looming bursting bubble if fracking proceeds at break-neck speed in order to meet investors' expectations — as promoted by the oil and gas industry — of 100 years of recoverable shale gas and a “Saudi America” of oil

Hughes, 40 years of experience as a geoscientist, says the productivity numbers coming out of wells around the country point to a far less rosy picture about the future of fracked oil and gas in the United States. The industry must maintain a constant “drilling treadmill” to ensure steady amounts of oil and gas come out of the ground. 

David Hughes; Photo Credit: Post Carbon Institute

In an April article, Hughes said he believes EIA is “seriously exaggerating shale gas production.” His piece critiqued EIA's April “Drilling Productivity Report.”

“Production in February 2014, is stated to be more than 7.8 bcf/d higher in the EIA Drilling Productivity Report than it actually is…equivalent to more than 10 percent of the total gas production of the U.S,” wrote Hughes.

“Real production data usually lags two months behind, and the most recent months are subject to revisions. Yet the EIA’s Drilling Productivity Report confidently reports production for the current and following month.”

Krohn has also co-authored two articles for “Today in Energy!” painting a rosy picture of shale gas and oil production numbers — one a summary of EIA's March Drilling Productivity Report and the other a summary of EIA's Annual Energy Outlook 2014. In line with the rosy numbers and figures published by EIA, Krohn's articles served to echo those findings.

“The productivity of oil and natural gas wells is steadily increasing in many basins across the United States because of the increasing precision and efficiency of horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing in oil and natural gas extraction,” reads the March article. “Many resource-producing basins are experiencing an increasing yield over time in either oil (Bakken, Eagle Ford, Niobrara) or natural gas (Marcellus, Haynesville).”

Hughes'“Drill Baby, Drill” comes to far different conclusions about those fields. The day after Krohn's article was published, Energy in Depth published an article citing and quoting from it.

“Critics of shale development have frequently alleged that the industry is a 'bubble' about to burst, owing to an alleged need to drill more and more wells to maintain production,” wrote Energy in Depth's Dana Bohan. “But EIA’s latest report tosses cold water on that theory, demonstrating that technology is not static — unlike the bizarre musings of anti-fracking activists.” 

Bohan did not respond to a request for comment for this article.

Krohn's Track Record

Before coming to EIA, Krohn denied fracking has ever contaminated groundwater, promoted climate change denial, called for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency not to act on fracking and berated New York Governor Andrew Cuomo for not ushering in fracking to his state.

Image Credit: Twitter Screenshot

Image Credit: Twitter Screenshot

Though his name has been removed from the website, Krohn also served as a media contact for “Truthland,” which served as EID's rebuttal to Josh Fox's “Gasland.” His name still appears on an archived version of the website.

In between leaving EID and heading to EIA, Krohn was a self-described “consultant for major energy producers and energy coalitions.” Among those he did consulting work for: Natural Gas Now, a website and blog run by former EID-Marcellus Campaign Director Tom Shepstone.

Krohn has removed his resumé from his website, which also has no mention of his previous job at EID. Before his resumé was taken down, though, DeSmogBlog made a copy here.

Since coming to EIA, Krohn still maintains a pro-fracking stance on his Twitter account, which contains the “All opinions are my own” boilerplate language. 

“North Dakota added more millionaires last year than any other state as #energy and #shale drive wealth in the state,” reads a January 17 tweet from Krohn. Another January tweet by Krohn gives a shout out to people on Twitter who work for the oil and gas industry for “keeping us warm during the cold.”

Both Krohn and the EIA have denied repeated requests for comment. 

“Troubling” Hire

U.S. Public Law 95-91, Section 205, which created the EIA, suggests its reports should steer clear of policy prescriptions:

The [EIA] Administrator shall not be required to obtain the approval of any other officer or employee of the Department in connection with the collection or analysis of any information; nor shall the Administrator be required, prior to publication, to obtain the approval of any other officer or employee of the United States with respect to the substance of any statistical or forecasting technical reports which he has prepared in accordance with law.

Post Carbon Institute, which has been at the forefront of raising awareness about a prospective looming shale gas bubble, told DeSmogBlog it finds the hiring of Krohn “troubling.”

“The Energy Information Administration is viewed by government agencies — both here in the US and abroad — and media as the trusted source of energy information,” said Asher Miller, Executive Director of Post Carbon Institute“It plays an invaluable role in determining energy policy, which is why it’s so troubling that the EIA would hire staff with a recent history of pro-industry propaganda.”

Photo Credit: Facebook; Krohn on the left at a fracking site while working at EID

Martin Armstrong

$
0
0

Martin A. Armstrong

Credentials

  • After finishing high school, Armstrong attended RCA Institutes (now TCI College of Technology) in New York City and audited courses at Princeton University but never completed a college degree. [1]

Background

Martin Arthur Armstrong is former chairman of Princeton Economics International Ltd. and the CEO of Armstrong Economics. Martin Armstrong is known for developing the Economic Confidence Model based on business cycles and pi. He has claimed to have predicted the crash of 1987 to the very day, as well as Nikkei's collapse in 1989, and Russia's financial collapse in 1998. [2][1], [3]

In September 1999, the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission prosecuted Armstrong for fraud. He was imprisoned for over seven years for civil contempt of court, one of the longest-running cases of civil contempt in American legal history. In August 2006, Armstrong pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy to commit fraud and began a five-year sentence. Armstrong appeared in a 2015 documentary titled “The Forecaster” regarding his mathematical model and prosecution. [4],[5][11]

Armstrong started Armstrong Economics in 2007 while he was still in prison. Inspired by letters he was receiving, Armstrong began producing research reports. He relied mainly on the Financial Times for information. In his essays and letters, he compares himself to Adam Smith, Abraham Lincoln, Galileo, and Neo, from “The Matrix.” [1]

Armstrong has published a number of articles where he suggests we are moving into a period of global cooling, or a new ice age. According to Armstrong, “Every possible data series warns that we are heading back into a cooling — not warming — period.” [12]

He has posted photos of snow in Austria, a “dusting of snow reported at Mauna Kea in Hawaii,” and a cold period in Britain as supposed evidence that “Britain is moving into an Ice Age.”[13][14], [15]

Stance on Climate Change

January 16, 2018

Writing at his blog, Armstrong described climate change mitigation measures as an “agenda to eliminate your freedom” and “move toward an authoritarian state”: [20]

“Climate is changing and it is part of the normal cycle – not human-induced. You are actually correct that I support capitalism and freedom and am against authoritarianism and totalitarian systems. What you fail to understand is that climate change is an agenda to eliminate your freedom. The entire argument is to support a move toward an authoritarian state. You better wake up. This is not truly about the climate change, it is all about controlling society, eliminating democracy, and changing the entire economic model that changes society. There is far more at stake here than most people realize.” [20]

July 6, 2016

“There is now growing concern among scientists that we may indeed be heading into global cooling rather than warming. The concerns center on the apparent weakening of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation. This seems to be triggering a growing amount of speculation about abrupt cooling,” Armstrong declared at his blog, ArmstrongEconomics.  [12]

February 14, 2014

“[T]here is ABSOLUTELY no evidence whatsoever that the planet is going through some warming stages created by mankind. That is total nonsense,” Armstrong wrote in a blog article titled “Global Warming Why it is Nonsense.” [6]

Key Quotes

February 20, 2018

Armstrong claimed that CO2 is not a pollutant, that we should not be concerned about rising sea levels, and that there is a population control conspiracy behind global warming prevention measures: [22]

CO2 levels have been much higher than currently over the millennia. The Global Warming crowd has an agenda and the core of that is to reduce the population. They remain influenced by the Malthus theory and have been hell-bent on stopping population growth.

“Over the past 100 million years, we have been in a decline in CO2 level dropping from 500 ppm to 200 ppm with an average of about 300 ppm. They refuse to address any of the historical evidence no less the cycle of life itself.

“Humans exhale typically consists of 40,000 ppm to even 50,000 ppm of CO2. Should we be fined or extinguished because we are a major contributor to COs levels? Those who are demonizing CO2 as a 'pollutant' fail to explain that in a room filled with people CO2 levels can commonly reach 2000 ppm with no apparent ill effects.”

December 20, 2017

Writing at his blog, Armstrong warned of impending global cooling: [21]

“The danger from the Global Warming crowd is that they are misleading the entire world and preventing us from what is dangerously unfolding that sparks the rapid decline in civilization – GLOBALCOOLING. I previously warned that this is not my opinion, but simply our computer. If it were really conscious it would be running to store to buy heating pads. This year will be much colder for Europe than the last three. It will also be cold in the USA. We are in a global cooling period and all the data we have in our computer system warns that the earth is turning cold not warm.

“This cooling is very serious. This decline in the energy output of the sun will manifest in a commodity boom in agriculture as shortages send food prices higher. We will see famine begin to rise as crops fail and that will inspire disease and plagues. We will see the first peak in agricultural prices come probably around 2024 after the lows are established on this cycle. We have been warning that this rise would begin AFTER 2017.”

June 9, 2016

“Britain is moving into an Ice Age and energy prices are rising, for the U.K. is as cold today as it was in December,” Armstrong wrote at ArmstrongEconomics[15]

March 21, 2015

“Instead of wasting all this effort to try to support government raising taxes on people to prevent 'Global Warming' or 'Climate Change', it might be better spent informing people we are going back into a cooling period and there will be wild swings back and forth for the next 25 years. It snowed here on Friday and the back 60 degrees for Saturday,” Armstrong wrote in an ArmstrongEconomics article titled “The Ice Age Cometh.”[9]

February 2, 2015

“An investigation of the raw data recording temperature, has revealed that once again these academics are manipulating the data to keep billions of dollars flowing into their hands. No matter how many times they are caught, government will not change course because they want to believe in global warming to justify higher taxes,” Armstrong wrote at ArmstrongEconomics[8]

May, 2014

“Anyone who thinks that Global Warming is really caused by man is naive to say the least. This is a political agenda to raise taxes by politicians and to reduce population growth among academics.” [7]
“Global Warming is all about money and raising taxes for politicians to pay for their pensions and support all their illegitimate children,” Armstrong wrote at ArmstrongEconomics[7]

October 12, 2009

Martin Armstrong contended that global warming is “nonsense” in an article at his blog, ArmstrongEconomics:  [6]

“[P]eople ASSUME that we even have the power with nuclear bombs to destroy then planet. That is probably not even likely. They also assume that if we set one-off all life will be dead forever. They make a lot of assumptions based upon a guess that is NOT even EDUCATED.”  [6]
“We can impact a local area, but we CANNOT alter the course of the entire planet. On that score, we are but a pimple on a fly’s ass. So until I see HARD evidence beyond assumptions for a few decades, I will keep it real. We can not alter the trend of a market anymore than we can change the environment of the entire world” (emphasis in original). [6]

Key Deeds

January 16, 2018

In a blog post titled “Is Climate Change a Tool to Eliminate Democracy?” Armstrong argued that “climate change is an agenda to eliminate your freedom. The entire argument is to support a move toward an authoritarian state.” [20]

Armstrong made the unsubstantiated claim that all climate models have been found in error: [20]

“It’s a well-kept secret, but 95 per cent of the climate models we are told prove the link between human CO2 emissions and catastrophic global warming have been found, after nearly two decades of temperature stasis, to be in error. It’s not surprising.” [20]

He concluded with a call-to-action for readers to resist: [20]

“Resisting will be politically difficult. But resist we should. We are already paying an unnecessary social and economic price for empty gestures. Enough is enough.” [20]

January 7, 2013

Martin Armstrong published a climate change report for the Princeton Economics Research Institute. He included a inflammatory photo of Al Gore in the report, and referenced climate change skeptic Sallie Baliunas's work as “highly important in understanding the long-term interaction between weather and the economy.” [10]

Armstrong reached the following conclusion (emphasis added):

“The climate record shows that the global warming of 1°F observed over the last 100 years is not unusual.  Global temperature changes of this magnitude have occurred frequently in the past and are a result of natural factors in climate change.

But is it possible that the particular temperature increase observed in the last 100 years is the result of carbon dioxide produced by human activities?  The scientific evidence clearly indicates that this is not the case.

All climate studies agree that if the one-degree global warming was produced by an increase in carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, the additional CO2 first warms the atmosphere, and the warmed atmosphere, in turn, warms the earth’s surface.  However, measurements of atmospheric temperatures made by instruments lofted in satellites and balloons show that no warming has occurred in the atmosphere in the last 50 years. This is just the period in which human made carbon dioxide has been pouring into the atmosphere and according to the climate studies, the resultant atmospheric warming should be clearly evident.

The absence of atmospheric warming proves that the warming of the earth’s surface observed in the last 100 years cannot be due to an increase in carbon dioxide in the atmosphere caused by human activities. The recent global warming must be the result of natural factors in climate change.

Skeptical Science has provided an analysis of common assertions made by climate change skeptics. Here is a breakdown of what scientists have said about similar arguments to those in Armstrong's report. 

Skeptic Argument: Climate has changed before. 

What the Science SaysGreenhouse gasses, principally CO2, have controlled most ancient climate changes. This time around humans are the cause, mainly by our CO2 emissions. [16]

Skeptic Argument: Global Warming has stopped/is not happening. 

What the Science Says:  Global temperatures continue to rise steadily beneath the short-term noise. [17]

Skeptic Argument: Global Warming is due to natural causes, not humans. 

What the Science Says:   There are many lines of evidence which clearly show that the atmospheric CO2 increase is caused by humans.  The clearest of these is simple accounting - humans are emitting CO2 at a rate twice as fast as the atmospheric increase (natural sinks are absorbing the other half).  There is no question whatsoever that the CO2 increase is human-caused.  This is settled science.

Affiliations

Social Media

Publications

  • Martin Armstrong has not published any articles in Peer-Reviewed journals, according to a search of Google Scholar. His website provides a full list of his economic publications, mostly through Armstrong Economics, back to 1995. 
  • Martin Armstrong is featured in The Forecaster, a movie that details how he formed the Economic Confidence Model.

Armstrong Economics

Martin Armstrong has started commented regularly on climate change at his blog at Armstrong Economics. Originally dedicated to economic predictions, the blog later featured a number of articles denying the existence or importance of man-made climate change. Samples below:

Resources

  1. Nick Paumgarten. “The Secret Cycle,” The New Yorker, October 12, 2009. Archived July 9, 2015. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/kSnD8

  2. Robin Goldwyn Blumenthal. “Circular Reasoning: A Market for Pi in the Sky?“ Barron's, June 25, 2011. Archived July 9, 2015. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/86nr9

  3. Zeke Faux and David Glovin. “After Prison, a Forecaster Aims for a Comeback,” Bloomberg Business Week. October 13, 2011. Archived July 9, 2015. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/lU2EP

  4. Michael J. de la Merced. “Jailed 7 Years for Contempt, Adviser Is Headed for Prison,” The New York Times, April 28, 2007. Archived July 9, 2015. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/982sQ

  5. Ashby Jones. “No Charge: In Civil-Contempt Cases, Jail Time Can Stretch On for Years,” The Wall Street Journal, January 8, 2009. Archived July 9, 2015. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/Lym4b

  6. Martin Armstrong. “Global Warming Why it is Nonsense,” ArmstrongEconomics.COM, February 13, 2014. Archived July 9, 2015. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/mXHFw

  7. Martin Armstrong. “Global Warming Fascist Movement & Academic Welfare,” ArmstrongEconomics.COM, May 18, 2014. Archived July 9, 2015. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/zMmSc

  8. Martin Armstrong. “Scientists Caught Again Faking Global Warming Data,” ArmstrongEconomics.COM, February 2, 2015. Archived July 9, 2015. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/n0mGd

  9. Martin Armstrong. “The Ice Age Cometh,” ArmstrongEconomics.COM, March 21, 2015. Archived July 10, 2015. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/cemue

  10. Climate Change,” Princeton Economics Research Institute (Published at ArmstrongEconomics.COM). January 7th, 2013. Archived July 10, 2015. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/cemue

  11. Michael O'Sullivan. ”'The Forecaster': Criminal or financial Wizard?The Washington Post, April 9, 2015. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/jy6z2

  12. The End of Global Warming — the New Ice Age — Bundle Up!” ArmstrongEconomics, July 6, 2016. Archived July 5, 2016. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/ahROk

  13. Snowing in July in Austria,” ArmstrongEconomics, July 24, 2016. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/Cwr3U

  14. It Snowed in Hawaii?” ArmstrongEconomics, June 19, 2016.  Archived August 6, 2016. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/dVMFf

  15. Britain’s Ice Age Is Unfolding,” ArmstrongEconomics, June 9, 2016. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/Pk7gA

  16. What does past climate change tell us about global warming?SkepticalScience. Archived August 4, 2016. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/ICA3i

  17. Did global warming stop in 1998, 1995, 2002, 2007, 2010?SkepticalScience. Archived August 4, 2016. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/iYRXn

  18. ABOUTMARTINARMSTRONG” (PDF), Forecaster-Movie.com. Archived .pdf on file at Desmog.

  19. About,” ArmstrongEconomics. Archived August 6, 2016. Archive.is URLhttp://archive.is/CE9L7

  20. Is Climate Change a Tool to Eliminate Democracy?ArmstrongEconomics, January 16, 2018. Archived February 25, 2018. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/2SrPA

  21. The Sun is Cooling Faster than Anyone Suspected,” ArmstrongEconomics, December 20, 2017. Archived February 25, 2018. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/CWolS

  22. Climate Change Conspiracy Against us All,” ArmstrongEconomics, February 20, 2018. Archived February 25, 2018. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/QkKea

Other Resources

* Profile Image Rick Maiman/Bloomberg News

Stephen Moore

$
0
0

Stephen Moore

Credentials

Stephen Moore is a graduate of the University of Illinois and holds an MA in Economics from George Mason University[1]

Background

Stephen Moore is the founder and former President of the Club for Growth and currently a visiting fellow at the “arch-conservative“ Heritage Foundation. Moore has held a wide range of positions at conservative think tanks including the Cato Institute (former senior fellow), the Media Research Center (former advisor), and Donors Capital Fund (former director). In 2016, Moore was chosen to become part of Donald Trump's Economic Advisory Team. [2], [3]

Stephen Moore previously served as Senior Economist for the Joint Economic Committee under Chairman Dick Armey of Texas (former chair of FreedomWorks) and Research Director of President Reagan’s commission on Privatization in 1987. [1]

Stephen Moore, who has called climate change “climate improvement,” has repeatedly cited the debunked Oregon Petition as well as Bjorn Lomborg's “Copenhagen Consensus” to suggest there is still a debate on climate science. More has also called anyone who believes in man-made climate change “Stalinistic.” [4]

Moore is co-author, with Kathleen Hartnett-White (who also serves on Trump's Economic Advisory Team) of Fueling Freedom: Exposing the Mad War on Energy. According to a review of the book in American Thinker, “Rather than worrying that carbon energy resources are destroying the planet and looking to renewable energy as an alternative, the authors suggest we should celebrate the vast contributions fossil fuels made during the past century.” [5]

Moore, a regular Fox News contributor, has compared fracking to a cure for cancer in the past, and has also distorted a NASA study to claim that it was an “indication” that global warming is “actually not happening.” [6], [7]

Donald Trump's Economic Advisor

Stephen Moore was chosen as Donald Trump's campaign adviser and was picked by Trump, along with CNBC contributor Larry Kudlow, to re-write Trump's tax plan. He is currently listed on Trump's “Economic Advisory Council.” [3], [8], [9]

What we’ve been trying to do is help advise him a little bit to try to reduce the cost of the plan,” Moore said in an interview. [8]

E&E News noted that “Since Moore came on board this spring to advise Trump on his tax plan, he’s been encouraging Trump to hit back against Democrats’ claims that the transition to more wind and solar energy will be good for the economy and the environment.” [10], [11]

Moore wrote a February 2016 article in The American Spectator featuring a glowing review of Donald Trump:

“Meanwhile, Trump surges. His splendid victory speech last night, ‎was all about love of country – about patriotism,” Moore wrote.

“It is striking that Trump is the anti-Obama in every way. Obama blames America first for every problem on the earth, from global warming to terrorism. Trump emanates love for America and pledges to “make America great again.”

[…]

The rub against Trump that he can't win in November looks to be wrong. Trump certainly has some profound defects and his problem with minorities and women cannot be ignored. ‎He's unpredictable and sometimes crude.

On the other hand, Trump could expand the Republican base to include independents and union Democratic voters. Trump is also getting better each day as he expands his base rather than shrinking it. Trumpmania is a Black Swann political event that we've never seen before and may not ever see again.” [12]

Criticism

Stephen Moore's critics have called Moore a  “A voodoo economist … [who uses] especially devious methods to torture the data,” (The New Republic's Jonathan Chait)[13] with a career “marked by a pattern of errors, deception and falsehood,” (Brendan Nyhan and Ben Fritz) [14]. Economist Brad DeLong said that “Moore has zero credibility.” [15]

Economist Jared Bernstein of the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP) responded to Moore’s claim that “right-to-work” laws would offer extra protection to workers in Wisconsin in a March 2, 2015, op-ed in The Washington Post[16]

“Workers in a bargaining unit in non-RTW states don’t even have to pay full union dues. If they object to, say, the union’s political activities, they can pay reduced dues that cover only the costs of negotiating and enforcing the contract. Since that’s most of what local unions do, by the way, such fees amount to 80 percent to 90 percent of full dues.

So when Steve Moore of the Heritage Foundation claims that workers in non-RTW states 'can be compelled to join a union and pay dues at a union shop whether they wish to or not' or that they “can even be forced to pay union dues for partisan political activities with which they don’t agree,” he’s deep within a fact-free zone.” [16]

In a 2015 New York Times blog post, Paul Krugman investigated the “mystery” of Moore’s successful career in economic policy, concluding that Moore is not held accountable for consistently making bad predictions and misstating basic facts about the economy because “incompetence is actually desirable” in his field: [17]

“But here’s the mystery: evidently Moore has had a successful career. Why?

Think about Heritage: It’s immensely wealthy, and could surely afford to hire a technically competent right-wing hack. The Wall Street Journal, similarly, could have attracted someone much less likely to trip over his own intellectual shoelaces. Again, the problem isn’t even that Moore got the macroeconomics of recent years all wrong, although he did; it’s the inability to write without making embarrassing mistakes.

So why is he there (and he’s not alone — there are some other incompetent hacks at Heritage)?

I suspect that the incompetence is actually desirable at some level — a smart hack might turn honest, or something, But it’s remarkable.” [17]

The editorial page director of the Kansas City Star said that she “won’t be running anything else from Stephen Moore” after she discovered “substantial factual errors” in an Op-Ed that Moore had written criticizing economist Paul Krugman. [18]

Stance on Climate Change

June 3, 2016

In an interiew on the Janet Mefford Today Show, Moore described global warming as “one of the greatest propoganda campaigns in world history” and a “dingbat idea,” CNSNews.com reported. [19]

“It’s really amazing, I have to say. I have to tip my hat to the left: This has been one of the greatest propaganda campaigns in world history that the left has pulled off,” Moore said.  [19]

“I mean, they’ve taken this dingbat idea of global climate change and they’ve put it in the schools, they’ve put it in the movies, they’ve put it in the media and the churches — you know, I’m Catholic, even the Pope talks about climate change.”

 “So, it’s very alarming how this propaganda campaign, that they made this stuff out of, almost completely out of thin air and they’ve convinced millions and millions of thought leaders that this stuff is real.”

“They're becoming more militaristic. They are young Stalinists. I can't go on college campuses today even question their religion of global warming — and it is a religion by the way.” [19]

Key Quotes

February 14, 2018

“We need a change in strategy and philosophy when it comes to mining. For federal land development, the 20th-century philosophy of 'lock up and preserve' needs to be replaced with an ethic of 'use and explore.' We have hundreds of years of these resources with existing technology,” Moore wrote at the Daily Journal in an article titled “Let's make America a mineral superpower.” [49]

January 28, 2018

Moore suggested that President Donald Trump may be the reason for a boost in the economy, and that “the economy was decelerating at the end of the Obama presidency”: [51]

“If Mr. Trump had continued Mr. Obama’s policies, one might not credit him for today’s strong economy. But Mr. Trump has begun to systematically overturn Obama policies on taxes, regulations, energy, climate change, net neutrality, budget priorities and health care — as well as replacing Janet Yellen as chairwoman of the Federal Reserve. Trumponomics is Obamanomics in reverse,” Moore wrote at the New York Times.

November 15, 2016

“We have the cleanest coal in the world,” Moore said on Fox Business's Varney & Co.  [20]

September, 2016

Media Matters reported that a week after Stephen Moore said that Donald Trump's economic plan was designed to be vague, he contradicted himself by saying  it was the “most detailed” plan of any candidate: [21]

“But, back to this idea that there's no detailed plan, because I never really answered your question about that. We've put forward the most detailed economic plan, I think, of any candidate in 40 years. I mean, we've got a very detailed tax plan.” [21]

August 1, 2016

On the August 1 edition of C-SPAN2'S Book TV, Moore compared fracking to a cure for cancer, Media Matters reported.

“Now, look, to be against fracking is like being against a cure for cancer. This is one of the great seismic technological breakthroughs. We're way ahead of the rest of the world. It's giving us access to huge amounts of energy at very low prices. How could anybody be against this?” [6]

July, 2016

Appearing on the July 29 edition of Fox News'Your World with Neil Cavuto, Moore declared: [22]

“Now, why not tax the rich? I'll tell the mayor why not. When you talk about those people in the top one percent, Mayor, you know this, over half of them, nearly 2/3rds of them, are small business owners, investors, and operators. How are you going to get more businesses and how are you going to get more jobs, Mr. Mayor, if you're going to tax the very businesses that create the jobs?”

March 15, 2015

“I am no scientist, but I’m highly skeptical of a movement whose first advice is to steer the U.S. economy off a cliff toward financial ruin,” Moore wrote in Washington Times Article. [23]

October, 2013

“Hydraulic fracturing is like the equivalent in health care for a cure for cancer,” Moore declared on Fox News's Happening Now[24]

May 10, 2011

“The problem I have with though, this circles back to the whole issue of when we pay for gasoline at the pump. If you raise the taxes on gasoline and oil, the price of gasoline and oil isn't going to go down. The price of gasoline and oil is going to go up,” Moore declared on an edition of Fox News's Happening Now[25]

April, 2011

On Glenn Beck's podcast, Moore said that “Radical Environmentalists” Are “Plot[ting]” To “Grind The American Economy To A Halt.” [26]

March, 2011

“I hope, I sincerely hope the president doesn't really believe that we can engine and power a $15 trillion industrial economy with windmills. It ain't going to happen,” Moore said on Fox News's Hannity. [27], [28]

February 7, 2011

“I love the idea of eliminating entire agencies like the Department of Energy,” Moore declared on Fox News's America's Newsroom.  [29]

June, 2009

Stephen Moore called a recent white house climate impacts report “Stalinistic”:

“What I object to about this report is some of the language in this is sort of almost Stalinistic, that there’s an unequivocal conclusion that it’s inarguable that this is happening, that there’s overwhelming agreement among the scientists. None of that is true.”

“We’ve talked about global warming as climate improvement. […] The good news is that the bad news is wrong.” [4]

Key Deeds

August 19, 2018

Moore wrote an op-ed that was published at The Washington Times and RealClear Politics suggesting that recent data about GHG emissions in the United States was justification that “President Trump was completely right to pull the United States out of the flawed Paris accord.” [53], [54]

“Those who think they are helping save the planet by purchasing an electric car, or putting a solar panel on their roof, or trying to shut down coal production in the United States are barking up the wrong tree. If we want to stop greenhouse gases, there is no way to make progress without China and India on board — which they clearly are not,” Moore wrote. [53]

Earlier in the summer, InsideClimate News reported on the same issue as Moore. However, ICN noted that in 2017 “[w]hile most countries' emissions increased, some, including the United States, saw declines driven largely by renewable energy deployments.” [55] 

Rather than reaching Moore's conclusion, that “[t]hose who think they are helping save the planet by purchasing an electric car, or putting a solar panel on their roof, or trying to shut down coal production in the United States are barking up the wrong tree,” ICN highlighted how market forces have been partially responsible for the increase in renewable energy as well. [53]

“Renewable energy provided a record 17 percent of U.S. electricity generation in 2017. That's a percentage that will likely continue to grow, said Glen Peters, researcher director at the Center for International Climate Research in Oslo,” the ICN article noted.  [55] 

January 29, 2018

The Washington Times announced that Moore would become its new associate opinion editor. “There is no greater voice preaching prosperity and free markets in Washington today than Stephen Moore,” Times Opinion Editor Charles Hurt said. “He doesn’t just talk and write about these things. He has a track record of proving their success. We are delighted to have him join the Opinion pages.” [50]

It’s exciting to add to my role at The Washington Times. The paper has long served as a premier news outlet in the nation’s capital,” Mr. Moore said. “The commentary section has been a must-read for conservatives every morning for as long as I have lived in Washington.” [50]

December 8, 2016

Stephen Moore was a speaker at the “At the Crossroads III Energy and Climate Summit,” an event co-hosted by the Heritage Foundation and the Texas Public Policy Foundation (TPPF). The event was billed as “the premier energy-and-climate policy event in America,” and attracted a range of prominent climate change deniers as well as a range of names connected to Donald Trump and his transition team. [47]

Doug Domenech, director of the Texas Public Policy Foundation's “Fueling Freedom” project, wrote about the proceedings at The HillDomenech outlined the common climate change denial message shared among the speakers: “Is climate change real? Yes, it has happened in the past and will happen in the future. Is man making an impact on the climate? Perhaps but in very small ways. But the overarching consensus remains the climate change we are experiencing is by no means catastrophic.” [48]

Speakers included:

November 15, 2016

Stephen Moore went on Fox Business' Varney & Co where he discussed “Stalinist global warming rules.” According to Moore, “we have the cleanest coal in the world. Video below. [20]

STUARTVARNEY (Host): This is a quote from you. Defy Stalinist global warming rules and burn coal. Are we gonna do that, and when? 

STEPHENMOORE (Trump Adviser): Yeah. I mean look, Donald Trump made a very specific promise to the coal miners of America: We're going to try to put as many of them back in their jobs. These Stalinistic rules that deal with climate change have put so many tens of thousands of our coal miners out of work. By the way, Stuart, do you know how much coal – guess how many years of coal we have in this country. Just take a wild guess.

VARNEY: Couple of hundred years worth? 

MOORE: You're wrong. 500 years. We have more coal than any other country in the world. We're the Saudi Arabia of coal. Hell yes, we should use our coal resources. And by the way, for the environmentalists, we have the cleanest coal in the world. Great story in The Wall Street Journal people didn't pay too much attention to on Wednesday because of the election: China is building like 100 new coal plants. How does it help the environment when we shut down our coal and China builds ten plants for every one we shut down? How does that reduce global warming? 

August 1, 2016

During an episode of C-SPAN2's Book TV, while discussing his new book Fueling Freedom: Exposing the Mad War on Energy, Stephen Moore stated that opposing fracking “is like being against a cure for cancer” because it is “one of the great seismic technological breakthroughs” that is “giving us huge amounts of energy at very low prices.” Moore went on to criticize Florida high school students opposing fracking, saying they were “indoctrinated in their high school classes” to think that “somehow fracking is a bad thing.” Video below. [6]

November 2, 2015

Stephen Moore appeared on the November 2 edition of Fox Business' Varney & Co. The host, Stuart Varney, claimed a NASA study is “putting some doubt that some global warming theories are going the right way. That's NASA saying that.” [7]

Varney later brought on Stephen Moore, who complained that the media touts every “story that seems to validate global warming,” while supposedly ignoring studies like the NASA study, which are an “indication that it's actually not happening.” At the end of the segment, Moore joked that “this might be the start of another Ice Age.” Media Transparency noted that Moore was distorting the original NASA study. [7]

July 2015

Moore founded a group called the Committee to Unleash Prosperity with fellow economists Steve Forbes, Larry Kudlow, and Arthur B. Laffer. The group reportedly “aims to end America's growth slump and restore faith in the American Dream.” [56]

May 10, 2015

Stephen Moore declared in a Washington Times column that ”[t]he green energy movement in America is dead.” Media Matters notes that a video, airing directly above Moore's column,  “makes clear that his characterization of the U.S. clean energy industry is blatantly false.” [30], [31]

According to Media Matters, “Moore egregiously distorted quotes from the IEA to falsely claim it 'concedes that green energy is in fast retreat' and that the clean energy industry 'is getting crushed' by low fossil fuel prices.” 

April 5, 2013

Stephen Moore was confronted by science education activist Zack Kopplin about myths about climate science funding on an episode of Real Time with Bill Maher. Kopplin points out that Moore, who questioned the need for funding research on “snail mating habits,” is “not a scientist”: [32]

Affiliations

Social Media

Publications

Moore has been contributing editor to both the National Review, was on the Editorial Board of the Wall Street Journal (WSJ), and on the Economic Board of Advisors for Time. His television appearances have included CNN’s Inside Politics, Crossfire and Moneyline, NBC’s Nightly News, Fox Morning News, and The McLaughlin Group.  [1]

Moore is the co-author of It’s Getting Better All the Time: 100 Greatest Trends of the Past 100 Years and author of Government: America’s #1 Growth Industry and the editor of Restoring the Dream: What House Republicans Plan to Do Now to Strengthen the Family, Balance the Budget, and Replace Welfare (Times Mirror, 1995).  [1]

Stephen Moore has been a prolific contributor to a range of publications including:

Image of Stephen Moore at top by Gage Skidmore from Peoria, AZ, United States of America [CCBY-SA 2.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0)], via Wikimedia Commons.

Resources

  1. Stephen Moore. “Putting Taxpayers First: A Federal Budget Plan to Benefit the Next Generation of American Taxpayers” (PDF), Institute for Policy Innovation, February, 2004. Archived .pdf on file at DeSmog.

  2. Moore Passes Torch to Toomey,” The Club For Growth, January 6, 2005. Archived March 6, 2005. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/Bnb6H

  3. Rachael Bade. “Stephen Moore to huddle with House GOP whips,” Politico, November 14, 2016. Archived November 14, 2016. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/ywwdJ

  4. Denier Stephen Moore says climate change is 'climate improvement' and 'the truth is the 1930s was a warmer decade than the last decade',” ThinkProgress, June 20, 2009. Archived November 15, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/t3hNI

  5. Janet Levy. “Green Energy Revolution Folly,” American Thinker, September 19, 2016. Archived November 13, 2016. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/xJOAx

  6. Trump Adviser Stephen Moore Compares Fracking To 'The Cure For Cancer',” Media Matters, August 2, 2016. Archived.mp4 on file at DeSmog. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/XUrEb

  7. Denise Robbins. “NASA Scientist Warned Deniers Would Distort His Antarctic Ice Study – That's Exactly What They Did,” Media Matters, November 4, 2015. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/O9olI

  8. Trump launches tax plan rewrite,” Politico, May 11, 2016. Archived November 15, 2016. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/ZDvE1

  9. TRUMPECONOMICADVISORYCOUNCIL” (PDF), donaldjtrump.com. Archived .pdf on file at DeSmog.

  10. Ben Adler. “This Trump advisor might be even more confused about climate and energy than Trump himself,” Grist, September 9, 2016. Archived November 15, 2016. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/fSdCf

  11. Hannah Hess. “Economic adviser pushes Trump to throw more punches on energy,” E&E News, September 7, 2016. Archived November 15, 2016. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/WuRg3

  12. Stephen Moore. “America Trumpted,” The American Spectator, February 11, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/L2Nu3

  13. Jonathan Chait. “Less is Moore,” The New Republic, June 30, 1997. Archived January 11, 2003. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/UguLd

  14. Brendan Nyhan and Ben Fritz. “The deceptive advocacy of Stephen Moore,” Spinsanity, September 22, 2003. Archived November 14, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/RwRY1

  15. J. Bradford Delong. “Cranks and Charlatans,” Semi-Daily Journal, March 1, 2003. Archived November 14, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/xx3u7

  16. Jared Bernstein. “Right to work for less: Gov. Scott Walker wants to lower worker pay in Wisconsin,” The Washington Post, March 2, 2015. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/jzv2g

  17. The Mystery of Moore,” New York Times (Blog), February 18, 2015. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/xo4Mx

  18. Deron Lee. “Why one editor won’t run any more op-eds by the Heritage Foundation’s top economist,” Columbia Journalism Review, July 31, 2014. Archived November 15, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/YHAIG

  19. Michael W. Chapman. “Stephen Moore: Climate Change 'One of Greatest Propaganda Campaigns in World History’–'Very Stalinistic',” cnsnews.com, June 9, 2016. Archived November 15, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/DdOeT

  20. Trump Adviser Stephen Moore: 'We Have The Cleanest Coal In The World',” Media Matters for Americas, November 15, 2016. Archived .mp4 on file at DeSmog. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/fouHO

  21. Trump Adviser Can’t Decide If Candidate Is 'Too Specific' Or Intentionally Vague,Media Matters, September 6, 2016. Archived .mp4 on file at DeSmog. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/5JXhZ

  22. On Fox, Trump Economic Advisor Steve Moore Defends Tax Reductions For Top One Percent,” Media Matters, July 29, 2016. Archived .mp4 on file at DeSmog. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/eyzgt

  23. Stephen Moore. “The myth of 'settled science',” The Washington Times, March 15, 2015. Archived November 15, 2016. Archive.is URL:https://archive.is/YlZ31

  24. WSJ's Stephen Moore: Fracking Is 'Like The Equivalent In Health Care Of A Cure For Cancer',” Media Matters, October 3, 2013. Archived .mp4 on file at DeSmog. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/tawvT

  25. Jocelyn Fong. “Conservative Media Defend Tax Breaks For Big Oil With False Claim About Gas Prices,” Media Matters, May 10, 2011. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/uf26T

  26. WSJ's Moore In Beck Webcast: 'Radical Environmentalists' Are 'Plot[ting]' To 'Grind The American Economy To A Halt',” Media Matters. Archived .mov on file at DeSmog.

  27. Obama Finds Time for NCAA Bracket, Golf Amid Global Turmoil,” Fox News, March 15, 2011. Archived November 15, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/MVeYQ

  28. Jill Fitzsimmons. “Myths & Facts About Wind Power,” Media Matters, May 25, 2012. Archive.is URL:https://archive.is/xfyll 

  29. Steve Moore: 'I Love The Idea Of Eliminating Entire Agencies',” Media Matters, February 7, 2011. Archived .mp4 on file at DeSmog.

  30. Stephen Moore. “Promoters of renewable energy failed to account for the return of cheap oil,” The Washington Times, May 10, 2015. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/m5aZ8

  31. Andrew Seifter. “Fox's Stephen Moore Preemptively Debunked On Clean Energy By Video Affixed To His Column,” Media Matters, May 12, 2015. Archived November 15, 2016. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/mMrVM

  32. Stephen Moore, Rush Limbaugh, And The Right-Wing War On Science,” Media Matters, April 8, 2013. Archived November 15, 2016. Archived .mp4 on file at DeSmog. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/oz7gc

  33. Stephen Moore,” The Heritage Foundation. Archived November 15, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/juKhK

  34. Stephen Moore: Former Senior Fellow,” Cato Institute. Archived November 14, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/li4X3

  35. “Media Research Center: 2003 Annual Report” (PDF), Media Research Center. Archived .pdf on file at DeSmog.

  36. About the Media Research Center,” Media Research Center. Archived November 14, 2016. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/gUEIm

  37. Executive Profile: Stephen Moore,” Bloomberg. Archived November 14, 2016. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/mCl19

  38. “Chicken Little Was Wrong” (PDF - see biographical sketch at bottom), Virginia Viewpoint, May 2, 2001. Archived .pdf on file at DeSmog.

  39. Donors Capital Fund, Inc. 2010 Form 990 (PDF) - retrieved from DocumentCloud.

  40. Board of Scholars,” American Legislative Exchange Council. Archived April 13, 2011. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/Q2Ij5

  41. Searle Freedom Trust 2014 990-PF (PDF). On file at DeSmog.

  42. Stephen Moore. “Immigration and the Rise and Decline  of American Cities,” Hoover Institution. Archived June 30, 2011. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/INz9E

  43. Stephen Moore,” CNBC.com. Archived November 15, 2016. Archived .pdf on file at DeSmog.

  44. Hoover Essay in Public Policy: Welfare For The Well-Off: How Business Subsidies Fleece Taxpayers by Stephen Moore,” Hoover Institution, May 5, 1999. Archived November 14, 2016. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/pQn2S

  45. Stephen Moore,” SourceWatch. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/duh9M

  46. Dana Milbank. “Brothers in Arms, But Sisters at Odds,” The Washington Post, August 31, 2005. Archived .pdf on file at DeSmog. Archiveis URL: https://archive.is/kxnyC

  47. At the Crossroads III: Energy and Climate Policy Summit,” Heritage Foundation, December 8, 2016. Archived December 22, 2016. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/AKaKq

  48. Doug Domenech. “Climate change: Speaking truth to power,” The Hill, December 13, 2016. Archived December 21, 2016. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/zAEH5

  49. Stephen Moore: Let's make America a mineral superpower,” Daily Journal, February 14, 2018. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/8zSq8

  50. Moore named new associate opinion editor,” The Washington Times, January 29, 2018. Archived February 19, 2018. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/DRILW

  51. It’s Trump’s Economy Now,”The New York Times, Janaury 28, 2018. Archived February 20, 2018. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/MB6eW

  52. Private Enterprise Advisory Council,ALEC. Archived February 20, 2018. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/qwyhZ

  53. Stephen Moore. “'Who's the cleanest of them all',” The Washington Times, August 19, 2018.

  54. Stephen Moore. “Who's the Cleanest of Them All,” RealClear Politics, August 21, 2018. Archived September 5, 2018. Archive URL: https://archive.fo/7yaLM

  55. Phil McKenna. “Global Emissions Rose in 2017, But U.S. and China Both Made Progress,” InsideClimate News, March 22, 2018. Archived September 5, 2018. Archive URL: https://archive.fo/nkzJO

  56. Economists Steve Forbes, Larry Kudlow, Dr. Arthur B. Laffer, Steve Moore Launch the Committee to Unleash Prosperity,” PR Newsire, July 25, 2015. 

Other Resources

Donald Trump

$
0
0

Donald Trump

Credentials

  • Donald Trump graduated from the Wharton School of Finance at the University of Pennsylvania with a degree in economics in 1968. [1]

Background

Donald J. Trump, 45th president of the United States, is an American businessman, real-estate developer, and reality television personality. Trump announced his candidacy for president of the United States in 2015, and became the official Republican candidate for president on July 19, 2016. Forbes listed Donald Trump's net worth at $3.7 billion as of November, 2016 (down from $4.1 billion in 2015). [1], [225]

Donald Trump, who has called climate change a “hoax” perpetrated by the Chinese, has picked a range of advisors with links to the fossil fuel industry. Trump's team includes Steve Bannon, former head of Breitbart News, a network that hosts such columnists as James Delingpole who called Climate Change “the biggest scam in the history of the world.” Scott Pruitt, administrator of the EPA under the Trump Administration, has a long history of suing the agency he new heads[2], [220], [221]

Trump also pledged to do away with the United States' ratification of the Paris Agreement on Climate change, which President Barack Obama hailed as “the moment that we finally decided to save our planet.” On June 1, 2017, Trump announced his decision to withdraw from the Paris Accord by 2020. [3], [4], [210]

When asked what departments or services he would cut, Trump pointed to environmental protection which he called a “disgrace.” When asked who would protect the environment, Trump replied “we'll be fine with the environment.” Prominent climate change denier Myron Ebell was picked by New Jersey Governor Chris Christie to lead Trump's transition team for the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). [219], [5]

Trump's Energy Plan vows to “Rescind all job-destroying Obama executive actions” and “eliminate all barriers” to energy production through strategies such as increasing oil and gas drilling on federal lands, opening up the Atlantic to offshore drilling, and repealing the Clean Power Plan. [6], [7]

Energy Policy

Trump's “Energy Independence” plan promises to do away with many regulations on the fossil fuel industry, open up offshore drilling and drilling on federal lands, and “refocus the EPA”: [8]

“Rather than continuing the current path to undermine and block America’s fossil fuel producers, the Trump Administration will encourage the production of these resources by opening onshore and offshore leasing on federal lands and waters. We will streamline the permitting process for all energy projects, including the billions of dollars in projects held up by President Obama, and rescind the job-destroying executive actions under his Administration.  We will end the war on coal, and rescind the coal mining lease moratorium, the excessive Interior Department stream rule, and conduct a top-down review of all anti-coal regulations issued by the Obama Administration.  We will eliminate the highly invasive 'Waters of the US' rule, and scrap the $5 trillion dollar Obama-Clinton Climate Action Plan and the Clean Power Plan and prevent these unilateral plans from increasing monthly electric bills by double-digits without any measurable effect on Earth’s climate.  Energy is the lifeblood of modern society. It is the industry that fuels all other industries.  We will lift the restrictions on American energy, and allow this wealth to pour into our communities. […]”

Vox outlines what they consider to be 11 environmental priorities for Trump and the GOP Congress, quoted below: [9]

  1. Kill Obama’s Clean Power Plan
  2. Withdraw from the Paris climate agreement
  3. Dismantle US environmental rules around coal power
  4. Weaken fuel economy standards for cars and light trucks
  5. Open up new public lands to oil and gas drilling
  6. Scale back federal support for wind and solar power
  7. Dramatically limit the EPA’s ability to regulate in the future
  8. Reverse the White House’s climate guidance to federal agencies
  9. Make the Supreme Court more hostile to environmental regulation
  10. Pack the executive branch with industry-friendly appointments
  11. Anti-EPA budget bills that will emerge every year, without end

Donald Trump on Climate Change

October 14, 2018

Trump sat down for an interview with 60 Minutes' Lesley Stahl where he discussed climate change, among other issues. View the full transcript here[258], [259]

Lesley Stahl: “Do you still think that climate change is a hoax?”

President Donald Trump: “I think something's happening. Something's changing and it'll change back again. I don't think it's a hoax, I think there's probably a difference. But I don't know that it's manmade. I will say this. I don't wanna give trillions and trillions of dollars. I don't wanna lose millions and millions of jobs. I don't wanna be put at a disadvantage.”

Lesley Stahl: “I wish you could go to Greenland, watch these huge chunks of ice just falling into the ocean, raising the sea levels.”

President Donald Trump: “And you don't know whether or not that would have happened with or without man. You don't know.”

Lesley Stahl: “Well, your scientists, your scientists–”

President Donald Trump: “No, we have–”

Lesley Stahl: “At NOAA and NASA–”

President Donald Trump: “We have scientists that disagree with that.”

Lesley Stahl: “You know, I– I was thinking what if he said, 'No, I've seen the hurricane situations, I've changed my mind. There really is climate change.' And I thought, 'Wow, what an impact.'”

President Donald Trump: “Well– I'm not denying.”

Lesley Stahl: “What an impact that would make.”

President Donald Trump: “I'm not denying climate change. But it could very well go back. You know, we're talkin' about over a millions–”

Lesley Stahl: “But that's denying it.”

President Donald Trump:  –of years. They say that we had hurricanes that were far worse than what we just had with Michael.”

Lesley Stahl: “Who says that? 'They say'?”

President Donald Trump: “People say. People say that in the–”

Lesley Stahl:” Yeah, but what about the scientists who say it's worse than ever?”

President Donald Trump: “You'd have to show me the scientists because they have a very big political agenda, Lesley.”

Lesley Stahl: “I can't bring them in.”

President Donald Trump: “Look, scientists also have a political agenda.”

December 28, 2017

President Trump went to Twitter to suggest the country could use some global warming during the cold snap: [245]

In the East, it could be the COLDEST New Year’s Eve on record,” Trump tweeted. “Perhaps we could use a little bit of that good old Global Warming that our Country, but not other countries, was going to pay TRILLIONSOFDOLLARS to protect against. Bundle up!”

Trump's tweet was ridiculed by climate experts, The Guardian reported. [246]

November 22, 2016

In an interview that The New York Times said demonstrated his “eagerness to please his audience and his tendency to speak in generalities,” Donald Trump did not repeat his promise to abandon the Paris climate accord. Trump said “I’m looking at it very closely.” But he said “I have an open mind to it.” [149]

When asked about the link between human activity and climate change, he said“I think there is some connectivity. Some, something. It depends on how much.” [150]

In an interview on Fox News Sunday, Trump's chief of staff Reince Priebus explained that Trump's “major flips on policy this week in an interview with the New York Times,” as host Chris Wallace put it. As ThinkProgress reports, Trump had not been entirely forthright with the Times. Priebus told Wallace: [160]

“As far as this issue on climate change — the only thing he [Trump] was saying after being asked a few questions about it is, look, he’ll have an open mind about it but he has his default position, which most of it is a bunch of bunk, but he’ll have an open mind and listen to people.”

July 26, 2016

On Fox News, Bill O'Reilly asked Trump if it was “true” that he had “called climate change a hoax.” Trump replied that he “might have” done so following the release of the ClimateGate emails. “Yeah, I probably did,” he added. “I see what's going on.” Trump then said fossil fuels “could have a minor impact” on the climate but “nothing [compared] to what they're talking about.” [169], [179]

March 21, 2016

The following is from an interview between Donald Trump and the Washington Post's editorial board:

FREDHIATT: “Last one: You think climate change is a real thing? Is there human-caused climate change?”

TRUMP: “I think there’s a change in weather. I am not a great believer in man-made climate change. I’m not a great believer. There is certainly a change in weather that goes – if you look, they had global cooling in the 1920s and now they have global warming, although now they don’t know if they have global warming. They call it all sorts of different things; now they’re using “extreme weather” I guess more than any other phrase. I am not – I know it hurts me with this room, and I know it’s probably a killer with this room – but I am not a believer. Perhaps there’s a minor effect, but I’m not a big believer in man-made climate change.” [10]

December 30, 2015

Trump said that President Obama was worrying too much about “the carbon footprint” and climate change, which he then erroneously attributed to the ozone layer: [176]

“I want to use hair spray,” complained Trump. “They say, 'Don't use hair spray, it's bad for the ozone.' So I'm sitting in this concealed apartment, this concealed unit…It's sealed, it's beautiful. I don't think anything gets out. And I'm not supposed to be using hair spray?”

He continued, “So Obama's talking about all of this with the global warming and the—a lot of it's a hoax, it's a hoax. I mean, it's a money-making industry, okay? It's a hoax, a lot of it.”

December 1, 2015

Donald Trump criticized President Obama for pursuing the Paris climate agreement. He posted to Instagram: [175]

“While the world is in turmoil and falling apart in so many different ways—especially with ISIS—our president is worried about global warming,” he said. “What a ridiculous situation.” [175]

Mother Jones notes that “It remains unclear how those things are contradictory.” [175]

What is Obama thinking?

A video posted by Donald J. Trump (@realdonaldtrump) on

September 21, 2015

Donald Trump appeared on Hugh Hewitt's radio show: [174]

“I'm not a believer in man-made global warming. It could be warming, and it's going to start to cool at some point. And you know, in the early, in the 1920s, people talked about global cooling…They thought the Earth was cooling. Now, it's global warming…But the problem we have, and if you look at our energy costs, and all of the things that we're doing to solve a problem that I don't think in any major fashion exists.” [174]

September, 2015

“I don’t believe in climate change.” [11]

June 17, 2015

Mother Jones reports that The day after announcing his candidacy for the GOP presidential nomination, Trump appeared on Sean Hannity's Fox News show, where he said he was “not a believer in man-made” warming. He added, “When I hear Obama saying that climate change is the No. 1 problem, it is just madness.” [169]

2015

Donald Trump dismissed global warming on the premier of Celebrity Apprentice in early 2016. Video below: [171]

Despite this statement, Trump had also donated $5,000 of his foundation's money to Protect Our Winters, a group dedicated to combating climate change. According to the New York Daily News, Trump had made the donation at the request of Olympic snowboarding gold medalist Jamie Anderson, who was one of the contestants on Trump's Celebrity Apprentice reality show. [172], [173]

January 29, 2014

“Snowing in Texas and Louisiana, record setting freezing temperatures throughout the country and beyond. Global warming is an expensive hoax!” – Via Twitter. [2]

“Give me clean, beautiful and healthy air - not the same old climate change (global warming) bullshit! I am tired of hearing this nonsense.” — Later that day, via Twitter. [2]

Below are additional quotes Trump wrote on twitter, from January 1 to 28, calling global warming a “Hoax”: [169]

January 6, 2014

On an episode of Fox News's Fox & Friends, Donald Trump called global warming a “hoax,” and attributes it to scientists “having a lot of fun.” Trump also said restrictions on fossil fuel use were making America less competitive. Video below: [12]

November 6, 2012

“The concept of global warming was created by and for the Chinese in order to make U.S. manufacturing non-competitive.” — Via Twitter.[2]

Note that Trump later said this was a “joke.” When Hillary Clinton brought it up during the first presidential debate on September 26, 2016, Trump denied that he had said it: [13]

CLINTON: “Some country is going to be the clean- energy superpower of the 21st century. Donald thinks that climate change is a hoax perpetrated by the Chinese. I think it's real.”

TRUMP: “I did not. I did not. I do not say that.”

CLINTON: ” I think science is real.”

TRUMP:” I do not say that.”

February 16, 2010

Mother Jones notes that wiscussing the so-called “ClimateGate scandal,” in which climate scientists were wrongly accused by climate change deniers of forming a conspiracy to fabricate global warming, Trump said on Fox News that there was an email “sent a couple months ago by one of the leaders of global warming, the initiative…almost saying—I guess they're saying it's a con.” He added that “in Washington, where I'm building a big development, nobody can move because we have 48 inches of snow.” Video below.  [169], [170]

February 14, 2010

In one of Trump's first flip-flops on climate change, he mentioned that Al Gore should be stripped of the Nobel Prize because it was cold outside:

“With the coldest winter ever recorded, with snow setting record levels up and down the coast, the Nobel committee should take the Nobel Prize back from Al Gore…Gore wants us to clean up our factories and plants in order to protect us from global warming, when China and other countries couldn't care less. It would make us totally noncompetitive in the manufacturing world, and China, Japan and India are laughing at America's stupidity,” Trump told members of the Trump National Golf Club in Westchester. Mother Jones notes that Trump would later say he was joking about rescinding the Nobel Prize. [168], [169]

December, 2009

As reported at Grist, contrary to his more recent statements on global warming, Donald Trump was once a signatory to a full-page New York Times ad calling for climate action: [167]

If we fail to act now, it is scientifically irrefutable that there will be catastrophic and irreversible consequences for humanity and our planet,” the letter declared. [167]

The letter, also signed by Trump's three children, called for passing U.S. climate legislation, and green energy investment: [167]

 “We support your effort to ensure meaningful and effective measures to control climate change, an immediate challenge facing the United States and the world today,” the letter reads. “Please allow us, the United States of America, to serve in modeling the change necessary to protect humanity and our planet.” [167]

Key Quotes

October 17, 2017

President Donald Trump spoke at the conservative Heritage Foundation's annual President Club's Meeting, where declared: [237]

“We have taken action to repeal the EPA's so-called 'Clean Power Plan' and we have ended, finally, the war on clean, beautiful coal.” [12:26]

June 1, 2017

Trump announced the U.S. would withdraw from the Paris climate agreement: [218]

“Thus, as of today, the United States will cease all implementation of the non-binding Paris Accord and the draconian financial and economic burdens the agreement imposes on our country.  This includes ending the implementation of the nationally determined contribution and, very importantly, the Green Climate Fund which is costing the United States a vast fortune,” Trump announced in his speech at the White House Rose Garden.

“Staying in the agreement could also pose serious obstacles for the United States as we begin the process of unlocking the restrictions on America’s abundant energy reserves, which we have started very strongly.” [218]

October, 2016

In a 2015 Fox News Sunday interview with Chris Wallace, Trump responds to the question of which departments or services he would cut: [5]

“Environmental protection, what they do is a disgrace. Every week they come out with new regulations. They're making it impossible…”

Wallace interjected, “Who's going to protect the environment?”

“They — we'll be fine with the environment,” Trump replied. “We can leave a little bit, but you can't destroy businesses.”

Trump also noted that “I may cut Department of Education. I believe Common Core is a very bad thing.” [14]

May, 2016

At a Charleston rally, Trump pointed to signs in the crowd: [177]

“I see over here: 'Trump digs coal,'” he said. “That's true. I do.” He went on to promise an increase in coal mining jobs by repealing Obama's “ridiculous rules and regulations.”

March 29, 2016

Donald Trump responded in an American Energy Alliance (AEA) Questionnaire: [15]

“Under my administration, all EPA rules will be reviewed. Any regulation that imposes undue costs on business enterprises will be eliminated.”

1997

As reported by Mother JonesTrump believed in an anti-asbestos conspiracy as he wrote in his 1997 book, The Art of Comeback: [16]

“I believe that the movement against asbestos was led by the mob, because it was often mob-related companies that would do the asbestos removal. Great pressure was put on politicians, and as usual, the politicians relented. Millions of truckloads of this incredible fire-proofing material were taken to special 'dump sites' and asbestos was replaced by materials that were supposedly safe but couldn't hold a candle to asbestos in limiting the ravages of fire.” [16]

Trump also claimed that asbestos is ”100 percent safe, once applied,” and that it just “got a bad rap.” [16]

“A lot of people could say if the World Trade Center had asbestos, it wouldn't have burned down. It wouldn't have melted. Ok. A lot of people in my industry think asbestos is the greatest fireproofing material ever made.” [16]

Key Deeds

July 31, 2018

As Politico reported, Trump went to Twitter to criticize the Koch Brothers who he said “have become a total joke in real Republican circles” after they had criticized Trump and his trade policies. In a Colorado Springs meeting about a week prior, the Kochs presented a video warning of the dangers of Trump's anti-free-trade sentiments. [256], [257]

In the video, Charles Koch warns that the current “rise in protectionism” represents “a natural tendency, but it’s a destructive one.”

March 22, 2018

Charlie Kirk interviewed President Donald Trump in the“Generation Next” White House Summit: [255]

Kirk Tweeted:

Today it was a great honor to interview @realDonaldTrump about student issues and the amazing success of this administration

The accomplishments are historic, fixed the trajectory of America, and are beginning the process of turning this country around! #MAGApic.twitter.com/Rhlf8bVim7

— Charlie Kirk (@charliekirk11) March 22, 2018

Partial transcript:

Charlie Kirk: “One of the things you've done so successfully during your campaign and presidency is crush political correctness, and what the college network that we represent—I represent a network on 1200 college campuses—is, it's harder than ever to espouse support of your presidency and the ideas that you're fighting for. 

So thank you for what you're doing to give us the courage of our convictions to fight against political correctness. But what advice do you have for young patriots and Conservatives on campus that support your agenda but are being ridiculed and silenced because of administrators that clamps own one see speech?”

Trump:“So that's a great question. I think the numbers are actually much different than people think. I think we have a lot of support. If they have one campus or two campuses and we know what they are it gets all the publicity. We have campuses where you have a vast majority of people that are perhaps like many of the people in this room: You could call it Conservative, you could call it whatever you want, but they're people that want free speech.

If you look at what's going on with free speech, with the super left, with ANTIFA, with all of these characters. I'll tell you what, they get a lot of publicity, but you go to the real campuses and you go all over the country, you go out to the real campus and you go all over the country… you go out to the Middle West you go out to even to the coast in many cases. We have tremendous support. I would say we have majority support. I think it's highly overblown. Highly overblown.”

Kirk:“I totally agree, and we see it on the ground. And so people say, hey I'm a Trump supporter, I'm just not allowed to say it because of the culture that's been created by the administrators and the professors. 

And kind of piggybacking off of that, what you see on college campuses and the speakers being disinvited and you know the assault on these ideas, I think it's so important what your administration is doing for the Department of Justice to support these lawsuits to help advance, you know, this free speech movement on campus.

So, kind of talking generationally in general, this is something I'm quite curious about and lot of people ask me: I consider you to be one of the most successful businesspeople in American history and your successful presidential run is something that all people, young people included, should look up to. What advice would you give to the 25-year-old Donald Trump knowing what you know today?

Trump:“Don't run for president.” Laughter and applause. 

Kirk:“But we're glad you did.”

Trump:“Well, I was talking to Mercedes and Sarah walking off for just a… you know the Oval Office is right across the street… and I said, all my life I've gotten really—you know look, every one in a while we all get a knock—but I got the greatest publicity. I was getting such great… until I ran for office. And it's been… but people get it. People really do get it. [12:07]

There is a lot of fake news out there. Nobody had any idea, and I'm actually proud of the fact I exposed it to a large extent because we exposed it. That's something… that's an achievement.” […] 

March 2018

The Executive Office released a report of “Science & Technology Highlights” in the first year of the Trump Administration. In a section on “Energy Dominance,” the report includes comments that Trump made at a June 30, 2017 “Unleashing American Energy” event: [254]

“The truth is that we have near limitless supplies of energy in our country. Powered by new innovation and technology, we are now on the cusp of a true energy revolution,” Trump had said at the event. [254]

According to the report, Trump had also called for a “complete review of U.S. nuclear energy policy” at the event, including what the report describes as “a focus on restoring U.S. nuclear R&D capabilities and enabling innovation in the development and deployment of new reactors.” [254]

The report also noted that domestic nuclear test facilities would resume operations: “For the first time in 23 years, the U.S. Department of Energy has resumed operations at the Transient Reactor Test Facility (TREAT).” [254]

January 28, 2018

Piers Morgan interviewed Donald Trump. While some headlines following the interview suggested that Trump had made a dramatic reversal on his position on the UN Paris Climate Agreement (“Would I go back in? Yeah, I’d go back in,” said Trump, after repeating claims that the pact was a “horrible deal” for the U.S.), DeSmog notes that this was not a U-turn of Trump's views and that Trump's views are the same as he held when announcing his withdrawal from the Agreement in June 2017. [252]

According to the interview transcript: [253]

PM: “Do you believe in climate change? Do you believe it exists?”

DT: “There is a cooling and there is a heating and I mean, look – it used to not be climate change. It used to be global warming. Right?”

PM: “Right.”

DT: “That wasn’t working too well, because it was getting too cold all over the place. The ice caps were going to melt, they were going to be gone by now, but now they’re setting records, so OK, they’re at a record level. There were so many thing happening, Piers. I’ll tell you what I believe in. I believe in clear air. I believe in crystal clear beautiful water. I believe in just having good cleanliness in all. Now, that being said, if somebody said go back into the Paris Accord, if we could go back into the Paris Accord, it would have to be a completely different deal because we had a horrible deal, As usual, they took advantage of the United States. We were in a terrible deal. Would I go back in? Yeah, I’d go back in. I like, as you know, I like Emmanuel… No, no, I like Emmanuel, I would love to, but it’s got to be a good deal for the United States.”

January 17, 2018

In an interview with The Wall Street Journal, Trump's EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt outlined his plans to remake the EPA in 2018. His goals include rewriting rules for power plant emissions made under the Obama administration, and speeding the permit review process under the EPA. [251]

Pruitt emphasized he wanted to move fast. “There’s tremendous opportunity to show really significant results to the American people in a really short time frame,” Pruitt said. [251]

WSJ author Timothy Puko notes that Pruitt had memorialized the moment that Trump announced the exit from the Paris climate agreement by hanging a framed photo of the two of them in the Rose Garden with an autograph of Pruitt's prepared remarks, along with the comment “Scott—Great Job!” [251]

One of Pruitt's goals is to begin weekly performance assessments for ever EPA office, and to get the permitting process to under six months. Former EPA administrator Gina McCarthy commented on Pruitt's shift of focus for the EPA away from climate change. [251]

Everything the agency does is to protect public health and the public from future risks,” said McCarthy.  “You don’t stop smoking because it kills you when you smoke the cigarette; it’s because it kills you later. It’s the same argument with climate change. You take action today to protect health today and in the future.” [251]

January 2018

Following the release of the book Fire and Fury: Inside the Trump White House by Michael Wolff, Trump released a statement excoriating former chief strategist Steve Bannon for statements that appeared in the book where Bannon reportedly said that Trump's his son-in-law Jared Kushner's meeting with a Russian lawyer was “treasonous” and “unpatriotic.” [247], [248]

“Steve Bannon has nothing to do with me or my Presidency. When he was fired, he not only lost his job, he lost his mind. Steve was a staffer who worked for me after I had already won the nomination by defeating 17 candidates, often described as the most talented field ever assembled in the Republican party,” Trump said in the statement. [248]

Following Fire and Fury's publishing, mega donor Rebekah Mercer publicly rebuked Bannon for his reported statements about the president, and Bannon announced that he would step down from Breitbart News. [249], [250]

October 17, 2017

President Donald Trump spoke at the conservative Heritage Foundation's annual President Club's Meeting, where he encouraged Heritage to push for antiregulation policy. Trump promoted his tax plan, which he described as a “once-in-a-generation opportunity to revitalize our economy.” [237], [238]

“Lower taxes mean bigger paychecks, more jobs, and stronger growth,” he said, describing existing corporate taxes as a “giant self-inflicted economic wound.” [17:47][238]

 View the full 34-minute video of his speech below: Some notable quotes below (emphasis added): [237]

“We believe we should preserve our history, not tear it down. Now they're even trying to destroy statues of Christopher Columbus. What's next? It has to be stopped. It's heritage.” [7:19]

“We believe that strong nations must have strong borders and that our most important job is to serve the needs of America and the American people. That includes common-sense reforms like cracking down on sanctuary cities, ending catch-and-release, and very importantly ending chain migration.” [8:12]

“This is the message I delivered in my address to the United Nations. I told the leaders in that hall […] that just like I expect them to put the needs of their countries first, I will always put the needs of our country first. That is why we are withdrawing from one-sided international deals like the Trans-Pacific Partnership and the Paris Climate Accord.” [9:09]

Noting increases in defense spending, Trump said “As Ronald Reagan said, we believe in peace through strength.”[10:17]

“We have taken action to repeal the EPA's so-called 'Clean Power Plan' and we have ended, finally, the war on clean, beautiful coal. People going back two work. They're going back to work.” [12:26]

October 12, 2017

President Donald Trump appointed climate change denier Kathleen Hartnett-White as chair of the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ), pending approval via a U.S. Senate confirmation hearing process, where she will likely face questions regarding her history of promoting fossil fuels and denying climate change. [222]

Hartnett-White has a history of representing fossil fuel interests. During her tenure as chair of the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ), appointed by then-governor Rick Perry, the TCEQ was found to “not consistently ensure violators are held accountable.” According to a 2003 Texas State Audit, polluters “often have economic benefits that exceed their penalties, which could reduce their incentive to comply.” [223]

As head of the CEQ, Hartnett-White would be in charge of coordinating interagency science, climate, and environmental policy and oversee things such as the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) review process and agency compliance with that law.  [222]

Though CEQ oversees the NEPA process, it remains unclear how seriously Hartnett-White will take the NEPA review process, for decades seen as a bedrock of U.S. environmental regulation since NEPA became law in 1970,” DeSmog's Steve Horn reported.  [222]

The Environmental Working Group (EWG) released a press statement critical of Hartnett-White's appointment:

At least Butch and Sundance had to put some effort into robbing banks and trains,” Ken Cook, EWG's president, said in a press statement. “If Hartnett-White joins Administrator Pruitt, polluters will stroll through the front doors of both the EPA and the White House, no questions asked, as the rampant looting of environmental and public health protection policies continues.” [224]

October 10, 2017

Trump's appointed EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt signed a proposed rule to begin withdrawal from the Clean Power Plan, Reuters reported: [239]

Here’s the president’s message: The war on coal is over,” Pruitt announced earlier at a gathering with coal miners in Hazard, Kentucky. [239]

The official EPA press release announced the repeal of what it described as “the so-called 'Clean Power Plan (CPP)'”:

After reviewing the CPPEPA has proposed to determine that the Obama-era regulation exceeds the Agency’s statutory authority. Repealing the CPP will also facilitate the development of U.S. energy resources and reduce unnecessary regulatory burdens associated with the development of those resources, in keeping with the principles established in President Trump’s Executive Order on Energy Independence,” the press release read. [240]

As the New York Times reported, the decision is a “personal triumph for Mr. Pruitt, who as Oklahoma attorney general helped lead more than two dozen states in challenging the rule in the courts.” [241] 

August 2017

DeSmog reported that Robert Powelson, newly appointed commissioner to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), previously received gifts from the energy and utility sector while working as a state regulator. In his position at the FERC, Powelson would be regulating those sectors at a federal level. [235]

June 1, 2017

Donald Trump officially announced that the U.S. would withdraw from the Paris Accord, effective November, 2020, one day after the 2020 election[210], [211]

The United States will withdraw from the Paris climate accord,” Trump said, “but begin negotiations to re-enter either the Paris accord or an entirely new transaction on terms that are fair to the United States and its businesses, workers and taxpayers.”

We'll see if we can make a deal that's fair,” he added. “If we can, that's great. If we can't, that's fine.”

View text of Trump's full statement on the Paris Climate Accord at the White House website. [218]

Shortly before the press conference began, CNN reported that the White House had told Congress of the decision.

We will initiate the process, which, all told, takes four years in total,” White House energy policy adviser and former fossil fuel lobbyist Michael Catanzaro told Congressional staffers in a conference call just before Trump's speech. “But we’re going to make very clear to the world that we’re not going to be abiding by what the previous administration agreed to.”

Reuters reported that Trump had misunderstood research that he had cited as justification for withdrawing from the Paris Climate Agreement. Trump had said during the speech that even if fully implemented, the Paris agreement would not have a large impact:

“Even if the Paris Agreement were implemented in full, with total compliance from all nations, it is estimated it would only produce a two-tenths of one degree Celsius reduction in global temperature by the year 2100,” Trump said. 

“Tiny, tiny amount.”

According to White House documents reviewed by Reuters, Trump's statement was attributed to research by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) in a April 2016 study titled “How much of a difference will the Paris Agreement make? [212], [213]

Erwin Monier, one of the study's authors and a a lead researcher at the MIT Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change, said “We certainly do not support the withdrawal of the U.S. from the Paris agreement,” [212]

“If we don't do anything, we might shoot over 5 degrees or more and that would be catastrophic,” said John Reilly, the co-director of the program. He also noted that MIT's scientists were not offered a chance to explain their work, and were not contacted by the White House. [212]

DeSmog looked deeper into Trump's sources, and found that when Trump claimed “onerous energy restrictions” would be placed on the U.S., he was citing figures from the National Economic Research Associates (NERA). NERA is the same group that had carried out a study for the tobacco industry in the 1990s that concluded there wasn't a link between tobacco advertising and smoking levels. [214]

The NERA study claiming that the Paris agreement would “cost” America 2.7 million jobs was funded by the American Council for Capital Formation (ACCF) and the U.S Chamber of Commerce. The Chamber has been described as “Big Tobacco’s Staunch Friend in Washington,” while ACCF has received over $1 million from oil giant ExxonMobil. [215], [216]

An AP Fact Check noted that the study “makes worst-case assumptions that may inflate the cost of meeting U.S. targets under the Paris accord while largely ignoring the economic benefits to U.S. businesses from building and operating renewable energy projects.” [217]

March 24, 2017

President Trump announced that he had approved the Keystone XL pipeline, reversing the pervious decision by former President Barack Obama to reject it. While Trump said the project would create 28,000 U.S. jobs Reuters noted that a 2014 State Department study had predicted just 3,900 construction jobs and 35 permanent jobs would be created by the project. [243]

As DeSmog Canada reported, despite Trump granting the presidential permit required to build the pipeline, this does not guarantee it will be built. [242]

“It's going to be an incredible pipeline, greatest technology known to man or woman.  And frankly, we're very proud of it,” Trump said in the official announcement of the pipeline's approval.  “When completed, the Keystone XL pipeline will span 900 miles – wow – and have the capacity to deliver more than 800,000 barrels of oil per day to the Gulf Coast refineries.  That's some big pipeline.” [244]

February 24, 2017

Trump was a speaker at the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC).View the complete video at The New York Times. [208] 

CPAC is sponsored by conservative and pro-industry groups, including The Heritage Foundation, Fueling U.S. Forward, American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC), Leadership Institute, Capital Research Center, Charles Koch Institute, FreedomWorks, America Rising, American Petroleum Institute, American Enterprise Institute (AEI), Independent Women's Forum, and many others. [209]

February, 2017

As reported by GreenWire, Trump chose climate change denier Mike Catanzaro, who is also a lobbyist for oil and gas companies Noble EnergyDevon EnergyEncana Oil and GasAmerican Fuel and Petrochemical Manufacturers (AFPM), and Hess Corporation, as a top energy policy aide. [200], [201], [203], [204], [205], [206], [207]

As DeSmog reported, Catanzaro served as a top energy aide during Trump's presidential campaign. According to GreenWire, he is expected to serve as special assistant to Trump for energy and environmental issues under the umbrella of the White House National Economic Council. [202][200]

January 25, 2017

Trump's team announced that the Atlantic Coast pipeline would be among the White House's top priorities for infrastructure projects. [195]

DeSmog reported that it was surprising that there was only one pipeline project to be in the list of 50. The Atlantic Coast pipeline was proposed by a partnership among Dominion Resources, Duke Energy, and Southern Gas Company. [196]

The full list, titled “Priority List: Energy and National Security Projects,” includes various highway and rail expansions, airport upgrades, hydro and wind power projects, new transmission lines, and the Atlantic Coast, which would carry natural gas obtained via hydraulic fracturing (“fracking”). [197]

January 20, 2017

DeSmog reported that, after President Donald Trump assumed power in the White House, the climate change section of the White House's website was removed. Journalist Brian Kahn of ClimateCentral.com was the first to point this out on Twitter. [198]

The new web section does mention environmental protection, but the word “climate” appears only once, and only in reference to the administration's plans to do away with President Obama's Climate Action Plan[198]

December 19, 2016

While Donald Trump claimed that he had no need for the Koch Brothers, DeSmog mapped out the extensive links between the Trump Administration and Koch affiliates and business associates: [199]

December 10, 2016

Trump picked ExxonMobil CEO Rex Tillerson, who—as Desmog reported—has close personal and company ties to Russia and its President Vladimir Putin. [181]

If the goal is to drain the swamp in D.C., Tillerson might not be your man; Exxon’s business plan continues to require raising the level of the ocean to the point where Foggy Bottom will be well underwater,” said 350.org founder Bill McKibben in a press release. “But this is certainly a good way to make clear exactly who’ll be running the government in a Trump administration — just cut out the middleman and hand it directly to the fossil fuel industry.”

Rex Tillerson was sworn in as Secretary of State on February 1, 2017 after being confirmed by the Senate earlier the same day. [184]

December 8, 2016

Bloomberg reports on a memo by President-Elect Trump's transition team requesting a list of employees and contractors who attended United Nations climate meetings. Information sought included agency loan programs, research activities, and the basis for statistics regarding the Obama administration's social cost of carbon metrics. [180]

Catherine Trywick at Bloomberg notes that “there is a fear that people who worked on climate policy under Obama could be targeted under the Trump administration, because some of the names who have been floated as cabinet members are very hostile towards climate change and environmental concerns.” [180]

Senator Ed Markey responded by sending a letter to Trump, warming that the punishment of agency workers carrying out policies his administration disagrees with “would be tantamount to an illegal modern-day political witch hunt, and would have a profoundly chilling impact on our dedicated federal workforce.”[180]

Energy Department employees said they had been unsettled by the information request by Trump's team.  [180]

It’s certainly alarming that they would be targeting specific employees in this way,” said Michael Halpern, deputy director of the Center for Science and Democracy at the Union of Concerned Scientists. “Scientists are looking at this with some suspicion, because many of the people who have been chomping at the bit to dismantle federal climate change science programs are now deeply embedded in the transition.” [180]

December 7, 2016

Trump nominated former Oklahoma attorney general Scott Pruitt to run the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Pruitt was confirmed as administrator of the EPA on February 17, 2017. Pruitt's initial committee confirmation vote was to take place on February 1, 2017, but the vote was delayed when Democrats boycotted the planned vote. [185][186][187][188]

At the time of Pruitt's nominationDeSmog reported on Pruitt's history working with oil, gas, and utility companies could affect his confirmation. [189][190]

DeSmog mapped Pruitt's extensive ties to the fossil fuel industry: [191]

December 1, 2016

The Intercept reports that Donald Trump's first pick for the NASA transition team is Christopher Shank, a climate change denier who previously worked with Rep. Lamar Smith. Shank has criticized NASA for the scientific data it releases, saying in a 2015 panel that “The rhetoric that’s coming out, the hottest year in history, actually is not backed up by the science — or that the droughts, the fires, the hurricanes, etc., are caused by climate change, but it’s just weather.” [183]

September 22, 2016

Donald Trump was a keynote speaker at the “Shale Insight 2016” conference, featuring major companies from the oil and gas industry. [17]

It's great to be with so many of my friends,” Trump began. “Oh, you will like me so much.”

Do you know all of my life, that business has never had problems, but in the last seven or eight years, it's been tough,” Trump said. “With the EPA, with all of the difficulties you're going through.” [17]

DeSmog's Sharon Kelly notes that, despite's Trump's statement, the Marcellus shale industry barely existed eight years ago.

America is sitting on a treasure trove of untapped energy,” Trump told the crowd. “Some $50 trillion in shale energy, oil reserves and natural gas on federal lands, in addition to hundreds of years of coal energy reserves. It's all upside for this country.” [17]

View the full video of Trump's speech below:

The Washington Examiner reported that, at the conference, Trump backed off of his prior statement that he would eliminate the Environmental Protection Agency as part of his plan to eliminate the federal budget deficit. [194]

“I will refocus the EPA on its core mission of ensuring clean air, and clean, safe drinking water for all Americans,” Trump said at the conference. “I believe firmly in conserving our wonderful natural resources and beautiful natural habitats. My environmental agenda will be guided by true specialists in conservation, not those with radical political agendas.” [194]

Trump cited a study by the industry-funded Institute for Energy Research (IER), declaring that opening up federal land to oil and gas drilling could contribute to $20 trillion in economic activity over the next 40 years. Trump also promised to open up drilling on the coasts: [194]

“Our energy policy will make full use of our domestic energy sources, including traditional and renewable energy sources,” Trump said. [194]

Trump also said that he would further open up the Marcellus and Utica shale regions to hydraulic fracturing (fracking). [194]

“The development of the Marcellus and Utica shales will fundamentally change the economic landscape of this region and our country, bringing extraordinary new prosperity to millions,” Trump said. [194]

May 17, 2016

In an interview with Reuters, Donald Trump promised that he would renegotiate or pull America out entirely from the Paris Climate Agreement: [3]

“I will be looking at that very, very seriously, and at a minimum I will be renegotiating those agreements, at a minimum. And at a maximum I may do something else,” Trump told Reuters.

“But those agreements are one-sided agreements and they are bad for the United States.”

Trump said that he did not belive China would adhere to its pledge under Paris:

“Not a big fan because other countries don’t adhere to it, and China doesn’t adhere to it, and China’s spewing into the atmosphere,” he said.

The Obama administration pledged to cut emissions by 26 to 28 percent by 2025 over 2005, while China promised to halt emissions increases by 2030. 

“This is another example of Trump’s dangerous lack of judgment and the very real impacts it could have for all of us,” said Gene Karpinski, president of the U.S.-based environmental group League of Conservation Voters.

May 26, 2016

Trump spoke about his “America First Energy Plan,” promising that during his first 100 days in office he would “rescind all the job-destroying Obama executive actions including” his landmark climate regulations, “cancel the Paris Climate Agreement,” and “stop all payments of US tax dollars to UN global warming programs.” [178]

Trump detailed his “100 day action plan” as follows:

  • “We’re going to rescind all the job-destroying Obama executive actions including the Climate Action Plan and the Waters of the U.S. rule.
  • We’re going to save the coal industry and other industries threatened by Hillary Clinton’s extremist agenda.
  • I’m going to ask Trans Canada to renew its permit application for the Keystone Pipeline.
  • We’re going to lift moratoriums on energy production in federal areas
  • We’re going to revoke policies that impose unwarranted restrictions on new drilling technologies. These technologies create millions of jobs with a smaller footprint than ever before.
  • We’re going to cancel the Paris Climate Agreement and stop all payments of U.S. tax dollars to U.N. global warming programs.
  • Any regulation that is outdated, unnecessary, bad for workers, or contrary to the national interest will be scrapped. We will also eliminate duplication, provide regulatory certainty, and trust local officials and local residents.
  • Any future regulation will go through a simple test: is this regulation good for the American worker? If it doesn’t pass this test, the rule will not be approved.”

March 3, 2016

Trump attended the 11th GOP candidate's debate in Detroit where declared that, as part of proposed tax cuts, he would cut the “Department of Environmental Protection,” by which he presumably meant the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The full quote below, as noted by The Washington Post: [193]

CHRISWALLACE (MODERATOR): “Mr. Trump, your proposed tax cut would add $10 trillion to the nation's debt over 10 years, even if the economy grows the way that you say it will. You insist that you could make up for a good deal of that, you say, by cutting waste, fraud, and abuse.”

TRUMP: “Correct.”

WALLACE: “Like what? And please be specific.”

TRUMP: “Department of Education. We're cutting Common Core. We're getting rid of Common Core. We're bringing education locally. Department of Environmental Protection. We are going to get rid are of it in almost every form. We're going to have little tidbits left but we're going to take a tremendous amount out.”

We have various other things. If you look at the IRS, if you look at every single agency, we can cut it down, and I mean really cut it down and save. The waste, fraud, and abuse is massive.”[193]

Funding

Top Campaign Contributors

The Center for Responsive Politics' OpenSecrets.org lists Donald Trump's top campaign contributors in 2016: [18]

CONTRIBUTORTOTAL
Murray Energy$102,659
Alliance Coal$66,679
Bank of America$48,269
Wells Fargo$45,803
US Army$44,765
US Government$43,306
US Air Force$38,534
Jennmar Corp$38,046
American Airlines Group$37,509
US Navy$35,350
US Dept of Defense$32,673
XPO Logistics$31,541
Realogy Corp$31,213
US Postal Service$30,684
Berkshire Hathaway$30,540
Lockheed Martin$28,855
Boeing Co$27,033
US Dept of Veterans Affairs$26,984
Morgan Stanley$25,415
United Continental Holdings

$25,331

Outside Spending

Trump's 2016 campaign was made successful through a range of support from corporations, labor unions, and other groups. Below is a summary of Committees who supported Trump, based on data from Opensecrets.org: [19]

Supported Trump

CommitteeSupport
Get Our Jobs Back$500,101,66
Great America PAC$245,275,32
NRA Institute for Legislative Action$8,760,028
Rebuilding America Now$40,95,641
Save America From it's Government$34,15,288
45 Committee$31,23,687
National Rifle Assn$18,37,094
Adams, Stephen$1,008,982
Future in America$698,263
Tea Party Patriots Citizens Fund$602,948
2016 Cmte$519,330
Phyllis Schlafly's Eagle PAC$219,368
RALLYPAC$191,634
Citizens United Super PAC$169,471
National Right to Life$127,685
Patriots for Trump$122,463
USA Business Freedom PAC$89,000
Our Voice Matters$76,300
Conservative Action Fund$68,093
Committee for American Sovereignty$64,000
Restore American Freedom & Liberty$59,000
America Speaks PAC$52,247
TrumPAC$48,620
Victory 2016$45,500
Making America Great Again Llc$39,370
60 Plus Assn$33,979
Right to Life of Michigan Victory Fund$32,027
Amish PAC$31,112
American Horizons$31,000
Mountaineers Are Always Free PAC$25,740
Bukowsky$21,595
Kenneth A Lanci$20,070
JANPAC$19,000
National Right to Life Victory Fund$18,987
Committee to Restore America's Greatness$16,000
Texas Republican Congressional Cmte$15,000
Agron$13,225
Susan B Anthony List$12,000
Republican Party of Williamson County$11,170
Republican Hindu Coalition$11,103
Missouri Right to Life Victory Fund$10,591
Republican National Cmte$10,000
John R Davis Jr$10,000
America's Renewable Future Inc.$8,362
Conservative Liberty Coalition$7,500
Wade, John Evan II$6,716
Republican Party of Ventura County$6,402
Rodrigues$5,996
Food Policy Action$5,833
Campaign for Working Families$5,745
Service Employees International Union$4,580
Art of the Deal$3,400
Marlowe, Mark Anthony$2,978
REPUBLICANPARTYOFPETERSTOWNSHIP$2,403
New Jersey Right to Life$2,401
Conservative Freedom Fighters$2,249
Save The American Way$2,220
Stop Hillary PAC$2,000
Florida New Majority$2,000
null$1,500
People and Politics$1,250
Kentucky Tomorrow$1,003
Black Conservatives Fund$1,000
Right to Life of Michigan$896
Vocal Citizens$835
Conservative Strikeforce$500
Club for Growth$376
Avaaz Foundation$9

Assets & Personal Finances

According to public date on file at OpenSecrets.org detailing Donald Trump's personal finances. The 92-page report (PDF) details Trump's affiliations with over five hundred companies. [20]

While Trump did not release his tax returns for public scrutiny, citing an ongoing audit, he said that his financial disclosures more than made up for the fact: [21], [22]

“I released the most extensive financial review of anybody in the history of politics,” Trump said. “It’s either 100 or maybe more pages of names of companies, locations of companies, etc., etc., and it's a very impressive list, and everybody says that. … You don't learn much in a tax return.”

The New York Times reports that while Trump has claimed his net worth is more than $10 billion, that figure cannot be verified with the disclosure form provided because the largest range for a single asset’s worth is “over $50 million.” [23]

Trump's Cabinet & Staff (2017)

The New York Times (NYT) reported on the status of Donald Trump's cabinet, as of March, 2017. As CNN reported, in addition to Cabinet-level positions, Trump has over 4,000 positions to fill with more than 1,200 requiring senate confirmation. Some notable names from the NYT list, combined with updates for more recent resignations or additions, below: [192], [229]

The Offical White House Cabinet page also lists Trump's current Cabinet positions, not all of which overlap with the March 2017 NYT list. [234]

NamePositionStatusOn Official White House Cabinet List
Mike PenceVice President [234]ServingYes
Elaine DukeActing Secretary of Homeland Security [234]ServingYes
Don J. WrightActing Secretary of Health and Human Services [234]ServingYes
Carl IcahnRegulatory CzarAppointed (since resigned) [226]No
Donald F. McGahn IIWhite House CounselAppointedNo
H.R. McMasterNat. Sec. AdviserAppointedNo
Jared KushnerSenior adviserAppointedNo
Kellyanne ConwayCounselorAppointedNo
Peter NavarroTrade CzarAppointedNo
Reince PriebusChief of StaffAppointed (since resigned) [227]No
Sean SpicerPress SecretaryAppointed (since resigned[227]No
Stephen K. BannonChief StrategistAppointed (since resigned)[228]No
Thomas P. BossertHomeland Security AdviserAppointedNo
Ben CarsonHousingConfirmedNo
Betsy DeVosEducationConfirmedYes
Dan CoatsD.N.I.ConfirmedYes
David J. ShulkinVeteransConfirmedYes
Elaine L. ChaoTransportationConfirmedYes
James N. MattisDefenseConfirmedYes
Jeff SessionsAtty. GeneralConfirmedYes
John F. KellyHomeland Security (now Chief of Staff, replacing John Kelly) [230][232]ConfirmedYes
Linda McMahonSmall BusinessConfirmedYes
Mick MulvaneyO.M.B.ConfirmedYes
Mike PompeoC.I.A.ConfirmedYes
Nikki R. HaleyU.N.ConfirmedYes
R. Alexander AcostaLaborConfirmedYes
Rex W. TillersonStateConfirmedYes
Rick PerryEnergyConfirmedYes
Robert LighthizerU.S. Trade Rep.ConfirmedYes
Ryan ZinkeInteriorConfirmedYes
Scott PruittE.P.A.ConfirmedYes
Sonny PerdueAgricultureConfirmedYes
Steven MnuchinTreasuryConfirmedYes
Tom PriceHealthConfirmed (since resigned) [233]No
Wilbur RossCommerceConfirmedYes
Andrew F. PuzderLabourWithdrewNo
Michael T. FlynnNat. Sec. AdviserResignedNo
Other Notable Positions & Staff
Mike DubkeWhite House Comm. DirectorResigned [227]
James ComeyFBI DirectorFired[227]
Sean SpicerWhite House press secretaryResigned [227]
Sally YatesUS Deputy Attorney GeneralFired [227]
Anthony ScaramucciWhite House Comm. Director (replacing Dubke)Resigned[230]
Sarah Huckabee SandersWhite House press secretaryReplaced Sean Spicer[231]
Kathleen Hartnett-WhiteChair of the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) Pending confirmation. [222]
Robert PowelsonFERC[235]Confirmed [236]
Neil ChatterjeeFERC [236]Confirmed [236]

Landing Teams (2016)

E&E News outlined Donald Trump's landing teams. They report that these so-called landing teams are responsible for “will be responsible for interviewing top government officials and helping to set the new administration's policy agenda.” Here is a snapshot of what the team looked like on December 16, 2016: [182]

Commodity Futures and Trading CommissionDescription
Sharon Brown-Hruskadirector of NERA Economic Consulting's securities and finance practice.
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
CJ Jordanpresident and CEO of Jordan Management Group LLC.
Paul AtkinsCEO at Patomak Global Partners LLC and former commissioner of U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.
Department of Agriculture
Brian Klippensteinexecutive director, Protect the Harvest.
Joel Leftwichstaff director on the Senate Agriculture, Nutrition and Forestry Committee and former PepsiCo lobbyist.
Department of Commerce
A. Mark Neumancounselor for international trade and global strategies at L Brands Inc.
David Bohigianmanaging director of Pluribus Ventures, former Commerce assistant secretary.
George Sifakisfounder and CEO of Ideagen.
Tom Leppertformer CEO of Kaplan, Inc.
William Gaynorpresident and CEO at Rock Creek Advisors LLC.
Department of Defense
Bert Mizusawamajor general in the U.S. Army Reserve.
Chris Hasslerpresident and CEO at Syndetics, Inc.
Craig Duehringformer assistant secretary of the Air Force for manpower and reserve affairs.
Dakota Woodsenior research fellow for defense programs at the Heritage Foundation.
David McCrackenfellow at Oak Ridge Strategies Group Inc.
David Trachtenbergowner of Shortwaver Consulting, LLC.
Earl MatthewsU.S. Army.
Justin Johnsonsenior policy analyst for defense budgeting policy at the Heritage Foundation.
Keith Kelloggvice president of strategic initiatives at Cubic Corporation.
Kendell Peasekendell LLC.
Kenneth Braithwaitesenior vice president and executive officer, VHA Mid-Atlantic at Vizient, Inc.
Mark Albrechtchairman of the board of U.S. Space LLC.
Michael Duffeyexecutive director of Republican Party of Wisconsin.
Michael Eganconsultant at the Boston Consulting Group.
Mira Ricardelformer Boeing executive and DOD official.
Sergio de la PenaCEO of de la Pena Consulting LLC.
Thomas Carterexecutive at Elbit Systems of America.
Trae Stephensprincipal at Founders Fund.
Whitney Meyersformerly of the Defense Intelligence Agency.
William Hartzogpresident and CEO at Burdeshaw Associates, Ltd. and former U.S. Army general.
Department of Education
James Manningself-employed consultant.
Kathleen Madigan Rebarbersenior research scientist at AccountabilityWorks.
Kent Talbertattorney at Kent D. Talbert PLLC.
Thomas Wheelerattorney at Frost Brown Todd, LLC.
Williamson Eversresearch fellow at the Hoover Institution.
Department of Energy
Daniel Simmonsvice president for policy at the Institute for Energy Research, formerly at the American Legislative Exchange Council.
David Jonaspartner at Fluet, Huber + Hoang, PLLC; former general counsel for the National Nuclear Security Administration.
Jack Spencervice president of the Institute for Economic Freedom and Opportunity at the Heritage Foundation.
Kelly Mitchellsales executive at Multi-Automatic Tool & Supply Co., outreach vice chair for Michigan Republican Party.
Mark Maddoxformer acting assistant secretary of fossil energy at DOE during the George W. Bush administration.
Martin Dannenfelser, Jr.previously at the Energy Innovation Reform Project and House Energy and Commerce Committee.
Tom Pylepresident of the American Energy Alliance and a former Republican congressional aide.
Travis Fishereconomist at the Institute for Energy Research, former economist at the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.
William Greenedeputy director of government affairs at Safari Club International.
Department of Health and Human Services
Andrew BrembergRight Policy, LLC.
Ed Haislmaiersenior research fellow at the Heritage Foundation.
Eric Harganshareholder at Greenberg Traurig LLP.
John Brooksdepartment head of health policy and economics at the MITRE Corp.
Kamran Daraviadviser of the United Nations economic and social council.
Maggie WynneKnights of Columbus.
Marie Meszarospolicy analyst for the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget.
Nina Owcharenko Schaefer, director of the Center for Health Policy Studies at the Heritage Foundation.
Paula Stannardformer deputy general counsel and acting general counsel at HHS.
Renee Amoorefounder and president of the Amoore Group, Inc.
Scott Gottliebfellow at the American Enterprise Institute.
Department of Homeland Security
Bradley BuswellCEO of Morpho Detection LLC.
Hugo Teufelsenior counsel of global privacy at Raytheon Co.
James Carafanovice president of foreign and defense policy studies at the Heritage Foundation.
John Barsadirector of business development at Goldbelt, Inc.
John SandersCEO at Pramantha Solutions, Inc.
Jonathan Spanerpublic sector practice at McKinsey & Company.
Katharine Gorkapresident and co-founder of the Council on Global Security.
Lora Riessenior principal at CSRA Inc.
Michael DoughertyCEO of the Secure Identity & Biometrics Association.
Thomas DiNannosenior fellow at the International Assessment & Strategy Center.
Department of Housing and Urban Development
Jimmy Kemppresident of the Jack Kemp Foundation.
Shawn Krauseexecutive vice president at Quicken Loans.
Department of Justice
Brian Benczkowskipartner at Kirkland & Ellis LLP.
David Higbeemanaging partner of Hunton & Williams LLP's Washington, D.C. office.
Edmund Searbypartner at BakerHostetler.
Greg Katsaspartner at Jones Day.
James Burnhamassociate at Jones Day LLP.
Lizette Benedi Herraizsenior vice president and general counsel at Strayer University.
Michael Battlepartner at Barnes & Thornburg LLP.
Ronald Tenpasattorney at Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP involved in lawsuit against the Clean Power Plan.
Stefani Carterprincipal at Stefani Carter & Associates, LLC.
Steven Engelpartner at Dechert LLP.
Thomas Wheelerattorney at Frost Brown Todd, LLC.
William ClevelandCity of Alexandria Public Schools.
Zina Bashformer counsel to Senate Judiciary Committee.
Department of Labor
Diana Furchtgott-Rothsenior fellow at the Manhattan Institute for Policy Research.
F. Vincent Vernuccio IIIdirector of labor policy at the Mackinac Center for Public Policy.
Loren Smithdirector at Capital Alpha Partners LLC.
Nathan Mehrensgeneral counsel and president of Americans for Limited Government Research Foundation.
Richard Manningpresident of Americans for Limited Government.
Veronica Birkenstockpresident of Practical Employee Solutions.
Department of State
Alexander GrayTrump campaign adviser.
Amy Bradshawproject leader at the Boston Consulting Group.
Andrew Peekassistant professor at Claremont McKenna College.
Ashley BellRepublican National Committee strategist.
Catharine O'Neillformer intern on the House Foreign Affairs Committee.
Charles Glazerformer U.S. ambassador to El Salvador.
Christopher Burnhamchairman of Cambridge Global Capital, LLC.
Erin Walshretired from Goldman Sachs.
Herman Pirchner, founding president of the American Foreign Policy Council.
Jackie Wolcottformer executive director at U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom.
Kristal Quarker Hartsfielddirector of intergovernmental affairs, executive office of the governor of Maryland.
Robert Blauformer State Department official.
Steven Grovesa critic of the Paris Agreement on climate change. Heritage Foundation.
Department of The Interior
Daniel Jorjanigeneral counsel at Freedom Partners.
Doug Domenechdirector of the Texas Public Policy Foundation's Fueling Freedom Project, former Interior official.
Karen Budd-Falenlawyer and former Reagan administration Interior official.
Kathy Benedettogeologist at Bioxy Research; former House Natural Resources Committee aide.
Mary Bomarformer director of the National Park Service.
Ned Mamulascholar at the Cato Institute and former Interior official.
Scott Cameronformer Interior deputy assistant secretary for performance, accountability and human resources.
Department of Transportation
Bo Denysykvice president at Global USA Inc.
Brigham McCownmanaging member at Kilgore McCown, PLLC.
Nancy Butlerformer vice president of government and federal relations at AECOM and former DOT staffer.
Shirley Ybarraformer senior transportation policy analyst at Reason Foundation.
T. Finch Fultonaccount supervisor at VOX Global.
Department of Treasury
Edward O’Callaghanpartner at Clifford Chance LLP.
Eileen O'ConnorLaw Office of Eileen J. O'Connor, PLLC.
Keith Noreikapartner at Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP.
Kimberly Reedpresident of the International Food Information Council Foundation.
Mark Woolwayacting CFO at Zenefits.
Michael Friedmanconsultant at the Boston Consulting Group.
Thomas Feddopartner at Alston & Bird LLP.
Todd Steggerdapartner at McGuireWoods LLP.
Department of Veterans Affairs
Amber Smithself-employed author.
Bill Chatfieldself-employed consultant.
Darin Selnickself-employed consultant.
Ellen Embreyfounder and managing partner of Stratitia, Inc.
J. Keith Kelloggsenior vice president at Cubic Corp.
Lolita Zinkesmall business woman and wife of Montana Republican Rep. Ryan Zinke.
Lynda Davisexecutive vice president, Tragedy Assistance Program for Survivors.
Michael Meesechief operating officer and secretary at the American Armed Forces Mutual Aid Association.
Philip Spencerconsultant at the Boston Consulting Group.
Ronald Thomasmanaging principal at ThomasRiley Strategies, LLC.
Steve Buyerformer Indiana Republican congressman.
EPA
Amy Oliver Cookeexecutive vice president and director of the Energy Policy Center for the Independence Institute in Colorado.
Austin Liparideputy director of the student division at the Federalist Society.
Christopher Hornersenior fellow at the Competitive Enterprise Institute.
David Kreutzersenior research fellow at the Heritage Foundation.
David Schnaregeneral counsel at the Energy and Environment Legal Institute.
David Stevensondirector of the Center for Energy Competitiveness at the Caesar Rodney Institute.
George Sugiyamaprincipal at the Sugiyama Group LLC, former counsel to EPA air administrator.
Harlan Watsonformer staffer on the House Science, Space and Technology Committee under then-Chairman Ralph Hall (R-Texas).
Myron Ebelldirector of the Center for Energy and Environment at the Competitive Enterprise Institute.
Federal Communications Commission
Roslyn LaytonPh.D. student at Aalborg University.
General Services Administration
Casey Colemangroup vice president at Unisys Corp.
Charles Jamespartner at Williams Mullen.
Don Williamsprincipal at Donald Williams Group LLC.
George Nesterczukowner and president of Nesterczuk & Associates.
Kurt Stoutexecutive vice president of government solutions at Colliers International.
Robert Mackichanpartner at Holland & Knight LLP.
Robert Tompkinspartner at Holland & Knight LLP.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Christopher ShankRepublican staff director for the House Committee on Science, Space and Technology.
Greg Autryassistant professor at the University of Southern California.
Jack Burnsprofessor at the University of Colorado.
Jeff Waksmanresearch fellow at the U.S. House of Representatives.
Rodney Liesveldformerly of NASA.
Sandra Magnusexecutive director of the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.
Steve Cookacting president of Dynetics Inc.
National Security Council
Brad Hansellconsultant at the Boston Consulting Group.
Jennifer Arangioprincipal at Command Consulting Group.
Kiron Skinnerdirector of Carnegie Mellon University's Center for International Relations and Politics.
Lisa Marie Cheneypresident at Innovative Business Group.
Mark Scrabapresident and chief champion officer at 29K Leaders.
Marshall Billingsleaformer NATO assistant secretary general for defense investment.
Sven Kramerformerly of the Defense Department.
Tera Dahlexecutive director and co-founder of the Council on Global Security.
Thomas Higginsexecutive vice president and chief administrative officer of First Data.
Yleem Pobletefellow at the Institute for Policy Research at The Catholic University of America.
Office of Management and Budget
Dan Kowalskia staffer on the Senate Budget Committee since 2012.
David Burtonsenior fellow in economic policy at the Heritage Foundation.
Justin Bogiesenior policy analyst at the Heritage Foundation.
Karen Evanspartner at KE&T Partners, LLC.
Linda Springerformer Office of Personnel Management.
Mark Robbinsmember of the U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board.
Pat Pizzellamember of the Federal Labor Relations Authority.
Paul Winfreedirector of economic policy research at the Heritage Foundation.
Russ Voughtvice president of grassroots outreach at Heritage Action for America.
Office of Personnel Management
James Imoehlassistant to the president at Gloucester Institute.
John Mullinschief strategy officer at the Millennium Group International, LLC.
Paul Conwayindependent consultant.
Office of the Comptroller of the Currency
Matthew Luscochief risk officer at Regions Financial Corp.
Office of the Director of National Intelligence
Benjamin Powellpartner at WilmerHale.
Brad Hansellconsultant at the Boston Consulting Group.
Bryan Smithvice president and technical adviser at Beacon Global Strategies LLC.
Geof Kahnpolicy director for the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence.
James Hoskinsretired chairman and CEO of Scitor Corp.
Juan Zaratesenior adviser at the Center for Strategic and International Studies.
L. Roger Mason, Jr.senior vice president at Noblis.
Paul Beckerpresident and CEO of the Becker T3 Group LLC.
Office of the U.S. Trade Representative
Jeff Gerrishpartner at Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher, & Flom LLP.
Nova Dalysenior public policy adviser at Wiley Rein LLP.
Rolf Lundbergowner of the Lundberg Group LLC.
Stephen Vaughnpartner in the international trade practice group of King & Spalding LLP.
Small Business Administration
Anthony Parkerowner and president of the Parker Tide Corp.
Deanna Bassprincipal at Bass Public Affairs.
Social Security Administration
David Blackformer general counsel of the Social Security Administration.
White House/Executive Office of the President
Don McGahnJones Day partner and incoming White House counsel.
Jennifer PavlickTrump campaign.
Josh PitcockTrump campaign aide and Indiana lobbyist.
Katie WalshRepublican National Committee chief of staff.
Marcia Lee KellyTrump campaign.
Reince PriebusRepublican National Committee chairman and incoming White House chief of staff.
Rick Dearbornchief of staff to Trump's attorney general nominee, Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-Ala.).
Sean CairncrossRepublican National Committee chief operating officer.

Transition Team (2016)

The Washington Post notes that “Although Trump has portrayed himself as the ultimate outsider, in putting together a transition team the New York real estate mogul has chosen veteran Washington insiders, many of them lobbyists for fossil fuel companies and skeptics about climate science.” [24]

Earlier in November, 2016, Politico PRO released an organizational chart for Trump's initial transition team structure:

Trump's Agency Action Team Structure

ClimateDenierRoundup notes that, “looking at all the lobbyists and beltway insiders, one would be forgiven for assuming his last campaign catchphrase was #StaffTheSwamp.” The chart notes a Homeland Security transition led by Cindy Hayden of tobacco giant Altria. Leading labor is Steve Hart, chairman of Williams & Jensen, who represents businesses like Coca-Cola, General Electric, HSBC, and VISA. The agricultural sector is being managed by Michael Torrey, who represents the American Beverage Association. [25]

Politico notes that “Lobbyists are all over Donald Trump's transition team,” singling out Cindy Hayden of Altira, Steve Hart of Williams & Jensen, Michael McKenna of MWR Strategies, David Bernhardt, Michael Torrey, and others. Myron Ebell leads the EPA transition. Ebell works forCEI, funded by ExxonMobil and the Kochs, and also heads the Cooler Heads Coalition[26]

Energy and environment is manned by Michael McKenna, who works for MWR Strategies, which represents the chemical giant Dow, the Kochs, and coal giant Southern Company. Fracking magnate Harold Hamm is in the lead for Secretary of Energy. For Interior, if Trump doesn’t give the position to Trump Jr., then it may go to Forrest Lucas, co-founder of Lucas Oil.

Note that the transition is a fluid process, and many names on this list will be replaced by others. For example, Mike Rogers withdrew from the national security lead. The New York Times reported that lobbyist Matthew Freedom, also on the national security team, as also fired. While the New York Times reported that Trump's ”transition was in disarray,” Trump maintained on Twitter that it was going “so smoothly.” [27][28]

Executive Committee

Trump released a statement on Friday, November 11, 2016 that outlined who would join his transition team's executive committee. Politico reports that Trump replaced New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie with Vice President-elect Mike Pence to chair the effort. They report that Christie's “viability as part of the team was thrown into question when two of his closest allies were convicted on charges of fraud and conspiracy related to the Bridgegate scandal.” Trump's new executive committee was structured as follows: [138], [151]

Mike Pence

Media Transparency notes that Pence is a climate science denier. When asked whether he believed climate change was man-made, Pence responded: “I don't know that that is a resolved issue in science today.” Pence added: “Just a few years ago, we were talking about global warming. We haven't seen a lot of warming lately. I remember back in the ‘70s we were talking about the coming ice age.” [39]

Steve Bannon

Stephen K. Bannon, emerging as Donald Trump's chief strategist, is the executive chairman of Breitbart News, which Bloomberg describes as the lineal descendant of the Drudge Report, and a “haven for people who think Fox News is too polite and restrained.” Breitbart faced controversy earlier during 2016 election season, nicknamed “Trumpbart” by detractors. The Daily Beast writes “it is widely seen as a credulous purveyor of [Donald] Trump's angry populist, anti-immigration, anti-Muslim message, and as an enthusiastic booster of the reality show billionaire's candidacy.” [152][153]

Right Wing Watch notes that Glenn Beck accused Breitbart News of “having turned itself into an arm of the Trump campaign and likening its executive chairman, Steve Bannon, to Hitler's propagandist Joseph Goebbels.” [154]

ClimateWire suggests that Bannon will be influential in shaping Trump's views on climate change, coming from a news network that describes environmentalists as “greentards” and “totally fu**ing wrong on climate change.” Climate change denier and journalist James Delingpole wrote that the Breitbart network has already created a clear outline of how Bannon plans to advice Trump on climate change. [155], [156]

“One of his pet peeves is the great climate-change con,” Delingpole wrote of Bannon. “It's partly why he recruited a notorious skeptic like myself.”

“Basically,” Delingpole wrote, “we won.”

Reince Priebus

Trump picked Reinhold Richard (Reince) Priebus, chairman of the Republican National Committee (RNC), as his White House chief of staff. The New York Times reported that Priebus's appointment, alongside that of Bannon, created “rival centers of power in the Trump White House.” While the Koch Brothers have refused to back Trump in the election, they are notably a considerable funder of the RNC[157], [158]

  • Rebekah Mercer
  • Peter Thiel
  • Rep. Lou Barletta
  • Rep. Marsha Blackburn
  • Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi
  • Rep. Chris Collins
  • Jared Kushner
  • Rep. Tom Marino
  • Steven Mnuchin
  • Rep. Devin Nunes
  • Anthony Scaramucci
  • Donald Trump Jr.
  • Eric Trump
  • Ivanka Trump

Staff Leadership

  • Kellyanne Conway— Senior Adviser
  • David Bossie— Deputy Executive Director
  • Stephen Miller — National Policy Director
  • Jason Miller— Communications Director
  • Hope Hicks — National Press Secretary
  • Dan Scavino — Director of Social Media
  • Don McGahn — General Counsel
  • Katie Walsh— Senior Adviser

Agency Action

Ron Nicol - Director, Agency Action

Ron Nicol

Ron Nichol, former US naval officer, has worked as senior advisor to The Boston Consulting Group (BCG) since January of 2016. Prior to his work at BCG, he worked for Babcock and Wilcox. He will oversee the following six groups, each of which also has its own team lead. [29]

Affiliations

  • Boston Consulting Group - Senior Advisor, previous senior partner and managing director.
  • Babcock & Wilcox — Prior position.

Defense

Keith Kellogg - Defense

Keith Kellogg

Keith Kellogg is a retired Army lieutenant general who previously endorsed Trump. Since retiring from the military in 2003, Kellogg has worked for a number of defense and homeland security contractors including GTSI, Oracle Corp., Coalition of Provisional Authority, and others. [28]

Affiliations

  • GTSIMember, Board of Directors. [30]
  • CACI International Inc. — Executive Vice President (January 2005 - July 2009). [31]
  • Cubic Corp.— Senior Vice President for Ground Combat Programs (2009). [31], [32]
  • Abraxis— Former President (2014). Abraxis is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Cubic Corp. [31]
  • Coalition Provisional Authority in Baghdad— Chief Operations Officer (Nov. 2003 - March 2004) [31]
  • Oracle Corp. — Senior Vice President of Homeland Security Solutions  (January 2005 - ). [33]
  • U.S. Army —  Lieutenant General. Served 1971 to July 2003. [31]

Mira Ricardel - Defense

Mira Ricardel is the former acting assistant defense secretary during the George W. Bush administration. Until recently she served as the vice president of business development for Boeing Strategic Missile & Defense Systems. Ricardel is also a consultant for Federal Budget IQ, a government research firm.  [34][26]

Affiliations

  • Boeing Strategic Missile & Defense Systems — Former vice president of Business Development. [35]
  • Freedom House — Former vice president of Programs. [35]
  • U.S. Arms Control and Disarmament Agency — Former deputy director of Congressional Affairs. [35]
  • Council on Foreign Relations — Former Member. [35]
  • Federal Budget IQ— Consultant. [26]

Michael Meese - Veterans Affairs

Michael Meese, working under Kellogg on Veterans Affairs, is a retired US Army brigadier general who currently teaches at Georgetown University. He also serves as chief operating officer of the American Armed Forces Mutual Aid Association. Meese is son of former Attorney General Edwin MEese, another Transition team member. [28]

Affiliations

  • American Armed Forces Mutual Aid Association (AAFMAA) — Chief Operating Officer (2013 - ) [36]

National Security

Mike Pence - Replaced Mike Rogers to lead National Security

Mike Pence

Mike Pence, Vice President-elect, was a Republican member of the US House of Representatives from  Indiana's 2nd District and 6th District between 2001 and 2013. Pence is a devout Evangelical Christian, an early supporter of the Tea Party, and a social conservative. The Washington Post reported that Pence became a household name after signing a religous freedom bill into law in 2016 which Pence said would protect Indiana business owners who did not want to participate in same-sex marriages, citing their religious beliefs. Several of Pence's top aids have ties with the Koch network. [37]

Pence signed what some described as “the most extreme abortion bill yet”—Bill HB 1347—which would ban women from abortions of fetuses diagnosed with physical or mental disability, including Down syndrome. [38]

Media Transparency notes that Pence is a climate science denier. When asked whether he believed climate change was man-made, Pence responded: “I don't know that that is a resolved issue in science today.” Pence added: “Just a few years ago, we were talking about global warming. We haven't seen a lot of warming lately. I remember back in the ‘70s we were talking about the coming ice age.” [39]

Affiliations

Mike Rogers - National Security (Withdrawn)

Mike Rogers

Former Rep. Mike Rogers was originally slated to lead the National Security transition team. However, in a statement released Tuesday, he said he was “pleased to hand off our work” to a new team led by Mike Pence. [44]

Jim Carafano - State

Jim Carafano

James Carafano is Vice President for the Kathryn and Shelby Cullom Davis Institute for National Security and Foreign Policy, and the E. W. Richardson Fellow at The Heritage Foundation, a conservative group that has received over $500,000 from ExxonMobil and is a former member of the Cooler Heads Coalition which fervently denies man-made climate change. [45], [46]

Carafano has said that the next president should abolish the White House Office of Science and Technology in order “to show that science is truly important to policy-making and good governance”: [47]

“The Obama White House has used the Office of Science and Technology principally to support its pet political causes — like advocacy for global climate change research that matches the president’s views on the topic and can be puffed to justify expanding federal regulations in virtually every aspect of American life,” Carafano wrote at the Heritage Foundation.

Affiliations

  • The Heritage Foundation — Vice President for the Kathryn and Shelby Cullom Davis Institute for National Security and Foreign Policy, and the E. W. Richardson Fellow [45]
  • Esprit de Corps — President. [45]
  •  Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments— Former Senior Fellow . [45]
  • Georgetown University — Adjunct Professor. [45]

Cindy Hayden - Homeland Security

Cindy Hayden

Cindy Hayden is director of Altria Client Services, the lobbying arm of tobacco giant Altria (formerly Philip Morris). 

Affiliations

Ron Burgess - Intelligence

Ron Burgess

Ron Burgess is a former Army Lt. General and former director of the Defense Intelligence Agency. President Obama appointed Burgess as head of the DIA in 2009, and he served in that position until 2012. Rogers is also former chair of the House Intelligence oversight committee. The Independent reports that pressure mounted on Trump to create his national security team after James Clapper's resignation. [49]

Affiliations

Matthew Freedman - NSC (Fired, replaced by Pence)

Matthew Freedman

Matthew Freedman is the chief executive at Global Impact. He was removed from his post overseeing the National Security Counsil after questions emerged about his lobbying times, reports The New York Times. Matthew Freedom briefly worked for the National Security Council and the Agency for International Development, later working as a security consultant. [51]

Affiliations

Kevin O'Connor - Justice (Since Dismissed)

Kevin O'Connor is a former U.S. attorney and top Justice Departemnt officer. He was one of a number on Trump's transition team who were dismissed with little explanation, although news sources conjecture that it is part of a “apparent purge of anyone tied to New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie.” [54]

Economic Issues

Bill Walton / David Malpass - Economic Issues

William L Walton

Bill Walton is chairman of Rappahannock Ventures, a private equity firm, and the film production company Rush River Entertainment. He is a senior fellow for the Discovery Institute's Center on Wealth, Poverty and Morality and is the chairman of the board and CEO of Allied Capital Corp. [55]

Affiliations

David Malpass - Treasury

David Malpass

David Malpass is founder and president of the consulting and economics research firm Encima Global. He previously worked at Bear Stearns as chief economist, as controller at Consolidated Supply Co. and maintained a number of appointments in the Reagan and Bush administrations. Malpass ran in the 2010 Republican primary for U.S. Senate in New York. [57]

In an interview with Marketplaceresponding to the question of if he thought Trump was capable of changing government, Malpass said: [58]

“Yes, of course, and that's why I'm working on the campaign…. I worked in both the Reagan and Bush administrations. They were effective, they tried to be effective. But overwhelms you when you're there is the number of decisions the federal government is making. [It's] this giant entity that's constantly affecting people's lives. And I think they haven't been making good decisions in the current administration and we need a better one. “

Affiliations

Ray Washburn - Commerce

Ray Washburn

Ray Washburn is a Dallas-based investor, and one of the key people helping to raise money for Trump's campaign. He is the former chairman of Republican National Committee, stepping down to lead New Jersey Governor Chris Christie's finance team. [59], [60], [61]

Affiliations

  • Charter Holdings— President and Chief Executive Officer (1990 - ) [62]
  • Republican National Committee Inc. — Former National Finance Chairman   [62]
  • HP Village Partners Ltd. — Managing Director [62]
  • Baylor Health Care System Foundation — Director [62]
  • Entrust Inc. — Director since June 5, 2006 [62]
  • Veritex Holdings, Inc. — Independent Director since 2009 [62]
  • Veritex Community Bank — Director [62]
  • Colonial Bank — Director [62]
  • Southern Methodist University— Adjunct Professor, Director at Southern Methodist University-21st Century Council [62]

Dan DiMicco - USTR

Dan DiMicco

Dan DiMicco is a board member of Duke Energy and the former President and CEO of Nucor. He continues to represent Nucor on the US Council on Competitiveness and the Coalition for a Prosperous America(CPA). He has also served on the board of the National Association of Manufacturers and on the Executive Committee of the World Steel Association. He has been described as “a leading voice for U.S. manufacturing and the nation's steel industry.” [63]

In 2012, DiMicco sent a letter to a concerned shareholder defending Nucor's support of the Heartland Institute, including many common talking points used in the Heartland Institute's continued denial of climate change. The Heartland Institute also historically defended Tobacco, claiming that smoking risks were “junk science.” 

ThinkProgress reported that DiMicco described $502,000 in contributions by Nucor Corporation as “entirely appropriate,” according to the letter: [64]

Heartland Funding by Nucor 'Entirely Appropriate'

The letter was released just two days before the Heartland Institute's disastrous billboard campaign that equated anyone who believes in climate change with the Unabomber and Osama bin Laden. [65]

Affiliations

  • Duke Energy — Board Member. [63]
  • Nucor — Chairman Emeritus. Former President and CEO.  [63]
  • National Association of Manufacturers (NAS) — Former Board Member. [63]
  • World Steel Association — Former Board Member. [63]

Paul Atkins - Indepent Financial Agencies

Paul Atkins

Image by Toppersmith (Own work) [CC0], via Wikimedia Commons

Paul Atkins is the CEO of the financial advisory firm Patomak Global Partners, a Washington-based financial consulting firm. Atkins was an SEC Commissioner from 2002 to 2008. [66]

Affiliations

  • Patomak Global Partners CEO[66]
  • US Securities & Exchange Commission — Commissioner (July 2002 - May 2008). [66]

Christine Toretti - SBA

Christine Toretti

Christine Toretti is the former Chairman and CEO of the now-defunct S. W. Jack Drilling Co. She serves as Vice Chairman of S&T Bancorp and is a former director of the Pittsburgh Federal Reserve Bank. In September 2016, Toretti announced the “Pennsylvania Women for Trump Statewide Leadership Team.” [67], [68]

Affiliations

  • Republican Party of Pennsylvania — National Committeewoman.
  • S.W. Jack Drilling Company (Now Defunct) — Former Chairwoman.
  • Palladio, LLC— Chairwoman and CEO.
  • S&T Bancorp— Director.
  • Pittsburgh Federal Bank Reserve — Former Director.
  • EQT Corporation — Member, Corporate Governance Committee.
  • Women Lead PAC— Founder.

Jeff Eisenach - FCC

Jeffrey Eisenach

Jeffrey Eisenach is the former leader of the now-defunct Progress and Freedom Foundation, and has argued for the FCC to take a hands-off aproach to digital issues. Eisenach is a Visiting Scholar and Director, Center for Internet, Communications, and Technology Policy at the conservative American Enterprise Institute (AEI), a group that has received over $3 million from ExxonMobil and a range of other high-profile conservative funding groups. Eisenach is senior president at NERA Economic Consulting, and an adjunct professor at the George Mason University School of law. [69]

In 2012, Reuters revealed that NERA Economic Consulting was the third party contractor behind an economic impact study on LNG (liquified natural gas) exports on behalf of the Department of Energy. NERA had also published a June 2011 report on behalf of the coal industry group American Coalition for Clean Coal Electricity (ACCCE). The ACCCE report concluded that  “clean-air rules proposed by the Obama administration would cost utilities $17.8 billion annually and raise electricity rates 11.5 percent on average in 2016.” [70]

Affiliations

  • American Enterprise Institute (AEI) — Visiting Scholar and Director, Center for Internet, Communications, and Technology Policy. Research Associate (1979-1981). [69]
  • NERA Economic Consulting — Senior Vice President (January 2013 – Present). [69]
  • Navigant Economics LLC— Managing Director and Principal (January 2010 – January 2014). [69]
  • George Mason University School of Law— Adjunct Professor (2000-Present). [69]
  • Economic Club of Washington— Vice President (2011-Present). [69]
  • Pew Project on the Internet and American Life— Board of Advisers (2002-Present). [69]
  • Empiris LLC— Chairman (2008-2010). [69]
  • Criterion Economics LLC— Chairman (2006-2008). [69]
  • The CapAnalysis Group LLC— Chairman (2005-2006). [69]
  • The Progress & Freedom Foundation— President (1993-2003). [69]
  • Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government — Adjunct Lecturer (1995-1999). [69]
  • GOPAC— Executive Director (1991-1993). [69]
  • George Mason University — Adjunct Professor (1989). [69]
  • Washington Policy Group Inc. — President (1988-1991). [69]
  • Pete du Pont for President Inc. — Director of Research (1986-1988). [69]
  • Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University— Adjunct Professor (1985, 1988). [69]
  • Office of Management and Budget — Executive Assistant to the Director (1985-1986). [69]
  • Office of the Chairman, Federal Trade Commission— Special Adviser for Economic Policy and Operations (1984-1985). [69]
  • Bureau of Economics, Federal Trade Commission— Economist (1983-1984). [69]
  • University of Virginia — Instructor (1983-1984). [69]
  • Office of Management and Budget/Presidential Task Force on Regulatory Relief — Special Assistant to James C. Miller III (1981). [69]

Michael Korbey - Social Security Administration

Michael Korbey

Michael Korbey was a senior advisor to the Social Security Administration under President George W. Bush. Prior to that, he worked for the lobbyist group United Seniors Association. Korbey has spent much of his career advocating for cutting and privatizing Social Security. “It's a failed system, broken and bankrupt,” Korbey said when he was a lobbyist in the mid-1990s. [71]

Affiliations

Domestic Issues

Ken Blackwell - Domestic Issues

Ken Blackwell

Ken Blackwell is a senior fellow for human rights and constitutional governance at the Family Research Council, a pro-life group engaged in lobbying and historically opposed to health care reform. Blackwell is a former mayor of Cincinnati, and former Ohio secretary of state and treasurer. [28], [74], [75]

Blackwell had previously spoken against Trump:

 “Donald Trump is an existential threat to conservatism. He is arguably one of the most divisive figures in modern political history and his candidacy represents not only a threat to the Republican Party, Donald Trump is dragging the nation into the political gutter. It's time for conservative voters to open their eyes and understand the nation deserves better than this political huckster.” [76]

Affiliations

    Mike McKenna - DOE/NRC (Left Post)

    Mike McKenna

    Michael McKenna is the president of MWR Strategies. DeSmog reports that McKenna's lobbying career started with an ethics scandal. Before resigning from the administration of Virginia's then-Governor George Allen in 1997, McKenna was implicated in the authorship and distribution of what the Associated Press called a“dirty tricks” memo written in response to a report published by the Joint Legislative Audit and Review Commission (JLARC), which had critiqued the Department of Environmental Quality for which McKenna had then served as policy director and spokesman. [77], [78]

    McKenna left his post on Trump's Energy Department transition team in November, 2016. “Although I have reluctantly decided that I cannot continue on the transition in an official capacity, I am excited about continuing to work to make America great again,” McKenna said in a November 18 statement. [161]

    McKenna currently lobbies for Southern CompanyKoch IndustriesGDF Suez and Dow Chemical. His past clients have included Past clients have included corporations like American Electric Power, pipeline company El Paso and the National Petrochemical Refiners Association. [77]

    Affiliations

    • MWR Strategies President. [79]
    • Andres-McKenna Research Group — Former Lobbyist. [80]
    • Duke Group — Former Lobbyist. [80]
    • Teco Energy — Former Lobbyist. [80]
    • Lazarus Group — Former Lobbyist. [80]

    Thomas Pyle - DOE

    In December, 2016 Thomas Pyle was chosen to head Donald Trump's energy transition team after Mike McKenna stepped down. Pyle's history of lobbying for the oil and gas industry seems to run counter to the “drain the swamp” strategy declared by Trump. Pyle also has a history of opposing renewable energy, describing subsidies for renewables as “perpetuating a cycle of dependency where politicians feed money to industries that then instruct their lobbyists to support those same politicians.” [165]

    Pyle revealed more details of the “The Trump Administration's Energy Plan,” including 14 policy proposals, in a December 2016 memo (see PDF), also obtained and published by the Center for Media and Democracy. His proposal included withdrawing from the 2015 Paris Climate agreement, increasing federal oil and natural gas leasing, eliminating the Clean Power Plan, and moving forward with the Keystone XL and Dakota Access pipelines. [162], [163], [164]

    OpenSecrets.org describes the “revolving door” of Thomas Pyle's employment history: [166]

    Myron Ebell - EPA

    Donald Trump chose key climate change denier Myron Ebell of the Competitive Enterprise Institute (CEI) to oversee his “EPA Transition Team.” [81], [82]

    Myron Ebell is the chair of the Cooler Heads Coalition, a group of organizations “that question global warming alarmism and oppose energy rationing policies.” Ebell has celebrated his poor track record with environmental groups, as evidenced in a biography (PDF) submitted before his testimony in Congress that noted he and three of his CEI colleagues were featured in “A Field Guide to Climate Criminals” distributed at the UN climate meeting in Montreal in December 2005. Ebell was also listed as one of the six top “Misleaders” by Rolling Stone magazine. [83]

    Affiliations

    Steve Hart - Labor

    Steve Hart is the the chairman of Williams & Jensen, a Washington, D.C.-based “government affairs firm” that lobbies for big businesses with a client list including Visa, the American Council of Life Insurers, Anthem, Cheniere Energy, Coca-Cola, General Electric, HSBC, Pfixer, PhRMA and United Airlines. Hart previously worked at the Labor Department in the Pension Welfare Benefits Program and on the Office of Management and Budget's ERISA Reorganization Task Force under Ronald Reagan. [87]

    Affiliations

    Andrew Bremberg - HHS

    Andrew Bremberg previously served as policy director for Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker's presidential campaign. Prior to that, he worked at the federal healthcare agency under President George W. Bush administration. Bremberg is currently Policy Advisor and Counsel on Nominations for U.S. Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell.  [88]

    Shirley Yharra - DOT

    Shirley Yharra is a former Virginia secretary of transportation, and worked in federal transportion during the Reagan Administration. She is a former senior transportation policy analyst  at the conservative Reason Foundation. Ybarra also served as senior policy advisor and special assistant for policy for U.S. Secretary of Transportation Elizabeth Dole from 1983 to 1987. [89], [90]

    Affiliations

    B. Evers/ J. Manning - Education

    Bill Evers

    Williamson (Bill) Evers (Education Lead) is a Research Fellow at the Hoover Institution and a member of their K-12 Education Task Force. He was the US assistant secretary of education for policy from 2007 to 2009. Evers served in Iraq as a senior adviser for education to Administrator L. Paul Bremer of the Coalition Provisional Authority. [91], [92]

    James F. Manning (Education Deputy) was chief of staff to Deputy Education Bill Hansen during the George W. Bush administration. Manning was also an official at the Office of Federal Student Aid during the first several years of the Obama administration. [93]

    David Bernhardt - Interior

    David Bernardt

    David Bernhardt represents large energy companies at the nation's second-largest lobbying firm, Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck. He was the Interior Department's solicitor, deputy solicitor, deputy chief of staff, counselor to the secretary of the Interior and director of the Office of Congressional and Legislative Affairs under George W. Bush. [94], [95]

    Affiliations

    Michael Torrey - Agriculture

    Michael Torrey

    Michael Torrey runs his own lobbying firm, specializing in “food, agriculture, risk management and financial services.” He is a former advisor to Senate Majority Leader Bobe Dole, and to Senators Nancy Landon Kassebaum and Sheila Frahm, deputy chief of staff at USDA. Torrey has lobbied for a number of big businesses including  the American Beverage Association, Dean Foods, and the Crop Insurance and Reinsurance Bureau. [96], [97]

    Affiliations

    • Michael Torrey Associates — Principal and Founder. [96]
    • USDA— Former Deputy Chief of Staff. [96]
    • Commodity Future Trading Commission — Former Special Assistant. [96]

    Management/Budget

    Ed Meese & Kay Coles James — Management/Budget

    Edwin Meese

    Ed Meese, former Attorney General, was a long-time aide to Ronald Reagan. Meese was a critic of Donald Trump's candidacy for presidency, Politico reportsIn January, Meese had written that Trump's “broadsides” against fellow GOP candidates had served “to divide and discourage potential Republican-party supporters.” Meese is associated with a range of public policy councils and think tanks including the Heritage Foundation, Hoover Institution, and the Federalist Soceity. [98], [99]

    Affilations

    P. Winfree / L. Springer - OMB

    Paul Winfree

    Paul Winfreewas formerly listed as  director of the Thomas A. Roe Institute for Economic Policy Studies at The Heritage Foundation, and the conservative think tank's Richard F. Aster fellow. He was previously a senior policy analyst in Heritage’s Center for Data Analysis. [103]

    Affiliations

    Linda Springer

    Linda Springeris the eighth Director of the United States Office of Personnel Management. Prior to her career in public service, Springer was Senior Vice President and Controller at Provident Mutual and Vice President and Product Manager at Penn Mutual Life Insurance Company. [104]

    Kay Coles James - OPM

    Kay Coles James is a former director of the U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM). She was President Bush's principal advisor in matters of personnel administration. Prior to her appointment under George W. Bush, she served under Virginia Secretary of Health and Human Resources under then-Governor George Allen. She is the President and Founder of the Gloucester Institute. [105], [106]

    She is the former senior vice president of the Family Research Council,  a Christian pro-life group and lobbying organization. Fellow transition team member Ken Blackwell also has ties to the Family Research Council. [107]

    Agency Transform & Innovation

    Beth Kaufman/Jonathan Beck

    Other Team Members

    Ado Machida — Executive Actions, Regulations, and Immigration Transition Team. 

    Ado Machida

    Ado Machida joined the Executive Actions, Regulations, and Immigration Transition Team. Machida previously served as deputy assistant to the vice president and Director of the Office of Domestic Policy under Vice President Dick Cheney from 2002-2003. Prior to working under Bush, Machida was a lobbyist for Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld; Kaizen Strategy Group; and BAE Systems, where he lobbied for major companies such as American Airlines, Time Warner, Walgreens, AT&T, Honeywell, Lucent Technologies, and several Native American tribes, reports Politico.  [108]

    Affiliations

    • International Stability Operations Association ISOA— President (2013 - present). [109]
    • The Kaizen Strategy Group, LLC— Former President (2012 - 2013). [109]
    • BAE Systems— Vice President, Government Relations (2009 - 2011). [109]
    • The Kaizen Strategy Group, LLC— President and Managing Principal (2007 - 2009). [109]
    • Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP— Partner (2004 - 2006). [109]
    • The White House— Deputy Assistant to the Vice President, Director, Office of Domestic Policy, OVP[109]
    • The Larson Company — General Manager, Corporate Strategy. [109]
    • Goldman Sachs —  Financial Analyst (1986 - 1989). [109]

    David Schnare - EPA

    David Schnare

    David Schnare is also on Trump's EPA transition team, reports The Guardian. Schnare is general counsel to the Energy and Environment Legal Institute (formerly the American Tradition Institute), a group which regularly opposes efforts to combat climate change. Schnare recently launched a number of Freedom of Information Act Requests with state attorneys general who had been investigating ExxonMobil's knowledge of climate change. [139], [140]

    The Energy and Environment Legal Institute has noted fossil fuel industry ties. It was listed in Arch Coal's 2015 bankruptcy documents as a creditor, and the group's other lawyers, Chris Horner, was directly funded by the coal company Alpha Natural Resources. [141], [142]

    Affiliations

    Steven Groves — Department of State 'Landing Team'

    Steven Groves

    On November 21, 2016, news broke that Steven Groves would lead Trump's Department of State “landing team.” Groves is the Bernard and Barbara Lomas Senior Research Fellow at the Heritage foundation's Margaret Thatcher Center for Freedom. Groves previously worked as senior counsel to the U.S. Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations and as an associate at Boies, Schiller & Flexner LLP, specializing in commercial litigation. [146], [147]

    In an article Groves co-wrote at The Daily Signal just days before the announcement he was joining the Trump team, he outlined steps that the new administration should take to “unwind” the Paris climate agreement including “ Withdraw from the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change,” “Dismantle domestic regulations that are all economic pain, no climate benefit,” and “Prohibit taxpayer funding” to green projects. [148]

    Affiliations

    “Shadow Transition Team”

    Politico reports that the Heritage Foundation has emerged as one of the most influential forces behind Donald Trump's transition team. [159]

    “Part gatekeeper, part brain trust and part boots on the ground, Heritage is both a major presence on the transition team itself and a crucial conduit between Trump’s orbit and the once-skeptical conservative leaders who ultimately helped get him elected,” Politco's Katie Glueck writes.  [159]

    Three sources with conservative groups said that Heritage employees were tracking resumes, looking to staff Trump's administration with conservative appointees. One source described the effort as a “shadow transition team” and “an effort to have the right kind of people in there.”  [159]

    The transition team is being assisted from Heritage officials including:  [159]

    A source reported that Rebekah Mercer had also been working with Heritage to recruit appointees for positions at the undersecretary level and below.  [159]

    Economic Advisory Council

    Time  reported on an initial list of Trump's Economic Advisors on August 5, 2016: According to an August 11 Press release, Trump had expanded his Economic Advisory Team to include a number of new members. The combined lists are below: [110], [111]

    Kathleen Hartnett-White

    Kathleen Hartnett-White is the director of the Armstrong Center for Energy & the Environment at the Texas Public Policy Foundation (TPPF), a group funded by ExxonMobil, Koch network, and RJ Reynolds. Hartnett-White directors the TPPF's “Fueling Freedom” project which seeks to “Explain the forgotten moral case for fossil fuels” while “building a multi-state coalition to push back against the EPA’s unconstitutional efforts to take over the electric power sector by regulating CO2 via the Clean Power Plan” as well as “End the regulation of CO2 as a pollutant.”  [112], [113], [114]

    Prior to her work at the TPPF, Hartnett-White worked as Chairman and Commissioner of the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ). Prior to 2001, she served as then-Governor George W. Bush's appointee to the Texas Water Development Board. She is also member of the Advisory Committee for the CO2 Coalition, formerly known as the George C. Marshall Institute. The CO2 Coalition's tag line is “Carbon dioxide, a nutrient vital for life,” and seeks to highlight “well-established uncertainties, the limitations of climate models, and the consequences of mandated reductions in CO2 emissions.” [115]

    Affiliations

    Other Economic Advisory Council Members include:

    • Diane Hendricks
    • Darlene Jordan
    • Betsy McCaughey
    • Brooke Rollins
    • Anthony Scaramucci 
    • Carla Sands
    • Judy Shelton
    • Liz Uihlein

    Stephen Moore

    Stephen Moore

    Stephen Moore is the founder and former President of the Club for Growth and currently a visiting fellow at the “arch-conservative“ Heritage Foundation. Moore has held a wide range of positions at conservative think tanks including the Cato Institute (former senior fellow), the Media Research Center (former advisor), and Donors Capital Fund (former director). Stephen Moore, who has called climate change “climate improvement,” has repeatedly cited the debunked Oregon Petition as well as Bjorn Lomborg's “Copenhagen Consensus” to suggest there is still a debate on climate science. More has also called anyone who believes in man-made climate change “Stalinistic.” [117], [118], [119]

    Affiliations

    Other Economic Advisory Team Members Include:

    Tom Barrack
    Andy Beal
    Stephen M. Calk
    Dan DiMicco
    Steve Feinberg
    Dan Kowalski
    Howard M. Lorber
    David Malpass
    Steven Mnuchin
    Peter Navarro
    John Paulson
    Steven Roth

    Affiliations

    Donald Trump's Financial Disclosure Report (PDF) lists Trump's connections to over five hundred companies. [20]

    Ethics lawyers who had worked for President George W. Bush, presidential candidates Bob Dole, John Kerry, John McCain and Mitt Romney, and New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg toldCNNMoneythat Trump would have more potential conflicts of interest due to his businesses than any other former president. [136]

    “This is certainly going to present an unprecedented ethical dilemma if Trump wins,” said Kenneth Gross, a partner at Skadden Arps Slate Meagher & Flom, who provided legal assistance to several presidential candidates during their campaigns. “He can't just get amnesia. He's stuck with the knowledge of what he owns.”

    In November 2016, Congresswoman Katherine Clark introduced legislation (H.R. 6340) that would require U.S. Presidents to resolve any conflicts of interest with regard to financial interests. While current law prohibits federal office holders from engaging in government business when they could gain a profit, the President and Vice President are excempt from that statute. [137]

    Publications

    Books written by Donald Trump include:

    DeSmog Reporting on Trump

    Resources

    1. Donald Trump Biography,” Encyclopedia of World Biography. Archived November 18, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/hcFk2

    2. Louis Jacobson. “Yes, Donald Trump did call climate change a Chinese hoax,” Politifact, June 3, 2016. Archived November 16, 2016. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/s8YXn

    3. Emily Flitter and Steve Holland. “Exclusive: Skeptical Trump says would renegotiate global climate deal,Reuters, May 18, 2016. Archived November 17, 2016. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/1ahVF

    4. “'The moment we finally decided to save our planet': US and China ratify Paris climate deal,” The Telegraph, September 3, 2016. Archived November 20, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/yXEDX

    5. Full Interview and Transcript: Donald Trump on 'FOX News Sunday' With Chris Wallace,” RealClear Politics, October 18, 2015. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/umZl0

    6. An America First Energy Plan,” DonaldJTrump.com. Archived November 17, 2016. Archived .pdf on file at DeSmog.

    7. Trump choosing leaders to roll back environmental, energy policies,” CBC News, November 14, 2016. Archived November 16, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/8kCjO

    8. Energy Independence,” GreatAgain.gov. Archived November 17, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/xXBbj

    9. David Roberts and Brad Plumer. “Most people are wildly underestimating what Trump’s win will mean for the environment,” Vox, November 14, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/dnkyH

    10. A transcript of Donald Trump’s meeting with The Washington Post editorial board,” The Washington Post, March 21, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/3oWdu

    11. Donald Trump: ‘I Don’t Believe in Climate Change’,” The Wall Street Journal, September 24, 2015. Archived .pdf on file at DeSmog. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/qZ7ZN

    12. Fox Regular Donald Trump Decries Climate Change 'Hoax',” Media Matters, January 6, 2014. Archived .mp4 on file at DeSmog.

    13. Rebecca Harrington. “President-elect Donald Trump doesn't believe in climate change. Here's his platform on the environment,” Business Insider, November 9, 2016. Archived November 16, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/3Kbki

    14. Trump Says He Will Cut The EPA As Prez: 'We'll Be Fine With The Environment',” Talking Points Memo, October 18, 2015. Archived November 17, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/aWqQL

    15. DONALD J. TRUMPFORPRESIDENT, INC. RESPONSETOAMERICANENERGYALLIANCEQUESTIONNAIRE”” (PDF), American Energy Alliance.

    16. The Trump Files: Donald Thinks Asbestos Fears Are a Mob Conspiracy,” Mother Jones, June 9, 2016. Archived November 16, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/YahP4

    17. Sharon Kelly. “Trump Touts Drilling's Potential, Botches Facts, at Shale Industry Conference,” DeSmog, September 23, 2016.

    18. Top Contributors, federal election data for 2016 cycle,” OpenSecrets.org. Accessed November 16, 2016.

    19. Independent Expenditures, Donald Trump, 2016 cycle,” OpenSecrets.org. Accessed November 19, 2016.

    20. “Executive Branch Personnel Public FInancial Disclosure Report (OGE form 2783)” (PDF)FEC, July 15, 2015. Archived .pdf on file at DeSmog. Retrieved from OpenSecrets.org.

    21. Donald Trump says his financial disclosures more than make up for lack of releasing tax returns,” PolitiFact, September 7, 2016. Archived November 16, 2016. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/XvBry

    22. 7 Things We Learned From Donald Trump’s Personal Financial Disclosure Form,” ABC News, May 18, 2016. Archived November 16, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/qM4Cp

    23. Gregor Aisch, Alicia Parlapiano, and Karen Yourish. “What’s in Donald Trump’s 104-Page Financial Disclosure?The New York Times, May 18, 2016. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/dN980

    24. Trump victory reverses U.S. energy and environmental priorities,” The Washington Post, November 9, 2016.  Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/OHxbG

    25. #StaffTheSwamp: Anti-Establishment Trump Choosing Establishment Staff,” DeSmog, November 11, 2016.

    26. Isaac Arnsdorf. “Lobbyists abound on Trump transition,” Politico, November 10, 2016. Archived November 18, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/ByqVc

    27. Julie Hirschfeld Davis, Mark Mazzetti, and Maggie Haberman. “Firings and Discord Put Trump Transition Team in a State of Disarray,” The New York Times, November 15, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/z4eaE

    28. From Lobbyists To Loyalists, See Who's On Donald Trump's Transition Team,” NPR, November 16, 2016. Archived November 17, 2016. Archive.is URL:https://archive.is/rHtJ3

    29. Ron Nicol: Senior Advisor,” Boston Consulting Group. Archived November 17, 2016. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/iP1U5

    30. GTSI Elects Lieutenant General Joseph 'Keith' Kellogg Jr., U.S. Army -Ret-, to Board of Directors,” BusinessWire, October 29, 2003. Archived November 17, 2016. Archive.is URL:https://archive.is/5n86B

    31. Former CACI International exec is part of Donald Trump's foreign policy team,” Washington Business Journal, March 21, 2016. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/fv19b

    32. (Press Release). “Joseph K. Kellogg, Jr. Joins Cubic As SVP Ground Combat Programs,” Cubic, July 16, 2009. Archived November 17, 2016. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/IpPof

    33. Executive Profile: Joseph K. Kellogg Jr.” Bloomberg. Archived November 17, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/PpJoK

    34. Michael Biesecker, Jeff Horwitz, and Vivian Salama. “Trump relies on Washington insiders to build administration,” The Washington Post, November 12, 2016. Archived November 13, 2016. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/uuYeG

    35. “Biography: Mira Ricardel” (PDF), Boing. Archived .pdf on file at DeSmog.

    36. Michael J. Meese,” Task & Purpose. Archived November 17, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/AbfDe

    37. Amber Phillips. “Who is Mike Pence?The Washington Post,  October 4, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/8AJsg

    38. Samantha Allen. “Fetal Anomaly Is the Most Extreme Abortion Bill Yet,” The Daily Beast, March 10, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/OrFHD

    39. What Media Should Know About Trump’s Reported VP Pick, Indiana Gov. Mike Pence,” Media Matters, July 14, 2016. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/7EML6

    40. ALEC has huge influence in Indiana,” Indianapolis Star, October 5, 2014. Archived November 17, 2016. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/75ZD5

    41. Tim Grimes. “Pence appoints more Daniels administration officials to key posts,” The Statehouse File.com, December 5, 2012. Archived November 17, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/vpSE8

    42. ALEC’s Report Card on American Education” (PDF), American Legislative Exchange Council, 2014.

    43. ALEC just asked your state rep. to join; Why is NM a top-ALEC recruiting target? Here's the answer,” ProgressNow New Mexico, April 11, 2015. Archived November 17, 2016. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/lJxEx

    44. Mike Rogers is off Donald Trump's transition team,CBS News, November 15, 2016. Archived November 17, 2016. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/3SacY

    45. James Jay Carafano, Ph.D.The Heritage Foundation. Archived November 18, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/JlNOe

    46. The Cooler Heads Coalition,” GlobalWarming.org. Archived April 12, 2004. Archived .pdf on file at DeSmogBlog.

    47. Next President Shouldn't Be a Mad Scientist,” Heritage Foundation, June 28, 2016. Archived November 18, 2016. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/GmizM

    48. “Cindy Hayden,” LinkedIn Profile. Archived .pdf on file at DeSmog. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/T8knR

    49. David Usborne. “Donald Trump may weigh respected foreign policy adviser Ron Burgess after intelligence chief James Clapper resigns,” The Independent, November 17, 2016. Archived November 18, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/5rmeL

    50. (Press Release). DDNI/Requirements Nominated to Head DNI Staff” (PDF), Office of the Director of National Intelligence, May 17, 2007. Archived .pdf on file at DeSmog.

    51. Jason Horowitz, Helene Cooper, Jennifer Steinhauer and Adam Goldman. “Trump Transition Nominates No One — But Does Name Inaugural Committee,” The New York Times, November 17, 2016.  Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/IStVi

    52. Team,” Global Impact Inc. Archived April 20, 2016. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/8Eh8h

    53. Matthew C. Freedman,”  Global Impact Inc. Retrieved from Google Cache (November 2, 2016. Archive.is URL:  https://archive.is/DDpoJ

    54. Edmund H. Mahony. “Connecticut Prosecutor O'Connor Casualty Of Purge In Trump Transition Team,” Hartford Courant, November 16, 2016. Archived November 17, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/B7L2X

    55. Bill Walton,” Rappahannock Ventures. Archived November 18, 2016. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/NhYyn

    56. Bill Walton,” Discovery Institute. Archived November 18, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/nku9q

    57. DAVIDMALPASS,” Encima Global LLC. Archived November 18, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/9xb7d

    58. Kai Ryssdal. “David Malpass on advising Donald Trump,” Marketplace, August 17, 2016. Archived November 18, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/qfxLp

    59. Paola Chavez and Veronica Stracqualursi. “Six Key People Helping Donald Trump Raise Campaign Cash,” ABC News, June 9, 2016. Archived November 18, 2016. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/PUh50

    60. Kevin Cirilli and Terrence Dopp. “Trump Seeks to Install Christie Ally as Top Republican Party Fundraiser,” Bloomberg, March 9, 2016. Archived November 18, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/8ntd8

    61. Sara Murray and Theodore Schleifer. “How Donald Trump won over big donorsCNN Politics, May 19, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/3T560

    62. Executive Profile: Ray W. Washburne,” Bloomberg. Archived November 18, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/yr0vt

    63. About Dan,” DanDimicco.com. Archived November 18, 2016. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/YzKUY

    64. Brad Johnson. “Nucor CEO: Funding Of Heartland Institute’s Climate Denial ‘Is Entirely Appropriate’,” ThinkProgress, June 14, 2012. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/gyceV

    65. Richard Littlemore. “Heartland Billboard: 'the most prominent advocates of global warming aren’t scientists; they are murderers, tyrants, and madmen',” DeSmog, May 4, 2012.

    66. Paul Atkins,” Bloomberg. Archived November 18, 2016. Archive.is URL:  https://archive.is/1Z7ty

    67. Christine J. Toretti,” Republican Party of Pennsylvania. Archived November 18, 2016. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/2O0hk

    68. Trump Campaign Announces Women For Trump Statewide Leadership Team,” Republican Party of Pennsylvania. Archived November 18, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/MH6LQ

    69. Jeffrey Eisenach,” American Enterprise Institute. Archived November 18, 2016. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/xS4pd

    70. Steve Horn. “Revealed: NERA Economic Consulting is Third Party Contractor for DOELNG Export Study,” DeSmog, November 19, 2012.

    71. Jeff Horwitz. “Trump advisers back deregulation, privatized Social Security,” AP, November 12, 2016. Archived November 18, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/CBh6E

    72. About the Conservative Caucus,” The Conservative Caucus. Archived November 18, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/p3Ave

    73. Board of Directors,” The Center for Long-Term Care Reform, Inc. November 18, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/OMJHw

    74. Family Research Council,' SourceWatch.

    75. Family Reserch Council: Client Profile,” OpenSecrets.Org.

    76. Ken Blackwell, former Ohio treasurer, secretary of state, takes key role in Donald Trump transition team,” Cleveland.com,  November 10, 2016. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/lzRQf

    77. Steve Horn. “Drain the Swamp? Mike McKenna, Head of Trump Energy Team, Began Lobbying Career with Ethics Scandal,” DeSmog, November 16, 2016.

    78. Karl Blankenship. “Virginia DEQ reorganization raises turmoil, controversy,” Bay Journal, July 1, 1997. Archived November 18, 2016. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/fMa1s

    79. Michael McKenna: MWR Strategies,” MWR Strategies. Archived November 19, 2016. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/JMadp

    80. Revolving Door: McKenna, Michael,” OpenSecrets.org. Accessed November 18, 2016. Archive.is URL:https://archive.is/JpUcR

    81. Graham Readfearn. “Climate Science Denialist Myron Ebell Named As Trump Adviser As Debate Skirts Climate,” DeSmog, September 27, 2016.

    82. Brady Dennis. “Trump taps climate-change skeptic to oversee EPA transition,” The Washington Post, November 11, 2016. Archived November 16, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/0DUhF

    83. Myron Ebell Director of Freedom Action and Director, Center for Energy and Environment Competitive Enterprise Institute” (PDF), U.S. House of Representatives Document Repository. PDF created October 17, 2013. Archived .pdf on file at DeSmog.

    84. Myron Ebell: Director, Center for Energy and Environment,” Competitive Enterprise Institute. Archived December 29, 2011. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/mxjzo

    85. About Us,” Freedom Action. Archived May 30, 2016. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/CtXN9

    86. Expert: Myron Ebell,” Heartland Institute. Archived May 30, 2016. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/fYCqS

    87. J. Steven Hart: Chairman,” Williams & Jensen. Archived November 19, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/yENyt

    88. So much for draining the swamp! Trump's transition team is full  of lobbyists and includes a climate change-denier and an ex-federal prosecutor involved in the mass firings of U.S. attorneys,” Associated Press, November 12, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/3nN4k

    89. Reason Foundation Experts: Shirley Ybarra,” Reason Foundation. Archived November 18, 2016. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/7AMEM

    90. Dug Begley. “Trump's highway improvement plans come with a price of maybe more Texas toll roads,” Houston Chronicle, November 10, 2016. Archived November 18, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/CJ9bX

    91. Emily Deruy. “Donald Trump and the Future of Education,” The Atlantic, November 9, 2016.Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/dwgbu

    92. Williamson M. Evers: Research Fellow,” Hoover Institution. Archived November 18, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/eyVcb

    93. Insurgent Trump taps GOP insiders, lobbyists for transition,” Politico, November 11, 2016. Archived June 1, 2017. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/EBG0q

    94. Donald Trump’s transition team is assembling like a super-lobbyist Voltron,” Quartz, November 11, 2016. Archived November 18, 2016. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/IB5Mt

    95. David Longly Bernhardt: Shareholder,” Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck. Archived November 18, 2016. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/kLmj9

    96. Michael Torrey,” Michael Torrey Associates, LLC. Archived November 19, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/W6jNC

    97. Michael Torrey Assoc. : Firm Profile,” OpenSecrets.org. Accessed November 18, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/78n3g

    98. Andrew Restuccia. “Sources: Former Trump critic Ed Meese joins transition team,” Politico, September 26, 2016. Archived November 19, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/JAcXe

    99. Conservatives against Trump,” National Review, January 21, 2016. Archived November 18, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/mUCje

    100. Edwin Meese III,” The Heritage Foundation. Archived November 18, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/7dacD

    101. Edwin Meese III: Distinguished Visiting Fellow,” Hoover Institution. Archived November 19, 2016. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/47Qbf

    102. Board of Directors,” The Federalist Society. Archived November 19, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/VH7BU

    103. Paul Winfree,” The Heritage Foundation. Archived November 19, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/fErNb

    104. Our Mission, Role & History: AGENCYLEADERSHIP,” OPM.Gov. Archived November 19, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/vHOmt 

    105. U.S. Office of Personnel Management: Kay Coles James: Former Director,” Archive.opm.gov. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/fCkMe

    106. KAYCOLESJAMES,” The Gloucester Institute. Archived November 19, 2016. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/tMn3X

    107. KAYCOLESJAMES,” The Gloucester Institute. Archived November 19, 2016. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/tMn3X

    108. Nancy Cook. “Domestic policy aide to Vice President Cheney joins Trump transition team,” Politico, September 26, 2016. Archived November 19, 2016. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/U01v3

    109. Ado Machida,” LinkedIn. Archived November 19, 2016. Archived .pdf on file at DeSmog.

    110. Will Drabold. “Meet Donald Trump’s Economic Advisors,” Time, August 5, 2016. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/ug9BX

    111. (Press Release). “EXPANSIONOFTRUMPECONOMICADVISORYCOUNCIL,” P2016.org, August 11, 2016. Archived September 28, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/NAD85

    112. Forrest Wilder. “Revealed: The Corporations and Billionaires that Fund the Texas Public Policy Foundation,” Texas Observer, August 24, 2012. Archived November 16, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/TOvci

    113. Home,” Fueling Freedom. Archived November 13, 2016. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/y99w1

    114. What We Do…” Fueling Freedom. Archived November 13, 2016. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/g8bgS

    115. About,” Co2Coalition. Archived April 14, 2016. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/9FCJk

    116. Kathleen Hartnett White, Distinguished Senior Fellow-In-Residence & Director, Armstrong Center for Energy & the Environment,” Texas Public Policy Foundation. Archived July 4, 2016. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/2mZEt

    117. Moore Passes Torch to Toomey,” The Club For Growth, January 6, 2005. Archived March 6, 2005. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/Bnb6H

    118. Rachael Bade. “Stephen Moore to huddle with House GOP whips,” Politico, November 14, 2016. Archived November 14, 2016. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/ywwdJ

    119. Denier Stephen Moore says climate change is 'climate improvement' and 'the truth is the 1930s was a warmer decade than the last decade',” ThinkProgress, June 20, 2009. Archived November 15, 2016. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/t3hNI

    120. Moore Passes Torch to Toomey,” The Club For Growth, January 6, 2005. Archived March 6, 2005. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/Bnb6H

    121. Stephen Moore,” The Heritage Foundation. Archived November 15, 2016. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/juKhK

    122. Stephen Moore: Former Senior Fellow,” Cato Institute. Archived November 14, 2016. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/li4X3

    123. Media Research Center: 2003 Annual Report” (PDF), Media Research Center. Archived .pdf on file at DeSmog.

    124. About the Media Research Center,” Media Research Center. Archived November 14, 2016. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/gUEIm

    125. Stephen Moore. “Putting Taxpayers First: A Federal Budget Plan to Benefit the Next Generation of American Taxpayers” (PDF), Institute for Policy Innovation, February, 2004. Archived .pdf on file at DeSmog.

    126. Executive Profile: Stephen Moore,” Bloomberg. Archived November 14, 2016. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/mCl19

    127. About the Media Research Center,” Media Research Center. Archived November 14, 2016. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/gUEIm

    128. Donors Capital Fund, Inc. 2010 Form 990 (PDF- retrieved from DocumentCloud.

    129. Board of Scholars,” American Legislative Exchange Council. Archived April 13, 2011. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/Q2Ij5

    130. Searle Freedom Trust 2014 990-PF (PDF). On file at DeSmog.

    131. Stephen Moore. “Immigration and the Rise and Decline  of American Cities,” Hoover Institution. Archived June 30, 2011. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/INz9E

    132. Stephen Moore,” CNBC.com. Archived November 15, 2016. Archived .pdf on file at DeSmog.

    133. Hoover Essay in Public Policy: Welfare For The Well-Off: How Business Subsidies Fleece Taxpayers by Stephen Moore,” Hoover Institution, May 5, 1999. Archived November 14, 2016. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/pQn2S

    134. Stephen Moore,” SourceWatch. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/duh9M

    135. Dana Milbank. “Brothers in Arms, But Sisters at Odds,” The Washington Post, August 31, 2005. Archived .pdf on file at DeSmog. Archiveis URLhttps://archive.is/kxnyC

    136. David Goldman. “Donald Trump's 500 businesses would pose 'unprecedented ethical dilemma',” CNN Money, March 17, 2016. Archived November 19, 2016. Archive.is URL:  https://archive.is/K7DvV

    137. (Press Release). “Clark introduces bill to ensure President-elect addresses conflicts of interest,” Katherineclarke.house.gov, November 17, 2016. Archived November 20, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/61BhY

    138. Glenn Thrush and Louis Nelson. “Pence to take over Trump's transition effort from Christie,” Politico, November 11, 2016. Archived November 20, 2016. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/8MqLU

    139. What will Trump’s presidency mean for American science policy? The Guardian, November 17, 2016. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/DbUap

    140. Senior Leadership,” Energy and Environment Legal Institute (formerly American Tradition Institute). Archived November 22, 2016. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/PEEUo

    141. Nick Surgey. “Bankruptcy Filing Shows Arch Coal Funding for Climate Denial Legal Group,” PRWatch, February 24, 2016. Archived March 15, 2016.

    142. Lee Fang. “Attorney Hounding Climate Scientists Is Covertly Funded By Coal Industry,” The Intercept, August 25, 2015. Archived March 16, 2016. Archived .pdf on file at DeSmogBlog.

    143. Senior Leadership,” Energy and Environment Legal Institute (formerly American Tradition Institute). Archived November 22, 2016. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/PEEUo

    144. Staff and Scholars,” Thomas Jefferson Institute for Public Policy. Archived November 22, 2016. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/npvcn

    145. Heartland Experts: David Schnare,” The Heartland Institute. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/vHBTA

    146. Kochs Control Trump-Puppet Through Appointees,” DeSmog (Guest Post), November 22, 2016.

    147. Steven Groves,” The Heritage Foundation. Archived November 22, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/YcGzi

    148. Nicolas Loris and Steven Groves. “The Pathway Out of Paris,” The Daily Signal, November 17, 2016. Archived November 22, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/3AeTu 

    149. Michael D. Shear, Julie Hirschfeld, and Maggie Haberman. “Donald Trump Seems to Retreat on Some Promises,” The New York Times, November 22, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/JcJz3

    150. Donald Trump disavows his alt-right and neo-Nazi supporters in meeting with New York Times,” The Independent, November 22, 2016. Archived November 22, 2016. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/D7Ukd

    151. (Press Release). “President-Elect Donald J. Trump Announces New Implementation Phase of Presidential Transition Team,” Greatagain.gov, November 11, 2016. Archived November 23, 2016. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/wOasa

    152. Joshua Green. “This Man Is the Most Dangerous Political Operative in America,” Bloomberg, October 8, 2015. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/JxIgK

    153. Lloyd Grove. “How Breitbart Unleashes Hate Mobs to Threaten, Dox, and Troll Trump Critics,” The Daily Beast, February 29, 2016.

    154. Kyle Mantyla. “Glenn Beck Accuses Breitbart Of Acting As The 'Goebbels' To Donald Trump's 'Brownshirts',” Right Wing Watch, February 24, 2016. Archived March 4, 2016.

    155. Erika Bolstad. “How Steve Bannon is shaping Trump's views on 'climate change',” ClimateWire November 18, 2016. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/Wmeb3

    156. James Delingpole. “It's tough being the only British journalist who's right about everything,” The Spectator, November 19, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/QvHwM

    157. Michael D. Shear, Maggie Haberman, and Alan Rappeport. “Donald Trump Picks Reince Priebus as Chief of Staff and Stephen Bannon as Strategist,” The New York Times, November 13, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/ee1yR

    158. Republican National Committee,” Recipient profile, Conservative Transparency. Accessed November 23, 2016.

    159. Katie Glueck. “Trump’s shadow transition team,” Politico, November 22, 2016. Archived November 24, 2016. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/AdrXn

    160. Joe Romm. “Priebus confirms that climate denial will be the official policy of Trump’s administration,” ThinkProgress, November 28, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/lq9fE

    161. Energy lobbyist leaves DOE landing team,Greenwire, November 18, 2016. Archived December 7, 2016. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/R2nHz

    162. Pyle-What-to-Expect-From-the-Trump-Administration.pdf” From the Desk of Thomas Pyle. Retrieved from Documentcloud.org. Archived .pdf on file at DeSmog.

    163. Nick Surgey. “REVEALEDTHE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION’S ENERGY PLAN,” The Center for Media and Democracy, December 4, 2016. Archive.is URL:  https://archive.is/R9rzX

    164. Ben Jervey. “Trump Energy Agenda Revealed in Thomas Pyle Memo,” DeSmog, December 7, 2016.

    165. Julian Spector. “Trump Energy Team Swaps Out Its Transition Team Leader,” Green Tech Media, December 1, 2016.  Archived December 7, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/uDcE5

    166. Pyle, Thomas J,” OpenSecrets.org. Archived October 19, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/ABxdK

    167. Ben Adler and Rebecca Leber. “Donald Trump once backed urgent climate action. Wait, what?Grist, June 8, 2016. Archived December 7, 2016. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/wh2D1

    168. Trump cool to global warning,” PageSix.com, February 14, 2010. Archived December 7, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/QxOJb

    169. Jeremy Schulman. “Every Insane Thing Donald Trump Has Said About Global Warming,” Mother Jones, December 5, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/ph8Dw

    170. Kate Sheppard. “Climategate: What Really Happened?Mother Jones, April 21, 2011. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/8pxIB

    171. Donald Trump Discusses Global Warming on Celebrity Apprentice,” YouTube Video uploaded by user Climate Desk on November 29, 2016. Archived .mp4 on file at DeSmog.

    172. Nathaniel Vinton. “Donald Trump, who calls climate change a ‘hoax’, gave $5K donation to Protect Our Winters in 2014,” New York Daily News, March 15, 2016. Archived December 7, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/lcrsb

    173. 2014 990-PF form, The Donald J. Trump Foundation. PDF archived at DeSmog.

    174. Donald Trump Returns,” HughHewitt, September 21, 2015. Archived December 7, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/jPhT2

    175. Tim McDonnell. “Donald Trump Just Gave the Dumbest Rebuttal to Obama's Big Paris Speech,” Mother Jones, December 1, 2015. Archived .mp4 on file at DeSmog. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/PfB2t

    176. Transcript of Donald Trump’s Dec. 30 speech in Hilton Head, S.C.,” The Kansas City Star, January 20, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/mCMoF 

    177. Ashton Marra. “'Trump Digs Coal' at Charleston Rally,” W Public Broadcasting, May 5, 2016. Archived May 5, 2016. Archived .mp3 on file at DeSmog. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/dquuo

    178. ANAMERICAFIRSTENERGYPLAN,” Donaldjtrump.com, May 26, 2016. Archived December 7, 2016. Archived .pdf on file at DeSmog. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/IAiio

    179. Trump talks DNC, minimum wage, climate change and NATO,” Fox News.com.

    180. Catherine Traywick and Jennifer A Dlouhy. “Trump Team Memo Hints at Big Shake-Up of U.S. Energy Policy,” Bloomberg, December 9, 2016. Archived December 10, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/zsyMo

    181. Steve Horn.  ”Exxon CEO Rex Tillerson Tapped for Secretary of State Despite Close Ties to Russia, Putin,” DeSmog, December 10, 2016.

    182. Trump Administration Landing Teams,E&E News. Archived December 16, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/BnTXa

    183. Allen Brown. “Global Warming Research in Danger as Trump Appoints Climate Skeptic to NASA Team,” The Intercept, December 1, 2016. Archived January 9, 2017. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/pS0w8

    184. Nicole Gaouette. “Tillerson sworn in as secretary of state,” CNN, February 1, 2017. Archived February 8, 2017. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/Wzcj4

    185. Ken Kimmell. “The Man Who Sued the EPA Is Now Running It,” EcoWatch, February 17, 2017. Archived February 18, 2017. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/CgKe6

    186. Coral Davenport. “Senate Confirms Scott Pruitt as E.P.A. Head,” The New York Times, February 17, 2017. Archived February 18, 2017. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/F1jWU

    187. Andrew Tarantola. “Who is Scott Pruitt, the new EPA head? Engadget, February 17, 2017. Archived February 18, 2017. Archive.is URL:https://archive.is/nveOF

    188. Brady Dennis, Chris Mooney, and David Weigel. “Democrats boycott controversial EPA nominee Scott Pruitt’s committee confirmation vote,” The Washington Post, February 1, 2017. Archived June 1, 2017. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/XrB32

    189. Coral Davenport and Eric Lipton. “Trump Picks Scott Pruitt, Climate Change Denialist, to Lead E.P.A.” The New York Times, December 7, 2016. Archived .pdf on file at DeSmog. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/Mwqop

    190. Graham Readfearn. “Donald Trump Confirms Climate Science Denier and Fossil Fuel Industry 'Stenographer' Scott Pruitt to Lead EPA,” DeSmog, December 7, 2016.

    191. Ben Jervey. “Mapping EPA Nominee Scott Pruitt's Many Fossil Fuel Ties,” DeSmog, January 13, 2017.

    192. Donald Trump’s Cabinet Is Taking Shape. Here’s the Latest List.” The New York Times, February 20, 2017. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/csQsR

    193. Team Fix. “The Fox News GOP debate transcript, annotated,” The Washington Post, March 3, 2016. Archived February 22, 2017. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/5323d

    194. Kyle Feldscher. “Trump backs off plan to eliminate EPA,” Washington Examiner, September 22, 2016. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/aOnLB

    195. Report says Trump has Atlantic Coast Pipeline among infrastructure priorities,” The News Virginian, January 26, 2017. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/Zkpyg

    196. Steve Horn. “Trump Team Has Ties to Atlantic Coast Pipeline Now Being Pushed by White House,” DeSmog, February 6, 2017. 

    197. Priority List - Emergency and National Security Projects 121416m” DocumentCloud file contributed by Greg Linch, McClatchy Washington Bureau. Archived .pdf on file at DeSmog.

    198. Steve Horn. “Trump’s White House Website Now Only Mentions 'Climate' in His Plans to Ax Obama’s Policies,” DeSmog, January 20, 2017.

    199. Ben Jervey. “The Trump Administration Is Filling Up With Koch Allies,” DeSmog, December 19, 2016.

    200. Robin Bravender. “Energy lobbyist expected to land key White House slot,” E&E News, February 7, 2017. Archived February 22, 2017. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/YymAY

    201. Steve Horn. “Trump Names Industry Lobbyist and Climate Science Denier Mike Catanzaro as Top White House Energy Aide,” DeSmog, February 8, 2017.

    202. Steve Horn. “Koch Industries and Fracking Lobbyist Mike Catanzaro To Lead Trump Energy Team,” DeSmog, October 4, 2016.

    203. LOBBYINGREPORT: CGCNGROUP, LLC (formerly known as Clark Geduldig Cranford & Nielsen, LLC),” Clerk of the House of Representatives, Q4 2016. House ID# ​361180101. Archived .pdf on file at DeSmog.

    204. LOBBYINGREPORT: CGCNGROUP, LLC (formerly known as Clark Geduldig Cranford & Nielsen, LLC),” Clerk of the House of Representatives, Q4 2016. House ID# 361180088. Archived .pdf on file at DeSmog.

    205. LOBBYINGREPORT: CGCNGROUP, LLC (formerly known as Clark Geduldig Cranford & Nielsen, LLC),” Clerk of the House of Representatives, Q4 2016. House ID# 300851398. Archived .pdf on file at DeSmog.

    206. LOBBYINGREPORT: CGCNGROUP, LLC (formerly known as Clark Geduldig Cranford & Nielsen, LLC),” Clerk of the House of Representatives, Q4 2016. House ID# 300851249. Archived .pdf on file at DeSmog.

    207. LOBBYINGREPORT: CGCNGROUP, LLC (formerly known as Clark Geduldig Cranford & Nielsen, LLC),” Clerk of the House of Representatives, Q4 2016. House ID# 300848782. Archived .pdf on file at DeSmog.

    208. Full Speech: President Trump at CPAC,” The New York Times, February 24, 2017. Archived March 6, 2017. Archived .mp4 on file at DeSmog.

    209. CPAC 2017 Sponsors,” cpac.conservative.org. Archived March 6, 2017. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/SKFRU

    210. Sharon Kelly. “Trump Abandons Paris Climate Deal At Bidding of Fossil Fuel Interests,” DeSmog, June 1, 2017.

    211. Tim Marcin. “Trump's Paris Agreement Decision Takes Effect One Day after the 2020 Election,” Newsweek, June 1, 2017. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/n0Kvj

    212. Emily Flitter. “Trump misunderstood MIT climate research, university officials say,” Reuters, June 2, 2017.  Archived June 2, 2017. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/D4xPV

    213. Mark Dwortzan. “How much of a difference will the Paris Agreement make?MIT News, April 22, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/xW3zo

    214. Graham Readfearn. “Tobacco To Fossil Fuels: Tracing the Roots of Trump's Claims on Paris Climate Deal,” DeSmog, June 1, 2017.

    215. Danny Hakim. “Big Tobacco’s Staunch Friend in Washington: U.S. Chamber of Commerce,” The New York Times, October 9, 2015. Archived June 2, 2017. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/is17R

    216. American Council for Capital Formation,” Conservative Transparency. Accessed June 2, 2017.

    217. Michael Biesecker and Paul Wiseman | AP. “APFACTCHECK: Trump’s shaky claims on climate accord,” The Washington Post, June 1, 2017. Archived June 2, 2017. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/IF3cP

    218. Statement by President Trump on the Paris Climate Accord,” The White House: Office of the Press Secretary, June 2, 2017. Archived June 2, 2017. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/iXqob

    219. Mat Hope. “UK Climate Science Denying GWPF Hosts Trump’s Fossil Fuelled ‘Environment Advisor’ Myron Ebell to Deliver Message to Britain,” DeSmog UK, January 30, 2017.

    220. James Delingpole. “Climate Change: The Greatest-Ever Conspiracy Against The Taxpayer,” Breitbart, March 28, 2016. Archived September 26, 2016. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/LHmOH

    221. Ken Kimmell. “The Man Who Sued the EPA Is Now Running It,” EcoWatch, February 17, 2017. Archived February 18, 2017. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/CgKe6

    222. Steve Horn. “Trump Names Climate Denier Kathleen Hartnett-White to Head White House Environmental Council,” DeSmog, October 13, 2017.

    223. An Audit Report on The Commission on Environmental Quality’s Enforcement and Permitting Functions for Selected Programs” (PDF), State Auditor's Office, December 2003.

    224. For Top White House Environment Job, Trump Taps Carbon Dioxide Fan,” EWG, October 13, 2017. Archived October 13, 2017. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/CdZqE

    225. #405 Donald Trump,” Forbes. Archived June 20, 2016.

    226. Carl Icahn drops out of presidential advisory role,” CNBC, August 18, 2017. Archived October 26, 2017.

    227. Grace Hauck. “Priebus latest high-profile departure from Trump admin,” CNN, July 29, 2017. Archived October 26, 2017. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/lPeu5

    228. Maggie Haberman. “Stephen Bannon Out at the White House After Turbulent Run,” The New York Times, August 18, 2017. Archived August 18, 2017.  Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/lSyn8

    229. Tracking Trump's nominations,” CNN. Last updated October 25, 2017. Archived October 25, 2017. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/5mnHl

    230. Dan Merica, Jeff Zeleny, and Jim Acosta. “Anthony Scaramucci out as White House communications director,” CNN, July 31, 2017. Archived October 25, 2017. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/DAyh1

    231. Sean Spicer, White House press secretary, resigns,” CNN, July 31, 2017. Archived October 26, 2017. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/cLI6J

    232. Dan Merica. “Kelly sworn in as Trump's second chief of staff,” CNN, July 31, 2017. Archived October 216, 2017. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/5J3C8

    233. Kevin Liptak and Miranda Green. “Price out as HHS secretary after private plane scandal,” CNN, Steptember 29, 2017. Archived October 26, 2017. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/7E8nN

    234. The Cabinet,” www.whitehouse.gov. Archived October 26, 2017. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/RPctz

    235. Itai Vardi. “Trump’s New FERC Commissioner Rob Powelson Accepted Gifts from Energy Industry as State Regulator,” DeSmog, August 15, 2017.

    236. (News Release. “Senate Confirms Chatterjee, Powelson to FERC,” FERC, August 4, 2017. Archived October 26, 2017. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/u7Qmt

    237. Watch President Trump’s address to conservatives live here,” The Heritage Foundation. Archived October 26, 2017. Archived .mp4 on file at DeSmog. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/ihpGH

    238. Jeremy . B. White. “Donald Trump speech: President preaches 'once-in-a-generation' tax plan to choir at Heritage Foundation,” Independent, October 18, 2017. Archived October 26, 2017. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/Otrez

    239. EPA chief to sign rule on Clean Power Plan exit on Tuesday,” Reuters, October 9, 2017. Archived October 26, 2017. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/vKmSz

    240. EPA Takes Another Step To Advance President Trump's America First Strategy, Proposes Repeal Of 'Clean Power Plan',” United Stated Environmental Protection Agency. October 10, 2017. Archived October 10, 2017. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/0HcBp

    241. Lisa Friedman and Brad Plumer. “E.P.A. Announces Repeal of Major Obama-Era Carbon Emissions Rule,” The New York Times, October 9, 2017. Archived October 10, 2017. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/E5cEn

    242. James Wilt. “Three Reasons Why Keystone XL May Never Get Built,” DeSmog Canada, March 14, 2017.

    243. Jeff Mason and Ethan Lou. “Trump greenlights Keystone XL pipeline, but obstacles loom,Reuters, March 24, 2017. Archived October 27, 2017. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/RTdEJ

    244. Remarks by the President in TransCanada Keystone XL Pipeline Announcement,” The White House, Archived October 27, 2017. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/TcQgG

    245. In the East, it could be the COLDEST New Year’s Eve on record […]” Twitter post by use @realDonaldTrump, December 28, 2017. Archived .png on file at DeSmog.

    246. Trump's call for some 'good old global warming' ridiculed by climate experts,” The Guardian, December 29, 2017. Archived January 14, 2018. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/y6551

    247. Jeremy Diamond. “Trump unloads on former top aide Bannon: 'He lost his mind',” CNN, January 4, 2018. Archived January 14, 2018. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/34rTn

    248. Read Trump's official statement about Steve Bannon,” CNN, January 3, 2018. Archived January 14, 2018. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/JSVb5

    249. Rosalind S. Helderman. “Mercer issues rare public rebuke of former ally Bannon,” The Washington Post, January 4, 2018. Archived January 10, 2018. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/Kj734

    250. Jeremy W. Peters. “Steve Bannon Steps Down From Breitbart Post,” The New York Times, January 9, 2018. Archived January 10, 2018. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/5IUcM

    251. Eli Stokols and Timothy Puko. “Scott Pruitt Aims to Accelerate His Efforts to Remake the EPA,” Wall Street Journal, January 17, 2018. Archived January 31, 2018. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/zOVuZ

    252. Graham Readfearn. “Trump's Piers Morgan Interview Pushes the Same Climate Denial Backed by his Mercer Family Benefactors,” DeSmog, January 28, 2018.

    253. The biggest moments from Donald Trump’s interview with Piers Morgan,” Metro, January 28, 2018. Archived January 31, 2018. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/2oecB

    254. “Science & Technology Highlights in the First Year of the Trump Administration” (PDF), Executive Office of the President of the United States. Document created March 6, 2018. Archived .pdf on file at DeSmog

    255. President Donald Trump Participates In ‘Generation Next’ White House Summit | NBC News,” YouTube video streamed live March 22, 2018. Archived .mp4 on file at DeSmog.

    256. Louis Nelson. “Trump attacks 'globalist' Koch brothers,” Politico, July 31, 2018. Archived July 31, 2018. Archive.is URL: https://archive.fo/e0ZEF

    257. Maggie Severns. “Trump tariffs assailed at Koch network gathering,” Politico, July 28, 2018. Archived July 31, 2018. Archive.fo URL: https://archive.fo/X5PTD

    258. On 60 Minutes Trump Says: 'I'm Not Denying Climate Change',DeSmog, October 17, 2018.

    259. Lesley Stahl. “President Trump on Christine Blasey Ford, his relationships with Vladimir Putin and Kim Jong Un and more,” CBS News, October 16, 2018. Archived October 22, 2018. Archive.fo URL: https://archive.fo/tLtRk

    Other Resources

    Image of Donald Trump by Michael Vadon [CCBY-SA 2.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0)], via Wikimedia Commons.

    Hubbel Relat

    $
    0
    0

    Hubbel Relat

    Credentials

    • JD from George Mason School of Law [1]

    Background

    Hubbel Relat is Vice President for State Policy and General Counsel for American Energy Alliance.  [1]

    According to his profile at AEA. Relat has worked for several non-profit organizations focusing on promoting free market public policy, particularly energy and regulatory reform.  [1]

    Relat is currently writing for Fueling U.S. Forward, a Koch-funded front group crafted by veteran Washington communications specialists. The organization — led by long-time fossil fuel executive and lobbyist Charlie Drevna— seeks to present oil and gas as savior fuels without any mention of the well-known impacts of fossil fuel pollution on our air, water, health and climate. [2]

    He is the former associate director of the Center for Freedom and Prosperity Foundation. [3]

    Stance on Climate Change

    Speaking on President Obama's carbon plan at CPAC2016: [4]

    “The President's carbon rule, his climate legacy, is fundamentally seeking to transfer wealth from the middle states who rely on affordable energy and have made good energy policy priority and transfer wealth to pay for the bad decisions by states like California and the northeast. […] That's fundamentally what this is–a wealth transfer for states that he likes from states that he does not. ” [2:47:39]

    Key Quotes

    April 15, 2016

    EPA Administrator Gina McCarthy declared that there was 'not one single bit of evidence that [the EPA has] destroyed an industry or significantly impacted jobs other than in a positive way.'

    This statement is clearly contradicted by reality and credible studies. For example, the economic consulting firm NERA found that the cost of EPA’s so-called 'Clean Power Plan' could total nearly $300 billion. Nearly $300 billion in compliance costs will significantly impact jobs.” [5]

    March 31, 2016

    “First, wind and solar are intermittent sources of energy, which means they cannot be relied on to provide sufficient electricity at a given point when the grid needs it. Conversely, coal and natural gas are baseload sources of power, precisely because they can be scaled up or down at any given time to meet energy needs. This is a critical difference between renewables and fossil fuels that permanently makes the former unable to actually replace the latter.

    The cherry-picking method used to manufacture these projections has been written about extensively.” [6]

    July 8, 2015

    “The administration equating our commentary on the relevance of the [mercury rule] to [the carbon rule] as “apples to oranges” presents a straw man that distracts from the lesson states should take away from [the mercury rule] — if you start implementing the rule before full legal resolution, there's no going back. Even worse, the EPA is counting on this to happen.” [7]

    Key Deeds

    January 21, 2017

    FUSF awarded three African-American students at Northwest Halifax High School $1,500 in scholarships for an electrical lineman training program. Hubbel Relat, FUSF' said Fueling U.S. Forward was making an effort to reach minority communities, reported Dailytarheel.com[10]

    “Despite how important this industry is to all of our lives and our economy, the African-American communities and a lot of rural communities in general are underrepresented and left out of this industry,” Relat said. “A lot of the time they are simply not made aware of the job opportunities in the industry.” [10]

    June 16, 2016

    Hubbel Relat appeared on a panel titled Energy: Changing the Narrative, “presumably meant to change the narrative of climate change to one of energy independence” reported The Nation. [9]

    Other panelists included Nancy Pfotenhauer, the president of MediaSpeak Strategies and former director of Koch Industries’ Washington Office, and Karen Steward,  Director of Research at Freedom Partners. [9]

    March 3, 2016

    Hubbel Relat, representing the American Energy Alliance, spoke at CPAC 2016. He spoke about President Obama's carbon plan, contending it was essentially wealth transfer: [4]

    “The President's carbon rule, his climate legacy, is fundamentally seeking to transfer wealth from the middle states who rely on affordable energy and have made good energy policy priority and transfer wealth to pay for the bad decisions by states like California and the northeast. […] That's fundamentally what this is–a wealth transfer for states that he likes from states that he does not. ” [2:47:39]

    Affiliations

    Publications

    Sample publications at AEA:

    Sample publications at Fueling US Forward:

    Resources

    1. Staff: Hubbel Relat,” American Energy Alliance. Archived December 8, 2016. Archived .pdf on file at DeSmog. 

    2. These Moments: The Internet,” November 16, 2016. Archived December 10, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/jhwst

    3. Exclusive: Inside the Koch Brothers’ Secret Billionaire Summit,” The Nation, June 17, 2014. Archived December 8, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/lFFRo

    4. #CPAC2016: Romney v. Trump, Rubio v. Cruz, Amnesty, Obamacare, & Death penalty,” YouTube video uploaded by user The Real Side, March 3, 2016. Archived .mp4 on file at DeSmog. Video starts at [2:45:12]

    5. The Two Faces of Coal Opposition,” American Energy Alliance, April 15, 2016. Archived December 8, 2016. archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/5MsVD

    6. EPA’s Deceptive Defense of Carbon Rule,” American Energy  Alliance, March 31, 2016. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/bJHVr

    7. Zack Colman. “States working on power-plant compliance plans,” Washington Examiner, July 8, 2015. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/oPj3o

    8. Member Profile: Mr. Hubbel Relat,” Republication National Lawyers Association. Archived December 10, 2016. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/u8O3K

    9. Lauren Windsor. “Exclusive: Inside the Koch Brothers’ Secret Billionaire Summit,” The Nation, June 17, 2014. Archived March 13, 2017. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/n8e5c

    10. Camille Vargas. “Fossil fuel advocacy campaign offers scholarships to African-American students,” Dailytarheel.com, March 6, 2017. Archived April 11, 2017. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/3bjHI

    11. Hubbel Relat,” LinkedIn. Accessed July 19, 2018.

    Rudy Giuliani

    $
    0
    0

    Rudolph W. Giuliani

    Credentials

    • J.D., cum laude, New York University School of Law, 1968. [1]
    • B.A., Manhattan College, 1965. [1]

    Background

    Rudolph (Rudy) Giuliani served as the Mayor of New York City for two terms, from 1994 through 2001, and was a 2008 Republican presidential candidate. He is the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Giuliani Partners LLC, which he founded in January, 2002. He was appointed the Associate Attorney General under President Reagan in 1981. [2], [3]

    When Giuliani launched his presidential bid in 2007, Time magazine dubbed him an “honorary Texas oil lawyer.” By October of that year, he had raised more than half a million dollars from the oil and gas industry, more than the next two top recipients combined. Giuliani began work at Bracewell & Patterson—later renamed Bracewell & Giuliani—in 2005. During his presidential bid, over $14,000 of his total campaign dollars came from the oil refiner Valero Energy, one of Bracewell & Giuliani’s clients. Giuliani left Bracewell & Giuliani in January, 2016, and the firm subsequently rebranded itself as Bracewell. [4],[5], [6]

    Giuliani appeared to reflect his client’s interests on the campaign trail and beyond. Over 2007 and 2008, Giuliani indicated he would open the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge to oil drilling, came out against fuel economy mandates for cars, said the United States would be “better off if we could rely somewhat more on our coal reserves” in order to achieve energy independence, and supported coal-to-fuel synthesis, believing it could be “a very valuable contributor” to said independence. [7], [8],[9]

    Giuliani Declined Positions in Trump Administration

    Before making the surprise announcement that he was pulling out of consideration for a cabinet post in the Trump administration, Giuliani was one of the contenders for the position of Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton’s former position in the Obama administration. The Secretary of State position entails power over approving cross-border pipelines and other fossil fuel infrastructure, as well as advancing the administration’s energy policy. [10], [11], [12]

    Giuliani’s deep financial ties to the oil and gas industry are a major red flag; nominating him as Secretary of State would be another deeply disturbing move by President-elect Trump,” says League of Conservation Voters Senior Vice President of Government Affairs Tiernan Sittenfield.  [13]

    Trump's consideration of Rudy Giuliani for secretary of state, with all of his ties to the fossil fuel industry, is par for the disastrous course the President-elect is setting,” says Dani Heffernan, US Communication Coordinator at 350.org. “Giuliani isn't an outright climate denier, but his deep loyalties to the fossil fuel industry pose a threat to international action against climate change and, ultimately, a livable future.” [13]

    Politico reports that Giulani confirmed president-elect Trump had offered him two “Cabinet-level positions” in government, and that he had turned down the positions because he “didn't want to do it.” [14]

    While he declined to name the positions, he did say that they were “very high” and did not include the top job at state. Giulani dismissed suggestions that his decisions had been based on inadequate loyalty by Trump: “As far as I'm concerned, he fulfilled whatever loyalty that entails,” Giuliani said, referencing the two other job offers he said he received. “I mean, it was my own decision not to do it, largely because of my personal life.” [14]

    Fossil Fuel Ties & Lobbying

    When Rudy Giuliani joined Bracewell & Patterson in 2005, expanding the firm’s New York office, it already had the reputation of being the firm of choice for major energy companies. In 2007, the New York Times called Bracwell & Patterson “perhaps the nation’s most aggressive lobbyist for coal-fired power plants, heavy emitters of air pollutants and carbon dioxide,” arguing it was “central to rolling back environmental regulations in the Bush years,” such as provisions of the Clean Air Act.  [15], [16], [17][5]

    Legal Clients

    Some of the firm's largest legal clients have included Shell Oil, and Chevron/Texaco. Bracewell & Giuliani helped Shell acquire 618,000 acres of the Permian Basin in 2012 from the Chesapeake Energy Corporation—itself a major client, and one that gave the firm hundreds of thousands of dollars for lobbying work from 2011-2015. [18], [19], [20], [21]

    Chevron/Texaco is a multinational energy company that, according to Forbes, is the 28th biggest public company in the world and the United States’ second biggest oil and gas producer, worth $192 billion. Chevron was responsible for one spill that released more than 18 billion gallons of oil and other waste into the Ecuadorian Amazon—30 times larger than the 1989 Exxon Valdez spill. [22], [23], [24], [25]

    Other notable fossil fuel clients included Saudi Arabia’s oil ministry (despite Giuliani’s rejection of a $10 million donation from a Saudi prince after the September 11 attacks), Citgo (Venezuela’s state-owned oil company, which spent more than $5 million since 2014 lobbying against U.S. sanctions), and Pacific Gas & Electric, California’s largest utility, which was found guilty of violating safety regulations prior to a pipeline explosion that killed eight people and destroyed 38 homes. Bracewell represented the company in the case. [26], [27], [28], [29]

    Lobbying Clients

    According to public lobbying disclosures, Giuliani's firms have a long history with the energy industry with clients like Arch Coal and Chesapeake Energy. Tyson Slocum, director of Public Citizen’s Energy Program said that “Bracewell & Giuliani was probably the most premier energy lobbying firm in the 2000s.” [13][5]

    Bracewell & Giuliani also lobbied for 11 years for Southern Company, a company vehemently opposed to the Environmental Protection Agency’s Clean Power Plan and once ranked “the United States’ most irresponsible utility.” The firm also lobbied for gas and coal power plant operator Dynegy, frequently criticized for it's air-polluting power plants, for seven years. GenOn Energy, which has racked up thousands of violations of federal and state water laws over the years, retained the firm as lobbyists for the same amount of time. [30],[31], [32], [33]

    There is significant overlap between the firm and the Electric Reliability Coordinating Council, a coalition of energy companies which opposesenvironmental legislation. The group’s director, Scott Segal, is a partner at Bracewell & Giuliani. [34]

    Jeff Holmstead, who in 2010 was referred to by the ERCC as its counsel, is also a partner at the firm (though as this transcript of his Senate testimony shows, he hasn’t always disclosed this connection). [35], [36],[37]

    While the ERCC has not revealed its full member list, some of its members are known to be Duke Energy, Salt River Project, and Southern Company, though it has also done work for mining company Arch Coal. These all were or still are Bracewell & Giuliani clients. At the same time, the ERCC has not only been one of Bracewell & Giuliani’s oldest clients, starting with the firm in 2001, but one of its most lucrative, too, paying out more than $1 million a year to the firm since 2008, dwarfing every other client listed. [38]

    Giuliani left Bracewell & Giuliani in January 2016, moving to Greenberg Traurig, another firm maintaining a range of connections to the fossil fuel industry, as well as the pharmaceutical industry, with clients including Peabody Energy, Bayer Corporation, Colorado Interstate Gas, FPL Energy, General Motors Corporation, Generic Pharmaceutical Association, Golden Queen Mining Company, Business Roundtable, and others. [39], [5]

    The firm has a close relationship to oil and gas producer El Paso Corporation, which is owned by Kinder Morgan. Greenbert Traurig lobbied for two of the company’s subsidiaries, El Paso Electric and El Paso Pipeline Group, from 2005 through 2013. [40]

    There is a revolving door between the two entities, with one of Greenberg Traurig’s attorneys becoming vice president, legal and chief compliance officer at El Paso Electric (then CEO) of El Paso Electric. El Paso Corporation’s senior counsel of 15 years moved to Greenberg Traurig in 2014. One of the firm’s lawyers, serving as the company’s general counsel for nearly a decade also rejoined Greenberg Traurig in 2013. [41], [42], [43], [44]

    Some of Bracewell & Giuliani's notable lobbying clients are below. View the attached spreadsheet for additional details on Bracewell & Giuliani's lobbying by year (.xlsx)[5]

    It isn't clear what Giulini’s own personal involvement with many of these companies was. Giuliani himself has never registered as a lobbyist, and he’s not listed as an attorney in legal cases involving the companies. In 2006, Newsday reported that Giuliani personally sat down with Shell executives, part of his role of “solidifying existing relationships” with the firm. It’s also worth noting that when working for his private consulting firm, Giuliani Partners, the former mayor regularly did lobbying work for his clients without ever registering himself as such, possibly because he didn’t technically meet the threshold of salaried time spent communicating with officials. [45], [46]

    Tyson Slocum says whether or not Giuliani was directly involved with some of these companies is beside the point:

    It would be one thing if you had some minor role,” he says. “It’s another when one of the world’s largest lobbying groups renames itself after you.”  [13]

    Stance on Climate Change

    2007

    Talking about a potential Carbon Tax on CNBC: [47]

    “I don't like taxes. I don't know how to make that any clearer. I don't like taxes. I generally think taxes are, given the level of taxation we have, and a lot of our states and in the country, inventing new ones is a very big mistake. Find other ways to do it. 

    If you want to deal with global warming, the way to deal with global warming is to develop these alternative technologies. Really get serious about energy independence, which we should probably have been serious about 30 years ago. We wouldn't be in this situation where we have to send money to our enemies.”

    “Get serous about why we haven't licensed a new nuclear power plant in 30 years. Because people are afraid of nuclear power.  […] Nobody's died from nuclear power.” […]

    “I look at wind and solar from the point of view of, can we store that energy? Right now it's inconsistent energy. When the wind is blowing, you get energy. When it isn't, you don't. Is there a way to develop a technology that you can store it? Can you clean coal? Carbon sequestration: it can be done. Can we expand it?

    The other benefit of looking at it this way, which I consider a pro-growth way, is we move ourselves towards energy independence then we also create an industry. A new industry in America. And with the growth of China and the growth of India, if we're at the head of that industry we''re going to make a lot of money in China and we're going to make a lot of money in india. We won't just be buying things from them; they'll be buying things from us.”

    In the same interview, Giuliani discusses the Kyoto Protocol and global warming:

    “It would move [jobs] to China and India and it would have no impact on global warming. Whatever your scientific conclusion about global warming, whether it's man-made, or it isn't or whatever, the reality is that if you don't have restrictions on China and you don't have restrictions on India, our contribution ultimately is going to be minor. We could put all these restrictions on ourselves and have just as much arguable global warming if China, India—some of these other countries that are going to be contributing a lot more to this don't become part of some sort of system […]”

    October, 2007

    Grist reports that while Giulani said “I do believe there’s global warming,” on the campaign trail, in a later speech on energy in the summer in Waterloo, Iowa, he had hardly a word about the environment. Instead, he focused on tapping domestic sources of energy, including coal, which is considered a major contributor to global warming. [48]

    Key Quotes

    December 13, 2016

    Speaking of Exxonmobil CEO Rex Tillerson's appointment as secretary of state: [49]

    “I'm okay with the choice. I think Donald Trump has selected somebody who knows the world and can advise him on the world.”

    July, 2016

    Rudy Giulani applauded Donald Trump at the Republican National Convention [50]

    “”It's time to make America safe again. It's time to make America one again […] What I did for New York, Donald Trump will do for America!”

    “Donald Trump has said the first step in defeating our enemies is to identify them properly and see the connections between them,” Giuliani said. “To defeat Islamic extremist terrorism we must put them on defense. If they are at war against us ― which they have declared ― we must commit ourselves to unconditional victory against them.”

    “This includes undoing one of the worst deals America ever made ― Obama's Nuclear Agreement with Iran that will eventually let them become a nuclear power and put billions of dollars back into a country that the world's biggest state sponsor of terrorism.”

    September, 2015

    Speaking at the annual Shale Insight conference, Rudy Giulani argued the natural gas industry was “not being supported by the national government in the way that it should be.” He told the audience of industry members that many people were “irrationally afraid” of fracking, and the industry needed to launch “a national effort to explain how relatively safe this process was.” [54] 

    February, 2015

    “I do not believe, and I know this is a horrible thing to say, but I do not believe that the president [Barack Obama] loves America […] He doesn’t love you. And he doesn't love me. He wasn't brought up the way you were brought up and I was brought up, through love of this country.” [51]

    In response to criticism for the above statement, Giuliani said “Some people thought it was racist—I thought that was a joke, since he was brought up by a white mother… This isn't racism. This is socialism or possibly anti-colonialism.” [52]

    September, 2014

    In 2014, he called on President Obama to fast-track applications to export natural gas as part of a foreign policy strategy: [53]

    You know how President Obama is looking at non-military options to solve things such as the invasion of the Ukraine by Russia? It would have been within our abilities to export a massive amount of natural gas […] which would then have an impact on the world price of natural gas and would deprive Putin of the only strength he has left in his economy.”

    August, 2007

    I was once in the coal business for a short period of time. I ran a company that had coal mines in Hazard, Ky., so we were able to share stories about the coal industry and some of the struggles it faces and the need for clean coal and carbon sequestration […]”

    “[The U.S. would be] “better off if we could rely somewhat more on our coal reserves which are greater (in number) than the oil reserves in Saudi Arabia. “There’s a real opportunity here to expand our economy and take advantage of the global economy by selling energy independence to others. And as a matter of national security to put ourselves in a position where we don’t have to rely so much on oil from other parts of the world.”

    One of my 12 commitments to the American people is to make our country energy independent and coal plays a big role in that.” [9]

    June, 2007

    “Energy independence: if we can make that a major focus of American policy for the next 5-10 years, is a great industry for us to sell to China and India. They need energy independence. We should be able to figure out how to produce it and then we can sell it to them.” [55]

    Key Deeds

    October 2, 2016

    Rudy Giuliani went on ABC News with George Stephanopoulos, discussing Trump's taxes.  [56]

    “My response is he’s a genius,” Giuliani began. “Absolute genius. I mean, the man in “The Art of the Deal” this is described. First of all, we’re talking about 26 years ago, perfectly legal. We should get that straight immediately. This is a perfectly legal application of the tax code. And he would’ve been fool not to take advantage of it. Not only that, he would’ve probably breached his fiduciary duty to his investors, to his business. You have an obligation when you run a business to maximize the profits. And if there is a tax law that says I can deduct this, you deduct it. If you fail to deduct it, people can sue you. Your investors can sue you.”

    November 4, 2016

    According to the Huffington Post, Rudy Giulani knew that the FBI planned to review emails tied to Hillary Clinton before the public announcement was released about the investigation, confirming that the agency had leaked information to Donald Trump's presidential campaign. [57]

    Giulani had already dropped several hints that he knew in advance that the FBI planned to look at the emails and had touted his connection to the FBI, mentioning that “outraged FBI agents” have told him they’re frustrated by how the Clinton investigation was handled. [58]

    Two days before FBI Director James Comey announced that the agency was reviewing the emails, Giuliani said that Trump’s campaign had “a couple of surprises left.”  He said on Fox News (October 22):

    “I think he's got a surprise or two that you're going to hear about in the next few days. I mean, I'm talking about some pretty big surprise […] you'll see. […] We've got a couple things up our sleeve that should turn this around.” [57]

    Later, after the FBI re-launched their investigation of the emails, Giulani confirmed on “Fox & Friends” that he had heard about it from former FBI agents: [57]

    I did nothing to get it out, I had no role in it,” he said. “Did I hear about it? You’re darn right I heard about it, and I can’t even repeat the language that I heard from the former FBI agents.” 

    I had expected this for the last, honestly, to tell you the truth, I thought it was going to be about three or four weeks ago, because way back in July this started, they kept getting stymied looking for subpoenas, looking for records,” he said.  [57]

    The Daily Beast's Wayne Barrett also explored Giulani's FBI connections, reporting that Giulani's ties to the agency dated back to his days as a U.S. attorney in the 1980s. [59]

    December 2, 2015

    Rudy Giuliani appeared on “Your World With Neil Cavuto” to dispute President Obama's statements linking climate change to terrorism (video below): [60]

     

    “The president’s wrong in linking somehow by fixing climate change if he’s gonna fix it, he’s gonna fix terrorism. That’s absurd. There’s no connection between the two things. Where it’s like two different things. It’s like saying I’m gonna fix terrorism by curing cancer,” Giuliani told Cavuto. ““The terrorism that we’re dealing with is not emerging from desperation. Many of these people are middle class or rich people who are involved in the terrorism. This is an ideologically or religiously based – and I would say certainly a misinterpretation of the religion and a, or if you want to call it a hijacking of the religion – but the religion has been turned into an ideology,” Giuliani said. “It’s like saying communism was caused by climate change.” [60]

    September, 2014

    Rudy Giuliani spoke at the 5th Law of Shale Plays Conference in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. The conference was presented by the Institute for Energy Law and the Energy and Mineral Law Foundation (EMLF).

    Giuliani suggested Obama to fast-track applications to export natural gas as part of a foreign policy strategy: [53]

    You know how President Obama is looking at non-military options to solve things such as the invasion of the Ukraine by Russia? It would have been within our abilities to export a massive amount of natural gas […] which would then have an impact on the world price of natural gas and would deprive Putin of the only strength he has left in his economy.”

    Giuliani also said that the energy industry should “massive campaign to educate the American people.” He added that “I would conduct this in the year 2015 — which is the lead-up to the 2016 presidential campaign — a very well thought-out, a very well-planned campaign throughout the United States. Maybe focus more in the key states where the presidential election will be battled out among the Democrats and Republicans to explain what this can do for us, what it can do for our economy.” [53]

    Affiliations

    Resources

    1. RUDOLPH W. GIULIANI: PARTNER,” Bracewell. Archived December 13, 2014. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/N4Ci7 

    2. Rudolph W. Giuliani: Chairman & Chief Executive Officer,” Giuliani Partners. Archived February 6, 2015. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/sYxuW

    3. “Rudolph W. Giuliani,” Giuliani Security & Safety. Archived December 12, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/4dCPy

    4. Giuliani Leaps Past $500,000 Mark in Big Oil Contributions,” Consumer Watchdog, October 19, 2007. Archived December 12, 2016. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/Dh5Ju

    5. Lobbying Disclosures database. Search performed December 11, 2016.

    6. (Press Release). “BRACEWELLANNOUNCESTHATMAYORRUDOLPHGIULIANIWILLLEAVEFIRMBYAMICABLEAGREEMENT; MOVINGONTOOTHERCHALLENGES,” Bracewell, January 19, 2016. Archived December 12,2 016. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/GciyE

    7. Giuliani’s Green Record,” Living on Earth, September 14, 2007. Archived December 12, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/JZgFD

    8. ‘Meet the Press’ transcript for Dec. 9, 2007,” NBC News, December 9, 2007. Archived December 12, 2016. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/NRbD3

    9. Christian Giggenbach. “Giuliani touts importance of coal,” The Register-Herald, August 3, 2007. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/hNDTO

    10. S.A. Miller. “Giuliani withdraws from consideration for Trump’s Cabinet,” The Washington Times, December 9, 2016. Archived December 12, 2016. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/IQeSg

    11. Presidential Permits for Border Crossings,” U.S. Department of State. Archived December 12, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/slh9j

    12. Bureau of Energy Resources,” U.S. Department of State. Archived December 12, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/ebeRA

    13. Rudy Giuliani — And His Numerous Fossil Fuel Industry Connections — Out for Potential Post in Trump Admin,” DeSmog, December 10, 2016.

    14. Madeline Conway. “Giuliani: I turned down two Cabinet offers,” Politico, December 13, 2016. Archived December 13, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/rgNvT

    15. Sara Randazzo. “Bracewell & Giuliani is Losing … Giuliani,” The Wall Street Journal, January 19, 2016. Archived .pdf on file at DeSmog. 

    16. Giuliani joins law firm renowned for defending energy interests,Grist, April 9, 2005. Archived December 11, 2016. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/1vVFa

    17. Russ Buettner. “Giuliani’s Tie to Texas Law Firm May Pose Risk,” The New York Times, May 2, 2007. Archived December 11, 2016. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/YO9u4

    18. (Press Release). “BRACEWELLREPRESENTSSHELLIN 1.2 MILLION-SQUARE-FOOTSHELLPLAZALEASE, CULMINATINGITSRESTRUCTURINGOFNORTHAMERICANREALESTATEHOLDINGS,” Bracewell, December 21, 2011. Archived December 12, 2016. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/HfCVe

    19. (Press Release). “BRACEWELLREPRESENTSCHEVRONIN $800 MILLIONSALEOFNGLPIPELINE,” Bracewell, October 27, 2014. Archived December 12, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/HfCVe

    20. Shell Represented by Bracewell in $1.9 Billion Purchase of Chesapeake’s Permian Basin Assets,” KinneyRecruiting, September 18, 2012. Archived December 12, 2016. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/OgfLg

    21. (Press Release). “BRACEWELLREPRESENTSCHESAPEAKEENERGYCORPORATIONIN $1.25 BILLIONJOINTVENTURE,” Bracewell, April 11, 2012. Archived December 12, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/fxHj1

    22. #28 Chevron,” Forbes, May 2016. Archived .pdf on file at DeSmog. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/fJ3BH

    23. Chevron (CVX) Stock Price, Financials and News,” Fortune 500. Archived December 12, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/nMCCT

    24. Claudia Garcia. “A slippery decision: Chevron oil pollution in Ecuador,” Dw.com, September 8, 2016. Archived December 12, 2016. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/j3br6

    25. CHEVRONCORPORATION, Plantiff, V. STEVENDONZIGER, et al., Defendants” (PDF). Case No. 11 Civ. 069 (LAK). PDF retrieved from theamazonpost.com. Archived .pdf on file at DeSmog.

    26. Giuliani rejects $10 million from Saudi prince,”CNN.com, October 12, 2001. Archived December 12, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/5E0pB

    27. Lachlan Markay. “State-Owned Venezuelan Oil Firms Spends Millions on U.S. Lobbying,” The Washington Free Beacon, June 6, 2016. Archived December 12, 2016. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/MhD4p

    28. Associated Press. “Pacific Gas & Electric Convicted of Misleading Investigators After Pipeline Blast,” The Wall Street Journal, August 9, 2016. Archived .pdf on file at DeSmog. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/OvrTq

    29. U.S. Drops $562 Million Alternative Fines Act Allegation Against PG&E,” Lexology, August 2, 2016. Archived December 12, 2016. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/VN4Yh

    30. Bob Sussman. “Southern Company’s Attack on the Clean Power Plan: Some Important Unanswered Questions,” The Brookings Institution, December 17, 2014. Archived December 12, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/UXqHp

    31. “Leadership We Can Live Without” (PDF), Green America, May 24, 2011. Archived .pdf on file at DeSmog.

    32. Dynegy Agrees to Reduce Pollution,” St. Louis Public Radio. Archived December 12, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/7fACO

    33. Jody Barr. “Report: Hamilton County among most polluted in U.S.Fox 19 Now, May 10, 2016. Archived December 12, 2016. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/rN5Mk

    34. SCOTT H. SEGAL: PARTNER,” Bracewell. Archived December 12, 2016. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/8zdeL

    35. Statement from ERCC Counsel Jeff Holmstead on the EPA's GHG'Tailoring' Rule,” Electric Reliability Coordinating Council, May 13, 2010. Archived December 12, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/BhlhR

    36. JEFFREY R. HOLMSTEAD: PARTNER,” Bracewell. Archived December 12, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/rhV2U

    37. “Testimony of Jeffrey R. Holmstead before the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works” (PDF),U.S. Senate Committee on Environment & Public Works, July 8, 2015. Archived .pdf on file at DeSmog.

    38. Lobbyists for the 'Electric Reliability Coordinating Council' Attack Clean Air Rules on Behalf of Arch Coal,” Polluterwatch, May 24, 2012. Archived December 12, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/TNHOk

    39. Liz Moyer. “Rudolph Giuliani to Join Greenberg Traurig Law Firm.” The New York Times, January 19, 2016. Archived .pdf on file at DeSmog. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/rhAu3

    40. Kinder Morgan - El Paso transaction completed,” Kinder Morgan. Archived December 12, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/WR9Ud 

    41. El Paso Electric Appoints El Pasoan Mary Kipp as New President,” El Paso Electric, September 18, 2014. Archived December 12, 2016. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/E69fk

    42. Mary E. Kipp: Chief Executive Officer,” El Paso Electric. Archived December 12, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/dZWXi

    43. (Press Release). “Greenberg Traurig Grows Global Energy and Infrastructure Practice, Adds Elizabeth B. Herdes in Denver,” gtlaw.com, April 21, 2014. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/aeKjp

    44. Emily Atkin. “Greenberg Traurig Adds Former El Paso General Counsel,” Law360, October 2, 2013. Archived December 12, 2016. Archive.is URL:  https://archive.is/xMo9w

    45. Democratic National Committee Press Release. “DNC: Giuliani Offers Iowa Just Another Friend to Big Oil,” PR Newswire, July 19, 2007. Archived December 12, 2016. Achive.is URL: https://archive.is/KZrnH

    46. Michael Shnayerson. “A TALEOFTWOGIULIANIS,” Vanity  Fair, January, 2008. Archived December 12, 2016. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/QF53V

    47. Rudy Giuliani's Ideas for Dealing with Global Warming,” YouTube video uploaded by user The Heat Is On, March 27, 2007. Archived .mp4 on file at DeSmog.

    48. Joseph Romm. “Rudy Giuliani’s stance on climate and energy,” Grist, October 19, 2007. Archived December 12, 2016. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/SP28I

    49. The Latest: Energy Dept. pushes back against Trump team,” KIRO7, December 13, 2016. Archived December 13, 2016. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/YHuOh

    50. Rudy Giuliani: What I did for New York City, Donald Trump ‘will do for America’,CNBC News, July 18, 2016. Archived December 13, 2016. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/CPm2O

    51. Giuliani: Obama doesn't love America,” Politico, February 16, 2015. Archived December 12, 2015. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/GPaCB

    52. Giuliani: Obama Had a White Mother, So I’m Not a Racist,” The New York Times, February 20, 2015. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/3UcFu

    53. Giuliani pushes shale gas as a foreign policy solution PowerSource, September 6, 2014. Archived December 12, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/fq0Jj

    54. Jon Hurdle. “Giuliani urges shale industry to fight ‘irrational’ public fear of fracking,” StateImpact Pennsylvania, September 16, 2016. Archived December 14, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/XyTMe

    55. Giuliani on energy independence,” YouTube video uploaded by user The Heat is On, June 18, 2007. Archived .mp4 on file at DeSmog.

    56. “'This Week' Transcript: Rudy Giuliani and Sen. Bernie Sanders,” ABC News, October 2, 2016. Archived December 12, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/oAROB

    57. Mollie Reilly. “Rudy Giuliani Confirms FBI Insiders Leaked Information To The Trump Campaign,” The Huffington Post, November 4, 2016. Archived December 12, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/aMQx4

    58. Jim Dwyer. “As Trump Ally, Rudy Giuliani Boasts of Ties to F.B.I.The New York Times, November 3, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/WX5fA

    59. Wayne Barrett. “Meet Donald Trump’s Top FBI Fanboy,” The Daily Beast, November 2, 2016. Archived December 13, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/aBDf2

    60. “Giuliani: Linking Climate Change to Terrorism ‘Like Saying Communism Was Caused by Climate Change’,”CNSnews.com, December 2, 2015. Archived December 13, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/r9yNI

    61. Rudolph W. Giuliani,” Greenberg Traurig. Archived December 12, 2016. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/ZiHiA

    62. Giuliani’s Investment Bank Is Sold,” The New York Times, March 5, 2007.  Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/W270t

    Other Resources

    Image by Gage Skidmore [CCBY-SA 3.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0)], via Wikimedia Commons.


    Roger A. Pielke Sr.

    $
    0
    0

    Roger A. Pielke Sr.

    Credentials

    • B.A., Mathematics, Towson State College, 1968. [1]
    • M.S., Ph.D., Meteorology, Pennsylvania State University, 1969, 1973. [1]

    Background

    Roger A. Pielke Sr. is a Senior Research Scientist, heading the the Pielke research group at CIRES (Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences), and a Senior Research Associate at the University of Colorado-Boulder in the Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences (ATOC). He is also an Emeritus Professor of Atmospheric Science at Colorado State University. Pielke Sr. served as Colorado State Climatologist from from 1999 to 2006. [2], [9]

    While Pielke Sr. accepts that humans impact the climate, he does not completely agree with the IPCCthat most of the observed warming of the last 50 years is probably caused by greenhouse gas emissions. Pielke also disagreed with the American Geophysical Union's (AGU) statement on climate change, claiming it over-emphasized the role of carbon dioxide. [3], [4]

    Pielke Sr. has written on climate change denial blogs such as Watts Up With That, and has also praised that site's host and founder Anthony Watts for his work on climate change. [5]

    His son, Roger Pielke Jr., is a climate science policy writer also working at the University Colorado in Boulder. Huffington Post writer David Roberts wrote that Pielke Jr. “been playing footsie with denialists and right-wing ideologues for years; they're his biggest fans,” and critics have noted that Pielke Jr.'s work has often been cited by climate change deniers. [6], [7], [8]

    Stance on Climate Change

    January, 2017

    Writing on Twitter, Roger A. Pielke Sr. comments on President Obama's farewell speech: [10]

    ”[…] 'Change' in 'climate change' redundant. Climate always has changed on different time periods naturally.”

    May, 2010

    Writing on his blog, Climate Science: Roger Pielke Sr.,  Roger Pielke provides an updated response to a question posed by Andry Revkin from August 26, 2005, whiich asked “Is most of the observed warming over the last 50 years likely to have been due to the increase in greenhouse gas concentrations?”  To this, Pielke Sr. responded: [3]

    “The 2010 answer to the question by Andy Revkin […] remains NO.”

    “The added greenhouse gases from human activity clearly have a role in increasing the heat content of the climate system from what it otherwise would be. However, there are other equally or even more important significant human climate forcings, as I summarized in my 2005 post and in the 2009 article […]

    “We now know, however, that the natural variations of atmospheric and ocean circulation features within the climate system produces global average heat changes that are substantially larger than what was known in 2005. The IPCC models have failed to adequately simulate this effect. 

    “The answer to Andy’s question from 2005 is an even more clearly No. That is,  a significant fraction of the observed warming over the last 50 years is NOT due to the increase in greenhouse gas concentrations”

    November, 2009

    Roger A. Peilke Sr. is listed as a co-author to a paper in Eos titled “Climate Change: The Need to Consider Human Forcings Besides Greenhouse Gases” (PDF) where authors conclude: [11]

    “[O]ur scientific view is that human impacts do play a significant role within the climate system.”

    The authors list out three “hypothesis” as follows.

    “Hypothesis 1: Human influence on cli-mate variability and change is of minimal importance, and natural causes dominate climate variations and changes on all time scales. In coming decades, the human influ-ence will continue to be minimal.'

    Hypothesis 2a: Although the natural causes of climate variations and changes are undoubtedly important, the human influ-ences are significant and involve a diverse range of first- order climate forcings, includ-ing, but not limited to, the human input of carbon dioxide (CO2). Most, if not all, of these human influences on regional and global climate will continue to be of con-cern during the coming decades.

    Hypothesis 2b: Although the natural causes of climate variations and changes are undoubtedly important, the human influences are significant and are dominated by the emissions into the atmosphere of greenhouse gases, the most important of which is CO2. The adverse impact of these gases on regional and global climate constitutes the primary climate issue for the coming decades.”

    According to the authors, “the evidence in the peer- reviewed literature (e.g., as summarized by National Research Council (NRC) [2005]) is predominantly in support of hypothesis 2a, in that a diverse range of first- order human climate forcings have been identified.”

    Pielke Sr. later cites this paper in his testimony before the House Energy & Commerce Committee, where he also notes that “Hypothesis 2b is the IPCC perspective,” and then states that “Hypotheses 1 and 2b are inaccurate characterizations of the climate system.” [12]

    October, 2008

    In an interview with Mother Jones magazine, Roger Pielke said: [13]

    “I definitely think that we humans have altered the climate system. I think we have a strong component that has been warming—for some reason, it has stopped. And I don't understand the reasons why.”

    December, 2007

    Pielke has said that his is “not a 'sceptical scientist'.” He writes: [14]

    “On Climate Science, I state as a fundamental conclusion that

    Humans are significantly altering the global climate, but in a variety of diverse ways beyond the radiative effect of carbon dioxide. The IPCC assessments have been too conservative in recognizing the importance of these human climate forcings as they alter regional and global climate. These assessments have also not communicated the inability of the models to accurately forecast the spread of possibilities of future climate. The forecasts, therefore, do not provide any skill in quantifying the impact of different mitigation strategies on the actual climate response that would occur.”

    August, 2005

    In his first response to the question “Is most of the observed warming over the last 50 years likely to have been due to the increase in greenhouse gas concentrations” by Andrew Revkin, Pielke Sr. offered the following statement: [15]

    “There are natural explanations for global warming of which a change in the output of solar energy is a candidate. However, none of the published work has convinced me that this can explain much of the observed global warming over the last several decades. Volcanic emissions are another natural global forcing, and it is well known that they produce cooling, such as after the eruption of Mount Pintatubo, where in August of 1991 it was estimated as -4 Watts per meter squared. There have not been eruptions of that magnitude since, such that the absence of such major eruptions might permit greater absorbed solar radiation in the climate system than otherwise would occur. However, this absence of eruptions resulting in any positive radiative imbalance for a period of time well after a major volcanic emission has also not been shown to occur. This leaves anthropogenic emissions as a source for global warming.”

    ”[…] we limit the communication to policymakers if we use climate change as a synonym for global warming. Global warming is just one aspect of a much more complicated environmental issue.”

    Key Quotes

    November 17, 2016

    Writing in a comment at WattsUpWithThat, a user claiming to be Roger Pielke Sr. congratulates climate change denier Anthony Watts (Watts had, himself, congratulated Pielke in his blog post): [16], [17]

    “Hi Anthony. Congratulations! You have significantly and positively contributed to climate science. All the best for the next ten years!!! Roger Sr”

    November, 2011

    In a Q&A with high school students, reporduced on his own blog, Roger Pielker Sr. wrote:

    “[N]ot all glaciers and ice caps are melting. While the Arctic ice, for example, has been decreasing in areal extent…Antarctic sea ice coverage has not.” [18]

    Melting is a response to warming. However, not all glaciers and ice caps are melting. [18]

    September, 2011

    In an entry on his own blog, Roger Pielke Sr. wrote:

    “There has not been warming significantly, if at all, since 2003, as most everyone on all sides of the climate issue agree.” [19]

    April, 2011

    In an entry on his own blog, Roger Pielke Sr. wrote:

    ”[…] I have reproduced below the current plots of lower tropospheric temperature anomalies. The trend of temperatures using that climate metric is NOT accelerating, and, indeed, has not even been positive for over 12 years!” [20]

    September 6, 2010

    In an entry on his own blog, Roger Pielke Sr. wrote:

    “[U]pper ocean heat, in terms of its annual average, did not accumulate during the period ~2004 through 2009.” [21] 

    June, 2009

    In an entry on his own blog, Roger Pielke Sr. wrote:

    “Their has been no statistically significant warming of the upper ocean since 2003.” [22]

    “Sea level has actually flattened since 2006.”  [22]

    September, 2008,

    Writing at his blog, Roger A. Pielke Sr. declares: [23]

    “Hurricanes respond to their immediate environment, not a global average increase in heat!”

    Key Deeds

    September 8, 2016

    Roger Pielke Sr. criticized the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) for announcing that global warming had increased the chances of torrential rains by 40 percent.  Pielke Sr.  told The Washington Times that NOAA should be “embarrassed” by its rush to release the research, accusing the agency of “bias” and calling the study a “dismaying example of manipulation of science for political reasons.” [24]

    The models being used in the study have not shown the skill needed to make these definitive forecasts of changes in extreme rainfall statistics,” said Mr. Pielke in an email. “Also, the article is still under peer review and it was premature for NOAA to have done a press release.”

    May 19, 2015

    Roger Pielke Sr. wrote a guest post on Watts Up With That (WUWT), the blog managed by prominent climate change denier Anthony Watts. In his post, Pielke contends that climatologist Dr. Gavin Schmidt, Director of NASAGISSis “hiding from seven very inconvenient climate questions.” [5]

    Pielke wrote that he had submitted a series of questions to Gavin Schmidt: “On March 18 2015, I submitted a set of questions to Gavin Schmidt, Director of NASAGISS, who initially seemed inclined to answer and ask some of his own. However, he now is not even replying to my e-mails.” [5]

    Pielke goes on to post the questions at WUWT , stating that “By posting these questions, I am encouraging others to respond to the science issues I have raised, as well as be used in the future when Gavin is required to testify, such at a House and/or Senate committee.”  [5]

    One of those who responded was Ken Rice, Professor of Computational Astrophysics at the Institute for Astronomy of the University of Edinburgh. On his blog ...and Then There's Physics, Rice responds to one of Roger Pielke's questions, suggesting that the reason for an “apparent discrepancy between the system heat uptake rate estimated using an energy balance approach, and that estimated from ocean heat content measurements” is that “Roger appears to have made a number of mistakes in his calculation.” [25]

    August 20, 2013

    After the AGU released its statement on climate change (PDF) where they emphasized that “human-induced climate change requires urgent action,” Roger Pielke Sr. published a dissenting opinion in EOS journal (PDF). [26], [4]

    According to Pielke, who said he was on the AGU panel that helped draft the updated position on climate change, the AGU's statement was “incomplete” and gave to much emphasis to carbon dioxide:

    “[I]t inaccurately, in my view, presents a view of climate change that is dominated by the emission of carbon dioxide and a few other greenhouse gases,” Pielke wrote. “Indeed, in my opinion, the committee, under the direction of Gerald North with the writing subgroup led by Susan Hassol, was clearly motivated to produce a statement of this one  particular view. My viewpoint is that under this leadership, other views were never give  an adequate opportunity to be discussed.”

    March 8, 2011

    Roger A. Pielke Sr. testified before the House Energy & Commerce Committee in a hearing titled “Climate Science and EPA's Greenhouse Gas Regulations.” John R. Christy, a noted climate change denier, also testified at the event. [27]

    In his complete testimony, Pielke Sr. outlined four main points, which he described as follows:  [12]

    “1. Research has shown that a focus on just carbon dioxide and a few other greenhouse gases as the dominant human influence on climate is too narrow, and misses other important human influences.

    “2. The phrases 'global warming' and “climate change” are not the same. Global warming is a subset of climate change.

    “3. The prediction (or projection) of regional weather, including extremes, decades into the future is far more difficult than commonly assumed. In addition, the attribution of extreme events to a particular subset of climate forcings is scientifically incomplete if the research ignores other relevant human and natural causes of extreme weather events.

    “4. The climate science assessments of the IPCC and CCSP, as well as the various statements issued by the AGU, AMS, and NRC, are completed by a small subset of climate scientists who are often the same individuals in each case.”

    November, 2009

    Writing in the journal Eos, Pielke Sr. and other authors conclude that, while “The evidence predominantly suggests that humans are significantly altering the global environment, and thus climate, in a variety of diverse ways beyond the effects of human emissions of greenhouse gases, including CO2,” that other factors in addition to man-made CO2 need to be considered, and also that “the cost- benefit analyses regarding the mitigation of CO2 and other greenhouse gases need to be considered along with the other human climate forcings in a broader environmental context, as well as with respect to their role in the climate system.” [11]

    October, 2008

    In an interview with Mother Jones magazine, Roger A. Pielke Sr. argued that global warming had stopped: [13]

    MJ: “So it's not that you are a “global warming skeptic”; it's that you think that global warming has been hyped at the expense of other problems.”

    RAP: “That's exactly right. I would also add that climate change is much more than global warming. We have altered the climate significantly, say by land-use change, without changing the global average surface temperature, yet it has big impacts. So I definitely think that we humans have altered the climate system. I think we have a strong component that has been warming—for some reason, it has stopped. And I don't understand the reasons why.”

    September 3, 2008

    Roger A. Pielke Sr. responded to an article written by AP Science writer Seth Borenstein. DeSmog reported that Pielke particularly objected to the following lines written by Borenstein: [28]

    Global warming has probably made Hurricane Gustav a bit stronger and wetter, some top scientists said Sunday, but the specific connection between climate change and stronger hurricanes remains an issue of debate.”

    Measurements of the energy pumped into the air from the warm waters — essentially fuel for hurricanes — has increased dramatically since the mid 1990s, mostly in the strongest of hurricanes, according to a soon-to-be published paper in the journal Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems by Kevin Trenberth, climate analysis chief at National Center for Atmospheric Research in Boulder, Colo.”

    Warmer water makes the surface air warmer, which means it could contain more moisture. That means more hot moist air rises up the hurricane, serving as both fuel for the storm and extra rainfall coming back down, said Peter Webster, professor of atmospheric sciences at Georgia Tech.”

    Responding at his blog, Roger A. Pielke Sr. declared: [23]

    “Hurricanes respond to their immediate environment, not a global average increase in heat!”

    Pielke also stated: [23]

    “The focusing on global warming as the reason for any hurricane (or making it more likely to occur or become more intense) ignores that natural variations are not only more important than indicated by the AP news story, but also that the human influence involves a diverse range of first-order climate forcings, including, but not limited global warming [which, of course, has not occurred since at least mid-2004!].”

    August 23, 2005

    Roger A. Pielke Sr. resigned from a panel that had been generating a report of the Bush administration on atmospheric temperature trends. 

    The New York Times reported that Pielke had made his decision to resign after three papers had been published online on Aug. 11 by the journal Science. The papers explained how earlier analysis had failed to find warming in the troposphere, attributing it to errors in satellite and balloon studies. Several authors of those papers, who were also authors of the government report, said those findings would be discussed in the final report.  [29]

    Climate change denier John R. Christy, who had worked with Pielke on the Bush administration's report, commented:

    “This process is the worst way to generate scientific information.”

    Affiliations

    • CIRESSenior Research Scientist[2]
    • University of Colorado-Boulder — Senior Research Associate, Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences (November 2005 - present).  [2]
    • AMS— Fellow (1982). Serving on the AMS Committee on Planned and Inadvertent Weather Modification (October 2009-present). [2]
    • American Geophiscal Union (AGU— Fellow (2004). Currently serving on the AGUEOS Advisory Board on Natural Hazards (August 2009 - present). [2]
    • Duke University  — former adjunct faculty member in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering.  [2]
    • University of Arizona — Former visiting Professor in the Department of Atmospheric Sciences.  [2]

    Publications

    According to his profile at CIRES, Dr. Pielke has published over 380 papers in peer-reviewed journals, 55 chapters in books, co-edited 9 books, and made over 700 presentations during his career. A listing of papers can be viewed at the project website.  [2]

    Resources

    1. Roger A. Pielke Sr.CIRES. Archived June 11, 2010. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/0IGMW

    2. Roger A. Pielke Sr.CIRES. Archived December 22, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/gX353

    3. Update To Andy Revkin’s Question In 2005: 'Is Most Of The Observed Warming Over The Last 50 Years Likely To Have Been Due To The Increase In Greenhouse Gas Concentrations'?Climate Science: Roger Pielke Sr. May 4, 2010. Archived January 24, 2017. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/GvhyA

    4. R.A. Pielke Sr. “Climate Change Position Statement,Dissenting View” (PDF),EOS, Vol. 94, No. 34, pp. 301 (August, 2013). Archived .pdf on file at DeSmog.

    5. Roger Pielke Sr. “NASA’s Dr. Gavin Schmidt goes into hiding from seven very inconvenient climate questions,” Watts Up With That? May 19, 2015. Archived January 25, 2017. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/dl64r

    6. ROGERPIELKE, JR.” Center for Science & Technology Policy Research, University of Colorado Boulder. Archived December 22, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/lzU0O

    7. David Roberts. “Bashing Dirty Hippies and Getting Played: A Case Study in Six Chapters,” The Huffington Post, January 17, 2007. Archived January 25, 2017. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/BFtjZ

    8. Is Roger Pielke, Jr. Zelig?Examiner.com, March 1, 2008. Archived March 4, 2009. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/eRoSm

    9. Roger Pielke Sr. Group,” CIRES. Archived December 22, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/qXtk0

    10. Roger A. Pielke Sr. “4/ wrt http://time.com/4631007/president-obama-farewell-speech-transcript/ … “change” in “climate change” redundant. Climate always has changed on different time periods naturally” Twitter post by user @RogerAPielkeSr, January 11, 2017. Archived .pdf on file at DeSmog.

    11. Roger Pielke Sr., et al.Climate Change: The Need to Consider Human Forcings Besides Greenhouse Gases,” EOS, Vol. 90, Issue 45 (November 10, 2009). Full .pdf retrieved from Wiley online library and archived at DeSmog.

    12. Roger A. Pielke Sr. “Testimony to the Subcommittee on Energy and Power entitled “Climate Science and EPA’s Greenhouse Gas Regulation” (PDF), The Energy and Commerce Committee, March 8, 2011. Archived .pdf on file at DeSmog.

    13. Q&A: Roger A. Pielke Sr.Mother Jones, November/December 2008 Issue. Archived January 25, 2017. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/8WPh6

    14. Correction To A December 10, 2007 BBC News Article,” Climate Science: Roger Pielke Sr., December 10, 2007. Archived January 25, 2017. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/5dJFa

    15. Response to Andy Revkin’s Science Question of August 26, 2005,” Climate Science: Roger Pielke Sr. August 29, 2005. Archived January 25, 2017. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/epF1A

    16. Anthony Watts. “WUWT milestone – 10 years,” Watts Up With That? November 17, 2016. Comment #2344192 by user rpielke, November 17, 2016 at 11:54 AM. Archived January 25, 2017. Archived .png on file at DeSmog. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/hcB7C

    17. Watt about a 10th Anniversary?…and Then There's Physics, November 19, 2016. Archived January 25, 2017. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/twxv7

    18. Q&A For Climate For High School Students,” Climate Science: Roger Pielke Sr. November 8, 2011. Archived January 6, 2017. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/1AQif

    19. My Response To The Skeptical Science Post “One-Sided 'Skepticism',” Climate Science: Roger Pielke Sr. September 15, 2011 Archived January 6, 2017. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/CPVCR

    20. Informative News Article by Margot Roosevelt In The Los Angeles Times On Richard Muller’s Testimony To Congress,” Climate Science: Roger Pielke Sr. April 4, 2011. Archived January 5, 2017. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/lxTi3

    21. Misinformation on the Website 'Skeptical Science – Getting Skeptical About Global Warming Skepticism',” Climate Science: Roger Pielke Sr. September 6, 2010. Archived January 5, 2017. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/uC7kW

    22. Real Climate’s Misinformation,” Climate Science: Roger Pielke Sr. June 30, 2009. Archived January 5, 2017. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/OKpCt

    23.  ”Hurricanes And Global Warming – A Scientific Disconnect,” Climate Science: Roger Pielke Sr. September 3, 2008. Archived January 24, 2017. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/TsqyT

    24. Valerie Richardson. “Climate change skeptics scoff as NOAA quickly links global warming, La. floods,” The Washington Times, September 8, 2016. Archived January 25, 2017. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/ZA9DK

    25. Watt about Roger’s questions?” ...and Then There's Physics, May 20, 2015. Archived January 25, 2017. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/HYYkl

    26. “Human‐Induced Climate Change Requires Urgent Action” (PDF), American Geophysical Union, December, 2003. Revised August, 2013. Archived .pdf on file at DeSmog.

    27. HEARING: Climate Science and EPA's Greenhouse Gas Regulations,” House Energy & Commerce Committee, March 8, 2011. Archived March 16, 2011. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/QOFTA

    28. Richard Littlemore. “Roger Pielke Sr. Attacks Messenger, Injures Self,” DeSmog, September 4, 2008. 

    29. Andrew C. Revkin. “Panelist Who Dissents On Climate Change Quits,” The New York Times, August 23, 2005. Archived .pdf on file at DeSmog. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/QM4j2

    Other Resources

    Rex Tillerson

    $
    0
    0

    Rex W. Tillerson

    Credentials

    • Bachelor of science degree in civil engineering (B.S.C.E.) at the University of Texas at Austin (1975). [1]

    Background

    Rex W. Tillerson served as the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of ExxonMobil from 2006-2016. Tillerson announced his retirement on December 14, 2016, after his nomination for the position of U.S. Secretary of State by President-elect Donald Trump. Exxon Mobil Corp said that Darren Woods would replace Rex Tillerson as chairman and CEO after Tillerson was chosen by President-elect Donald Trump to serve as the next U.S. Secretary of State.  [2], [3][4]

    Tillerson was fired as Secretary of State on March 13, 2018 after learning about the change from a tweet by the President. Trump announced he would be replaced with Mike Pompeo. [72]

    Critics speculated that Tillerson's stake in the Russian oil industry could “create a very blurry line between his interests as an oilman and his role as America’s leading diplomat.” He would also be in a position to benefit the oil company, which has billions of dollars in projects being held back by American sanctions in Russia. [5] 

    The chances that he will view Russia with Exxon Mobil DNA are close to 100 percent,” said Robert Weissman, the president of Public Citizen, a public interest group based in Washington. [5]

    Tillerson earned Moscow's Order of Friendship award from Russia and has previously voiced skepticism about American sanction. He was also previously the president of Exxon Ventures (CIS) Inc. and Exxon Neftegas Limited, where he was responsible for Exxon's holdings in Russia and the Caspian Sea. The New York Times notes that Tillerson also owns $218 million in Exxon stock, and has a pension plan worth nearly $70 million. [5]

    Before confirmation, Tillerson announced he would sever his ties with the oil company to comply with federal ethics rules. Exxon announced that it would pay him out in cash for his 2-million-plus shares and that money would then be transferred to an independently managed trust. If confirmed, Tillerson also promised to sell over 600,000 Exxon shares he currently owns. [58]

    Tillerson was sworn in as Secretary of State on February 1, 2017 after being confirmed by the Senate earlier the same day. [59]

    ExxonMobil on Climate Change

    According to data collected by Greenpeace's ExxonSecrets project, ExxonMobil has given more than $33 million since 1997 to over 60 different organizations that work to spread misinformation about man-made climate change and deny the scientific consensus. [6]

    In addition to funding climate change denial, investigations by InsideClimate NewsThe Guardian, and Los Angeles Times' partner investigations with Columbia Graduate School of Journalism document what #ExxonKnew about the impact of fossil fuel pollution on climate and when the company knew it. [7], [8], [9]

    DeSmog's own investigation subsequently uncovered Exxon corporate documents from the late 1970s stating unequivocally “there is no doubt” that CO2 from the burning of fossil fuels was a growing “problem” well understood within the company. [10]

    In December, 2016, The Waterkeeper Alliance, represented by Pace Environmental Litigation Clinic, submitted a 54-page petition with 358 footnotes and 448 pages containing 43 exhibits to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), calling for an end of all of its federal contracts with ExxonMobil. [11]

    DeSmog reports that the petition serves as a “corporate rap sheet” including details on what the company knew about climate change, and could provide fodder for members of Congress to “ask tough questions” of Tillerson at his congressional confirmation hearing. [12]

    Exxon executives, speaking confidentially, argued that Mr. Tillerson had pushed for more research on advanced biofuels, carbon capture and sequestration, and carbon taxes to reduce greenhouse emissions. They also said that Tillerson had moved toward acknowledging climate change as a serious problem, however Tillerson also strongly defended Exxon during the investigations by state attorneys general. [13]

    Tillerson publicly denied the charges that Exxon had misled the public on climate change: [14]

    “Nothing could be further from the truth,” Tillerson said. “They're dealing with a period of time that happened decades ago,” he said. “I'm not sure how helpful it would be for me to talk about it, particularly as we're leading up to some very important meetings that are going to occur in Paris here in just a few weeks. I don't want to be a distraction. I really don't want this to be a distraction. There's some serious issues that need to be talked about.”

    Rex Tillerson & the Trump Administration

    On December 12, 2016, The New York Times announced that Donald J. Trump had officially nominated Rex Tillerson as his Secretary of State. He was officially confirmed for the position on February 1, 2017. The New York Times also reported that Tillerson's confirmation would present a challenge, given his extensive ties to Russia, and that ExxonMobil's business dealings with Russia would also come under additional scrutiny. [15][59]

    The Wall Street Journal noted that Tillerson's nomination even surprised senior Exxon officials, given Tillerson's complete lack of prior government experience.  [16]

    Republican Senator John McCain said Tillerson’s connections to Mr. Putin were “a matter of concern to me” and promised to examine them closely if he were appointed.

    Vladimir Putin is a thug, bully and a murderer, and anybody else who describes him as anything else is lying,” Mr. McCain said on Fox News[15]

    During a briefing with reporters, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnel refused to comment on Tillerson's nomination: [17]

    “I don't want to comment on a phantom nominee today,” he stated. “The Russian are not our friends. I hope that those who are going to be in positions of responsibility in the new administration share my view.” [17]

    Trump described Tillerson as “among the most accomplished business leaders and international deal makers in the world.” [18]

    “Rex Tillerson’s career is the embodiment of the American dream. Through hard work, dedication and smart deal making, Rex rose through the ranks to become CEO of ExxonMobil, one of the world’s largest and most respected companies,” the Trump news release read. “Rex knows how to manage a global enterprise, which is crucial to running a successful State Department.”

    According to Politico, Rex Tillerson was interviewed by Donald Trump after a suggestion by former Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice and Defense Secretary Robert Gates, who both count ExxonMobil among their private consulting clients. Rice's recommendation was further backed by Robert Gates three days later. [19] Tillerson's nomination was reportedly advocated by both Steve Bannon and his son-in-law Jared Kushner. [20]

    After Trump's announcement, Media Matters reports that numerous news outlets had reported prominent figures including James Baker III, Robert M. Gates, and Condoleezza Rice had expressed support for Tillerson, with some mentioning that their support adds credibility to the pick. However, those outlets failed to disclose that Baker, Gates, and Rice all have significant financial ties to Tillerson, ExxonMobil, and the company's business in Russia. [21]

    Bob Murray, CEO of Murray Energy Corp, said “Rex Tillerson is one of the best choices he could ever make as secretary of state of our country.” [22] 

    Tillerson's Ties with Russia

    Rex Tillerson has had close ties with Russia's President Vladimir Putin since representing Exxon's interests in Russia during President Boris Yeltsin's premiership. [16]

    Bloomberg notes that Tillerson's ties to Putin go back to 1999, when they met on Sakhalin Island in Russia’s Far East. As recently as 2015, Tillerson was meeting with “Putin's inner circle.” The relationship was something touted by Trump as an advantage: [23]

    A great advantage is he knows many of the players, and he knows them well,” Trump said in a Fox News interview. “He does massive deals in Russia. He does massive deals for the company – not for himself, for the company.” [23]

    The Wall Street Journal describes the relationship is both Tillerson's biggest claim to his nomination as secretary of state under Donald Trump, and also “potentially the biggest concern about him,” given the investigation into Russia's alleged hacking. [24]

    I have a very close relationship with [Mr. Putin],” Tillerson told students at the University of Texas, his alma mater, in February. “I don’t agree with everything he’s doing. I don’t agree with everything a lot of leaders are doing. But he understands that I am a businessman. And I have invested a lot of money, our company has invested a lot of money, in Russia, very successfully.” [24]

    Tillerson became president of Exxon Ventures (CIS) Inc. and Exxon Neftegas Limited, where he was responsible for Exxon's holdings in Russia and the Caspian Sea, as well as the Sakhalin I consortium operations offshore Sakhalin Island, Russia. In 2013, he was awarded the Order of Friendship by Vladimir Putin, president of the Russian Federation. [2], [25]

    The Guardian reports that Tillerson's name was on a set of leaked documents given to the german newspaper Süddeutsche Zeitung by an anonymous source. One leaked 2001 document originated from the corporate registry in the Bahamas, and detailed his directorship of Exxon Deftegas. [57]

    “Though there is nothing untoward about this directorship, it has not been reported before and is likely to raise fresh questions over Tillerson’s relationship with Russia ahead of a potentially stormy confirmation hearing by the US senate foreign relations committee,” The Guardian's Luke Harding and Hanes Munzinger reported[57]

    Notably, Exxon, the top U.S. producer of oil and gas, actually leases more land in Russia than it does in the U.S.: [26]

    Exxon boosted its Russian holdings to 63.7 million acres in 2014 from 11.4 million at the end of 2013, according to data from U.S. regulatory filings,” reported Bloomberg in March 2015. “That dwarfs the 14.6 million acres of rights Exxon holds in the U.S., which until last year was its largest exploration prospect.” [26]

    After a two-year hiatus, in June, 2016, Tillerson attended the St. Petersburg International Economic Forum, a top business meeting held annually in Russia. [27]

    In 2014, shortly after the United States and allies had applied sanctions on Russia for its action with the Ukraine, President Obama had asked American business leaders not to addend the major business forum in Russa that may. While Tillerson obeyed, the New York Times reports that he found another way to get a seat by sending his top exploration official in his place. That official, Neil W. Duffin, signed an agreement promoting more business with the state-owned Rosneft and expand joint drilling in the Arctic Ocean. [13]

    “Mr. Tillerson has opposed sanctions on Russia, which are the single greatest obstacle to foreign investment in that country,” the New York Times notes. “Russia has two enormous areas for new oil development, in the Barents Sea and the Bazhenov shale field in western Siberia, that are essentially closed to development because of a lack of foreign capital and expertise. Exxon was poised to invest in both areas before the sanctions.” [13]

    In a 2005 interview, Tillerson laid out his strategy for doing business in Russia: [28]

    ExxonMobil is not interested in buying shares in other companies, because it does not allow us to fully do what we do best. We invest in Russia, not only money,” 

    Exxon-Russia Timeline

    1990s – Exxon's interest in Russia started in the early 90s, with former Exxon CEO Lee Raymond's attempt to buy into the Russian energy company Yukos. [29]

    1998 – Rex Tillerson was appointed head of Exxon Neftegas Limited, which was in charge of the Sakhalin-1 oil and gas project off the coast of Siberia. [30]

    1999  Tillerson met with Putin on the Sakhalin Island as Exxon began relations with the Russia state-owned Rosneft. Tillerson and Putin met several times after this, building Exxon's business interests in Russia. [31]

    2004 – Tillerson became president of ExxonMobil. In the same year, Igor Sechin took control of Rosneft, the company controlling the Russian portion of the Sakhalin-1 consortium. [30]

    2011 – Rosneft and Exxon signed a $3.2 billion deal, as part of a “Strategic Cooperation Agreement“ giving Exxon drilling permissions in the Russian Arctic in exchange for stakes in some of Exxon's projects in the US and Canada.  “These agreements are important milestones in this strategic relationship,” Tillerson said at the time. [32]

    2012 – Sechin visited New York in April 2012 as part of a publicity tour with Tillerson to promote the ExxonMobil-Rosneft cooperation. [30]

    2013 – Rosneft further expanded their Arctic deal with Exxon. This year, Tillerson was also personally awarded Russia's Order of Friendship medal, something The Washington Post notes isn't as impressive as it sounds. [33]

    2014 – The Artic deal with Rosneft was cancelled when the US imposed sanctions on Russia over its annexation of Crimea. Tillerson condemned the sanctions, saying they caused “broad collateral damage.” [34]

    Stance on Climate Change

    October, 2016

    “At ExxonMobil, we share the view that the risks of climate change are serious and warrant thoughtful action.” [35]

    May 29, 2013

    “If you examine the temperature record of the last decade, it really hadn’t changed.” [36]

    “Well, I can’t conclude there is something magical about 350 because that suggests these models are very competent and our examination about the models, are that they’re not competent […]”  [36]

    March, 2013

    “[T]he facts remain there are uncertainties around the climate, climate change, why it's changing, what the principal drivers of climate change are. […] at the end of it there are still a range of uncertain outcomes around these models” [37]

    On CO2

    “It's – it is clear that there is an impact.  […]  What's not clear is our ability to measure with a great degree of accuracy or certainty exactly how large that impact will be.” [37]

    June 27, 2012

    Rex Tillerson has said we need to look at how to adapt to climate change and changing weather patterns: [38]

    “As we have looked at the most recent studies coming – and the IPCC reports, which we – I've seen the drafts; I can't say too much because they're not out yet. But when you predict things like sea level rise, you get numbers all over the map. If you take a – what I would call a reasonable scientific approach to that, we believe those consequences are manageable. They do require us to begin to exert – or spend more policy effort on adaptation. What do you want to do if we think the future has sea level rising four inches, six inches? Where are the impacted areas, and what do you want to do to adapt to that?

    “And as human beings as a – as a – as a species, that's why we're all still here. We have spent our entire existence adapting, OK? So we will adapt to this. Changes to weather patterns that move crop production areas around – we'll adapt to that. It's an engineering problem, and it has engineering solutions. And so I don't – the fear factor that people want to throw out there to say we just have to stop this, I do not accept.

    I do believe we have to – we have to be efficient and we have to manage it, but we also need to look at the other side of the engineering solution, which is how are we going to adapt to it. And there are solutions. It's not a problem that we can't solve.”

    January, 2010

    According to Tillerson, while there may be climate change, it was not yet clear “to what extent and therefore what can you do about it. […] There is not a model available today that is competent.” [39]

    May, 2008

    Speaking with reporters after the annual meeting of shareholders, Tillerson argued that climate change science is not settled, and that it is a “corporate social responsibility” to continue to supply the world with fossil fuels: [40]

    My view is that this is so extraordinarily important to people the world over, that to not have a debate on it is irresponsible. To suggest that we know everything we need to know about these issues is irresponsible.”

    And I will take all the criticism that comes with it. Anybody that tells you that they got this figured out is not being truthful. There are too many complexities around climate science for anybody to fully understand all of the causes and effects and consequences of what you may chose to do to attempt to affect that. We have to let scientists to continue their investigative work, unencumbered by political influences. This is too important to be cute with it.”

    May 30, 2007

    “There's much we know and can agree on around the climate change issue, and there’s much that we just don’t believe we do know…and we want to have a debate about the things we know and understand, the things we know about that we don’t understand very well, and the things we don’t even know about around this very complex issue of climate science. So that will continue to be our position.” [41], [42]

    Video produced by Sirotablog:

    May, 2007

    We don't have a difference of views that it's an important issue. We have differences about what we know and what we don't know.” [43]

    February, 2007

    My understanding is there’s not a clear 100 percent conclusion drawn,” Tillerson told an industry gathering in Houston. “Nobody can conclusively 100 percent know how this is going to play out. I think that’s important.” [44]

    Tillerson poked fun at ethanol, calling it “moonshine”: [44]

    I am not an expert on biofuels,” he said. “I am not an expert on farming. I don’t have a lot of technology to add to moonshine.” [44]

    March, 2006

    “We recognize that climate change is a serious issue. We recognize that greenhouse gas emissions are one of the factors affecting climate change.” [45]

    2005

    Now, the question is, is part of what’s happening related to something other than natural variability? And if so, how do you determine what that is? And the reality is, the science isn’t there to make that determination.” [46]

    Key Quotes

    May 25, 2016

    “The world is going to have to continue using fossil fuels, whether they like it or not.” [47]

    May 5, 2016

    “Advances in hydraulic fracturing have significantly increased volumes of cleaner-burning domestic natural gas, helping bring down U.S. carbon dioxide emissions to levels not seen since the 1990s. In fact, thanks to the shale revolution, the U.S. is now leading the world in reducing emissions – a fact rarely conveyed in the public discourse of our policy decisions.” [48]

    April, 2012

    Speaking about fracking:

     “If you want to live by the precautionary principle, then crawl up in a ball and live in a cave.” [49]

    January, 2009

    “A carbon tax is also the most efficient means of reflecting the cost of carbon in all economic decisions – from investments made by companies to fuel their requirements to the product choices made by consumers. […]

    A carbon tax may be better suited for setting a uniform standard to hold all nations accountable. This last point is important. Given the global nature of the challenge, and the fact that the economic growth in developing economies will account for a significant portion of future greenhouse-gas emission increases, policy options must encourage and support global engagement.” [50]

    August, 2008

    “It doesn't do the consumer a lot of good to substitute an alternative fuel that costs $5 for gasoline that costs $4.” [51]

    “The dominant energy source in the future will continue to be oil and natural gas.” [52]

    Key Deeds

    August 29, 2017

    Before UN Climate talks scheduled in November, Tillerson scrapped the position for the State Department’s Special Envoy for Climate Change. [66]

    In a letter to Senate Foreign Relations chair Bob Corker (R-TN), Tillerson wrote, “I believe that the Department will be able to better execute its mission by integrating certain envoys and special representative offices within the regional and functional bureaus, and eliminating those that have accomplished or outlived their original purpose.” [66]

    July 2017

    While the House of Representatives passed legislation to tighten U.S. sanctions on Russia, Iran, and North Korea, Tillerson had publicly argued against the sanctions. [67]

    Tillerson told the Senate Foreign Relations Committee that the sanctions would reduce “the flexibility to turn that heat up” when working with Russia on anti-terrorism efforts or to resolve the Syrian civil war, Politico reported[68]

    Tillerson said the U.S. and Russia “have some channels that are open where we're starting to talk, and I think what I wouldn't want to do is close the channels off with something new.” [68]

    July 20, 2017

    The New York Times reported that ExxonMobil would be fined $2 million by the Treasury Department for violating sanctions that the U.S. imposed on Russia in 2014. The violation occured while Rex Tillerson was the company's chief executive. [63]

    Exxon Mobil demonstrated reckless disregard for U.S. sanctions requirements,” the Treasury reported in the penalty. “Exxon Mobil caused significant harm to the Ukraine-related sanctions program.” [63]

    Corporate Accountability International spokesperson Gigi Kellett said the following in a statement: [64]

    It should really come as no surprise that Exxon Mobil would violate the law in order to advance its profit interests. Nor is it a surprise that Trump Administration officials–Rex Tillerson in particular–would be implicated in such a scandal. Exxon Mobil’s blatant disregard for the rule of law is just the latest chapter in its decades-long campaign of lying, obfuscation and regulatory interference that has delayed climate action for a generation. Let’s not forget this corporation’s track record: As early as the 1960’s, Exxon understood the global consequences of its business, both human and environmental, and chose to bury the truth.” [64]

    June 2, 2017

    A court filing by New York Attorney General, Eric Schneiderman, accused Rex Tillerson of having approved an accounting scheme for greenhouse gas emissions during his time at ExxonMobil which deliberately misled investors, as reported by Dan Zegart at the Climate Investigations Center. [61], [62]

    “Schneiderman claims that beginning in 2007, ExxonMobil used one set of figures in describing carbon-related risks to investors but internally used another, secret set. The net result was to vastly understate the financial danger to the company,” Zegart wrote. [62]

    The June 2 court filing also accuses ExxonMobil of destroying documents, despite its legal obligation to preserve records relevant to the attorney general's investigation on potential fraud in the company's disclosures about climate change. [62]

    “These failures directly resulted in the destruction of months, and in many cases, more than a year’s worth, of emails and other electronic documents belonging to key custodians including the company’s top management and reserves analysts,” the attorney general wrote. [62]

    Zegart's article is also cross-posted at DeSmog

    May 20, 2017

    Tillerson and President Donald Trump were present at a deal signed between ExxonMobil and the state-owned Saudi Basic Industries Corporation (SABIC) to study a co-owned natural gas refinery in the Gulf of Mexico, DeSmog reported. [69]

    While the official ExxonMobil press release mentions that ExxonMobil CEO Darren Woods was in the room for the signing, as well as ExxonMobil Saudi Arabia CEO Philippe Ducom and SABIC executives, it failed to mention the private signing ceremony attended afterwards by both Trump and Rex Tillerson. [70]

    DeSmog found images of Tillerson and Trump at the signing ceremony via the Saudi Press Agency's English-language press Twitter account, which released a series of photos of Woods and Tillerson shaking hands with SABICCEO Yousef Al-Benyan and Saudi Defense Minister Prince Mohammad bin Salman, respectively: [71]

    Public Citizen energy program director Tyson Slocum told DeSmog that Tilleson's presence could violate his recusal agreement regarding Exxon affairs:

    The President's Saudi trip was a bizarre Art of the Deal-esque foreign policy disaster: a sleazy mix of conflicted government-arranged corporate endorsement deals,” Slocum told DeSmog. “Most troubling of all was Tillerson's presence and role in accommodating Exxon's deal with the House of Saud, thereby violating the former CEO's recusal agreement. Trump and Tillerson's Riyadh embarrassment is just another sad indication of the administration's prioritization of crony corporate access masquerading as a jumbled assembly of foreign policy and economic development.”

    March 2017

    Under Tillerson, the State Department's web page for the Office of Global Change was scaled back and revised with more passive language on climate change. [65]

    Office of Global Change website before and after Trump administration changes

    The Office of Global Change web page, before (left) and after (right) its alterations by the Trump administration. Credit: Environmental Data & Governance Initiative

    As Climate Central noted[65]

    Deleted from the text was: ‘The United States is taking a leading role by advancing an ever-expanding suite of measures at home and abroad.’ Also stricken were references to mitigation efforts and other mentions of leading on climate change.

    In its place is more generic language, solely referencing that the office represents the U.S. at the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change and other international forums. It does use the word ‘lead’ once, but only saying the office leads the U.S. government in participating with the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.”

    January, 2017

    Testifying before the Senate, Tillerson said that  “I don't see it as the imminent national security threat that perhaps others do,” The Daily Caller reported. Tillerson added: [60]

    The facts on the ground are indisputable in terms of what's happening with drought, disease, insect populations, all the things you cite, but the science behind the clear connection is not conclusive. And, there are many reports out there that we are unable yet to connect specific events to climate change alone,” Tillerson said.  [60]

    Dem. Senator Jeff Merkley, citing Hurricane Sandy as an example, said “What we're seeing are a lot of scientific reports that will say we can tell you the odds increased, we can't tell you any specific event was the direct consequence,” Merkley said, citing Hurricane Sandy as an example of global warming-induced weather.  [60]

    To which Tillerson responded that “I think as you indicated, there's some literature out there that suggests that. There's other literature that says it's inconclusive,” Tillerson responded.  [60]

    One of the things we– I'm sorry to hear that viewpoint because it's overwhelmingly– the scales are on one side of this argument,” Merkley said.  [60]

    October 19, 2016

    Speaking at the 37th Annual Oil & Money Conference in London, England, Rex Tillerson supported the idea of a carbon tax: [35]

    “We have long supported a carbon tax as the best policy of those being considered. Replacing the hodge-podge of current, largely ineffective regulations with a revenue-neutral carbon tax would ensure a uniform and predictable cost of carbon across the economy. It would allow market forces to drive solutions.” [35]

    According to Tillerson, “At ExxonMobil, we share the view that the risks of climate change are serious and warrant thoughtful action.” He adds that “In our industry, the best hope for the future is to enable and encourage long-term investments in both proven and new technologies, while supporting effective policies.” [35]

    March 7, 2013

    Rex tillerson appeared on the Charlie Rose show to discuss topics affecting Exxon, including climate change. Notable excerpts below: [37]

    On climate change:

    “With all of that, though, the facts remain there are uncertainties around the climate, climate change, why it's changing, what the principal drivers of climate change are. And I think the issue that I think is unfortunate in the public discourse is that the loudest voices are what I call the absolutist, the people who are absolutely certain that it is entirely man- made and you can attribute all of the climate change to nothing but man- made burning of fossil fuels. And on the other end of the debate I certainly would say to absolutists who say there is absolutely no relationship. And the truth of the matter based on our investigation is it's somewhere in between.

    Climate science is probably one of the most extraordinarily complex areas of scientific study that anyone can undertake. The variables are numerous. Many of the variables are measurable and – and we can replicate models. Many of the variables we cannot measure them. We cannot model them but we know they're part of the climate system. And so the models are extraordinarily complicated. And therefore how certain do you feel about the competency of the model and its ability to predict the future. And it's my view that the models have become increasingly more competent because of high speed computing capabilities and just more sophisticated mathematical modelling and more data to inform the model. But at the end of it there are still a range of uncertain outcomes around these models. And every scientist I know agrees there's a range of uncertainty. And if you read that PCC-detailed report they talk about these ranges of uncertainty.”  [37]

    On CO2, Tillerson said “it is clear that there is an impact”:

    Of CO2 there is a difference I think, a range in that model as to what the impact of 600 ppm versus 400 ppm or 300 ppm would be. There are some ranges around those numbers, even, because it's not clear when we introduce that into the climate model how some of the other elements that we're not able to model so well may act to, in a different way. It's – it is clear that there is an impact.  […]  What's not clear is our ability to measure with a great degree of accuracy or certainty exactly how large that impact will be. And that's why most of the impact studies you see have ranges around them.”  [37]

    On extreme weather and climate change, Tillerson says “There has been nothing to confirm that there is a link.” However, he later adds “Well, I view global warming and climate change as a serious risk. And I'm in the risk management business. “  [37]

    January 20, 2010

    Rex Tillerson presented congressional testimony on behalf of ExxonMobil, saying that while the company acknowledged man-made climate change to some degree, it was not yet clear “to what extent and therefore what can you do about it.” Tillerson added, “There is not a model available today that is competent” for understanding the science and predicting the future. [39]

    The New York Times reported that Tillerson's congressional testimony was later used an example of “questionable public statements” by Attorney General Eric Schneiderman in his investigation of ExxonMobil's knowledge of climate change. [53]

    November 13, 2007

    DeSmog's Ross Gelbspan reported that on the same day Hillary Clinton released her plan to reduce the US addiction to foreign oil imports and significantly reduce greenhouse gas emissions, Rex Tillerson, release dan “isolationism” in energy policy, arguing that attempts to pursue energy independence are futile and counter-productive. [54]

    Tillerson stated that:

    “Regardless, no conceivable combination of demand moderation or domestic supply development can realistically close the gap and eliminate Americans' need for imports.” [54]

    November 30, 2006

    Rex Tillerson spoke at the Boston College Chief Executives' Club on the subjects of oil price fluctuation, peak oil, climate change, and energy security. Tillerson largely denounces wind and solar power as small players in the overall energy mix, noting that “fossil fuels will remain the predominant energy force for the foreseeable future.” [55]

    Regarding climate change, Tillerson notes that “the potential risk to society could prove to be significant,” yet suggests that further study is needed, and ends his speech calling for policies that would open up the U.S. to more oil and gas exploration. On climate, Tillerson calls for “ongoing study of not only the possible forcing effects resulting from man-kind's socio economic activity, but equally if not more important a better understanding of the natural forcing elements that are, and have been a part of the climate system since the dawn of time.”  [55]

    Below is the complete audio, followed by notable excerpts from Tillerson's speech: [55]

    “No energy source of sufficient scale to meet global needs comes without consequences.” [4:47]

    “Oil, like all fossil fuels, is indeed finite. But it is far from finished.” [5:18]

    “Wind and solar are likely to see double digit growth rates over the next 25 years, due in large part to government mandates and subsidies.” [6:13]

    “However, these alternatives build upon a relatively small base. And, as I mentioned earlier, are expanding within a world energy system that is itself expanding significantly. For this reason, they will not fundamentally change the world energy mix—Despite their impressive growth.”  [6:37]

    “Until breakthroughs are achieved and implemented worldwide, fossil fuels will remain the predominant energy force for the foreseeable future. No other energy source holds the same advantages of availability, affordability, and adaptability.”[7:17]

    “So the real question is not whether we will soon reach peak oil, but whether we can reach peak performance.” [7:34]

    “There simply are no silver bullets to the energy-environment challenge.” [17:55]

    “While our scientific understanding of climate change continues to improve, it nonetheless remains today an extraordinarily complex area of scientific study. Having said that, the potential risk to society could prove to be significant. So, despite the areas of uncertainty that do exist, it is prudent to develop and implement strategies that address the potential risk.” [18:10]

    “In my view this means we should continue to fund ongoing scientific research, without conditioned or preconceived outcomes, to increase our understanding of all of the forcings which are part of this very elegant but very complex climate system in which we live.” [18:37]

    “Including ongoing study of not only the possible forcing effects resulting from man-kind's socio economic activity, but equally if not more important a better understanding of the natural forcing elements that are, and have been a part of the climate system since the dawn of time.” [18:55]

    “While the science community continues their study, we should pursue public policies that start gradually, and learn along the way, with full recognition of the economic consequences of certain actions. And we should bring all countries into the effort.” [19:14]

    “This is a global-wide, century scale problem. 85% of the future growth in CO2 emissions will come from the developing world. Only 15% from the developed economies. [19:30]

    “We should start on a path to reduce the likelihood of the worst outcomes and understand the context of managing carbon emissions among other developing world priorities such as economic development, poverty eradication, and public health. Consistent with this approach, we should take steps now to reduce emissions in an effective and meaningful way. Improving the fuel economy of our light-duty vehicle fleet is one such way. Reducing emissions from coal-fired power plants must also be a priority. […] [19:47]

    “The important point is that a variety of ways exist to mitigate carbon dioxide emissions but weighing the options effectively requires understanding the potential scale, cost, and economic and quality of life tradeoffs.” [20:25]

    “Policies that promote open access to untapped oil and natural gas resources in our country can help reduce our dependence on imports […]. Ours is the only country in the world with major oil and natural gas resources that as a matter of policy denies its own citizens the economic benefits of developing and utilizing the energy resources that belong to them.” [23:23]

    Affiliations

    ExxonMobil Affiliations

    • ExxonMobil Corporation — Chairman and Chief Executive Officer since January 1, 2006. Formerly President/Board Member (2004), and Senior vice president (2001).  Tillerson announced he would retire at the end of 2016. [2][3]
    • ExxonMobil Development Company — President (1999). [2]
    • Exxon Ventures (CIS) Inc. and Exxon Neftegas Limited — President (1998). [2]
    • Exxon Yemen Inc., Esso Exploration and Production Khorat Inc.  — President. (1995). [2]
    • Exxon Corporation — Production Advisor (1992)
    • Exxon USA— General manager of the central production division (1989). [2]
    • The Exxon Company — Production Engineer (1975) [2]

    Other Affiliations

    • Center for Strategic and International Studies — Trustee. [2]
    • American Petroleum Institute (API) — Member of the executive committee and former chairman. [2]
    • Business Roundtable — Member. [2]
    • The Business Council — Former member, executive committee (including 2011 and 2012). [56]

    Resources

    1. Rex W. Tillerson,” The University of Texas at Austin Cockrell School of Engineering. Archived December 14, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/dim0k

    2. Rex W. Tillerson: Chairman and Chief Executive Officer,” ExxonMobil. Archived December 14, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/gyBxB

    3. (Press Release). “Rex Tillerson to Retire, Darren Woods Elected Chairman, CEO of Exxon Mobil Corporation,” ExxonMobil, December 14, 2016. Archived December 15, 2016. Archive.is URL:https://archive.is/IpMXu

    4. Exxon Mobil Taps Darren Woods to Replace Rex Tillerson as CEO,” The Wall Street Journal, December 14, 2016. Archived .pdf on file at DeSmog. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/4kwER

    5. Andrew E. Kramer and Clifford Krauss. “Rex Tillerson’s Company, Exxon, Has Billions at Stake Over Sanctions on Russia,” The New York Times, December 12, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/4zVDL

    6. EXXONMOBIL'S $33 MILLIONCAMPAIGNTOSOWDOUBTANDDENIALABOUTGLOBALWARMING,” DeSmog.

    7. Suzanne Goldenberg. “Exxon knew of climate change in 1981, email says – but it funded deniers for 27 more years,” The Guardian, July 8, 2015. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/ceDCf

    8. Exxon: The Road Not Taken,” InsideClimate News series.

    9. Sara Jerving, Katie Jennings, Masako Melissa Hirsch and Susanne Rust. “What Exxon knew about the Earth's melting Arctic,” Los Angeles Times, October 9, 2015. Archived December 14, 2016. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/ZZjxk

    10. Brendan DeMelle and Kevin Grandia. “'There is no doubt': Exxon Knew CO2 Pollution Was A Global Threat By Late 1970s,” DeSmog, April 26, 2016.

    11. PETITIONFORSUSPENSIONORDEBARMENT” (PDF), PACEENVIRONMENTALLITIGATIONCLINIC, INC. Retrieved from Google Drive. Archived .pdf on file at DeSmog.

    12. Steve Horn. “As Trump Names Exxon CEO Tillerson Secretary of State, Waterkeeper Alliance Asks EPA to Tell Company 'You're Fired!'” DeSmog, December 14, 2016.

    13. Clifford Krauss. “Rex Tillerson, an Aggressive Dealmaker Whose Ties With Russia May Prompt Scrutiny,” The New York Times, December 11, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/2fD4M

    14. John H. Cushman Jr. “Exxon CEO Denies Misleading Public About Climate Change,” InsideClimate News, November 5, 2015. Archived December 15, 2016.

    15. Michael D. Shear and Maggie Haberman. “Rex Tillerson, Exxon C.E.O., Chosen as Secretary of State,” The New York Times, December 12, 2016. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/ViptP

    16. Bradley Olson. “Rex Tillerson, a Candidate for Secretary of State, Has Ties to Vladimir Putin,” The Wall Street Journal, December 6, 2016.  Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/jqs86

    17. Sam Sacks. “McConnell Won't Say if Tillerson Can Be Confirmed as Secretary of State,” Truth-Out.org, December 1, 2016. Archived December 15, 2016. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/upYWu

    18. Julie Pace and Catherine Lucey. “Donald Trump Picks Exxon Mobil’s Rex Tillerson to Lead State Department,” Time, December 13, 2016. Archived December 15, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/RTWpt

    19. Henry C. Jackson, Josh Dawsey, and Eliana Johnson. “ExxonMobil CEO Tillerson emerging as frontrunner for secretary of state,” Politico, December 9, 2016. Archived December 14, 2016. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/9OWiP

    20. David E. Sanger, Maggie Haberman, and Clifford Krauss. “Rex Tillerson, Exxon Chief, Is Expected to Be Pick for Secretary of State,” The New York Times, December 10, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/CZ4qP

    21. Nina Mast. “Supporters Of Rex Tillerson, Trump's Pick For State, Have Exxon Ties Of Their Own,” Media Matters for America, December 13, 2016. Archived December 15, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/tPWI1

    22. Tom Knox. “Donald Trump to Ohio coal CEO Bob Murray: ‘I love you, man’,Columbus Business First, December 13, 2016. Archived December 15, 2016. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/AeoAO

    23. Joe Carroll and Jennifer Jacobs. “Exxon CEO Tillerson Said to Be Trump Secretary of State Pick,” Bloomberg, December 9, 2016. Archived December 15, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/iR8e6

    24. Justin Scheck, James Marson, and Damian Paletta. “Global Deals That Made Exxon’s CEO Now Pose Big Test,” The Wall Street Journal, December 13, 2016. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/L907r

    25. Meeting with energy company heads,” President of Russia, June 21, 2013. Archived June 27, 2013. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/VTre4

    26. Joe Carroll. “Exxon Russia Exposure Surges as Long View Outweighs Politics,” Bloomberg, March 2, 2015. Archived December 14, 2016. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/Er3AZ

    27. Exxon CEO back at Russia shindig after hiatus over Ukraine: sources,” Reuters, June 14, 2016. Archived December 15, 2016. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/t2i0H

    28. INTERVIEW: Rex Tillerson, president of ExxonMobil,” JSC Business News Media, November 10, 2005. Translated from Russian with Google Translate. Archived December 15, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/0fqFM

    29. Brad Plumer. “Rex Tillerson’s potentially huge conflict of interest over Russia and oil, explained,” Vox, December 14, 2016. Archived December 15, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/zMvi6

    30. Josh Rogin. “Josh Rogin Inside Rex Tillerson’s long romance with Russia,” The Washington Post, December 13, 2016. Archived December 15, 2016. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/I7DCH

    31. Sonar Sheth. “A timeline of Rex Tillerson's relationship with Russian President Vladimir Putin,” Business Insider, December 13, 2015. Archived December 15, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/Lr9Mf

    32. Rosneft and ExxonMobil Announce Progress in Strategic Cooperation Agreement,” Rosneft, April 16, 2012. Archived December 15, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/uuBZT

    33. David Filipov. “What is the Russian Order of Friendship, and why does Rex Tillerson have one?The Washington Post, December 13, 2016. Archived April 11, 2017. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/BGwKd

    34. Associated Press. “Rex Tillerson is no fan of Russia sanctions,” CBS News, December 15, 2016. Archived December 15, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/JelXe

    35. Rex W. Tillerson. “The Path Forward in Today’s Energy Environment,” ExxonMobil, October 19, 2016. Archived December 15, 2016. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/NN1jy

    36. Seeking Alpha (Transcripts). “ExxonMobil Corporation CEO Hosts Annual Shareholder Meeting (Transcript),” Yahoo Finance, May 29, 2013. Archived .pdf on file at DeSmog. Archived December 15, 2016. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/7aJmH

    37. Rex Tillerson,” Charlie Rose, March 7, 2013. Archived December 15, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/WwGAH

    38. CEO Speaker Series: A Conversation with Rex W. Tillerson,” Council on Foreign Relations, June 27, 2012. Archived December 14, 2016. Archived .mp4 on file at DeSmog. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/6y3jp

    39. HEARINGBEFORETHESUBCOMMITTEEONENERGYANDENVIRONMENTOFTHECOMMITTEEONENERGYANDCOMMERCEHOUSEOFREPRESENTATIVESONEHUNDREDELEVENTHCONGRESSSECONDSESSION” (PDF), Committee on Energy and Commerce, January 20, 2010 (Serial No. 111-91). Archived .pdf on file at DeSmog.

    40. Claudia Cattaneo. “Exxon Mobil CEO takes aim at environmentalists,” Financial Post, May 29, 2008. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/yVuOo

    41. Kevin Grandia. “Exxon's 'Rumsfeldian' position on climate change,” DeSmog, June 2, 2007.

    42. ExxonMobil's CEO Goes Rumsfeldian On Global Warming,” Sirotablog, May 31, 2007. Archived August 21, 2008. Archived .mp4 on file at DeSmog. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/frTjN

    43. Ross Gelbspan. “Rex, We Know About 3,000 Scientists You Might Ask,” DeSmog, May 31, 2007.

    44. Clifford Krauss and Jad Mouawad. “Exxon Chief Cautions Against Rapid Action to Cut Carbon Emissions,” The New York Times, February 14, 2007. Archived December 14, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/AzJA4

    45. Jad Mouawad. “The New Face of an Oil Giant,” The New York Times, March 30, 2006. Archived December 14, 2016. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/xvC22

    46. Chris Mooney. “Rex Tillerson’s view of climate change: It’s just an ‘engineering problem’,” The Washington Post, December 13, 2016. Archived December 15, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/C7yMp

    47. ISEXXONWAITINGFORTHEPARISCLIMATEAGREEMENTTOFAIL?Newsweek, May 26, 2016. Archived December 14, 2016. Archive.is URL:  https://archive.is/XOlyN

    48. Rex W. Tillerson. “The Energy Industry’s Good News Story,” ExxonMobil, May 5, 2016. Archived December 15, 2016. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/EZr8J

    49. Exxon's big bet on shale gas,” CNN Money, April 16, 2012. Archived May 9, 2012. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/P2Io2

    50. Rex W. Tillerson. “Strengthening Global Energy Security,” ExxonMobil, January 8, 2009. Archived December 14, 2016. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/v3VEX

    51. Lauren Sher. “ExxonMobil CEO Defends High Profits,”ABC News, August 13, 2008. Archived December 14, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/eGUJT

    52. Transcript: Rex Tillerson, ExxonMobil CEO,” ABC News, August 13, 2008. Archived December 14, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/beram

    53. John Schwartz. “Exxon Mobil Fraud Inquiry Said to Focus More on Future Than Past,” The New York Times, August 19, 2016. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/7ojoR

    54. Ross Gelbspan. “ExMo Chief: energy independence is 'isolationist',” DeSmog, November 13, 2007.

    55. Chief Executives' Club of Boston,” The Trustees of Boston College. Archived December 14, 2016. Archived .mp3 on file at DeSmog. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/SHHmd

    56. Executive Committee: 2011-2012,” The Business Council. Archived August 29, 2011. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/wy00Z

    57. Luke Harding and Hannes Munzinger. “Leak reveals Rex Tillerson was director of Bahamas-based US-Russian oil firm,” The Guardian, December 18, 2016. Archived December 19, 2016. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/SWTSe

    58. Rex Tillerson Cuts Ties With Exxon Mobil In Advance Of Confirmation Hearings,” NPR, January 4, 2017. Archived January 5, 2017. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/W5xg5

    59. Nicole Gaouette. “Tillerson sworn in as secretary of state,” CNN, February 1, 2017. Archived February 8, 2017. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/Wzcj4

    60. Michael Bastasch. “Tillerson: Global Warming Is Not An ‘Imminent National Security Threat’ [VIDEO],” The Daily Caller, January 12, 2017. Archived April 11, 2017. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/uuQxB

    61. MEMORANDUMOFLAWINOPPOSITIONTOEXXON’S MOTIONTOQUASHANDINSUPPORTOFTHEOFFICEOFTHEATTORNEYGENERAL’S CROSS-MOTIONTOCOMPEL” (PDF), Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York. Index No. 451962/2016. Archived .pdf on file at DeSMog.

    62. Dan Zegart. “NY Attorney General: Phony CO2 Accounting, Extensive Document Destruction by ExxonMobil,” Climate Investigations Center, June 3, 2017. Archived July 12, 2017. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/IYAnB

    63. Alan Rappeport. “Exxon Mobil Fined for Violating Sanctions on Russia,” The New York Times, July 20, 2017. Archived July 20, 2017. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/aYNZI

    64. STATEMENT: Tillerson’s Exxon Violated Russian Sanctions, Should Step Down,” Common Dreams, July 20, 2017. Archived July 21, 2017. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/qufmu

    65. Brian Kahn. “The State Dept. Rewrote Its Climate Change Page,” Climate Central, March 23, 2017. Archived October 25, 2017. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/cOrZV

    66. Ashely Braun. “Tillerson Scraps US Climate Envoy Position Ahead of UN Talks,” DeSmog, August 30, 2017.

    67. The Exxon-Treasury Fight And The Roots Of Russiagate,” HuffPost, July 30, 2017. Archived October 25, 2017. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/hRvMF

    68. Elana Schor. “Tillerson signals trouble for Senate's bipartisan Russia sanctions deal,Politico, June 13, 2017. Archived October 25, 2017. Archive.is URLhttp://archive.is/XKdu8

    69. Steve Horn. “Tillerson Present as Exxon Signed Major Deal with Saudi Arabia During Trump Visit,” DeSmog, May 30, 2017.

    70. (Press Release). “ExxonMobil and SABIC Sign Agreement for Next Phase of Proposed U.S. Petrochemical Project,” ExxonMobil, May 20, 2017. Archived October 13, 2017. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/yGzLo

    71. Signing ceremony of a number of agreements and investment opportunities in presence of King Salman and President Trump,” Twitter post uploaded by user “SPAENG,” May 20, 2017. Archived .png on file at DeSmog.

    72. Rex Tillerson Out as Trump’s Secretary of State, Replaced by Mike Pompeo,” The New York Times, March 13, 2018. Archived March 13, 2018. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/ohYDn

    Other Resources

    David Rose

    $
    0
    0

    David Rose

    Credentials

    • BA, University of Oxford, Modern History (1978 - 1981). [1]

    Background

    David Rose is a British author and journalist who has published a wide range of articles challenging man-made climate change, frequently citing material and reports from the Global Warming Policy Foundation (GWPF) and global warming skeptics such as Judith Curry, and Benny Peiser, of the GWPF.

    Rose has repeatedly suggested the disputed theory that there has been a global warming “pause,” and has previously suggested Britain may experience another ice age. Skeptical Science has described Rose as a “leading purveyor of the myth.” [2][3], [4], [5]

    Davis Rose's first job was as a reporter with the London magazine Time Out (1981 - 1984), and his since worked with a range of papers and magazines including The Guardian (which has itself since published critiques of Rose's articles at the Mail on Sunday), The Observer, and BBC Current affairs TV. Rose became a freelance writer in 2000, later a contributing editor of Vanity Fair in 2002, and in 2008 a special investigations writer for the Mail on Sunday. [1], [6]

    Writing in the New Statesman, Rose described his work with British intelligence disseminating what he described as “sheer disinformation.” According to Rose, if he was told something by the secret service and it proved to be false, “there would be no comeback, no accountability. I could put up, or shut up.” He also added “To my everlasting regret, I strongly supported the Iraq invasion, in person and in print.” [7]

    DeSmog previously reported on David Rose's “misinformation legacy,” pointing to an article by The Guardian's George Monbiot who summed up Rose's errors over time. Monbiot also wrote of Rose's potential role in the Iraq war, noting that The Observer “was strongly influenced by Rose's reporting” at the time. “Rose's articles for the paper uncritically reported the claims made by Ahmed Chalabi and the Iraqi National Congress about Saddam Hussein's alleged weapons of mass destruction. Chalabi later admitted that they were incorrect,” Monbiot wrote. [8], [9]

    “Since the Iraq debacle, Rose has latterly been writing articles attacking climate science for the Daily Mail. He has distinguished himself by the same uncritical reliance on dodgy sources that caused his catastrophic mistakes about Iraq,” Monbiot added. 

    In 2013, Media Matters named Rose's publication, the Daily Mail  “2013 Climate Change Misinformer of the Year” for its stirring up of “faux controversies about climate science.”  In 2014, Greenpeace made an official release noting that David Rose is “not a credible source.” [10], [11]

    David Rose & the Global Warming Policy Foundation (GWPF)

    David Rose has described himself as a “Friend” of the Global Warming Policy Foundation (GWPF), a group that has been devoted to denying the existence of man-made climate change: [12]

    David Rose GWPF

    Stance on Climate Change

    January, 2015

    [T]here is little doubt that the rapid warming of the 1980s and early 1990s has slowed – although greenhouse gas emissions have surged.

    […] Dr David Whitehouse, of the Global Warming Policy Forum, said ‘there has been no statistically significant warming trend since 1997’ – because the entire increase over this period was smaller than the error margin.” [13]

    November, 2013

     “The 17-year pause in global warming is likely to last into the 2030s and the Arctic sea ice has already started to recover. […] The pause means there has been no statistically significant increase in world average surface temperatures since the beginning of 1997, despite the models’ projection of a steeply rising trend.” [3]

    March, 2013

    “No, the world ISN'T getting warmer (as you may have noticed). Now we reveal the official data that's making scientists suddenly change their minds about climate doom. So will eco-funded MPs stop waging a green crusade with your money? Well… what do YOU think?” [14]

    January, 2012

    The supposed ‘consensus’ on man-made global warming is facing an inconvenient challenge after the release of new temperature data showing the planet has not warmed for the past 15 years.

    The figures suggest that we could even be heading for a mini ice age to rival the 70-year temperature drop that saw frost fairs held on the Thames in the 17th Century.” [2]

    July, 2011

    “[T]he world temperature trend since 1995 has been flat, with no evidence of warming at all.” [15]

    Key Quotes

    November 16, 2017

    On Twitter, Rose admited doubt on the “promised shale gas bonanza” in the UK. Rose was responding to a Twitter comment by “Bishop Hill” critical of a recentFinancial Post article on Blackpool for failing to mention recent drilling by the shale gas firm Quadrilla: [60]

    November, 2016

    Global average temperatures over land have plummeted by more than 1C since the middle of this year – their biggest and steepest fall on record,” Rose writes. ” The fall, revealed by Nasa satellite measurements of the lower atmosphere, has been caused by the end of El Nino – the warming of surface waters in a vast area of the Pacific west of Central America.” [16]

    September, 2013

    The [global warming] pause – which has now been accepted as real by every major climate research centre – is important, because the models’ predictions of ever-increasing global temperatures have made many of the world’s economies divert billions of pounds into ‘green’ measures to counter climate change.” [17]

    January 6, 2013

    “The stupidest international agreement since the Treaty of Versailles expired at midnight on New Year’s Eve. Fifteen years after its launch, the Kyoto Protocol to the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change died a miserable failure. Few are likely to mourn.” [18]

    January 9, 2010

    “The bitter winter afflicting much of the Northern Hemisphere is only the start of a global trend towards cooler weather that is likely to last for 20 or 30 years, say some of the world’s most eminent climate scientists.

    Their predictions – based on an analysis of natural cycles in water temperatures in the Pacific and Atlantic oceans – challenge some of the global warming orthodoxy’s most deeply cherished beliefs, such as the claim that the North Pole will be free of ice in summer by 2013.” [19]

    Key Deeds

    February 4, 2017

    David Rose published a piece in The Mail on Sunday titled “Exposed: How world leaders were duped into investing billions over manipulated global warming data.” In the article, Rose claimed to reveal “astonishing evidence that the organisation that is the world’s leading source of climate data rushed to publish a landmark paper that exaggerated global warming and was timed to influence the historic Paris Agreement on climate change.” [52]

    The article, which was shared in a number of mainstream media outlets including The TimesFox News, and even referenced in US Congress by Representative Lamar Smith. As DeSmog UK reported, the Mail on Sunday was forced to publish a correction for Rose's article after the Independent Press Standards Organisation (IPSO) ruled that the Mail on Sunday had “failed to take care over the accuracy of the article” and “had then failed to correct these significantly misleading statements.” [53], [54], [55], [56]

    The ruling is now published above the original article at the Mail on Sunday’s website. IPSO said that “the newspaper’s claims that Dr Bates’ testimony had provided ‘irrefutable evidence’ that the paper had been based on ‘misleading, ‘unverified’ data’’, leading – as the headline claimed – to world leaders being ‘duped’ over global warming, and ‘convinced’ to invest billions in climate change, went much further than the concerns which Dr Bates had detailed in his blog or in the interview.” [57], [58]

    The ruling added that the article “did not represent criticisms of the data collection process” but had instead taken as “assertions of fact that the data had been demonstrated conclusively to be wrong and had a significant impact on the decision making of world leaders, with an additional implication this had been part of a wilful attempt to deceive.” [57]

    Bates himself clarified his account, which appears to be different than David Rose's portrayal. Speaking with E&E News, as reported by The New York Times: [59]

    “The issue here is not an issue of tampering with data, but rather really of timing of a release of a paper that had not properly disclosed everything it was,” Bates said. [59]

    February, 2017

    David Rose writes an “exclusive” for the Mail on Sunday making a number of inflammator claims about the background to a scientific paper, published in the journal Science, which updated global temperature data to account for changes in the way ocean temperature measurements were taken.  

    In summary, Rose's story claimed a “whistleblower”, retired National Oceanic and Atmsopheric Administration scientist John Bates, had revealed that the paper, led by his former superior Tom Karl, had been rushed, used flawed data and had been politically motivated. Further, the story claimed that this single paper had “strongly influenced” that climate negotiations in Paris in late 2015.  Rose's story was based heavily on a guest blog post, written by Bates, on the blog of contrarian scientist Judith Curry.

    Scientists and other journalists discovered several major flaws in the story.  Climate Home spoke to several UN climate negotiators, who explained the Karl paper had no influence on the Paris talks. A factcheck at Carbon Brief by Berkeley Earth climate scientist Zeke Hausfather showed how Rose had ignored other scientific articles which had confirmed the work done by Karl et al.  The claim that the Karl paper was “rushed” was refuted by the editor of Science, who revealed that in fact that paper had taken longer than usual to go through peer review at the journal. 

    December 12, 2016

    David Rose went on ”GWPFTVto speak with climate science denier David Whitehouse on “the hostile and irrational reactions to his article on the drop in global temperatures since the El Nino ‘spike’ in early 2016.” Video below. [20]

    December 11, 2016

    Writing at The Mail on Sunday, David Rose cited a Global Warming Policy Foundation (GWPF) report written by Conservative MP Peter Lilley titled “The Cost of The Climate Change  Act” (PDF), claiming that as evidence that “the radical shift to ‘green’ renewable energy will have cost the economy £319 billion by 2030 – three times the annual NHS budget for England.” Peter Lilley is a member of the GWPF's Board of Trustees and one of only five members to vote against the bill. [21], [22][23]

    Carbon Brief  noted that Rose was the first to cover the report in Mail on Sunday, while it was subsequently picked up by a Telegraph editorial, then by Matt Ridley (member of GWPF's Advisory Board) in theTimes, and finally by the far-right website Breitbartwhere James Delingpole used it to argue that climate policy was “pointless.” [24], [25], [26], [27]

    November 26, 2016

    David Rose wrote an article titled “Stunning new data indicates El Nino drove record highs in global temperatures suggesting rise may not be down to man-made emissions” in The Mail on Sunday. [28]

    “Global average temperatures over land have plummeted by more than 1C since the middle of this year – their biggest and steepest fall on record,” Rose writes. ” The fall, revealed by Nasa satellite measurements of the lower atmosphere, has been caused by the end of El Nino – the warming of surface waters in a vast area of the Pacific west of Central America.” [28]

    Rose quotes climate change denier Judith Curry to support his claim that there is a slowdown in global warming. He also points to David Whitehouse of Nigel Lawson's Global Warming Policy Foundation (GWPF) to support that claim. [28]

    Seven scientists analyzed the article at Climate Feedback, and concluded the article was a “textbook case of cherry picking,” ignoring limitations on the data it comments on. “This is akin to claiming that sea level rise has ended because high tide in one area has ebbed” the summary adds. [29]

    “Overall the article is made highly misleading by omitting critical information and cherry-picking one particular dataset and time period. It also incorrectly interprets comments from climate scientists,” Ed Hawkins, Principal Research Fellow at National Centre for Atmospheric Science writes. [29]

    David Rose's article was mentioned in the far-right website Breitbart where noted climate change denier and journalist James Delingpole wrote that it was evidence that global temperatures had plummeted by one degree Celsius since the middle of the year.” Delingpole added that “the news has been greeted with an eerie silence by the world’s alarmist community.” [30]

    Daily KoS reported that Lamar Smith, Chairman of the US House Science Committee, eventually posted a link to the Breitbart article on Twitter. “David Rose’s story doesn’t actually link to the 'evidence' he pretends to give and that “evidence” isn’t real,” the Daily KoS's Walter Einenkel writes. [31]

    October 17, 2016

    David Rose attended the Global Warming Policy Foundation's (GWPF) annual lecture at the Royal Society in London. The GWPF's lecture was controversial given it was hosted at the Royal Society in London, which had reportedly been under internal pressure to cancel the booking. [50], [51]

    Rose can be seen sitting next to James Delingpole, a prolific journalist at the far-right news site Breitbart who has repeatedly cited David Rose in his own articles. See screenshots below [1:39], second row on the left, and third person over, and more clearly at [34:38].

    David Rose and James Delingpole at GWPF Conference

    David Rose at GWPF Conference

    Another notable audience member was Baroness Neville-Rolfe, Commercial Secretary to the Treasury. Such an audience suggests the event provided an opportunity for Rose to rub shoulders with, members of the press, the government, and with GWPF.
     

    April 25, 2015

    David Rose reported on a “international panel of scientists,” convened by the Global Warming Policy Foundation (GWPF) and led by former Tory Chancellor Lord Lawson to “launch a major inquiry to discover whether official world temperature records have exaggerated the extent of global warming.” [32]

    Rose wrote in the Mail on Sunday that the panel “will focus on thousands of ‘adjustments’ that have been made to temperature records kept at individual weather stations around the world.
    Sceptics have argued that the effect of such adjustments – made when instruments are replaced or recalibrated, or heat-producing buildings are erected close to weather station sites – has skewed the records.” [32]

    The GWPF project was billed as “The International Temperature Data Review Project” and claimed that “the global surface temperature records have been the subject of considerable and ongoing controversy” due to so-called “adjustments” causing data to exhibit “a much larger warming trend than the raw data.” [33]

    The panel consisted of the following people: [34]

    January 17, 2015

    Discussing whether 2014 was the warmest year on record, David Rose attempted to discredit the NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS), claiming they were only 38 percent sure that was the case. Rose goes on to promote the debunked viewpoint of an ongoing global warming “pause”: [13], [4]

    “Climate sceptics insisted that the new figures showed the warming ‘pause’ had continued,” Rose quoted Dr David Whitehouse, of the Global Warming Policy Forum. Whitehouse said “there has been no statistically significant warming trend since 1997’ – because the entire increase over this period was smaller than the error margin.” 

    October 25, 2014

    Writing at the Mail on Sunday, David Rose claims to have exposed the “‘Green Blob’ financed by a shadowy group of hugely wealthy foreign donors is driving Britain towards economically ruinous eco targets.” [35]

    Rose then goes on to lament the supposedly small budgets of climate change denial groups like the Global Warming Policy Forum. The Global Warming Policy Forum is an extension of The Global Warming Policy Foundation (GWPF), conducting activities outside of the nonprofit Foundation's abilities as an “educational charity.” According to Rose, the Forum “has an annual budget of £300,000 and employs just three people.” [36]

    Rose quotes GWPF's director Benny Peiser: “At the end of the day, someone will have to be held accountable for us committing economic suicide. We are the only organisation that does what we do – against hundreds on the other side, all saying the same thing.” [36]

    August 30, 2014

    David Rose writes that, seven years after warnings by Al Gore, “The Mail on Sunday can reveal that, far from vanishing, the Arctic ice cap has expanded for the second year in succession – with a surge, depending on how you measure it, of between 43 and 63 per cent since 2012.” [37]

    Rose quotes climate change contrarian scientist Judith Curry who said ‘The Arctic sea ice spiral of death seems to have reversed.’ Curry also claimed that the majority of sea ice decline was due to “natural variability.”  [37]

    Rose does admit that “few scientists doubt that carbon-dioxide emissions cause global warming, and that this has caused Arctic ice to decline,” however goes on to suggest that there is “much uncertainty about the speed of melting and how much of it is due to human activity.”  [37]

    David Rose authored a similar article on the Antarctic in July, 2014, again quoting Judith Curry: “We do not have a quantitative, predictive understanding of the rise in Antarctic sea ice extent,” she said. Curry also repeated the debunked myth of a 16-year global warming “pause”: [38]

    “Prof Curry also revealed that because of the ‘pause’, in which world average temperatures have not risen for more than 16 years, the Arctic ice decline has been ‘touted’ by many as the most important evidence for continued global warming,” Rose wrote. [38]

    May 17, 2014

    David Rose contends that “Ground-breaking climate research” that had found that global warming due to greenhouse gases was “significantly exaggerated” was “controversially ‘covered up’” [39]

    A paper by Professor Lennart Bengtsson of Reading University had been rejected by a number of journals. According to Rose, “The rejection sparked accusations that scientists had crossed an important line by censoring findings that were not helpful to their views.” [39]

    One of the journals had rejected the paper because “reviewers questioned the paper’s methods,” Rose wrote. Professor Bengtsson, 79, was a former member of the council of the Global Warming Policy Foundation (GWPF)[39]

    Bengtsson said he was accused by former friends and colleagues of “crossing into the deniers’ camp” when he joined the GWPF, a reaction which Rose described as “a pressure so great he had feared for his health.”  [39]

    November, 2013

    Pointing to a paper by climate change denier Judith Curry, David Rose writes in the Mail on Sundaythat “The 17-year pause in global warming is likely to last into the 2030s and the Arctic sea ice has already started to recover.” [3]

    “The pause means there has been no statistically significant increase in world average surface temperatures since the beginning of 1997, despite the models’ projection of a steeply rising trend,” Rose writes. [3]

    March 30, 2013

    When the Committee on Climate Change claimed that David Rose had “misunderstood” the value of computer models, and refuted Rose's claim that “there has been no statistically significant increase for more than 16 years,” Rose countered that it was an “astonishing attack” and that his original reporting was “backed up by a scientifically researched graph.” Rose points to statements from climate change deniers Andrew Montford, and David Whitehouse of the GWPF for defense. [40]

    March 16, 2013

    David Rose published an article titled “The Great Green Con no. 1: The hard proof that finally shows global warming forecasts that are costing you billions were WRONG all along” in the Mail on Sunday. In the article, Rose claims to present “irrefutable evidence that official predictions of global climate warming have been catastrophically flawed.” [14]

    The Committee on Climate Change reviewed Rose's claims, among which include the agreement between observed temperatures and model predictions, the so-called “pause” in temperature rise, and climate sensitivity. Below is a portion of their response: [41]

    “We conclude that the approach to global and UK emissions reductions underpinning the Climate Change Act remains appropriate despite the assertions in the article. Nonetheless, as ever, it will continue to be important to monitor developments in climate science closely and draw out any policy implications.

    Of the four scientists quoted in the Mail article, three (Myles Allen, James Annan and Piers Forster) have since publicly criticised it. The chart used appears to have been copied from the blog of a fifth climate scientist, Ed Hawkins, who has also taken issue with the article’s interpretation of it.

    A chart of observed global temperatures against climate model outputs is the main evidence provided in the article. It claims that the chart “blows apart the scientific basis” for reducing emissions. This is simply incorrect, and reveals a misunderstanding of what the chart shows – a pattern of observed temperature over the last sixty years within the range of model outputs” [41]

    September 14, 2013

    Claiming to have obtained a leaked final draft of the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) report, David Rose contends that “over the past 15 years, recorded world temperatures have increased at only a quarter of the rate of IPCC claimed when it published its last assessment in 2007.” [42]

    He goes on to state that the IPCC“recognise the global warming ‘pause’ first reported by The Mail on Sunday last year is real – and concede that their computer models did not predict it.” [42]

    Rose quotes Judith Curry, who said “The consensus-seeking process used by the IPCC creates and amplifies biases in the science. It should be abandoned in favour of a more traditional review that presents arguments for and against – which would  better support scientific progress, and be more useful for policy makers.” [42]

    He also goes on to quote climate change denier Benny Peiser of the Global Warming Policy Foundation who described the leaked IPCC report as a “staggering concoction of confusion, speculation and sheer ignorance.”  [42]

    February 24, 2013

    Included in an article claiming that certain MPs were unduly benefiting from green energy companies, David Rose lists a number of debunked “myths” regarding climate change, reproduced in full below. Note that the “myths” and “truths” Rose lists are largely inverted when compared to the view of mainstream climate change science: [43]

    EXPLODINGTHEMYTHSABOUTCLIMATECHANGE
    MYTHThe world is continually getting warmer.
    TRUTH
    Official Met Office data shows no statistically significant global temperature rise since January 1997. The fact was confirmed last week by Raj Pachauri, chairman of the UN Intergovernmental Panel  on Climate Change (IPCC). Many scientists say this means forecasts of how much warmer the world will be by 2100 must be revised downwards. Pachauri disagreed: for him to be convinced, the ‘pause’ would have to last 30 years.

    MYTHGlobal warming is already causing extreme weather.
    TRUTH I
    f anything, weather has become less, not more extreme in the past 50 years. Professor Roger Pielke Jr of Colorado University – no climate sceptic – last week said that the past seven years had been the longest period ever recorded without a Category 3 or stronger hurricane hitting America, and that drought  has decreased since the  mid-20th Century. The IPCC admits  there is no evidence that global warming has caused more storms  in the tropics. 

    MYTH If we don’t take swift, drastic action to cut CO2 emissions, the world will soon become uninhabitable
    TRUTH
    The ‘pause’ in rising temperatures, along with new research into the decline in the sun’s output and other natural factors, is leading many scientists to lower estimates of how fast carbon dioxide warms the world. Until now, the IPCC has suggested that doubling CO2 causes a worrying increase of 3.5C, but many experts say it is about 1.7C. The computer models still say the world will be at least 2C warmer by the end of the century, but they failed to predict the pause. 

    MYTHWe’ve got to do our bit, even if it hurts. If we cut emissions, the rest of the world will follow.
    TRUTH
    The fiasco of the 2009 UN climate conference in Copenhagen proved that China, India, Brazil and other fast-growing nations are simply not prepared to make any binding commitments to reduce their emissions. However, by cutting our own ever more deeply, all we do is increase the already rocketing price of our energy and so drive jobs abroad – while making almost no difference to world CO2 levels.

    MYTHThe faster we cut carbon in our power generation, the more prosperous we will be.
    TRUTH
    We face declining energy capacity, while the Government targets on 2030 emissions would mean few firms will be willing to invest in the one proven type of power source – gas – that can fill the gap relatively cheaply. Instead of  ‘green growth’, we face years of impoverished stagnation, while industry flees Britain and our  sky-high energy prices. 

    MYTHThe Arctic is going to be ice-free in summer in a few years.
    TRUTH
    Although last summer saw a return to the relatively low levels of ice seen in 2007, the growth of Arctic winter ice this year is the fastest on record. Canadian archaeologists have been finding evidence the ice cover shrank to half its current extent during a warm period 7,000 years ago – but never vanished entirely.

    October 13, 2012

    David Rose wrote in the Mail on Sunday, that voicing the debunked myth that “The world stopped getting warmer almost 16 years ago.” Rose claimed that new data proved a global warming “plateau” or “pause.” While Rose notes that Phil Jones, director of the Climate Research Unit (CRU) at the University of East Anglia disagreed, he goes on to cite climate change denier Judith Curry for support.  [44], [45]

    CarbonBrief noted that there was a huge response following Rose's post, and went on to analyze a number of his claims. They note that Rose had also posted a followup, making “no acknowledgement of his previous mistakes.” The Met Office had responded to Rose's claim that the report had been released “without fanfare or publicity” by them: [46]

    …the Met Office has not issued a report on this issue. We can only assume the article is referring to the completion of work to update the HadCRUT4 global temperature dataset compiled by ourselves and the University of East Anglia’s Climate Research Unit,” The Met office's blog wrote. [46]

    CarbonBrief notes that while Rose clarifies in his now article that the original graph did not come from the Met Office, he still describes his graph as a “a new official world temperature graph” despite being what CarbonBrief describes as “clearly a Mail on Sunday graphic.” [46]

    Despite this, other news outlets proceeded to write as if the report had been released from the Met Office, with article headlines like “Global Climate Warming Stopped 15 Years Ago, UK Met Office Admits.” [47]

    Rose wrote a similar claim in an earlier September 28 article, where he  said “The global warming ‘pause’ has now lasted for almost 17 years and shows no sign of ending – despite the unexplained failure of climate scientists’ computer models to predict it.” In that article, he also claimed that data direct form the MET Office “shows the lack of a warming trend.” [48]

    October 30, 2011

    David Rose featured an interview with climate change denier Judith Curry in his column at the Mail on Sunday. Rose discusses a study published by former climate change skeptic Richard Muller, who Curry goes on to accuse of misleading the public. She said that the affair had to be compared to the so-called “Climategate” scandal. [49]

    Rose cites a graph from an upcoming report by the Global Warming Policy Foundation (GWPF) as evidence that “the [warming] trend of the last decade is absolutely flat, with no increase at all – though the levels of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere have carried on rising relentlessly.” [49]

    “This is nowhere near what the climate models were predicting,”  Curry said. ‘Whatever it is that’s going on here, it doesn’t look like it’s being dominated by CO2.’ [49]

    Affiliations

    • Global Warming Policy Foundation (GWPF) — While Rose describes himself as a “Friend” of the GWPF, he does not appear to have an official position with the group. Rose has repeatedly cited GWPF reports and affiliated individuals in his column at the Mail on Sunday. [12]
    • The Mail on Sunday — Special Investigations Writer (2008 - Present). [1]
    • Vanity Fair— Contributing Editor (2001 - Present). [1]
    • The Observer — Home Affairs Editor, then freelance contributor (after 2000). [1]
    • BBCTVREporter (1996 - 2000) [1]
    • The Guardian — Former Crime Correspondent and reporter (1984 - 1990). [1]

    Publications

    Sample Refutations

    Sample Publications

    Below are some samples of David Rose's publications on environmental, energy, and climate issues:

    Resources

    1. David Rose: writer and journalist,LinkedIn. Archived .pdf on file at DeSmog. Archived December 29, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/XU3i4

    2. David Rose. “Forget global warming - it's Cycle 25 we need to worry about (and if NASA scientists are right the Thames will be freezing over again),” The Mail on Sunday, January 29, 2012. Archived December 29, 2016. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/kLeLE

    3. David Rose. “Global warming 'pause' may last for 20 more years and Arctic sea ice has already started to recover,” Mail on Sunday, November 2, 2013. Archived December 29, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/6aFHE

    4. Global warming not slowing - it's speeding up,” SkepticalScience, March 12, 2014. Archived December 29, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/JcHw9

    5. David Rose Hides the Rise in Global Warming,” SkepticalScience, March 19, 2013. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/zOqCS

    6. David Rose,” Vanity Fair, August, 2011. Archived December 29, 2016. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/pvdWb

    7. Spies and their lies,” New Statesman, September 27, 2007. Archived December 28, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/gQReq

    8. Kevin Grandia. “David Rose's Misinformation Legacy from WMD to Climate Change,” DeSmog, September 17, 2013.

    9. George Monbiot. “David Rose's climate science writing shows he has not learned from previous mistakes,” The Guardian, December 8, 2010. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/7lQfN

    10. Shauna Theel and Denise Robbins. “Climate Change Misinformer Of The Year: The Daily Mail,” Media Matters, December 30, 2013. Archived December 28, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/mGwm3

    11. David Rose is not a credible source - OFFICIAL,” Greenpeace, July 24, 2014. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/mINOW

    12. @LeoHickman @ret_ward @mattwridley I'm not sensitive at all. I'm proud to be friends with GWPF, but I'm not their PR. But this is juvenile!” Twitter post by user @DavidRoseUK, April 4, 2014 and 1:46 AM.

    13. David Rose. “Nasa climate scientists: We said 2014 was the warmest year on record… but we're only 38% sure we were,” Mail on Sunday, January 19, 2015. Archived December 29, 2016. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/TNyUO

    14. David Rose. “The Great Green Con no. 1: The hard proof that finally shows global warming forecasts that are costing you billions were WRONG all along,” The Mail on Sunday, March 16, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/xkHQa

    15. David Rose. “Why we should give the cold shoulder to a BBC Trust Review that argues the broadcaster should ignore global-warming 'deniers’,” The Mail on Sunday, July 24, 2011. Archived December 29, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/qws1D

    16. Stunning new data indicates El Nino drove record highs in global temperatures suggesting rise may not be down to man-made emissions,” The Mail on Sunday, November 26, 2016. Archived December 28, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/jWiS2

    17. David Rose. “And now it's global COOLING! Return of Arctic ice cap as it grows by 29% in a year,” The Mail on Sunday, September 8, 2013. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/uHN97

    18. David Rose. “Why IS Britain about to pay £110billion to enter a new Dark Age? A damning indictment of the new 'Green-friendly' Energy Bill,” The Mail on Sunday, January 6, 2013. Archived December 29, 2016. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/LiKn4

    19. David Rose. “The mini ice age starts here,” The Mail on Sunday, January 9, 2010. Archived December 29, 2016. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/0ITly

    20. DAVIDWHITEHOUSE&DAVIDROSEDISCUSSREACTIONSTOGLOBALCOOLINGPOST-ELNINO,” The Global Warming Policy Forum, December 12, 2016. Archived .mp4 on file at DeSmog.

    21. David Rose. “Hot air: Bombshell report shows green levies backed by government will cost the economy £319bn by 2030,” Mail on Sunday, December 10, 2016. Archived December 29, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/tVErW

    22. £300 BILLION: The cost of the Climate Change Act” (PDF), Global Warming Policy Foundation, December, 2016. Archived .pdf on file at DeSmog.

    23. Climate Change Bill — Third Reading (and other amendments) — 28 Oct 2008 at 21:58,” The Public Whip. Archived December 29, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/MBZIl 

    24. Simon Evans. “UK Climate Change Act: Understanding the costs and benefits,” Carbon Brief, December 16, 2016. Archived December 19, 2016. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/u8tBC

    25. Leo Hickman. “Telegraph editorial describing LIlley's report as a 'study', rather than a non-peer-reviewed report for climate sceptic lobby group GPWF,” Twitter, December 11, 2016. Archived image on file at DeSmog.

    26. Matt Ridley. “Climate Change Act has cost us the earth,” The Times, December 12, 2016. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/RB3vN

    27. James Delingpole. “Delingpole: The £300 Billion Climate Change Act is Costing Britain the Earth,” Breitbart, December 13, 2016. Archived December 19, 2016. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/ALd3Y

    28. Stunning new data indicates El Nino drove record highs in global temperatures suggesting rise may not be down to man-made emissions,” The Mail on Sunday, November 26, 2016. Archived December 28, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/jWiS2

    29. Analysis of 'Stunning new data indicates El Nino drove record highs in global temperatures…'” Climate Feedback. Archived December 28, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/p0RGO

    30. James Delingpole. “Global Temperatures Plunge. Icy Silence from Climate Alarmists,” Breitbart, November 30, 2016. Archived December 29, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/tek7u

    31. Walter Einenkel. “Turns out that Breitbart article the House Science Committee tweeted out is a con job,” Daily KoS, December 5, 2016. Archived December 29, 2016. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/1RzA4

    32. David Rose. “Did exaggerated records make global warming look worse? Scientists to investigate whether 'adjusted' temperatures skewed data,” Mail on Sunday, April 25, 2015. Archived December 29, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/09IVR

    33. About,” The International Temperature Data Review Project. Archived December 29, 2016. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/jkaZD

    34. The commissioners,” The International Temperature Data Review Project. Archived December 29, 2016. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/H3kbV

    35. David Rose. “EXPOSED: How a shadowy network funded by foreign millions is making our household energy bills soar - for a low-carbon Britain,” Mail on Sunday, October 25, 2014. Archived December 29, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/ng2Pu

    36. Who We Are,” The Global Warming Policy Forum. Archived December 29, 2016. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/1OmsU

    37. David Rose. “Myth of Arctic meltdown: Stunning satellite images show summer ice cap is thicker and covers 1.7million square kilometres MORE than 2 years ago…despite Al Gore's prediction it would be ICE-FREE by now,” The Mail on Sunday, August 30, 2014. Archived December 29, 2016. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/pV3wu

    38. David Rose. “Global warming computer models confounded as Antarctic sea ice hits new record high with 2.1million sq km more than is usual for time of year,” The Mail on Sunday, July 5, 2014. Archived December 29, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/5Xe2A

    39. David Rose. “Revealed: How green zealots gagged professor who dared to question global warming,” The Mail on Sunday, May 17, 2014. Archived December 29, 2016. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/5AY12

    40. David Rose. “Government's climate watchdog launches astonishing attack on the Mail on Sunday… for revealing global warming science is wrong,” The Mail on Sunday, March 30, 2013. Archived December 29, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/9vJQW

    41. Steve Smith. “Climate science remains robust despite claims in the Mail,” Committee on Climate Change, March 26, 2013. Archived December 29, 2016. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/bqOBB

    42. David Rose. “World's top climate scientists confess: Global warming is just QUARTER what we thought - and computers got the effects of greenhouse gases wrong,” The Mail on Sunday, September 14, 2013. Archived December 29, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/xZ2sV

    43. David Rose. “Eco-tastrophe! How MPs in the pay of subsidised eco-firms set insane new carbon targets that send your bills sky-rocketing… and drag us to a new Dark Age,” The Mail on Sunday, February 23, 2013. Archived December 29, 2016. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/RAtVk

    44. David Rose. “Global warming stopped 16 years ago, reveals Met Office report quietly released… and here is the chart to prove it,” Mail on Sunday, October 13, 2012. Archived December 28, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/G2z1q

    45. Study drives a sixth nail into the global warming ‘pause’ myth,” SkepticalScience, November 24, 2015. Archived December 8, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/Hli5M

    46. The Mail on Sunday, David Rose and climate misinterpretation: Round two,” Carbon Brief, October 23, 2012. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/HkumN 

    47. Alex Newman. “Global Climate Warming Stopped 15 Years Ago, UK Met Office Admits,” The New American, October 15, 2012. Archived December 28, 2016. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/LCFs5

    48. David Rose. “Met Office proof that global warming is still 'on pause' as climate summit confirms global temperature has stopped rising,” The Mail on Sunday, September 28, 2013. Archived December 29, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/e5EsO

    49. David Rose. “Scientist who said climate change sceptics had been proved wrong accused of hiding truth by colleague,” The Mail on Sunday, October 30, 2011. Archived December 29, 2016. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/1EP1I

    50. MATTRIDLEY: GLOBALWARMINGVERSUSGLOBALGREENING,” The Global Warming Policy Foundation, October 18, 2016. Archived October 20, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/nD0fM

    51. Graham Readfearn. “Exclusive: Royal Society Under Internal Pressure To Cancel Venue Booking From Global Warming Policy Foundation,” DeSmog UK, October 5, 2016. 

    52. Exposed: How world leaders were duped into investing billions over manipulated global warming data,” The Daily Mail, February 4, 2017. Archived February 5, 2017.

    53. Matt Ridley. “Politics and science are a toxic combination,” The Times, February 6, 2017.

    54. “Federal scientist cooked climate change books ahead of Obama presentation, whistle blower charges,” Fox News, February 7, 2017. Archived September 18, 2017. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/pG09i

    55. Chris D'Angelo. “Rep. Lamar Smith Tried To Make A Big Deal Out Of A Fake Climate Scandal,HuffPost, February 7, 2017. Archived September 18, 2017. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/P4huZ

    56. Mat Hope. “Fake News: Mail on Sunday Forced to Correct ‘Significantly Misleading’ Article on Global Warming ‘Pause’,” DeSmog UK, September 18, 2017.

    57. 01032-17 Ward v The Mail on Sunday,” IPSO. Archived September 18, 2017. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/VQVGd

    58. Exposed: How world leaders were duped into investing billions over manipulated global warming data,” The Daily Mail, February 4, 2017. Archived September 18, 2017. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/VQVGd

    59. No Data Manipulation in 2015 Climate Study, Researchers Say,” New York Times, February 7, 2017. Archived September 18, 2017. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/OQ1FI

    60. Well, right now the promised shale gas bonanza looks more distant than sustainable power from nuclear fusion, so arguably not […]” Twitter post by @DavidRoseUK, November 16, 2017. Archived .pdf on file at DeSmog.

    Other Resources

    Marlo Lewis, Jr.

    $
    0
    0

    Marlo Lewis, Jr.

    Credentials

    • Ph.D. in Government from Harvard University and a B.A. in Political Science from Claremont McKenna College. [1]

    Background

    Marlo Lewis is a senior fellow at the Competitive Enterprise Institute (CEI), a group that has received funding from a range of energy industry groups and conservative foundations such as the Koch family foundations, ExxonMobil, Texaco, Arch Coal, and the American Petroleum Institute (API) among others. [2], [3], [4], [5]

    Lewis has also served in various governmental positions, working briefly as a policy analyst in the State Department during the Reagan administration. His position at the CEI, where disclosures show he is payed approximately $100,000-a-year, also allows him influence over elected officials. For example, he was given access to Congress when he was permitted to give a rebuttal to Al Gore’s film “An Inconvenient Truth” to the assembly. Lewis was also allowed to present the supposed “dangers” of the Kyoto Protocol to Congress in 1998. [6], [7], [8], [9]

    The CEI pays for and maintains the website of the Cooler Heads Coalition (CHC), a global warming denial group that Lewis formerly chaired and remains a prominent contributor to.  [10] Lewis has previously defended the“benefits” of Keystone XL pipeline and the Canadian tar sands. [11]

    Cooler Heads Coalition

    Marlo Lewis served as the former Chairman of the Cooler Heads Coalition (CHC), a group describing itself as an “informal and ad-hoc group focused on dispelling the myths of global warming.“ SourceWatch notes that the Cooler Heads Coalition originally had close ties to the Competitive Enterprise Institute (CEI) where Lewis is now a senior fellow. [12], [10]

    Stance on Climate Change

    November, 2013

    The following are summarized points from a presentation Lewis gave to train new interns at the Competitive Enterprise Institute (CEI) on why he believes that “climate change is not a 'crisis' or 'planetary emergency.'” [13]

    “My thesis, then and now, is that climate change is not a 'crisis' or 'planetary emergency.' Here’s a quick overview:

    • 'Worse than we thought' is a political mantra pretending to be a scientific finding. The state of the climate is better than they told us.
    • An unanticipated 17-year warming pause, the growing divergence between model predictions and observed warming, and a pile of recent studies indicate that 'consensus' science overestimates the key variable: climate sensitivity. Lower sensitivity means less warming and smaller impacts.
    • The scariest parts of the 'planetary emergency' narrative – dire warnings about ocean circulation shutdown triggering a new ice age, ice sheet disintegration raising sea levels up to 20 feet, malaria epidemics coming to a neighborhood near you, mass extinctions from runaway warming – are science fiction, not science.
    • The only card left in the alarmist deck is extreme weather. However, there has been no long term trend in the strength or frequency of hurricanes, tornadoes, U.S. floods and drought.
    • Heat waves have become more frequent but, paradoxically, the more common hot weather becomes, the more heat-related mortality declines: People adapt!
    • There is no long-term trend in 'normalized' extreme weather damages (losses adjusted for increases in wealth, population, and the consumer price index).
    • Globally, mortality rates and aggregate mortality related to extreme weather have declined by 98% and 93%, respectively, since the 1920s.
    • The state of the world keeps improving as CO2 emissions increase.”

    December, 2008

    Lewis told BBC Newsin December 2008:

    “There has been no net warming of the planet since 1998, or if you want to pick a more fair baseline, since 2001.” [14]

    1998

    In testimony to congress in 1998, Lewis declared:

    “There are several reasons why we shouldn’t worry about global warming. […] [T]he probability of catastrophic warming is low. Indeed, it is not clear global warming is something we should prevent, even if that were easy and cost little. Spending trillions to avoid better weather and a greener planet would make no sense at all.” [9]

    Key Quotes

    January, 2017

    Marlo Lewis wrote in The Daily Times

    “The Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) so-called Clean Power Plan (CPP) is an unlawful power grab that will increase consumer electricity prices, reduce U.S. job and economic growth, and have no discernible impacts on global warming or sea-level rise.

    “To overturn the CPP, Trump should direct the Justice Department to side with the 28 states and numerous industry and nonprofit petitioners challenging the Plan as unlawful and unconstitutional, if the litigation reaches the Supreme Court.” [15]

    December, 2016

    Lewis wrote in Fox News on why he believes Trump should repudiate the Paris climate agreement:

    “The election of Donald J. Trump to be the next president will soon enable congressional advocates of pro-growth energy policy to go on the offense for the first time in eight years—and they should, for the sake of our Constitution, among other things.” [16]

    January, 2015

    Writing at the Cooler Heads Coalition's blog, Lewis denounced President Obama's State of the Union speech:

    “The State of the Union speech? Yeesh. The energy and climate stuff was disingenuous and dumb.” [17]

    “Cap-and-trade, carbon taxes, renewable energy mandates, and the like will accomplish little except to centralize power and transfer wealth from consumers to special interests.” [18]

    “As energy analyst Alex Epstein puts it, fossil energy companies did not take a safe climate and make it dangerous, they took a dangerous climate and made it much safer.”  [18]

    November, 2014

    According to Lewis, writing at the Cooler Heads Coalition blog,  “The President should have approved the KXL long ago. The Keystone controversy is completely artificial — a fabrication of green politics.” [19]

    July, 2014

    Writing at the Cooler Heads Coalition's Blog, Lewis outlined portions of his “Las Vegas Slide Show” presentation at the Heartland Institute's 9th International Conference on Climate Change (ICCC9):

    “A 'conservative' carbon tax is so loopy that at times I half believe it must be a passing fad, a bad joke, or a piece of blackboard econometric foppery rather than a grimly-determined political agenda,” Lewis wrote. [20]

    June, 2014

    Marlo Lewis criticizes the American Lung Association (ALA)'s campaign to promote the Clean Power Plan. In his “fact check,” Lewis provides his reasons that CO2 should not be described as pollution:

    “[M]ercury emissions from power plants do not poison anyone’s air. […] The case is somewhat similar for arsenic. […] More importantly, carbon dioxide (CO2), the substance targeted by EPA’s Clean Power Plan, is non-toxic to humans and animals at multiple times today’s atmospheric concentration […]” [21]

    May, 2014

    Writing at the Cooler Heads Coalition's blog, Marlo Lewis criticizes a column Michael Mann wrote on the Keystone XL pipeline:

    “Despite climategate, the death of cap-and-trade, the 17-year warming pause, the epic failure of climate models, and the growing popularity of skeptic blogs, Hockey Stick inventor Michael Mann still tries to pull rank and tell policymakers what to do because, after all, he and his 'colleagues' in the climate alarm movement are 'scientists.' […]

    I will let others with the relevant expertise debate whether Prof. Mann is a competent paleo-climatologist. His writings on the Keystone XL pipeline are indistinguishable from those of a political hack.” [22]

    January, 2014

    Writing at the Cooler Heads Coalition's “Globalwarming.org,” Lewis declared:

    “Divorced from analysis of carbon’s social benefits, SCC [Social Cost of Carbon] estimation even at its theoretical best is partisan advocacy posing as objective research.” [23]

    October, 2013

    According to Marlo Lewis, writing at the Cooler Heads Coalition's blog, global warming is “not even close” to the world's biggest problem. He writes:

    “If global warming is the world’s most hyped problem, global warming alarm may well be the world’s most underrated problem.

    […] In the global warming debate, there has been far too little discussion of whether the proposed cure is worse than the alleged disease.” [24]

    October, 2012

    Writing in an October 25, 2012 Forbes opinion column, Lewis declared:

    “The big attraction of carbon taxes these days is not as a global warming policy but as a revenue enhancer.” [25]

    January 1, 2009

    In an interview, Lewis outlines what he believes would be negative impacts of California's greenhouse gas reduction law (A.B. 32). See video at [0:34]:

    “I predict that if we implemented AB32 over the next several years, as the increased energy costs kick in, you will begin to see job flight and capital flight from California.” [26]

    May 2, 2008

    Lewis told Fox News that the idea of ExxonMobil and the Rockerfeller family moving investment to more green fuels was “ridiculous”:

    “This idea that renewable fuels or alternative energy is the wave of the future is ridiculous,” he said in the interview. [27]

    July, 2007

    Marlo Lewis was featured on a “Debate” at Fox News opposing David Roberts. Video below:

    “The big question here is whether our children and our grandchildren will inherit a world that is energy rich, or energy poor,” Lewis said. “And if we put people like Al Gore in charge, and especially if we put Robert Kennedy in charge, this world is going to be put on an energy diet when much of the world is already energy starved.” [28]

    June, 1998

    Marlo Lewis delivered a June, 1998 testimony to the Committee on Small Business where he opposed the Kyoto Protocol:

    “There is no a priori reason to assume that global warming, on net, would be harmful rather than beneficial,” Lewis stated. “Millions of America’s senior citizens adapt to climate change every decade – when they move from the Snow Belt to the Sun Belt.” [29]

    “Yet precisely because carbon dioxide emissions may linger in the atmosphere for a century or longer, it makes no practical difference in the long run whether carbon withdrawal policies are implemented now or a decade or more from now.”  [29]

    “The road to Hell, we all realize, is often paved with good intentions. The global warming debate illustrates that maxim very well; even a baby step on this destructive path should be avoided.” [29]

    Key Deeds

    April 20, 2018

    Lewis wrote an article before Earth Day titled “The Blessing of fossil fuels.” “Anthropogenic global warming is real. However, that doesn’t mean the planet, and more important the people who inhabit it, are in peril,” Lewis wrote at The Times and Democrat. [68]

    According to Lewis, climate change isn't as bad as we thought: [68]

    “The warming rate is gradual and fairly constant, not rapid and accelerating, as it’s often claimed. Climate change is not 'worse than we thought,' it’s better than they told us,” he wrote. [68]

    Lewis cites fossil fuel proponent Alex Epstein to argue for more fossil fuel use: [68]

    “As fossil fuel consumption increased, the environment became more livable and human civilization more sustainable. That’s not a coincidence. Energy scholar Alex Epstein explains: human beings using fossil fuels did not take a safe climate and make it dangerous; they took a dangerous climate and made it safer.” [68]

    Lewis concluded:

    “Thanks in no small part to fossil fuels, the world today is healthier, wealthier and safer than ever before in history. And there’s no evidence the economic and social progress is about to stop.

    Unfortunately, most Earth Day protesters won’t see it this way — even though the results are right in front of them.” 68]

    October 22, 2016

    Marlo Lewis spoke at the 20th Annual National Conference on Private Property Rights held in Albany, NY. [30]

    DeSmog reported on Lewis's talk, which was titled “Standing for Accuracy About Global Warming.” After Lewis argued that Obama’s Clean Power Plan and the signing of the Paris Agreement were equivalent to  a “burning of the constitution,” he outlined the three main points of his presentation:  [31]

    One is that however strong the scientific case may have appeared at one time for alarm about global warming, there’s really nothing to it.”

    Another key point that all of these folks forget about is that fossil fuels have actually done more to make our climate a livable system than any other force on this planet. If it weren’t for fossil fuels our lives would all be nasty, brutal, and short.” 

    My final point is that all of these emission reduction policies, which they claim are necessary to save the world, are one of two things. They’re either all pain for no gain, in other words, they’re a highly costly exercise in symbolism, or they’re a cure that’s worse than the alleged disease. They are a humanitarian disaster in the making.”

    Lewis then ran through a PowerPoint presentation “disproving” climate science.

    The other thing is if this were really the terrible crisis that we can’t adapt to that they say, then the population shifts in the United States should have all been moving in the other direction, which is what my next slide shows. It shows that the states that are warmest are the states that have had the most rapid population growth over the last fifty years. People are voting with their feet by the millions to embrace and endure more climate warming in a short space of time than even these outlandish models predict will happen in a century. If you move from Albany to Florida or to Texas, the climate is really going to change for you.”

    February 25, 2016

    Marlo Lewis authored a “policy paper” (PDF) document claiming that the Paris Agreement is a treaty as opposed to an executive agreement. As a treaty, Lewis argues that it would be “would be dead on arrival” in the senate. [32], [33]

    “Far from being toothless, the Paris Agreement is the framework for a multi-decade global campaign of political pressure directed chiefly against Republican leaders, Red State voters, and the fossil fuel industry,” Lewis warns. “To safeguard America’s economic future and capacity for self-government, congressional leaders must expose Obama’s climate diplomacy as an attempted end-run around the Constitution’s treaty-making process.” [32]

    September 23, 2015

    Marlo Lewis appeared on Fox Business to discuss EPA fuel standards and Volkswagen's cheating on emissions tests.  [34]

    “Maybe we also need to rethink the fuel economy standards, for example,” he said, “so that companies aren't tempted to do this sort of thing.”

    June 23, 2015

    Marlo Lewis participated in a panel discussion hosted by the Heritage Foundation and moderated by David Kreutzer titled “The Social Cost of Carbon: A Controversial Tool for Misguided Policy.” Climate Change deniers Jim Inhofe and Patrick Michaels also spoke on the panel. Lewis's powerpoint presentation can also be viewed here (PDF). [35], [36],[37]

    June 11 - 12, 2015

    Marlo Lewis appeared on Panel 4, “The Social Costs of Carbon Dioxide” at the Heartland Institute's Tenth International Conference on Climate Change (ICCC10) in Washington, DC. [38]

    September 22, 2014

    Marlo Lewis took part in a media conference call where he advocated for the rollback of 2014 renewable fuel standard (RFS) targets. Others Lewis said were on the call included: [39]

    • Kristin Sundell — Director of Policy and Campaigns, Action Aid.
    • Former Senator Wayne Allard — VP for Government Relations, American Motorcycle Association.
    • Nicole Wood — Program Manager, Government Affairs, Boat U.S.
    • Ben Schreiber — Climate and Energy Program Director, Friends of the Earth.
    • Emily Cassidy —  Biofuels Research Analyst, Environmental Working Group.
    • Nan Swift — Federal Government Affairs Manager, National Taxpayers Union.

    July 7 - 9, 2014

    Marlo Lewis was a speaker at the Heartland Institute's Ninth International Conference on Climate Change (ICCC9) in Las Vegas, Nevada. His speech was titled “Is a Carbon Tax a Conservative Idea Whose Time Has Come?“ [40]

    Lewis was also on a Q&A Panel with Ken Haapala and David Kreutzer:

    November 7, 2013

    Marlo Lewis testified at a public listening session at the EPA's headquarters in Washington D.C. where he emphasized that coal power plants should not be shut down: [41]

    “Don’t use the guidelines either to shut down existing coal plants, or to enact a national clean energy standard through the regulatory back door,” Lewis said in a summary of his comments. He added that the EPA needed to be careful that  “guidelines for reducing CO2 emissions from existing power plants do not adversely affect the economic viability of existing coal power plants.” [41]

    November 5, 2013

    Marlo Lewis, Jr. outlines a global warming presentation that he gives to new interns at the Competitive Enterprise Institute (CEI), teaching them the reasons why he believes that “climate change is not a 'crisis' or 'planetary emergency.'” [13]

    In is presentation, titled “Climate Change: Be Not Afraid!” (PDF), Lewis cites the debunked “global warming pause,” says there is no link between extreme weather and climate change, and suggests that “The state of the world keeps improving as CO2 emissions increase.” [42]

    August 26, 2011

    According to Marlo Lewis, we should all “love” the Keystone XL pipeline. He provided eight reasons in a post on the Cooler Head Coalition's website. Excerpts below: [11]

    “A win for Keystone XL is a defeat for the global warming movement. Green groups view Keystone as an opportunity to regain momentum and offset their losses after the death of cap-and-trade. If friends of affordable energy win this fight, which seems likely, the greenhouse lobby will take another hit to its prestige, morale, and influence.

    Keystone XL strains relations between Obama and his environmentalist base. If Obama approves the pipeline, greenies will be less motivated to work for his re-election. If he disapproves, Republicans and moderate Democrats will hammer him for killing job creation and increasing pain at the pump. Either way, the prospects for new anti-energy legislation should be dimmer.

    Keystone XL is bringing aging, New Lefties out of the woodwork, where they can misbehave and get themselves arrested.”

    August 10, 2011

    When he made a trip to Canada to view the existing Keystone pipeline. Lewis documented his trip in a post at the Cooler Heads Coalition website in a post titled “My Excellent Journey to Canada’s Oil Sands.” [43]

    March 8 - 10, 2009

    Marlo Lewis was a speaker at the Heartland Institute's Second International Conference on Climate Change (ICCC2) in New York. His speech was titled “Economic Train Wreck: Regulating CO2 Emissions Under the Clean Air Act.” [44]

    DeSmog researched the funding behind Heartland's Second International Conference on Climate Change (ICCC2) and found sponsor organizations had received over $47 million in funding from energy companies and right-wing foundations, with 78% of that total coming from Scaife Family Foundations. [45]

    February, 2009

    Marlo Lewis appeared on CNN to debate global warming policy with Kert Davies from Greenpeace. Video and partial transcript below. [46]


    Commentator: “Is it the case that you don't believe in global warming at all, or do you consider it merely to be global alarmism?”

    Marlo Lewis: “I do believe there is global warming, although global warming has slowed down over the last decade, which I think is interesting because none of the climate models used by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change to forecast global warming over the 21st century anticipated a roughly 10 year period with no net global warming. Which suggest that those models may be too sensitive or too hot.”

    C: “If it's slowed, by which mechanism are you using to evaluate that?”

    ML: “The Hadley data and the data which is land-surface data mostly. And also the Alabama-Huntsville satellite data. So two datasets confirm that basically there's basically been no net warming since 2001. And or none since 1998 if you want to include a year with a very big El Nino.

    C: “Ok, now Kert Davis From Greenpeace, I expect you're going to disagree with that. Do you believe that global warming has stagnated or almost slowed since 2001? 

    Kurt Davies: “No. Marlo, people living in the real world see global warming every day and in fact what the science is telling us is that it's worse than we thought. All of the modelling projects exactly what we're seeing. That is, extremes in weather, extremes heat waves like we're seeing in the winter in California, loss of snow  cover, the protracted drought in the southeast in the United States. And all around the world—extreme typhoons, hurricanes—things are getting worse, not better.

    It's also a misnomer to look at just warming. In fact, the warming is worse at the poles. We're watching the icecaps break apart, polar bears are being left without ice to walk and feed and live on. And this is affecting people in their lives. Farmers are not planting crops in California this year. That means the food supply is threatened. In fact, what the IPCC found was that poor people around the world are going to be affected first and worst by global warming. That means their lives are at risk. It's a dangerous distraction to say that global warming does not affect people or is not as bad as we think it is.”

    C: “Kert Davies, so presumably then you're not going for Marlo Lewis's assertion about the kind of data that he follows and recommends.”

    KD: “Marlo Lewis is not a scientist. He comes from a think tank that also worked for the tobacco industry to deny that smoking causes damage. He took money from Exxon for over a decade—two million dollars plus—even Exxon dropped Competitive Enterprise Institute from its funding ranks because they were out of touch with reality.” [46]

    2009

    Marlo Lewis was one of the “experts” to appear in a video funded by the Cascade Policy Institute titled “Climate Chains.” Cascade describes the video as “22-minute documentary that exposes extreme environmentalism and the misguided pursuit of cap-and-trade legislation. Climate Chains not only explains the dangers of this legislation but offers an alternative to top-down regulation in the form of free market environmentalism.” [47]

    The full list of experts was as follows: [48]

    June 25, 2008

    Marlo Lewis testified before the Select Committee on Energy Independence and Global Warming (PDF), arguing against fuel economy standards. Some notable quotes below. [49]

    “The new mpg standards enacted in December 2007 will do nothing to measurably cool the atmosphere.”

    “Global warming policies can adversely affect human health and life expectancy.”

    […] Please note, I am not saying that global warming is a myth or that there are no health, environment, and safety risks associated with climate change. What I am saying is that there are also risks associated with global warming policy.”

    “The global warming debate suffers from a profound lack of balance. Proponents of carbon suppression policies spotlight, trumpet, and even exaggerate the risks of climate change but ignore or deny the risks of climate change policy.

    This one-sided perspective dominates recent attempts to link global warming to national security concerns. The remotest possibility of abrupt climate change is seized upon as a rationale for policies with enormous potential to harm people, the economy, and, indeed, national security. This hearing will have served a valuable purpose if it begins to redress the balance.”

    March 2 - 4, 2008

    Marlo Lewis was a speaker at the Heartland Institute's First International Conference on Climate Change (ICCC1) in New York. His speech was titled “The Economic and Regulatory Perils of Massachusetts v. EPA.” [50]

    October 12, 2007

    Marlo Lewis appeared on CNBCwhere he discussed his “Skeptic's Guide” to An Inconvenient Truth” and Al Gore's Nobel Peace Prize.[51]

    “A preponderance of scientists do believe that the recent warming, the warming of the past 30 years, is largely the result of the accumulation of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere,” Lewis admitted. “I would say that most scientists, though, understand—even if they don't publicly say—that there isn't a whole lot we can do about it.”

    Lewis also appeared on CNN to further discuss why he believes that Al Gore does not deserve the Peace Prize: [52]

    “An Inconvenient Truth is basically a lawyer's brief for a political agenda. It's completely one-sided. Gore only mentioned or cites studies that support his point of view, then he exaggerates in many cases the evidence that he presents, ” Lewis said.  “He is presenting global warming as a planetary emergency […] and that is simply not based on science.”

    August 20, 2007

    Marlo Lewis testified in the Senate before the Environment and Public Works Committee. Video and partial transcript below. [53]

    “Jonah Goldberg, the columnist, notes that the earth warned about 0.7 degrees Celsius in the 20th century while global GDP increased by some 1800 percent.

    For the sake of argument, says Goldberg, lets agree that all of the warming was anthropogenic; the result of economic activity. And let's further stipulate that the warming produced no benefits, only harms. That's still an amazing bargain, Goldberg remarks.

    Average life expectancies doubled in the 20th century. The human population nearly quadrupled, yet per-capita food supplies increased. Literacy, medicine, measure, and even in many respects the environment improved, at least in the prosperous west. 

    This suggests a thought experiment. Suppose you had the power to travel and time and impose carbon caps on previous generations. How much growth would you be willing to sacrifice to avoid how many tenths of a degree of warming? Would humanity be better off today if the twentieth century had half as much warming, but also a half or a third, or even a quarter less growth? I doubt anyone on this committee would say yes.

    A poorer planet would also be a hungrier, sicker planet. Many of us might not even be alive. How much future growth are you willing to sacrifice to mitigate global warming? That is not an idle question.”

    […] “Regulatory climate strategies put the policy cart before the technology horse.” [53]

    August 15, 2007

    Marlo Lewis appeared on NBC News In-Depth to talk about climate change. [54]

    Discussing funding from the oil industry including companies like ExxonMobil which funded the Competitive Enterprise Institute, Lewis said:

    “We don't take that position because they invest. It's the other way around. And any environmental group that is honest and has any familiarity with us knows that to be the case.”

    May 2, 2007

    Marlo Lewis appeared appeared on Glenn Beck's special “Exposed: The Climate of Fear,” a program that contended climate change was not a man-made ecological crisis. [55]

    March, 2007

    Marlo Lewis published a “Congressional Working Paper” titled“A Skeptic's Guide to An Inconvenient Truth” (PDF) with the Competitive Enterprise Institute. The paper describes Al Gore's film as “Science Fiction.” [56]

    Along with the paper, Lewis also released “A Skeptic's Primer” on the film, and a so-called“guide” to supposed “Distortions, Misleading Statements, Exaggerations, and Errors” in the film. [57], [58]

    For example, Marlo Lewis claims that Gore failed to note the “environmental, health, and economic benefits of climatic warmth and the ongoing rise in the air’s carbon dioxide (CO2) content,” a common myth among climate change skeptics[58]

    January 26, 2003

    Marlo Lewis co-wrote a letter to President Bush with Fred Smith, discouraging Bush from supporting the McCain-Lieberman bill that would have regulated carbon dioxide emissions. Signatories represented a range of climate change denial think tanks and conservative foundations: [59]

    October 2, 2002

    Lewis co-wrote an open letter with Fred L. Smith, Jr. to President Bush opposing GHG reduction credit. The letter expresses concern “that the Administration’s plan to award regulatory credits for 'voluntary' greenhouse gas (GHG) reductions will strengthen pro-Kyoto forces here at home – interests adverse to your supply-side economic and energy policies.” [64]

    July 1, 2002

    Lewis gave a speech titled“Precautionary Foolishness,” where he attempts to “challenge the pro-Kyoto coalition's strongest argument in favor of an international climate treaty. This is the argument that, ‘if we do it smart,”’ Kyoto will provide low-cost planet insurance for present and future generations.” [66]

    Lewis said that “the Precautionary Principle is incoherent, an ethical empty suit.“ [66]

    [D]o we have more to fear from Kyoto than from global warming itself? The purpose of the Precautionary Principle is to sweep such questions under the rug,” he said.  [66]

    On the subject of global warming, Lewis suggests that we have little to fear and goes on to discuss the science and he sees it: [66]

    A variety of empirical evidence suggests we have little or nothing to fear,“ Lewis begins.  “[M]uch of this century's modest warming may be due to natural causes such as changes in solar energy output. Second, since the models overestimate the warming of the past 100 years, they likely also overestimate the warming of the next hundred years. [66]

    From such facts, we may conclude that the climate system is probably less “sensitive” to ‘greenhouse forcing’ than the climate models assume.” [66]

    When it comes to extreme weather events, he defers to fellow climate change deniers for evidence of a lack of connection:  [66]

    What about extreme weather events, melting ice sheets, and the spread of tropical diseases? Here I would simply refer you to the work of hurricane scientists like Chris Landsea and William Gray, glaciologists like Howard Conway, and infectious disease experts like Paul Reiter. During the past fifty years, the period of the most rapid increase in atmospheric greenhouse gas concentrations, the frequency and intensity of Atlantic hurricanes have declined.” [66]

    June 5, 2002

    Writing on behalf of the CEI, Lewis urged President Bush to reconsider his proposal on  Voluntary Reporting of Greenhouse Gases Program, established under section 1605(b) of the 1992 Energy Policy Act: [65]

    A crediting program would energize and expand the “greenhouse lobby” – the coalition of politicians, advocacy groups, and companies supporting the Kyoto Protocol and kindred energy rationing policies,” Lewis said. [65]

    September 25, 2002

    Marlo Lewis co-authored an open letter with Myron Ebell to select senators, attempting to convince them to oppose the Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS), which they describe as “a regressive and coercive policy.” [60]

    July 29, 1998

    Marlo Lewis testified on behalf of the Competitive Enterprise Institute to the House Small Business Committee on “Why Kyoto Is Not an Insurance Policy.” [9]

    According to Lewis, “There are several reasons why we shouldn’t worry about global warming.” He adds “the probability of catastrophic warming is low. Indeed, it is not clear global warming is something we should prevent, even if that were easy and cost little. Spending trillions to avoid better weather and a greener planet would make no sense at all.” [9]

    In candid moments, Administration spokespersons will admit that the theory of catastrophic warming has not been validated by experimental or empirical evidence,” Lewis claimed. “They’ll concede that scientists know too little about the underlying physics, that computer models are too slow, and that the evidence is too conflicted, to permit a genuine resolution of the global warming debate. In other words, they’ll admit, at least privately, that the science supporting the Kyoto Protocol isn’t really clear, compelling, or ‘settled.’ But they don’t see this as a great liability. Indeed, in their view, our very ignorance about the extent of human influence on the climate system is reason enough to justify an enterprise like the Kyoto Protocol.” [9]

    In another testimony document, dated June 1998, Lewis argues that there is “no a priori reason to assume that global warming, on net, would be harmful rather than beneficial.” [9]

    Affiliations

    Publications

    Marlo Lewis, Jr. has written for several publications including Tech Central Station (TCS), Washington Times, Investors Business Daily, the National Review and Interpretation, a journal of political philosophy.

    Sample Publications

    Selection of Cooler Heads Coalition Posts by Marlo Lewis

    Resources

    1. Marlo Lewis, Jr.” Competitive Enterprise Institute. Archived January 2, 2017. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/VP7Dc

    2. Competitive Enterprise Institute,” Conservative Transparency. Data retrieved May 27, 2016.

    3. Competitive Enterprise Institute,” Capital Research Center. Archived July 2, 2003.

    4. ExxonSecrets Factsheet: Competitive Enterprise Institute, CEI. Data retrieved August, 2016. Most recent data on file at Desmog.

    5. COMPETITIVE ENTERPRISE INST,SMITH,FL JRCOMPETITIVE ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE. 1994 March. Philip Morris.

    6. Marlo Lewis Joins CEI As Senior Fellow,” Competitive Enterprise Institute, March 31, 2002. Archived January 2, 2017. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/R6kUy

    7. Competitive Enterprise Institute 990 Forms. Retrieved from DocumentCloud.

    8. Al Gore's Science Fiction,” Competitive Enterprise Institute, March 16, 2007. Archived January 5, 2017. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/uG5Ir

    9. Testimony on Why Kyoto Is Not an Insurance Policy, House Small Business Committee,” Competitive Enterprise Institute, July 29, 1998. Archived July 2, 2002. Archive.is URL:  https://archive.is/qAp3a

    10. About,” Cooler Heads Coalition. Archived January 2, 2017. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/TI18I

    11. Eight Reasons to Love the Keystone XL Pipeline,” GlobalWarming.org, August 26, 2011. Archived January 2, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/ag8wb

    12. Freedom 21 National Conference,” Freedom21. Archived August 13, 2001. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/NBxSb

    13. Updated Antidote to Climate Hysteria,” Global Warming.org, November 5, 2013. Archived January 3, 2017. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/iTwT6

    14. Marlo Lewis on Global Warming & The Economy,” YouTube Video uploaded by user Competitive Enterprise Institute, December 18, 2008. Archived .mp4 on file at DeSmog. 

    15. Myron Ebell. “Donald Trump and environmental regulation,” Daily Times, January 2, 2017. Archived January 6, 2017. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/12uBx

    16. Marlo Lewis. “Here's why the Senate should help Trump repudiate the Paris climate agreement,” Fox News, December 20, 2016. Archived January 4, 2017. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/o69mK

    17. Marlo Lewis. “SOTU on Energy and Climate: Disingenuous and Dumb,” Global Warming.org, January 21, 2015. Archived January 2, 2017. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/XmtOv

    18. Marlo Lewis. “Some Free Market Talking Points on the Keystone XL Pipeline Amendments,” Global Warming.org, January 13, 2015. Archived January 2, 2017. Archive.is  URL: https://archive.is/PsoAW 

    19. Marlo Lewis. “No Brainer: Senate Should Approve Keystone XL,” Global Warming.org, November 17, 2014. Archived January 2, 2017. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/k2XZ6

    20. Marlo Lewis. “My Las Vegas Slide Show on the ‘Conservative’ Case for a Carbon Tax,” Global Warming.org, July 9, 2014. Archived January 3, 2017. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/tDza6

    21. Marlo Lewis. “American Lung Association Manipulates 'Maternal Instinct' to Sell EPA Power Grab,” Global Warming.org, June 15, 2014. Archived January 3, 2017. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/Zd8Ag

    22. Michael Mann’s Hatchet Job on Keystone XL,” Global Warming.org, May 13, 2014. Archived January 3, 2017. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/nujrt

    23. Marlo Lewis. “At Last: A Report on the Social Benefits of Carbon,” Global Warming.org, January 22, 2014. Archived January 3, 2017. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/rVU5v

    24. Marlo Lewis. “Global Warming: Planet's Most Hyped Problem,” Global Warming.org, October 9 , 2013. Archived January 3, 2017. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/xaiwm

    25. Carbon Tax: Will Tweedle Dum Snatch Defeat From the Jaws of Victory?Forbes, October 25, 2012. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/vj1V1

    26. Marlo Lewis on California's Global Warming Regulation,” YouTube Video uploaded by user Competitive Enterprise Institute, January 1, 2009. Archived .mp4 on file at DeSmog.

    27. Marlo Lewis on ExxonMobil and the Rockefeller Family,” YouTube Video uploaded by user Competitive Enterprise Institute, May 2, 2008. Archived .mp4 on file at DeSmog.

    28. Marlo Lewis Debates Global Warming (7/11/07),” YouTube video uploaded by user Competitive Enterprise Institute, July 12, 2007. Archived .mp4 on file at DeSmog.

    29. Testimony before the Committee on Small Business, Hearing on the Kyoto Protocol,” Competitive Enterprise Institute, June 4, 1998. Archived July 4, 2002. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/y4bWl

    30. Twentieth Annual National Conference on Private Property Rights,” Property Rights Foundation of America, October 22, 2016. Archived November 5, 2016. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/YgUFY

    31. Justin Mikulka. “Insights Into the Thinking of Trump Advisor Myron Ebell’s Competitive Enterprise Institute on Climate Change,” DeSmog, November 27, 2016.

    32. The Paris Climate Agreement Is a Treaty Requiring Senate Review,” Competitive Enterprise Institute, February 24, 2016. Archived January 4, 2017. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/6rXuN

    33. The Paris Climate Agreement Is a Treaty Requiring Senate Review,” On Point No. 213 (February 24, 2016). Archived .pdf on file at DeSmog.

    34. Marlo Lewis discusses EPA fuel standards on Fox Business,” YouTube Video uploaded by user Competitive Enterprise Institute, March 25, 2016. Archived .mp4 on file at DeSmog.

    35. Marlo Lewis. “Computer-Aided Sophistry: My Power Point on the Social Cost of Carbon,” Global Warming.org, June 23, 2015. Archived January 2, 2017. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/iRhb2

    36. Social Cost of Carbon: A Controversial Tool for Misguided Policy,” The Heritage Foundation, June 23, 2015. Archived .mp4 on file at DeSmog. Archived January 2, 2017. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/gtd6i

    37. “Social Cost of Carbon: Computer-Aided Sophistry, Menace to Society” (PDF), Competitive Enterprise Institute, June 23, 2015. Archived .pdf on file at DeSmog.

    38. Marlo Lewis, ICCC10 (Panel 4),” International Conferences on Climate Change. Archived .mp4 on file at DeSmog. Archived January 2, 2017. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/uMPy2

    39. Marlo Lewis. “OMB Should Uphold Proposed Rollback of 2014 Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) Targets,” Global Warming.org, September 22, 2014. Archived January 2, 2017. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/Hn36E

    40. Marlo Lewis, ICCC9,” International Conferences on Climate Change. Archived January 2, 2017. Archived .mp4 on file at DeSmog. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/ZPtLG

    41. What I Told EPA at Its D.C.'Listening Session',” Global Warming.org, November 8, 2013. Archived January 3, 2017. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/DYSSK#selection-123.0-123.47

    42. Marlo Lewis. “Climate Change: Be Not Afraid!” Competitive Enterprise Institute, November 6, 2013. Archived .pdf on file at DeSmog.

    43. Marlo Lewis. “My Excellent Journey to Canada’s Oil Sands,” GlobalWarming.org, August 10, 2011. Archived January 2, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/QTMaZ

    44. Marlo Lewis, ICCC2,” International Conferences on Climate Change. Archived January 2, 2017. Archived .mp4 on file at DeSmog. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/SmBp6

    45. Heartland Institute's 2009 Climate Conference in New York: funding history of the sponsors,” Desmog.

    46. Marlo Lewis Debates Global Warming,” YouTube video uploaded by user Competitive Enterprise Institute, February 3, 2009. Archived .mp4 on file at DeSmog.

    47. About Climate Chains,” Climate Chains. Archived October 20, 2009. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/5pbwO

    48. “About the Experts,” Climate Chains. Archived October 21, 2009. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/bmqwC

    49. “Statement of Marlo Lewis” (PDF), Competitive Enterprise Institute, June 25, 2008. Archived .pdf on file at DeSmog.

    50. Marlo Lewis, ICCC1,” International Conferences on Climate Change. Archived January 2, 2017. Archived .mp4 on file at DeSmog. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/faFRJ

    51. Marlo Lewis Discusses Al Gore & the Nobel Prize (10/12/07),” YouTube Video uploaded by user Competitive Enterprise Institute, Oct 15, 2007. Archived .mp4 on file at DeSmog. 

    52. Marlo Lewis on Al Gore's Nobel Peace Prize 2 (10/12/07),” YouTube video uploaded by user Competitive Enterprise Institute, October 12, 2007. Archived .mp4 on file at DeSmog.

    53. Marlo Lewis Testifies in the Senate on Global Warming,” YouTube video uploaded by user Competitive Enterprise Institute on Aug 20, 2007. Archived .mp4 on file at DeSmog.

    54. Marlo Lewis on Global Warming Skeptics (8/15/07),” YouTube video uploaded by user Competitive Enterprise Institute, August 23, 2007. Archived .mp4 on file at DeSmog.

    55. Exposed: The Climate of Fear,” SourceWatch. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/m3tRa

    56. Marlo Lewis, Jr. “Al Gore's Science Fiction: A Skeptic's Guide to An Inconvenient Truth” (PDF), Competitive Enterprise Institute. Archived .pdf on file at DeSmog.

    57. Marlo Lewis. “A Skeptic’s Primer on Al Gore’s An Inconvenient Truth” (PDF), CEI on Point, March 15, 2007. Archived .pdf on file at DeSmog.

    58. Marlo Lewis, Jr. “Some Convenient Distortion” (PDF),CEI On Point, March 16, 2007. Archived .pdf on file at DeSmog.

    59. Fred L. Smith, Jr. “CEI's Fred Smith and Marlo Lewis Send Coalition Letter To President Bush On The Proposed Greenhouse Gas Registry,” Competitive Enterprise Institute, January 26, 2003. Archived January 3, 2017. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/7LOHj

    60. Myron Ebell and Marlo Lewis, Jr. “An Open Letter To Selected Senators On Their Support For The Renewable Portfolio Standard,” Competitive Enterprise Institute. Archived November 5, 2002. Archive.is URL:  https://archive.is/9sCZ5

    61. Who We Are: Marlo Lewis,” Heartland Institute. Archived January 3, 2017. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/pQYlN

    62. About the NCPA’s Environment Team (E-Team),” National Centre for Policy Analysis. Archived January 3, 2017. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/TnZcF

    63. Marlo Lewis, Jr.” Tech Central Station. Archived September 8, 2003. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/qcHmt

    64. Marlo Lewis, Jr. and Fred L. Smith, Jr. “An Open Letter To President Bush About His Plan To Award Regulatory Credits For 'Voluntary' Greenhouse Gas Reductions,Competitive Enterprise Institute, October 2, 2002. Archived November 9, 2002. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/sPv2w

    65. Marlo Lewis, Jr. “CEI Comments On The Department Of Energy's Voluntary Greenhouse Gas Reporting Proposal,“ Competitive Enterprise Institute, June 5, 2002. Archived November 27, 2002. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/aLMjh

    66. Marlo Lewis, Jr. PRECAUTIONARYFOOLISHNESS,” Competitive Enterprise Institute, July 1, 2000. Archived November 27, 2002. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/HOr71

    67. Scholars,” Institute for Energy Research. Archived July 4, 2008. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/SJ1Ne

    68. Marlo Lewis. “Blessing of fossil fuels,” Times and Democrat, April 20, 2018. Archived April 24, 2018. Archive.is URL: https://archive.li/uAHjB

    Other Resources

    Roger Pielke Jr.

    $
    0
    0

    Roger Pielke Jr.

    Credentials

    • Ph. D., Political Science, University of Colorado (1994). [1]
    • M.A., Public Policy, University of Colorado (1992). [1]
    • B.A., Mathematics, University of Colorado (1990). [1]

    Background

    Roger Pielke Jr., is a climate science policy writer working at the University Colorado in Boulder. Pielke Jr.'s academic degrees are in mathematics, public policy, and political science.

    According to his bibliographic notes, he started studying extreme weather and climate in 1991 at the at the National Center for Atmospheric Research in Boulder, CO. He discusses his views on climate policy in the book The Climate Fix (Basic Books, 2011). [6]

    While Pielke Jr. argues that he is not a climate change skeptic, and accepts that man-made climate change is a real problem, he has consistently opposed the idea that extreme weather events and climate change are connected. Pielke's father, Roger A. Pielke Sr., is also an outspoken critic of the United Nation's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Pielke Jr. has described research showing the link between extreme weather and climate change as “zombie science.” [4][5]

    Huffington Post writer David Roberts wrote that Pielke Jr. has “been playing footsie with denialists and right-wing ideologues for years; they're his biggest fans,” and critics have noted that Pielke Jr.'s work has often been cited by climate change deniers. [2], [3]

    Criticism

    Joe Romm at ThinkProgress writes that “the websites that most prominently feature or reprint Pielke’s attacks are climate denial sites like WattsUpWithThat and ClimateDepot.”

    Romm describes him as “probably the single most disputed and debunked person in the science blogosphere, especially on the subject of extreme weather and climate change.” Romm also notes that Roger Pielke Jr. was included on Foreign Policy's 2010 “Guide to Climate Skeptics” — something that Pielke informed FP that he strongly objected to. [7], [4]

    The website SkepticalScience features a page devoted to “Climate Misinformer: Roger Pielke Jr” where they have published an array of refutations to Pielke's blog posts and arguments. [8]

    Stance on Climate Change

    December 2, 2016

    Writing at The Wall Street Journal in an article titled “My Unhappy Life as a Climate Heretic,” Roger Pielke Jr. declared: [9], [10]

    “I believe climate change is real and that human emissions of greenhouse gases risk justifying action, including a carbon tax. But my research led me to a conclusion that many climate campaigners find unacceptable: There is scant evidence to indicate that hurricanes, floods, tornadoes or drought have become more frequent or intense in the U.S. or globally. In fact we are in an era of good fortune when it comes to extreme weather. This is a topic I’ve studied and published on as much as anyone over two decades. My conclusion might be wrong, but I think I’ve earned the right to share this research without risk to my career.”

    November, 2015

    Included in the PDF of a lecture Pielke Jr. gave at the Dutch Association of Science Journalists, under the category of “questions NOT addressed in this talk” he wrote: [11]

    “Is human-caused climate change real and/or significant? -

    - Me: Yes it is

    What policies make sense in response?

    - Me: Read my book! [The Climate Fix]”

    In his summary, Pielke says that extreme weather cannot be equated with climate change:

    “Have disasters become more costly because of human-caused climate change? Only one answer to this question is strongly supported by the available data, the broad scientific literature and the assessments of the IPCC:

    No.

    There is exceedingly little evidence to support claims that disasters have become more costly because of human caused climate change.”

    July, 2013

    In testimony before the U.S. Senate Committee on Environment & Public Works, Pielke Jr. declared: [6]

    “It is misleading, and just plain incorrect, to claim that disasters associated with hurricanes, tornadoes, floods or droughts have increased on climate timescales either in the United States or globally. It is further incorrect to associate the increasing costs of disasters with the emission of greenhouse gases.” [6]

    However, in clarification, he adds that he does believe climate change is caused by man's activity: [6]

     “Humans influence the climate system in profound ways, including through the emission of carbon dioxide via the combustion of fossil fuels […] It does mean however that some activists, politicians, journalists, corporate and government agency representatives and even scientists who should know better have made claims that are unsupportable based on evidence and research.”

    January 6, 2005

    Roger Pielke and co-author Daniel Sarewitz write in The New Republic Online: [12]

    “Global climate change is real, and developing alternative energy sources and reducing global carbon-dioxide emission is essential. But the claim that action to slow climate change is justified by the rising toll of natural disasters–and, by extension, that reducing emissions can help stanch these rising losses–is both scientifically and morally insupportable.”

    Key Quotes

    March, 2014

    Writing at the blog FiveThirtyEight, Roger Pielke Jr. declared: [13]

    “When you read that the cost of disasters is increasing, it’s tempting to think that it must be because more storms are happening. They’re not.

    2010

    Pielke Jr. said in an interview with Foreign Policy[4]

    “We cannot make a causal link between increase in greenhouse gases and the costs of damage associated with hurricanes, floods, and extreme weather phenomena.”

    November, 2008

    Co-writing with Christopher Green in the Rocky Mountain News, Pielke Jr. writes why he disagrees with cap-and-trade: [14]

    “The Obama plan for climate policy involves one very good idea - investment in new technologies and infrastructure - and one very bad one: cap-and-trade.

    To understand why cap-and-trade is a bad idea, we need only to look to lessons from Europe's experiences.”

    September 23, 2005

    Roger Pielke and co-author Daniel Sarewitz write in the opinion section of the Las Angeles Times:

    “Efforts to slow global warming will have no discernible effect on hurricanes for the foreseeable future. Reducing greenhouse gas emissions and adequately preparing for future disasters are essentially separate problems.” [15]

    August 18, 2003

    Writing in Rocky Mountain News, Roger Pielke discusses “pre-emptive” policies to combat climate change: [16]

    “We risk bad policy when all choices before us are bad ones. For instance, the Kyoto protocol on climate change has its supporters and opponents, but very few are willing to admit that debate over its implementation has considerably more symbolic value than practical effect. The debate over the war on Iraq may have been similarly misguided as better policy options may have been ignored. In both cases, a commitment to pre-emption enables the politicization of intelligence, which then serves as a constraint on options that may be more effective but, for certain ideologues, politically less desirable.

    Pre-emption hurts the policy process when it results in a dearth of choice.”

    February 23, 2003

    Writing in the opinion section of Newsday.com, Roger Pielke Jr. outlines his view on the Kyoto protocol: [17]

    “Today we see a subset of scientists trying to use their science to affect political outcomes. The most obvious example is with the Kyoto protocol on global warming, where scientists are arrayed on both sides of the debate. What policy makers need from scientists is not support for or against the protocol, but practical alternatives to deal with climate change. The protocol is more a symbol than an proposal for a real solution.”

    August 5, 2001

    Writing in the Albuquerque Journal, in an article titled “Climate Changes; Society has to learn to adapt,” Daniel Sarewitz and Roger Pielke Jr. declare: [18]

    “Of course, it is quite reasonable to believe, as many climate scientists do, that the record of past temperature increased, combined with knowledge of atmospheric chemistry and physics, foretells a warmer future. But what such scientists do not, and cannot, know is this: what will be the impact of such warming on humans and the environment,and how will those impacts change if we limit emissions?”

    According to the authors, “climate policy makers continue to focus on energy policy as the primary means to address future climate impacts. The approach is simply doomed to fail. Why has the idea of adaptation been so neglected in the political and scientific arenas?”

    February 2, 2000

    Writring in The Washington Times, Roger A. Pielke Jr. and co-author Daniel Sarewitz write: [19]

    “Predictions of the future can be more dangerous than ignorance, if they induce us to behave in ways that reduce our resilience in the face of inevitable uncertainties and contingencies. When predictions are made about events decades or centuries hence, such as the level of the stock market or the conditions of a changing climate, it is simply impossible to verify their accuracy , no matter how impressive the supporting science may be.”

    Key Deeds

    March 29, 2017

    Roger Pielke, Jr. was a witness in a house committee hearing titled “Climate Science: Assumptions, Policy Implications, and the Scientific Method” chaired by Lamar Smith. The hearing also featuring testimony from John Christy, Michael Mann, and Judith CurryDeSmog reported that the House Committee on Science, Space and Technology hearings “have officially turned into theater to stage climate science denial,” noting that Michael Mann was the only witness on the committee to represent the 97% consensus view that humans cause climate change. [45], [46]

    Officially, the hearing was organized to “examine the scientific method and process as it relates to climate change” and “focus on the underlying science that helps inform policy decisions.” [46]

    Rep. Suzanne Bonamici, a Democrat from Oregon, noted from the outset that “The witness panel does not really represent the vast majority of climate scientists.” For an accurate representation of the science, she said to “Visualize 96 more climate scientists that agree with the mainstream consensus. […] For a balanced panel we’d need 96 more Dr. Manns.” [45]

    The Global Warming Policy Foundation (GWPF) published the written testimonies by Curry, Christy, Mann, and Pielke online[47]

    According to Pielke, who describes himself as “an inconvenient academic”:  [45]

    There is little scientific basis in support of claims that extreme weather events, and specifically hurricanes, floods, drought, and tornadoes, and their economic damage, has increased in recent decades due to the emission of greenhouse gases.” 

    He later clarifies, in response to a question from Lamar Smith, that “ there’s no evidence to suggest that hurricanes, either in the U.S. or globally are increasing. And the same goes for floods, drought, and tornados.” He adds, “Why people would hang their hat on long-term trends in extreme weather is a puzzle.”  [45]

    Later in his testimony, Pielke said “You can fund billions and billions of dollars more climate research and the findings will be very much the same. There’s fundamental risks, the future is uncertain, and we have choices about whether and how we might want to mitigate those risks.” [45]

    Shortly after Congressman Clay Higgins of Lousiana grills Michael Mann on his affiliations, giving Mann little opportunity to respond, he puts forward a “series of short questions” to Pielke: [45]

    Higgins: “Are tornadoes increasing?”

    Pielke: “There is a lot of uncertainty about tornadoes, but there’s no evidence to suggest they’ve been increasing.”

    Higgins:“Are floods increasing?”

    Pielke: “As the IPCC concluded, there’s not really good data worldwide to know if they’re going up or down.”

    Higgins:“Are droughts increasing?”

    Pielke:“Globally, and in the United States, according to the EPA and according to the IPCC, the answer is no.”

    Higgins: “Can you explain why someone would say, with such certainty, that extreme weather events will increase given the fact they have not?”

    Pielke: “Well, they may increase yet in the future. And there’s a number of projections made by the IPCC that suggest that they might.”

    Michael Mann responded to Pielke's assertions in his own testimony. He also noted that Pielke has himself declared he was leaving the field several years ago: [45]

    “Roger is pointing to outdated reports. Outdated data,” Mann said.   “Three years ago, he actually posted the following on his blog: He said, ‘I am no longer conducting research or academic writing related to climate, I am not available for talks, and on the climate issue I have no interest in speaking with reporters,'” Mann pauses for effect,  ”'or giving testimony before congress.' Well, that’s what he said back in 2015. That’s, you know, three years ago. There has been a lot of progress over the past three years. […].” [45]

    Mann notes that we can now positively attribute, with a large degree of certainty, how much more large or severe an extreme weather event was likely made by climate change.  [45]

    Pielke goes on to claim that he is representing mainstream science, and that is being attacked by being called on the “fringe”: [45]

    ”[…] I’ve come here representing the science that’s in the IPCC report.  It’s almost a bizarro sort of reaction to be called fringe when you’re representing mainstream science,” he said. [45]

    December 2, 2016

    Roger Pielke Jr. Wrote an article in The Wall Street Journal  titled “My Unhappy Life as a Climate Heretic,” Roger Pielke Jr. declared: [9], [10]

    According to Pielke, journalists and academics have “joined the campaign against me” due to political interests.  [10]

    “I believe climate change is real and that human emissions of greenhouse gases risk justifying action, including a carbon tax. But my research led me to a conclusion that many climate campaigners find unacceptable: There is scant evidence to indicate that hurricanes, floods, tornadoes or drought have become more frequent or intense in the U.S. or globally. In fact we are in an era of good fortune when it comes to extreme weather. This is a topic I’ve studied and published on as much as anyone over two decades. My conclusion might be wrong, but I think I’ve earned the right to share this research without risk to my career.”

    Pielke says that he earned the term “denier” after questioning an IPCC report graph. He adds, “I was right to question the IPCC’s 2007 report, which included a graph purporting to show that disaster costs were rising due to global temperature increases.” [10]

    He emphasizes his point that “There is not a strong basis for connecting weather disasters with human-caused climate change,” noting that “The IPCC never acknowledged the snafu, but subsequent reports got the science right.” [10]

    When Arizona Rep. Raul Grijalva, the ranking Democrat on the House Natural Resources Committee investigated Pielke for what he described as “serious misstatements by Prof. Pielke of the scientific consensus on climate change,” Piekle said that this significantly damaged his reputation and was why he decided to pursue other subjects than climate change. He concludes:

    “Academics and the media in particular should support viewpoint diversity instead of serving as the handmaidens of political expediency by trying to exclude voices or damage reputations and careers. If academics and the media won’t support open debate, who will?” [10]

    June, 2016

    Roger Pielke Jr. published a paper titled “Tracking Climate Progress: A Guide for Policy Makers and the Informed Public” (PDF) for the Institute of Energy Economics, Japan. [20], [21]

    Pielke writes in the paper that its objective is to present a “straightforward approach to tracking international (and national) progress with respect to implementation of the Paris Agreement” and is designed for “observers who may not be insiders to better understand climate policy.” [21]

    According to Pielke, in order to successfully reach emissions reductions targets, the world would have to “deploy about 190 x 1.5 gigawatt power plants worth of carbon-free energy every year from now until 2100.” [21]

    “The proportion of global energy consumption from carbon-free sources provides a readily understandable and easily tracked metric with respect to progress in the implementation of the Paris Agreement on climate change. Today, that percentage is less than 14%. By the end of the century, it needs to be greater than 90% if the ultimate objective of the FCCC is to be achieved,” Pielke Jr. writes. [21]

    November 29, 2015

    Roger Pielke Jr.  gave a keynote lecture to the VWN– de Vereniging voor Wetenschapsjournalistiek en -communicatie, the Dutch Association of Science Journalists. According to the PDF version of his talk, Pielke covered extreme weather events, mentioning a study he co-wrote in 1998 with Chirs Landsea. He criticizes the IPCC for reliance on “one study” on extreme weather in 2007 while establishing a link between extreme weather and global warming. The later portions of his talk are devoted to his label as “climate change denialist” and equates this with having lost his job.  [22]

    In summary, Pielke says that extreme weather cannot be equated with climate change:

    “Have disasters become more costly because of human-caused climate change? Only one answer to this question is strongly supported by the available data, the broad scientific literature and the assessments of the IPCC:

    No.

    There is exceedingly little evidence to support claims that disasters have become more costly because of human caused climate change.”

    February 25, 2015

    Roger Pielke Jr. was the subject of investigation by U.S. Rep. Raúl Grijalva, a Democratic congressman from Arizona, on whether Pielke, Jr. had received research funding from fossil fuel companies. This was one of seven requests that Rep. Raul Grijalva (D-AZ) sent to universities in February, 2015. [23], [24]

    In his letter to University of Colorado President Bruce Benson, Grijalva requested that the university disclose all of Pielke's sources for external funding. The letter points out controversy of climate research by Dr. Willie Soon, and notes that his lack of disclosure “may not be isolated incidents.” [25]

    “Prof . Roger Pielke, Jr., at CU's Center for Science and Technology Policy Research has testified numerous times before the U.S . Congress' on climate change and its economic impacts,”  Grijalva writes in the letter. “His July 2013 Senate testimony featured the claim , often repeated, that it is 'incorrect to associate the increasing costs of disasters with the emission of greenhouse gases.' John Holdren, director of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy, has highlighted what he believes were serious misstatements by Prof. Pielke of the scientific consensus on climate change and his (Holdren's) position on the issue.”

    […] “I am hopeful that disclosure of a few key pieces of information will establish the impartiality of climate research and policy recommendations published in your institution 's name and assist me and my colleagues in making better law.”

    March 19, 2014

    Writing at the blog FiveThirtyEight, Roger Pielke Jr. contends that while natural disasters are costing more money, it is not due to climate change. [13]

    “When you read that the cost of disasters is increasing, it’s tempting to think that it must be because more storms are happening. They’re not. All the apocalyptic 'climate porn' in your Facebook feed is solely a function of perception. In reality, the numbers reflect more damage from catastrophes because the world is getting wealthier. We’re seeing ever-larger losses simply because we have more to lose — when an earthquake or flood occurs, more stuff gets damaged. And no matter what President Obama and British Prime Minister David Cameron say, recent costly disasters are not part of a trend driven by climate change. The data available so far strongly shows they’re just evidence of human vulnerability in the face of periodic extremes,” Pielke Jr. writes.

    Top climatologists responded to Pielke's article, concluding that Nate Silver's FiveThirtyEight had “used flawed data to make its conclusions,” reported ThinkProgress[26]

    Pielke’s piece is deeply misleading, confirming some of my worst fears that Nate Silver’s new venture may become yet another outlet for misinformation when it comes to the issue of human-caused climate change,” said Michael Mann, director of the Earth System Science Center at Pennsylvania State University. “Pielke uses a very misleading normalization procedure that likely serves to remove the very climate change-related damage signal that he claims to not be able to find.”

    Two climate scientists, Michael Mann and Kevin Trenberth, later said the Pielke Jr. had sent them emails threatening possible legal action in response to their criticism of his findings, reported Huffington Post. Pielke responded that it was “ridiculous” to characterize his emails as threats against Michael Mann, however apologized to both scientists. [27]

    In an email to Huffington Post, Mann said Pielke sent him “a threatening email in response to my fair criticism of his piece.” Mann added that a representative from FiveThirtyEight later contacted him and offered “an apology for what they characterized as unacceptable behavior by Pielke.” [27]

    Trenberth said that he considered the email he received from Pielke as “a threat to me,” telling Huffington Post “He was very accusatory and threatened me if I did not respond.” Trenberth forwarded some of the email's text to Huffington Post[27]

    Once again, I am formally asking you for a public correction and apology,” Pielke wrote to Trenberth. “If that is not forthcoming I will be pursuing this further. More generally, in the future how about we agree to disagree over scientific topics like gentlemen?” [27]

    FiveThirtyEight itself published a debunking of Pielke's piece in March, 2014, written by an MIT Climate Scientist Kerry Emanuel. [28]

    SkepticalScience also critiqued Pielke Jr.'s original blog piece, noting that Pielke only chose to examine economic losses from global disasters from 1990 to 2013 while Munich Re offers data going back all the way to 1980, data which was used on an article in New Scientist. [29], [30]

    The Center for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters also has natural disaster cost estimates ranging back to the year 1900. Skeptical Science notes that “Pielke has dismissed climate change as a causal factor using data from just 1990,” pointing out the irony in that Pielke himself had criticized Munich Re for using data only going back to 1980: [31]

    “Thirty years is not an appropriate length of time for a climate analysis, much less finding causal factors like climate change,” Pielke Jr. said.

    SkepticalScience found that the positive trend in global disaster losses in the Munich Re data was almost 30 percent larger for 1980–2013 than was for 1990–2013.  “What's more, the trend in disaster losses for 1980–2013 is statistically significant at the 99 percent confidence level, whereas the trend for the 1990–2013 window cherry picked by Pielke is not statistically significant,” they wrote. [29]

    Pielke Jr. wrote a follow post at FiveThirtyEight, noting that “Human-caused climate change is both real and important, so being careful about what claims science can support and which it can’t is imperative.” According to SkepticalScience , Pielke “dug himself even deeper into a hole by claiming that efforts and technologies to mitigate disaster damages don't make a difference in damage trends 'for floods, U.S. hurricanes or tornadoes.'  The problem is that those referenced papers he links don't support his claims. ” [32], [29]

    Pielke's post received criticism in a number of blogs and news sources including Climate Progress, The Way Things BreakThe Huffington PostDaily Kos, and Columbia Journalism Review. [26], [33], [34], [35], [36]

    Pielke told journalist Keith Kloor that as of June 2014, he was no longer writing for the outlet “after 538 showed some reluctance in continuing to publish my work.”

    July 18, 2013

    Roger Pielke Jr. testified before the U.S. Senate Committee on Environment & Public Works at a hearing on climate change. In his full testimony (PDF), reprinted by the Science and Public Policy Institute (SPPI), Pielke declares, as some “take-home points” that: [6]

    “It is misleading, and just plain incorrect, to claim that disasters associated with hurricanes, tornadoes, floods or droughts have increased on climate timescales either in the United States or globally. It is further incorrect to associate the increasing costs of disasters with the emission of greenhouse gases.” [6]

    According to Pielke Jr., other “take-home points” include that weather-related losses have not increased since 1990, hurricanes have not increased in intensity since 1900, floods have not increased since 1950, tornadoes have not increased since 1950, and drought has become shorter and less frequent over the last century. [6]

    In clarification, he adds that he does believe climate change is caused by man's activity: [6]

     “Humans influence the climate system in profound ways, including through the emission of carbon dioxide via the combustion of fossil fuels […] It does mean however that some activists, politicians, journalists, corporate and government agency representatives and even scientists who should know better have made claims that are unsupportable based on evidence and research.” [6]

    Writing about the testimony on his blog, Pielke Jr. says that he is “declaring victory in this debate” while any future claims associating floods, drought, hurricanes and tornadoes with human-caused climate change would be “Zombie science.” [5]

    On February 28, 2014, in what ThinkProgress described as “an unprecedented move” the President's Science Advisor, Dr. John P. Holdren, published a 6-page critique (PDF) of Roger Pielke Jr.'s 2013 senate testimony. [7], [37]

    Holdren noted that Senator Jeff Sessions had quoted both Roger Pielke Jr. and Roy Spencer in February 2014 testimony, to which Holdren had replied that “the indicated comments by Dr. Pielke, and similar ones attributed by Senator Sessions to Dr. Roy Spencer of the University of Alabama, were not representative of mainstream views on this topic in the climate-science community.” Holdren said his comments were following through on his promise to “record a more complete response with relevant scientific references.” [37]

    ThinkProgress also outlined an interchange between Pielke and Holdren on Twitter that happened in December of 2014. Pielke had criticized Holdren for staying “safe” on climate:

    Since becoming sci advisor Holdren has always stayed on safe (boring) ground in his public remarks,” Pielke Tweeted. [38]

    In February, after Holdren made statements suggesting climate change was worsening Western droughts, Pielke responded in another Tweet, saying “it is brazen for zombie science to show up in the White House!” [39]

    After receiving Holdren's six-page response, Pielke Jr. criticized him on his blog in a post titled “John Holdren's Epic Fail”: [40]

    “In a nutshell, Holdren's response is sloppy and reflects extremely poorly on him. Far from showing that I am outside the scientific mainstream, Holdren's follow-up casts doubt on whether he has even read my Senate testimony,” Pielke claims. He concludes that Holdren “has gone too far” by supposedly attempting to “delegitimize a colleague.” 

    October, 2010

    Roger Pielke Jr. is the author of The Climate Fix: What Scientists and Politicians Won't Tell You About Global Warming. The book, according to one review, “wants everyone to take a giant step backward and restart the entire conversation” on climate change science. While “Pielke agrees with the rest of his field on the need to stop emitting carbon dioxide and to stabilize its concentration in the atmosphere at somewhere between 350 and 500 parts per million; he just doesn’t want scientists to tell the rest of us how to get there.” He instead focuses on the uncertainties of climate science and the politicization of the debate. [41]

    He presented his book as part of a “Sustainability Series” (PDF) with Arizona State University's Global Institute of Sustainability and the Consortium for Science, Policy and Outcomes. The event description read as follows: [42]

    “Conventional wisdom on how to deal with climate change has failed us, according to Roger Pielke, and it’s time to change course. Using an arithmetic and logical explanation, Pielke explores the problem and practical ways of meeting growing energy demands. In this thought-provoking discussion of the interaction between science and politics, Pielke proposes a means for digging ourselves out of this climate change mess we’ve created.”

    July, 2000

    Writing in The Atlantic Monthly with co-author Daniel Sarewitz, Roger Pielke Jr. and Sarewitz claim that the recent Hurricane Mitch may have been a “public relations gift to environmentalists” and claim that “disasters like Mitch are a present and historical reality, and they will become more common and more deadly regardless of global warming.” [43]

    Discussing modern environmentalists, the authors claim they are “in the habit of calling on science to help advance their agenda.” They say that, in light of global warming, the call to reduce carbon dioxide emissions was “used to rationalize the moral imperative, unify the environmentalist agenda, and determine the political solution.” [43]

    The authors go on to criticize the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change's (IPCC) reliance on climate models. “Although various models can reproduce past temperature records, and yield similar predictions of future temperatures, they are unable to replicate other observed aspects of climate.” The authors write that “it is simply not possible to know far in advance if the models agree on future temperature because they are similarly right or similarly wrong.” [43]

    Talking about sea level rise, authors say that while “Sea-level rise is a problem […] anthropogenic global warming is not the only culprit, and reducing emissions cannot be the only solution.” They add that “Predicting the impact on climate of reducing carbon dioxide emissions is so uncertain as to be meaningless.” [43]

    Authors also put an emphasis on adaptation to climate change, which they say has been “taboo in many circles.” [43]

    “Reframing the climate problem could mobilize this constituency [those subject to the effects of the weather] and revitalize the Framework Convention. The revitalization could concentrate on coordinating disaster relief, debt relief, and development assistance, and on generating and providing information on climate that participating countries could use in order to reduce the vulnerability.”

    Pielke Jr. and Sarewitz claim that, while “[E]fforts to reduce carbon dioxide emissions need not be abandoned […] An opportunity to advance the cause of adaptation is on the horizon.” They contend that the United nation's Frameworkk Convention on Climate Chnage should instead focus on “promoting the diffusion of energy-efficient technologies that would reduce emissions” and that this should be “promoted independently” from emissions regulations. [43]

    February 2, 2000

    Roger Pielke Jr. and Daniel Sarewitz co-wrote an article in The Washington Times titled “Anyone for global warming?” In the article, the authors warn that “predictions of the future can be more dangerous than ignorance […]” [19]

    “Understanding the strengths and limits of predictions is important because our sense of certainty about events in the future influences the actions we take today,”  Pielke Jr. and Sarewitz write. “For example, predictions of global warming have focused international environmental efforts on reducing greenhouse gas emissions. But future economic trends, geopolitical events, and technological advances — three variables that defy predictive accuracy — will have a much greater impact on emissions than any conceivable international agreements.”

    Affiliations

    A complete list of Roger A. Pielke Jr. affiliations can be found on his CV on file at CIRES. Below are some notable examples: [1]

    Professional Affiliations

    • Cooperative Institute for Research in the Environmental Sciences (CIRES) — Professor (2004 to present), Fellow (2001 to present). [1]
    • The Breakthrough Institute — Senior Fellow (2008 to present), former Advisory Board Member (2008 to 2016). [1]
    • Risk Frontiers, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia — Research Fellow (2011 to present). [1]
    • Mackinder Institute, London School of Economics, London, UK— Visiting Fellow (2010 to 2012). [1]
    • Oxford University, Said Business School, Oxford Institute for Science, Innovation and Society — Associate Fellow (2007), Associate Fellow (2008 to 2009). [1]
    • Arizona State University, Consortium for Science, Policy, and Outcomes — Affiliated Scholar (2004 to 2009). [1]
    • Institute for the Study of Society and Environment, National Center for Atmospheric Research — Affiliate Scientist (2004 to 2007). [1]
    • University of Colorado, Environmental Studies Program — Director of Graduate Studies (2002 to 2004). [1]
    • Columbia University, Center for Science, Policy and Outcomes — Academic Advisory Board (1998 to 2004), Adjunct Scientist (1998 to 2001). [1]
    • University of Illinois, Illinois State Water Survey — Adjunct Scientist (1998  to 2001). [1]
    • University of Colorado, Department of Political Science — Affiliate Professor (1997 to 2000). [1]

    Notable Board Positions

    Publications

    Roger Pielke Jr. lists all of his publications, as of December 2016, on his website. Some that he lists under the category “Energy and Climate” include:

    Pielke Jr. is also a polific author on blogs including:

    Books

    • The Honest Broker: Making Sense of Science in Policy and Politics. (April, 2007.)
    • The Rightful Place of Science: Disasters and Climate Change. (November, 2014.)
    • The Climate Fix: What Scientists and Politicians Won't Tell You About Global Warming. (September 2010.)
    • Daniel Sarewitz and Roger Pielke Jr. Prediction: Science, Decision Making, and the Future of Nature. (April, 2000).
    • Roger A. Pielke Jr. and Roger A. Pielke Sr. Hurricanes: Their Nature and Impacts on Society by Roger A. Pielke Jr. (1997).

    Resources

    1. “Roger A. Pielke Jr.” (PDF),CIRES, February 2016. Archived .pdf on file at DeSmog.

    2. ROGER PIELKEJR.” Center for Science & Technology Policy Research, University of Colorado Boulder. Archived December 22, 2016. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/lzU0O

    3. David Roberts. “Bashing Dirty Hippies and Getting Played: A Case Study in Six Chapters,” The Huffington Post, January 17, 2007. Archived January 25, 2017. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/BFtjZ

    4. The FP Guide to Climate Skeptics,” Foreign Policy, February 26, 2010. Archived January 27, 2017. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/TKXQl

    5. Coverage of Extreme Events in the IPCCAR5,” Roger Pielke Jr.'s Blog, October 3, 2013. Archived January 27, 2017. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/WvgWD

    6. STATEMENTOFDR. ROGERPIELKE, JR. to the COMMITTEEONENVIRONMENTANDPUBLICWORKS of the UNITEDSTATESSENATEHEARING on CLIMATECHANGE: IT’S HAPPENINGNOW 18 July 2013” (PDF), July 19, 2013. Reprinted by Science & Public Policy Institute. Archived .pdf on file at DeSmog.

    7. Joe Romm. “Obama Science Advisor John Holdren Schools Political Scientist Roger Pielke On Climate And Drought,” ThinkProgress, March 3, 2014. Archived January 27, 2017. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/nsdXW

    8. Climate Misinformer: Roger Pielke_Jr,” SkepticalScience. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/BmoHM

    9. Roger Pielke Jr. “My Unhappy Life as a Climate Heretic,” The Wall Street Journal, December 2, 2016.

    10. Marc Morano. “Extreme Weather expert Dr. Roger Pielke Jr.: ‘My Unhappy Life as a Climate Heretic’,” Climate Depot, December 3, 2016. Archived January 25, 2017. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/CRGvH 

    11. Roger A. Pielke, Jr. “You Can’t Say That! Journalism, Science and Politics” (PDF), CIRES. PDF retrieved from Google Drive. Archived .pdf on file at DeSmog.

    12. Daniel Sarewitz & Roger A. Pielke, Jr. “Rising Tide” (PDF), The NewRepublic Online, January 6, 2005. Archived .pdf on file at DeSmog.

    13. Roger Pielke Jr. “Disasters Cost More Than Ever — But Not Because of Climate Change,” FiveThirtyEight, March 19, 2014. Archived January 25, 2017. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/qU5u8

    14. Roger Pielke Jr. and Christopher Green. “Obama plan a good start to climate policy” (PDFRocky Mountain News, November 22, 2008. Archived .pdf on file at DeSmog.

    15. Roger Pielke Jr. and D. Sarewitz, “Managing the next disaster” (PDF), Los Angeles Times, September 23, 2005. Archived .pdf on file at DeSmog.

    16. Roger A. Pielke Jr. “Speakout: Pre-emptive politics ignore science” (PDF),Rocky Mountain News, August 18, 2003. Retrieved from Centre for Science & Policy Research at the University of Colorado. Archived .pdf on file at DeSmog.

    17. Roger A. Pielke JR. “When Science Gets Political,Newsday.com, February 23, 2003. Retrieved from Centre for Science & Policy Research at the University of Colorado. Archived .pdf on file at DeSmog.

    18. Daniel Sarewitz and Roger Pielke JR. “Climate Changes; Society Has To Learn To Adapt,” The Albuquerque Journal, August 5, 2001. Retrieved from Centre for Science & Policy Research at the University of Colorado. Archived .pdf on file at DeSmog.

    19. “Roger A. Pielke Jr. and Daniel Sarewitz. “Anyone for global warming?The Washington Times, February 2, 2000. Retrieved from Centre for Science & Policy Research at the University of Colorado. Archived .pdf on file at DeSmog.

    20. New Paper on Global Carbon-Free Energy,” Roger Pielke Jr. July 14, 2016. Archived January 26, 2017. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/FUS7h

    21. “A Tracking Climate Progress: A Guide for Policy Makers and the Informed Public” (PDF)”, IEEJ Energy Journal  special issue (June 2016). Archived .pdf on file at DeSmog.

    22. Roger A. Pielke, Jr. “You Can’t Say That! Journalism, Science and Politics” (PDF), CIRES. PDF retrieved from Google Drive. Archived .pdf on file at DeSmog.

    23. Gloria Dickie. “CU-Boulder's Roger Pielke Jr. targeted by congressman over research funding,” Daily Camera, February 25, 2015. Archived January 26, 2017. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/RtOb3

    24. Emily Atkin. “Why A Congressman’s Probe Of Climate Denier Scientists’ Funding Might Not Be A Great Idea,” ThinkProgress, February 27, 2015. Archived January 26, 2017. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/mkrES

    25. “Dear President Benson:” (PDF), Congress of the United States, February 24, 2015. Archived January 26, 2017. Retrieved from Scribd. Archived .pdf on file at DeSmog.

    26. Emily Atkin. “First Climate Article On Nate Silver’s Data Website Uses ‘Deeply Misleading’ Data, Top Climatologists Say,” ThinkProgress, March 19, 2014. Archived January 25, 2017. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/xctux

    27. Michael Calderone. “FiveThirtyEight Apologizes On Behalf Of Controversial Climate Science Writer,” The Huffington Post, March 28, 2014. Archived January 26, 2017. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/YrfDK

    28. Kerry Emanuel. “MIT Climate Scientist Responds on Disaster Costs And Climate Change,” FiveThirtyEight, March 31, 2014. Archived January 27, 2014. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/anFxo

    29. Cherry picked and misrepresented climate science undermines FiveThirtyEight brand,” Skeptical Science, March 24, 2014. Archived January 25, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/MpxkO

    30. Last year costliest on record for natural disasters,” New Scientist, January 11, 2012. Archived January 25, 2017. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/5jVkV 

    31. Dale S. Rice. “Report: Climate change behind rise in weather disasters,USA Today, October 10, 2012. Archived January 25, 2017. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/UMflB

    32. Roger Pielke Jr. “Following Up on Disasters And Climate Change,” FiveThirtyEight, March 21, 2014. Archived January 25, 2017. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/VlV1d

    33. Nate Silver falls off,” The Way Things Break, March 19, 2014. Archived January 25, 2017. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/sI6np

    34. Dan Kessler. “A Few Numbers for Nate Silver and Roger Pielke Jr. on Climate Change,” The Huffington Post, March 20, 2014. Archived January 25, 2017. Archive.is URL https://archive.is/MQoEW

    35. Laurence Lewis. “By hiring a climate disinformer, Nate Silver undermines his entire premise of data-driven journalism,” Daily KOS, March 23, 2014. Archived January 25, 2017. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/iJG8s

    36. Alex Sobel Fitts. “FiveThirtyEight’s disappointing science section,Columbia Journalism Review, March 20, 2014. Archived January 25, 2017. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/BOkpi

    37. “Drought and Global Climate Change: An Analysis of Statements by Roger Pielke Jr” (PDF), John P. Holdren, February 28, 2014. Retrieved from Whitehouse.gov. Archived .pdf on file at DeSmog.

    38. Roger Pielke Jr. “@jameswilsdon @alicebell Since becoming sci advisor Holdren has always stayed on safe (boring) ground in his public remarks,” Twitter post by user @RogerPielkeJr, December 1, 2012, 10:39 AM. Archived .png on file at DeSmog.

    39. Roger Pielke Jr. “@andersbolling That's right, thanks. The zombies will always be with us. But it is brazen for zombie science to show up in the White House!” Twitter post by user @RogerPielkeJr, February 14, 2014, 5:50 AM. Archived .png on file at DeSmog.

    40. John Holdren's Epic Fail,Roger Pielke Jr.'s Blog, March 1, 2014. Archived January 26, 2017. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/sJ8kZ

    41. Dave Levitan. “Book Review: The Climate Fix: What Scientists and Politicians Won't Tell You About Global Warming,” IEEE Spectrum, January 3, 2011. Archived January 26, 2017. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/vZmmn

    42. “The Climate Fix: What Scientists and Politicians Won’t Tell You About Global Warming” (PDF), Arizona State University, Global Institute of Sustainability. Archived .pdf on file at DeSmog.

    43. Daniel Sarewitz and Roger Pielke Jr. “Breaking the Global-Warming Gridlock” (PDF), The Atlantic Monthly, July 2000. Retrieved from Centre for Science & Policy Research at the University of Colorado. Archived .pdf on file at DeSmog.

    44. Occasionally Asked Questions About Roger Pielke, Jr.” University of Colorado at Boulder. Archived December 14, 2008. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/2XC2i

    45. Climate Science: Assumptions, Policy Implications, and the Scientific Method,” House Committee on Science, Space, & Technology, March 29, 2017. Archived March 31, 2017. Archived .mp4 on file at DeSmog.

    46. Ben Jervey. “House Science Committee Hearing Pits Three Fringe Climate Deniers Against Mainstream Climate Scientist Michael Mann,” DeSmog, March 29, 2017.

    47. CLIMATE SCIENCE: Assumptions, policy implications, and the scientific method” (PDF)Global Warming Policy Foundation (Report 24). Archived .pdf on file at DeSmog.

    Other Resources

    Scott Pruitt

    $
    0
    0

    Scott Pruitt

    Credentials

    • Juris Doctor (J.D.), University of Tulsa College of Law (1990-1993). [1]
    • Bachelor's Degree, Political Science and Communications (1990). [1]

    Background

    E. Scott Pruitt served as the 14th administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) under the Trump Administration untilresigning in July 2018 following a series of ethics scandals. Pruitt formerly served as the Oklahoma Attorney General, a position he held since November, 2010. [2], [162][74], [75], [76]

    While Attorney General, Pruitt established the “first federalism unit to combat unwarranted regulation and overreach by the federal government.” Pruitt's profile at The Federalist Society, where he is listed as an expert, notes that Pruitt has been described as “one of the Obama administration’s most tenacious tormentors.” He has been a “advocate against the EPA’s activist agenda, and he is leading the charge against the EPA’s proposed Clean Power Plan and 'Waters of the U.S.' rules for their unlawful attempt to displace state sovereignty in the environmental regulatory context.” [3], [4]

    According to data from Followthemoney.org, Pruitt has collected at least $345,246 in campaign contributions from the oil and gas industry since 2002. E&E News writes that Pruitt raised $282,111 from oil and gas interests over four state campaigns. Only lawyers and lobbyists gave more, at $298,717. [5][6]

    Pruitt was the subject of a 2014 New York Times investigation titled ”Energy Firms in Secretive Alliance With Attorneys General” which described “the unprecedented, secretive alliance that Mr. Pruitt and other Republican attorneys general have formed with some of the nation's top energy producers to push back against the Obama regulatory agenda.” [7]

    Scott Pruitt has a history of opposing to the EPA. In 2011, after the Obama administration issued Mercury and Air Toxics Standards in order to reduce mercury emissions, Pruitt responded by issuing a number of lawsuits, including one that is ongoing. Pruitt has sued the EPA at least 14 times, including many cases which oppose emissions reductions under the Obama Administration's Clean Power Plan. “In all but one of these 14 cases, regulated industry players also were parties. And these companies or trade associations in 13 of these cases were also financial contributors to Mr. Pruitt's political causes,” The New York Times reported. [49], [22]

      Controversies & Ethics Questions

      In late March 2018, ABC News first reported that Pruitt had stayed in a condo owned by the wife of top energy lobbyist Steve Hart during much of his first year in Washington. A Bloomberg report said Pruitt paid $50 a night for a single bedroom, but for only the nights he slept there. The White House proceeded to launch a formal inquiry into Pruitt's living arrangement, which could present an ethics issue for Pruitt. [115], [116], [123]

      Steve Hart's lobbying firm, Williams and Jensen, has lobbied on issues including the “the export of liquefied natural gas (LNG), approval of LNG exports and export facilities.” [115]

      Cheniere Energy Inc., the only active liquid natural gas export plant in the US at the time, gave Hart's form $80,000 in 2017. LNG exports were on the agenda for Pruitt's December 2017 trip to Morocco. According to the EPA press release, Pruitt promoted “the potential benefit of liquefied natural gas (LNG) imports on Morocco’s economy.” [115][117]

      A subsequent internal ethics investigation endorsed the living agreement, however outside ethics experts told ABC News that the rushed ruling was problematic: [118]

      This ethics opinion is highly unusual and problematic in many respects,” said Noah Bookbinder, the executive director of Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington.

      It is not regular practice, and not okay, for a situation that presents the clear possibility of a conflict of interest to be evaluated and approved by an ethics officer after the fact when the story comes out publicly, rather than beforehand,” Bookbinder said. “Second, on the substance, there are many problems with the logic of the opinion.”

      While Pruitt has said that J. Steven Hart had no lobbying business with the EPAThe New York Times reported that the EPA had approved a pipeline expansion plan for a Canadian energy company represented by Hart's lobbying firm at the same time that Pruitt was renting the condominium. Both the EPA and Hart's lobbying firm denied any connection between the condo rental and the action: [124]

      Any attempt to draw that link is patently false,” Liz Bowman, a spokeswoman for Mr. Pruitt, said in a written statement.

      Pruitt has faced a number of other controversies. For example, The Washington Post reported that Pruitt knew of and approved of a plan to grant large raises to two of his aides, while Pruitt later said in a Fox News interview he had only found out about the raises the day before and conceded the raises “should not have happened.” The Atlantic reported Pruitt bypassed the White House, which declined the raises, and had gone through an obscure provision in the Safe Drinking Water Act to pay for the wage increases. [119], [120], [121]

      It’s a complete coincidence that Pruitt went behind the White House’s back and used this in the most unethical way possible, just as the [inspector general] starts asking questions,” one EPA staffer told The Atlantic. “Now they just have to connect the dots.” [122]

      Pruitt's travel and office expenditures have also faced scrutiny. News sources including The New York Times have reported that staffers who questioned Pruitt's spending were reassigned, demoted, or requested new jobs after they raised concerns. [125]

      Among items that Pruitt requested: [126]

      • Two new desks totaling $2,075 (granted) and requested a bulletproof security desk that would have cost $70,000 (not granted).
      • First class, military, and charter flights totaling more than $163,000 in his first year. [127]
      • Sought a $100,000-per-month charter aircraft membership, which The New York Times wrote would allow him to “take unlimited private jet trips for official business.” The membership was not purchased. [125]
      • A bulletproof SUV with run-flat tires that would allow it to continue driving after sustaining gunfire (not purchased). [126]
      • $43,000 secure, soundproof phone booth for his office. [128]
      • A 24-hour security detail that followed him on personal trips including Disneyland and the Rose Bowl. The security detail's salaries could cost at least $2 million per year, CNN reported. [129]

      After the controversies, President Trump voiced support for Pruitt, saying he is doing a “great job,” and “under seige,” Politico reported. [130]

      Do you believe that the Fake News Media is pushing hard on a story that I am going to replace A.G. Jeff Sessions with EPA Chief Scott Pruitt, who is doing a great job but is TOTALLY under siege?” the president wrote. “Do people really believe this stuff? So much of the media is dishonest and corrupt!”

      Pruitt has also received support from climate change deniers and groups including Myron Ebell of the Competitive Enterprise Institute, who described the controversies as “little messes.” Marc Morano went on Fox News, where he described Pruitt as “a marked man in Washington” while he praised Pruitt's decision to roll back fuel economy and emissions standards for vehicles. [131], [132]

      An April 18, 2018 press release from the U.S. House of Representatives reported that the investigations into Pruitt's spending was growing substantially, including investigations from The House of Representatives, Senate, White House, Office of Management and Budge, Government Accountability Office, and the EPA Inspector General. [137]

      Pruitt's EPA Nomination

      Pruitt was confirmed as administrator of the EPA on February 17, 2017. Pruitt's initial committee confirmation vote was to take place on February 1, 2017, but the vote was delayed when Democrats boycotted the planned vote.  [74], [75], [76][71]

      When President-elect Donald Trump nominated Scott Pruitt to serve as administrator of the U.S.EPADeSmog how Pruitt's history working with oil, gas, and utility companies could affect his confirmation. [8], [9]

      In 2015, Pruitt, as Oklahoma's AG, filed suit against the EPA over the Clean Power Plan, the regulation that would curb carbon dioxide emissions from power plants. Assisting Pruitt were attorneys from BakerHostetler, one of the nation’s largest law firms.

      It’s a safe assumption that Pruitt could be the most hostile E.P.A. administrator toward clean air and safe drinking water in history,” Ken Cook, head of the Environmental Working Group, told the New York Times in December 2016. [8]

      Two of the BakerHostetler attorneys joining Pruitt, David B. Rivkin Jr. and Andrew M. Grossman, recently established the Free Speech in Science Project to defend companies and groups over their climate science denial. The group arose shortly after investigations began into ExxonMobil’s knowledge and actions relating to climate change. A few months after the group launched, Pruitt signed a letter, along with other Republican attorneys general, to counter the climate fraud investigations of fossil fuel companies. 

      Pruitt received strong support for his confirmation from industry groups and think thanks opposing climate change action including The Heartland Institute, American Energy Alliance (AEA), and others. In a January 12, 2017 official letter of support (PDF), numerous groups declared that the Senate should “swiftly approve his nomination.” Signatories of the letter included: [70]

      The Republican Attorneys General Association and the Rule of Law Defense Fund

      Pruitt is a former chair and member of The Rule of Law Defense Fund (RLDF), a secretive group that actively fought against the Clean Power Plan. While the RLDF's funding remains largely unknown, Bloomberg reports that it received funding from Freedom Partners, a group tied to Charles and David Koch. Pruitt stepped down shortly before his selection by Trump to head the EPA was announced and resigned as a board member in December, 2016. [10], [11]

      According to the Center for Media and Democracy (CMD), The RLDF is a 501(C)(4) organization and is not required to publicly disclose its sources of funding. RLDF was created in 2014 by the Republican Attorneys General Association and shares staff and offices. [12], [13]

      The Republican Attorneys General Association (RAGA) has received almost $4 million in funding from fossil fuel interests since 2014. In 2015, RAGA had secretive meetings with energy companies Murray Energy and Southern Company, which Bloomberg noted coincided closely with large contributions from both energy companies. Shortly after that meeting, Republican attorneys general went on to fight the EPA's Clean Power Plan in court. [14], [15]

      CMD notes how RAGA lets corporations get close to attorneys general and their staff: [16]

      “Corporations can pay a premium rate RAGA membership fee of up to $125,000 for the privilege of holding private briefings with attorneys general and their staff, as well as attending the annual meeting. The conference provides ample opportunity for attorneys general to directly solicit campaign contributions from corporate representatives during private meetings, informal conversations and leisure activities—like kayaking, a five-hour golf game, and a National Rifle Association-sponsored shooting tournament.”

      Politico reported that shortly before Pruitt's confirmation hearing, a new secretive Super PAC emerged calling itself Protecting America Now. Politico writes: [17]

      “The new group, Protecting America Now, warns that Pruitt’s confirmation “is not a certainty” and says that millions of dollars are needed for advertising and social media campaigns to counter anti-Pruitt campaigning from “anti-business, environmental extremists,” according to a flier obtained by POLITICO.

      Politico also reported on two other PACs, formed in 2015, both supporting Pruitt. E&E News details the background of Liberty 2.0 and Oklahoma Strong Leadership PAC, noting that “The Oklahoma Strong Leadership PAC is able to accept limited donations and coordinate with Pruitt, enabling the Oklahoma attorney general to funnel money to preferred political candidates across the country. The downtown Tulsa address is the same as that of Pruitt's campaign office.” [6]

      Two other groups, America Rising PAC and America Rising Squared, also ran ads supporting Pruitt's nomination in red states with Democratic senators and also launched the ConfirmPruitt.com website. [18]

      Scott Pruitt's Fossil Fuel Ties

      DeSmog mapped Scott Pruitt's fossil fuel ties and tracked groups connected to Pruitt and his confirmation hearings: [19]

      Ties to the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC)

      While still a state representative, Scott Pruitt formerly chaired the ALEC Civil Justice task force. [20] He described ALEC in a 2013 interview: [21]

      ALEC is unique in the sense that it puts legislators and companies together and they create policy collectively. The actual stakeholders who are affected by policy aren’t at the table as much as they should be […] Serving with them is very beneficial, in my opinion.”

      After becoming attorney general, Pruitt spoke at a number of ALEC events including a 2013 panel titled “Embracing American Energy Opportunities: From Wellheads to Pipelines” and in ALEC's 2014 annual meeting

      Legal Actions against  the EPA

      Pruitt has filed 14 lawsuits against the EPA, as reported in a review by the New York Times“In all but one of these 14 cases, regulated industry players also were parties. And these companies or trade associations in 13 of these cases were also financial contributors to Mr. Pruitt's political causes,” The New York Times reported. Case list below: [22]

      • EPA's Regional Haze Rule (2011)
      • Cross-State Air Pollution Rule (CSAPR) (2011)
      • Mercury and Air Toxics Standards for Power Plants (MATS) (2012)
      • Alleged EPA violated the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) (2013)
      • Regulation of greenhouse gases under the Clean Air Act (2014)
      • Draft rule of the Clean Power Plan (2014)
      • Clean Power Plan (July 2015)
      • Clean Power Plan (August 2015)
      • Clean Power Plan (June 2016)
      • Mercury and Air Toxics Standards for Power Plants (MATS) (2015)
      • Waters of the United States (WOTUS) (2015)
      • National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) (2015)
      • Methane Emissions (2016)
      • Startup, Shutdown and Malfunction and Scheduled Maintenance (SSM&SM) State Implementation Plan (2016)
      • Oil and Natural Gas Sector: Emission Standards for New, Reconstructed and Modified Sources (2016)

      Stance on Climate Change

      February 2018

      Pruitt expanded on his views on climate change. In an interview with KSNVTV in Nevada, Pruitt claimed that global warming could beneficial: [108]

      “I mean, we know that humans have most flourished during times of what, warming trends? I mean, so I think there's assumptions made that because the climate is warming, that that necessarily is a bad thing. […]” [108]

      January, 2017

      Scott Pruitt was questioned on his positions regarding climate change at his EPA confirmation hearing. In response to a question from Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders, Pruitt stated: [23]

      The climate is changing and human activity contributes to that in some manner. It is the ability to measure it and the extent of that impact, and what to do about it that is subject to continued debate and dialogue.”

      Later in the hearing, further responding to questions from Sanders, Pruitt proclaimed that his personal opinion on the matter of climate change was“immaterial” to serving as the EPA administrator[48]

      According to The Independent, Pruitt contradicted Donald Trump's claim that climate change was a hoax: [24]

      “I do not believe climate change is a hoax,” Mr Pruitt said.

      In his opening remarks, Pruitt stated (see video below):

      “Science tells us that the climate is changing, and that human activity in some manner impacts that change. The ability to measure with precision the degree and extent of that impact, and what to do about it, are subject to continuing debate and dialogue, and well it should be.” [48]

      May, 2016

      In an article Pruitt co-wrote with Alabama Attorney General Luther Strange in the National Review, they declared: [25]

      “That debate is far from settled. Scientists continue to disagree about the degree and extent of global warming and its connection to the actions of mankind. That debate should be encouraged — in classrooms, public forums, and the halls of Congress. It should not be silenced with threats of prosecution. Dissent is not a crime.”

      April, 2015

      In a 2015 Financial Times interview, Scott Pruitt said that humanity’s contribution to global warming was “subject to considerable debate.” After being told that 97 per cent of scientists endorsed the idea that humans had caused climate change, he said: “Where does that fit with the statutory framework? That’s not material at all. So that’s why I don’t focus on it.” [26]

      Stance on Abortion

      HuffPost reported that in the late 1990s, while an Oklahoma senator, Pruitt twice introduced a bill that would give men “property rights” over unborn fetuses. The bill required women to obtain a father's permission before aborting a pregnancy. [157]

      It’s not surprising that another member of Trump’s inner circle is hostile to women,” said Dawn Huckelbridge, a senior director at the progressive American Bridge PAC, which opposes Pruitt and supports abortion rights. “But framing a fetus as a man’s property is a new low.”

      While his current position in the Trump Administration does not relate to abortion policy, he has regularly appeared alongside Trump to meet with evangelical leaders, and reportedly receives support from right-wing evangelical Christians. HuffPost previously reported this could be one of the reasons that Trump hasn’t fired Pruitt, despite numerous controversies. [158]

      Key Quotes

      October 20, 2017

      In an interview at the The Heritage Foundation’s annual President’s Club meeting in Washington, Pruitt declared: [104]

      “True environmentalism from my perspective is using natural resources that God has blessed us with […]”

      November 30, 2017

      Speaking at the “At the Crossroads IV: Energy & Climate Policy Summit,” co-hosted by The Heritage Foundation and Texas Public Policy Foundation, Pruitt said President Donald Trump was “very courageous” for exiting the Paris agreement: [103]

      “There was tremendous pressure brought on the President to stay in that, by the way, for no good environmental reason. It was a bumper sticker. Paris was a bumper sticker. It was not about CO2 reduction. It was about penalizing our own economy. And I could give you some information about that if you’d like, but the President made a very courageous decision to exit.” 

      September 7, 2017

      In a phone interview with CNNabout Hurricane Irma, Pruitt said that it wasn't the time to talk about climate change. [92]

      “Here's the issue,” Pruitt said in the phone interview. “To have any kind of focus on the cause and effect of the storm; versus helping people, or actually facing the effect of the storm, is misplaced.”

      He continued, adding, “What we need to focus on is access to clean water, addressing these areas of superfund activities that may cause an attack on water, these issues of access to fuel. […] Those are things so important to citizens of Florida right now, and to discuss the cause and effect of these storms, there's the […] place (and time) to do that, it's not now.”

      Shortly after, Myron Ebell came to Pruitt's defense, writing at The Hill that “Pruitt is of course absolutely right to focus on government action rather than idle chatter, but that has not dissuaded global warming activists and even some elected officials from trying to take political advantage of these two huge storms to promote their pet cause — policies to limit the use of fossil fuels.” [93]

      May 26, 2016

      Testifying (PDF) before a Congressional committee on why he sued the EPA under the Obama administration, Pruitt said: [27], [28]

      “The EPA was never intended to be our nation’s foremost environmental regulator. The states were to have regulatory primacy. That construct –a construct put in place by this body – has been turned upside down by this administration. That’s why I’m here today. I’d like to explain to you why I so jealously guard Oklahoma’s sovereign prerogative to regulate in both a sensible and sensitive way.”

      July, 2014

      Speaking at the American Legislative Exchange Council's (ALEC) 2014 Annual Meeting, Pruitt declared: [29]

      “Beyond the regional haze case, we have something on the horizon something more troubling. And that’s the proposed rule under 111(d) with respect to CO2 regulation. We have an EPA that is engaged in rulemaking, proposed rulemaking, that seeks to exert itself in a way that the statute doesn’t authorize at all.”

      October, 2012

      Scott Pruitt among others signed a suit filed against the EPA's regulation of mercury pollution from power plants (PDF). In the Summary of Argument, they wrote: [53]

      “[T]he record does not support EPA’s findings that mercury, non-mercury HAP metals, and acid gas HAPs pose public health hazards.”

      Key Deeds

      July 5, 2018

      Pruitt stepped down from his position at the EPA. Donald Trump, announcing Pruitt's departure, tweeted that Pruitt had done an “outstanding job.” [162]

      Pruitt would be replaced by Andrew Wheeler, a former lobbyist for Murray Energy

      “It is extremely difficult for me to cease serving you in this role first because I count it as a blessing to be serving you in any capacity, but also because of the transformative work that is occurring,” Pruitt said in his resignation letter posted by Fox News. [163], [164]

      “However, the unrelenting attacks on me personally, my family, are unprecedented and have taken a sizable toll on all of us.”

      June 28, 2018

      The Daily Beast reported that Pruitt had instructed his staff to pitch “oppo hits” to media outlets on officials who had left on poor terms. Sources told TDB that targets had included former transition team member David Schnare and career official John Reeder, who Pruitt reportedly called a “communist” in private. [165]

      “Sources say he’s actively undermined the reputations of former and current staffers, with campaigns that former senior EPA officials have described as 'ratf*cking',” TDB reported. [165]

      Pruitt's former deputy chief of staff, Kevin Chmielewski, was suspected of leaking details about Pruitt's travel and spending. Sources say Pruitt pushed back by tasking aides with leaking information about Chmielewski’s alleged misconduct at EPA. Chmielewski has accused Pruitt of retaliation, a charge to be investigated by the Office of Special Counsel. [165]

      June 7, 2018

      Heartland Institute president Tim Huelkamp addressed a letter to Pruitt supporting his prior statement that human emissions of carbon dioxide are not “a primary contributor to the global warming that we see.” The letter offered materials to counter a Freedom of Information Act request by the Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility (PEER) demanding the release of “EPA documents that support the conclusion that human activity is not the largest factor driving global climate change.” [159], [161]

      “We have no doubt that PEER, with the assistance of the judge, is trying to box you in and embarrass you,” Huelskamp wrote. “Fortunately, you do not have to look far to find 'documents that support the conclusion that human activity is not the largest factor driving global climate change.'” [159]

      For these documents, Huelskamp pointed to “Climate Change Reconsidered,” a report compiled by Heartland's Nongovernmental International Panel on Climate Change (NIPCC) in partnership with the Center for the Study of Carbon Dioxide and Global Change. “Heartland has submitted these volumes in digital form during EPA comment periods in the past, and we are certain physical copies were also sent to the agency,” he said. [159]

      Among numerous other claims, Huselkamp stated that the NPCC report—which he included a copy of in the letter to Pruitt—contained scientific evidence that: [159]

      • “Summarizes the research of a growing number of scientists who say variations in solar activity, not greenhouse gases, are the true driver of climate change” —See SkepticalScience myth #2.
      • “Challenges the IPCC’s claim that CO2-induced global warming is harmful to human health” — SkepticalScience Myth #42.
      • “Explains how the sun may have contributed as much as 66% of the observed twentieth century warming, and perhaps more” — SkepticalScience myth #2.

      Huselkamp described Climate Change Reconsidered as the work of a “'Red Team' that has been working to critique and correct the work of ideological alarmists on the 'Blue Team'” for more than a decade. “Feel free to cite this material, which contains more than 10,000 footnotes, in your response to the judge or in any other public setting,” Huelskamp concluded. [160]

      May 2018

      Maria Marshall, Director of Operations at the Office of the Executive Vice President at the Federalist Society was reportedly involved in planning a Rome visit for EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt in which he visited Cardinal Pell, a prominent member of the Catholic church and a climate change denier. [151]

      Documents released by New York Times reporter Eric Lipton outlined planning for the dinner in May, and the schedule of the dinner. According to an email sent during the dinner, an EPA staff member said that Pruitt and Pell discussed a Wall Street Journal article that had reported on the proposal of a “red team/blue team” debate on climate science.

      The Federalist Society's Leonard Leo also attended the dinner. According to another report in the New York Times, Leo also helped organize other elements of Pruitt's June 2017 Vatican trip. [152]

      The Washington Post reported Pruitt had earlier dined at one of Rome's finest restaurants at the expense of The Federalist Society's Leonard Leo. When asked about the dinner, an EPA spokesman said Pruitt was allowed to accept the gift given the men's personal relationship, however Leo was subsequently reimbursed for the cost. Leo reportedly arranged private events for Pruitt and his aides in Rome, and Leo was invited to join a meeting between Pruitt and Archbishop Paul Gallagher to discuss environmental policy. [149], [150]

      Altogether, Pruitt's Rome trip reportedly cost $120,000, according to previously-released EPA documents. That cost included $36,000 for Pruitt and staff to take a military jet from Cincinnati to New York. [153]

      May 8, 2018

      A new set of documents released to the Natural Resource Defense Council (NRDC) as part of a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request revealed details of Pruitt's plan to engage in a “red team, blue team” expertise on climate change. The documents showed communications between the EPA and a number of corporate-funded conservative think tanks with views that run counter to established science on climate change including the Heartland Institute, the Manhattan Institute, and theCO2 Coalition. [148]

      “The documents show the extent to which the E.P.A., which is the main federal agency charged with protecting human health and the environment, worked with groups like the Heartland Institute, which holds positions on climate change that are far outside the mainstream of scientific opinion, as opposed to the agency’s own chief scientists,” The New York Times reported. [148]

      According to Benjamin D. Santer, a climate researcher at the Energy Department’s Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, “The idea that the Heartland Institute should be dictating what E.P.A. does on climate science is crazy.” He added, “They do not have scientific expertise.” [148]

      The emails also suggest that the EPA's Office of Research and Development, which normally does most of the science work of the Agency, was not active in the discussions.  In one email, a program analyst in the office, Christina Moody, wrote: “We are not involved. The Administrator is the one who wants to do this and I’m guessing his folks are putting it together.” [148]

      Oren M. Cass, a senior fellow at Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, another conservative think tank, was also included in EPA communications: [148]

       “We were thinking this meeting could be purely informative in nature, and not necessarily in the context of a specific EPA exercise,” Tate Bennett, associate administrator at the EPA wrote to Cass.  [148]

      Rodney W. Nichols, a consultant to the pro-carbon CO2 Coalition, wrote to Pruitt’s senior adviser for public affairs: [148]

      The ‘Red Team’ idea is superb. We will be glad to help the initiative in any way we can,” Nichols said.

      In a later email, Mark Carr, another consultant for the CO2 Coalition, wrote to Pruitt’s chief of staff, Ryan Jackson: [148]

      I’m following up on face-to-face conversations my CO2 Coalition colleagues and I have had with Administrator Pruitt,” Mr. Carr wrote. “As you likely know, our experts are strongly supporting and helping organize the Red/Blue team initiative.”

      May 7, 2018

      The Sierra Club released a set of over 24,000 pages of EPA documents via a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request, outlining what it described as “the culture of corruption in and around Scott Pruitt at the EPA.”  View the complete set of searchable documents here. Highlights of the emails included confirmation of numerous meetings between Pruitt's senior political aides and polluting corporations, as well as connections between “Pruitt fundraisers, prominent Oklahoman business people, climate denial organizations abroad and more.” [141]

      The New York Times reported: “the documents provide new indications … that the concern with secrecy is less about security than a desire by Mr. Pruitt to avoid criticism from detractors or even unexpected questions from allies.” [142]

      Thepublicly released documents also revealed Pruitt's links to Matthew Freeman, former government lobbyist and treasurer for the American Australian Council, a “group that helps promote business for American based companies in Australia,” with clients including ConocoPhillips and Chevron. Freeman planned to have Pruitt meet with top Australian officials to discuss “the current US Australian environmental agreements that are currently in place and whether they should be changed or updated or canceled or replaced.” While the trip was postponed due to Hurricane Harvey, this is only one example of people with business interests planning Pruitt's trips. [141], [143]

      The Guardian reported the Australian climate change denial think tank Institute of Public Affairs had proposed co-hosted a proposed Australian visit by Pruitt before it was cancelled when Hurricane Harvey hit the Texas gulf goast. An email from IPA's executive director, John Roskam, proposed a two-hour roundtable with Pruitt and IPA representatives who disagree with the mainstream consensus on climate change including Peter Ridd and Jennifer Marohasy. Roskam wrote to Matthew Freedman: “All of these people are excellent and I know Scott and his team would learn a great deal from a discussion with them. Among other names, Roskam also recommended Pruitt meet Maurice Newman, who has described global warming as “a delusion.” [156]

      Roskam wrote that he had spoken to Brendan Pearson, then working for Minerals Council, who was “working with the [US] embassy” on the trip. In emails, Freedman described the IPA as a “very strong group for the administrator” and a potential co-host of the trip. [156]

      In a New York Times article on the documents, Don Beyer, a Virginia Democrat with a history of criticizing Pruitt's spending was quoted as saying that the documents “reveal that lobbyists for energy companies and foreign Governments acted as travel agents.” [143]

      Blomberg reported that the documents show Scott Pruitt has had many requests to meet from oil and gas associations, coal companies, oil executives and energy lobbyists since his appointment as Administrator of the EPA. Many of the requests “are laced with praise or full of congratulations for Pruitt's work to revise Obama administration pollution regulations.”   [155]

      A meeting with Kinder Morgan Public Affairs Vice President Dave Conover would have covered topics like pollution control requirements and and natural gas pipeline permitting, while Marathon Petroleum Corp. lobbyist Michael Birsic “leveraged a relationship with one of Pruitt's deputies to try to arrange a meeting for Heminger, his CEO, to talk about the U.S. biofuel mandate and air regulations.” [155]

      Mother Jones reported the documents showed how Pruitt was open to meetings with industry executives and groups while EPA staff ensured “Pruitt’s events were not advertised ahead of time and were closed to the general public.” [147]

      April 24, 2018

      Pruitt unveiled a “secret science” initiative that would prevent the Environmental Protection Agency from using any studies that do not make the raw data public. The rule would be subject to a 30-day comment period. [138]

      “The science that we use is going to be transparent, reproducible and able to be analyzed by those in the marketplace,” Pruitt said. “This is the right approach. Today is a red letter today. It's a banner day. It's an agency taking responsibility for how we do our work and respect the process to make sure we can enhance confidence in our decision making.” [138]

      A range of Pruitt's conservative allies attended the event at EPA headquarters, however press was not invited. Among those present was Lamar Smith, who tried to create a similar rule through legislation, but it failed to pass. Senator Mike Rounds, who authored a similar bill in the Senate, also attended. Emails released under a Freedom of Information Act request revealed Lamar Smith's staff coordinated with Pruitt on the rule, E&E News reported. [139]

      Critics have noted that the rule would prevent the EPA from using all available data, with examples including data from patients that needs to be kept private and data subject to industry confidentiality.

       “Administrator Pruitt is very clearly trying to exclude and ignore longstanding pollution and medical science that is peer-reviewed, embraced by the National Academy of Sciences among others, and also based on health data that people were promised would be kept confidential,” John Walke, the clean air director of the Natural Resources Defense Council, told the Washington Examiner. [138]

       Climate change denier Steve Milloy told E&E news that he also had a role to play: [139]

      “I look at it as one of my proudest achievements. The reason this is anywhere is because of Steve Milloy,” he said.

      The Examiner reported that the text of the proposed rule could allow possible exceptions to the transparency rule for corporate-funded research, and Pruitt may be able to grant special exemptions on a case-by-case basis. Examples included “confidential business information” and information “sensitive to national and homeland security.” [138]

      A letter by seven Democratic lawmakers, led by Sen. Tom Carper (D-Del.) wrote a letter to Pruitt requesting for more information. [140]

      The proposed new policy will require EPA—when developing rules—to rely only on scientific studies where the underlying data have been made public and are available to be reproduced. Such a policy would likely violate several laws that mandate the use of ‘best available science,’ including the Toxic Substances Control Act and Safe Drinking Water Act because it would require EPA to ignore some of the ‘best’ scientific studies,” the letter read.

      On the afternoon of the announcement, Marc Morano tweeted an image, posting with Steve Milloy at the EPAHQ ”celebrating the end of secret science.” In another tweet, Morano presented his book—“The Politically Incorrect Guide to Climate Change”—to a smiling Scott Pruitt.

      Prominent climate change denier Will Happer posed for a photo along with CFACT's executive director Craig Rucker and Morano, with the title “At EPAHQ with Dr. Will Happer waiting for EPA chief Pruitt.”

      April 12, 2018

      Pruitt faced new allegations in a six-page letter signed by two Democratic senators and three House lawmakers, The New York Times reported. [133]

      The letter followed a meeting between staff members and Kevin Chmielewski, who served as the EPA's chief of staff until he was removed from the position for bringing up objections to Pruitt's spending. View the letter below: [134]

      “Although your spokesperson has repeatedly described those who raise concerns about your actions as 'disgruntled employees' whose stories should not be believed, our staffs found Mr. Chmielewski to be a credible professional who continues to express deep loyalty to the President and Vice-President. He came forward because, as he said, 'right is right, and wrong is wrong',” the letter concluded, along with a request for all documents relating to the concerns outlined in the letter.

      April 4, 2018

      In whatHuffPost described as a“suprisingly firm interview” with Fox News' Ed Henry, Pruitt faced questions on his recent scandals including pay raises to two of his staffers, which he denied knowledge of. [135], [136]

      Henry said the interview “got a little combative.” He demanded to know who was responsible for the raises: [136]

      Henry: So, is somebody being fired for that?
      Pruitt: That should not have been done. And it may be —
      Henry: So, who did it?
      Pruitt: There will be some accountability.
      Henry: A career person or a political person?
      Pruitt: I’ll have to — I don’t know. I don’t know who’s —
      Henry: You don’t know? You run the agency. You don’t know who did this?
      Pruitt: I found out about this yesterday, and I corrected the action.

      Are you embarrassed?” Henry asked. [135], [136]

      April 3, 2018

      Pruitt formally announced his decision to rewrite greenhouse gas emission standards for cars and light duty trucks, DeSmog reported. [109]

      “The Obama Administration's determination was wrong,” Pruitt said, quoted in the April 2 EPA press release. “Obama’s EPA cut the Midterm Evaluation process short with politically charged expediency, made assumptions about the standards that didn’t comport with reality, and set the standards too high.” [110]

      Before Pruitt stepped up to the podium to make the announcement, he shook hands with representatives from the auto industry including the Auto Alliance and Global Automakers trade group, as well as Myron Ebell of the Competitive Enterprise Institute[111] 

      The New York Times reported the event was originally planned for a Chevrolet dealership in northern Virginia and changed last-minute due to push back from some Chevy dealerships that didn't want the brand to be associated with the announcement. [112]

      According to Media Matters, reporters from numerous outlets were blacklisted from the event, while CNN reported that the EPA had attempted to allow television access to Fox News without informing the other four networks: CNN, ABC, NBC, or CBS. A CNNreporter was in the building, but not allowed access to the room the event was held. [113], [114]

      February 2018

      As reported by E&E News, in an interview with KSNVTV in Nevada, Pruitt claimed that global warming could beneficial. [107], [108]

      “No one disputes the climate changes. Is changing,” Pruitt said, responding to Gerard Ramahlo's question on his views of climate change. “That's, we see that, that's constant. We obviously contribute to it. We live in the climate, right. So our activity contributes to the climate changing to a certain degree. Now, measuring that with precision, Gerard, is I think more challenging than is let on at times. But I think the bigger question is what you asked at the very end: is it an existential threat? Is it somethat that is unsustainable, or what kind of effect or harm is this going to have? [108]

      “I mean, we know that humans have most flourished during times of what, warming trends? I mean, so I think there's assumptions made that because the climate is warming, that that necessarily is a bad thing. Do we really know what the ideal surface temperature should be in the year 2100? In the year 2018? And that's somewhat, I think, fairly arrogant for us to think we know exactly what it should be in 2100. So there's important questions around the climate issue that folks don't really get to.” [108]

      E&E News's Climatewire noted that the interview went beyond Pruitt's previous claims on climate change, where in the past he hadn't spoken on what impacts climate change could have. [107]

      “Pruitt is right that temperatures have varied throughout geologic history. But scientists say the speed of change sets the modern age apart. It's happening over a period of decades, not millenia. That makes comparisons to the past inaccurate, they say,” E&E News noted. [107]

      Climate change denier Myron Ebell, a supporter of Pruitt, also noted the shift in Pruitt's views: [107]

      “When you're learning about a subject, you pick up pieces, and you don't pick up other pieces right away,” Ebell said. “His rhetoric has shifted, and I expect that that is because he has been briefed by someone.” [107]

      January 2018

      In an interview with The Wall Street Journal, Pruitt outlined his plans to remake the EPA in 2018. His goals include rewriting rules for power plant emissions made under the Obama administration, and speeding the permit review process under the EPA. [106]

      Pruitt emphasized he wanted to move fast. “There’s tremendous opportunity to show really significant results to the American people in a really short time frame,” Pruitt said. [106]

      WSJ author Timothy Puko notes that Pruitt had memorialized the moment that Trump announced the exit from the Paris climate agreement by hanging a framed photo of the two of them in the Rose Garden with an autograph of Pruitt's prepared remarks, along with the comment “Scott—Great Job!” [106]

      One of Pruitt's goals is to begin weekly performance assessments for ever EPA office, and to get the permitting process to under six months. Former EPA administrator Gina McCarthy commented on Pruitt's shift of focus for the EPA away from climate change. [106]

      Everything the agency does is to protect public health and the public from future risks,” said McCarthy.  “You don’t stop smoking because it kills you when you smoke the cigarette; it’s because it kills you later. It’s the same argument with climate change. You take action today to protect health today and in the future.” [106]

      December 2017

      Kent Lassman, President of the Competitive Enterprise Institute (CEI), wrote that Scott Pruitt had invited him to the EPA, and that the think tank had “contributed to positive development recently at the Environmental Protection Agency”: [105]

      “Speaking of impact measures, CEI contributed to positive development recently at the Environmental Protection Agency. Administrator Scott Pruitt invited me along with three colleagues for a signing ceremony where he officially put in place new conflict of interest requirements for the 22 scientific advisory boards at the EPA. It was a good day and is another step in the march to stop the flow of tens of millions of dollars from the federal fisc to outside advocates who only ever counsel more regulation,” Lassman wrote in a “fall policy update” at CEI[105]

      Lassman also said that he had been to the EPA and White House multiple times in recent months: [105]

      “As a representative of the dozens of analysts, fellows, and lawyers who toil away at CEI, in the last two months I’ve found myself in multiple meetings at Office of Mangement [sic] and Budget, the EPA, and the White House. I can make an unqualified assertion: It is nice when the government wants our advice on how to shape a policy proposal.” [105]

      November 30, 2017

      The Heritage Foundation and Texas Public Policy Foundation (TPPF) invited Pruitt to speak at their co-hosted event, “At the Crossroads IV: Energy & Climate Policy Summit.” Speaking on stage to TPPF President and CEO Brooke Rollins, Pruitt discussed how he believed that the new administration needs to “embrace a stewardship mentality” by making use of more natural resources, while “navigating the pathway to undoing these [Obama administration] regulations.” Pruitt highlighted recent accomplishments like undoing the Waters of the United States Rule, saying “what we’re doing is undoing those rules that were deficient.” [103]

      “We as country need to ask ourselves, and we need to answer: what is true environmentalist? Is it truly prohibition? Is it to say that though we’ve been blessed with certain natural resources we shouldn’t use them? Or should we use those natural resources to feed and power the world and do so with environmental stewardship in mind? And it’s a very important question,” Pruitt said. “

      […] We need to embrace a stewardship mentality. And, to whom much is given, much is required. And use those natural resources we’ve been blessed with to bless others, both domestically and internationally. And we’ve got to have that dialogue.” [103]

      Brooke responded, “I love that,” moving to a question on Pruitt's experience given he was “a complete Washington Outsider.” Pruitt said he is “so thankful to be serving the President, as I indicated earlier, because of his courage.” 

      “He’s made very, very courageous decisions,” Pruitt said. He’s willing to take on the culture here in Washington and across the country. As an example, that is the Paris Accord agreement, to exit that. There was tremendous pressure brought on the President to stay in that, by the way, for no good environmental reason. It was a bumper sticker. Paris was a bumper sticker. It was not about CO2 reduction. It was about penalizing our own economy. […] The President made a very courageous decision to exit.”  [103]

      November 9, 2017

      Scott Pruitt addressed the Heartland Institute's“America First Energy Conference” at the Marriott Hotel in Houston, Texas in a pre-recorded video message. In the video, Pruitt personally thanked Heartland for “what you're doing to advance energy” and “for what you're doing to advance natural resources: [99]

      Many of the other speakers have regularly spoken at the Heartland Institute's past ICCCs. Notable speakers listed so far Joe BastFred PalmerRoger BezdekH. Sterling BurnettHal Doiron, Paul DriessenJohn Dale DunnMyron Ebell, Heartland's new President Tim HuelskampCraig IdsoDavid LegatesJay LehrAnthony LupoRoss McKitrickSteve MilloyTodd MyersJohn Nothdurt, David Schnare, and numerous others. [100]

      As reported at the Houston Chronicle, speakers notably included two Trump Administration officials: Richard W. Westerdale II of the State Department and Vincent DeVito of the Department of Interior. David Bernhardt, deputy secretary of the Interior Department, was also formerly listed as a Heartland conference speaker, but apparently withdrew. [101]

      The Climate Investigations Center put up a parody of the America First Energy conference website, complete with profiles on the individual speakers and highlighting their corporate funding and ties to groups such as the Cooler Heads Coalition (CHC)[102]

      November 8 2017

      A November 2017 exchange reported on by Mother Jones between Pruitt and the Federalist Society expressed concerns about one of Pruitt's events being posted online. An EPA official was concerned event could be “disrupted by those who see that the Administrator is attending and want to distract from the event.” The EPA official wrote: “If your team can take extra care to prevent that, we would appreciate it. A Federalist Society representative later reassured her: “Fed Soc does meticulous vetting of his registrants.” [147]

      October 10, 2017

      Pruitt issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) to repeal what the official EPA press release describes as “the so-called 'Clean Power Plan (CPP).'” [95]

      “After reviewing the CPP, EPA has proposed to determine that the Obama-era regulation exceeds the Agency’s statutory authority. Repealing the CPP will also facilitate the development of U.S. energy resources and reduce unnecessary regulatory burdens associated with the development of those resources, in keeping with the principles established in President Trump’s Executive Order on Energy Independence,” the press release reads. [95]

      As the New York Times reported, the decision is a “personal triumph for Mr. Pruitt, who as Oklahoma attorney general helped lead more than two dozen states in challenging the rule in the courts.” [96]

      The proposal for repeal will now have to make it through a formal public comment period, and will face opposition from both environmental groups and Democrats. New York and Massachusetts attorneys general also said they plan to sue the E.P.A. once the repeal is finalized. [96]

      September 18, 2017

      A recent release of EPA documents following a FOIA lawsuit by the Sierra Club have revealed that Pruitt agreed to fast-track the clean up of a polluted California area following an unreported meeting with conservative radio and television host Hugh Hewitt. The area was designated a Superfund site, an EPA program that governs the investigation and cleanup of the nation’s most complex hazardous waste sites in order to convert those sites into community resources.  [141]

      “Pruitt has drawn criticism from environmentalists and other critics for letting prominent GOP backers and industry groups influence the agency's agenda — even as he has kicked scientists off of EPA's advisory panels and moved to limit the kinds of peer-reviewed research it will consider when making decisions,” Politico reported. [146]

      August, 2017

      According to an August 2017 article at The New York Times, David Schnare, who had previously announced he was quitting the EPA under Pruitt's leadership, clarified that his reason for resigning was Scott Pruitt's secrecy and mismanagement of the agency. [88]

      He’s got a serious problem because of his emails down in Oklahoma — he’s burned himself,” said Schnare, referring to the thousands of emails released as part of a request by the Center for Media and Democracy (CMD). (Pruitt had previously asserted the emails did not exist). [88]

      Schare cited Pruitt's lack of transparency as one of the reasons for his resignation: [88]

      My view was that under this administration we would be good at transparency, particularly in the regulatory area,” he said. “But these guys aren’t doing that.” [88]

      July 2017

      Scott Pruitt's EPA began initial moves to assemble a “red team” designed to combat mainstream climate change science. The administration reached out to the Heartland Institute, which had a red team of its own designed to be the antithesis to the United Nations' Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, the Washington Examiner reported. [89]

      “The White House and the Environmental Protection Agency have reached out to the Heartland Institute to help identify scientists who could constitute a red team, and we've been happy to oblige,” Jim Lakely, the Heartland Institute's communications director, told the Washington Examiner.

      “This effort is long overdue,” he said. “The climate scientists who have dominated the deliberations and the products of the IPCC have gone almost wholly without challenge. That is a violation of the scientific method and the public's trust.”

      The Heartland Institute has been a long proponent of a red team “to critically examine what has become alarmist dogma rather than a sober evaluation of climate science for many years,” Lakely said. “In fact, Heartland has worked closely with a red team that has been examining the science for several years: the Nongovernmental International Panel on Climate Change, or NIPCC.” [89]

      According to Climatewire, a senior administration official said that EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt “believes that we will be able to recruit the best in the fields which study climate and will organize a specific process in which these individuals […] provide back-and-forth critique of specific new reports on climate science.” [90]

      The official added that the program will use “red team, blue team” exercises to conduct an “at-length evaluation of U.S. climate science.” Climate scientists expressed concern that the “red team, blue team” concept could further politicize research and “disproportionately elevate the views of a relatively small number of experts who disagree with mainstream scientists,” Climatewire also reported. [91]

      The New York Times reported that Pruitt's preparations were already underway by the time he spoke at an ACCCE board meeting where he discussed his strategy, The New York Times reported. Critics have said that Pruitt's approach would undermine the role of academic research at the EPA. [94]

      I think this is fundamentally a dumb idea,” Andrew Dessler, a professor of atmospheric science at Texas A&M University, told The New York Times in an email. “It’s like a red team-blue team exercise about whether gravity exists.”

      June 16, 2017

      The Associated Press received a new set of emails from Pruitt, further detailing his coordination with fossil fuel companies during his time as Oklahoma’s state attorney general. The set of emails ran over 4,000 pages and included schedules and speaking engagements between Pruitt and his staff as well as key representatives and lobbyists from the fossil fuel industries. [87]

      The AP reported that one June, 2016 email showed a board member of Domestic Energy Producers Alliance (DEPA) seeking a meeting with Pruitt's team to brief them “regarding a pending federal tax issue that is related to the state’s position on the Clean Power Plan.” v

      DEPA represents a range of independent oil and gas companies including interests of Harold Hamm, who backed Scott Pruitt politically and also frequently advised Donald Trump. [87] 

      June 2, 2017

      Following Donald Trump's official announcement that the U.S. would withdraw from the Paris Accord, Pruitt said the U.S. has “nothing to be apologetic about” for leaving the Paris climate deal at the White House Daily Briefing. [85], [86]

      The Washington Post reported that Pruitt had played a decisive role in influencing Trump's decision to pull the U.S. out of the Paris Climate Agreement. [83]

      In Pruitt's prepared speech on June 1, Pruitt applauded Trump's decision to exit the agreement as “a historic restoration of American Economic Independence – one that will benefit the working class, the working poor, and working people of all stripes.  With this action, you have declared that people are the rulers of this country once again.” [84]

      May 5, 2017

      A release of documents by the Sierra Club revealed the Heritage Foundation helped Pruitt with his talking points prior to the address given at its “Resource Bank” event. [141]

      The angles described by the Heritage foundation in an article by Mother Jones included:

      “remind the audience of some of the fights he was engaged in with the Obama Administration (and just how bad it was). His selection as EPA Administrator (and maybe mention Sen. SEssions as AG and others now in the Administration who have fought hard to rollback and contain the power of the federal government) should give us hope The Paris Climate Agreement is one area the audience will be interested in hearing about. The Executive Orders and review of regulations are other ways the Administration is beginning to turn the corner.”

      In a later email, the EPAs Millian Hupp thanked Heritage and mentioned that Lincoln Ferguson, speechwriter for Pruitt would find the remarks “helpful in preparing talking points.” [154]

      March 29, 2017

      The New York Times reported that Pruitt, as head of the EPA, rejected conclusions from his own agency's chemical safety experts who had recommended to ban the pesticide chlorpyrifos used widely on farms across the United States. [97]

      Pruitt released a statement concluding that the agency needed to study the science more before banning the chemical. While still used in about 40,000 farms, the chemical had already been banned in household settings. [98]

      Late in 2016, EPA scientists found that the chemical was potentially causing health consequences including memory decline in farm workers and children who might become exposed to the substance through drinking water. Farm groups using the chemical as well as Dow Chemical, which sells the chemical to farmers under the name Lorsban, had argued the science was inconclusive. [97]

      March 9, 2017

      Scott Pruitt stated in a CNBC interview that he doesn't carbon dioxide to be one of the main contributors to global warming. The Hill posted a partial except of the interview: [80], [81]

      “I think that measuring with precision human activity on the climate is something very challenging to do and there’s tremendous disagreement about the degree of impact. So no, I would not agree that it’s a primary contributor to the global warming that we see […] But we don’t know that yet […] we need to continue the debate and continue the review and the analysis,” Pruitt said.

      DeSmog reported that environmental groups have expressed their displeasure with Pruitt's comments: [82]

      This is like your doctor telling you that cigarettes don't cause cancer,” Jamie Henn, strategic communications director for 350.org, said in a statement. “Pruitt’s statement isn’t just inaccurate, it’s a lie. He knows CO2 is the leading cause of climate change, but is misleading the public in order to protect the fossil fuel industry.”

      DeSmog also put together a brief video, outlining Pruitt's stance on global warming, highlighting his earlier statements during his confirmation hearing when he was questioned by Sen. Bernie Sanders:

      February 21, 2017

      The Center for Media and Democracy (CMD) obtained thousands of emails from the Oklahoma Attorney General's office. CMD had previously filed a lawsuit against Pruitt for withholding the public records. The emails were released after the Oklahoma County Court found Pruitt in violation of the state’s Open Records Act. [77], [78]

      Among the documents released on February 21, CMD found emails further documenting the close relationship between Devon Energy and Scott Pruitt. They also found that the oil and gas lobby group American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers (AFPM) coordinated opposition in 2013 to both the Renewable Fuel Standard Program and ozone limits with Pruitt’s office. AFPM provided Pruitt with template language for an Oklahoma petition,  noting “this argument is more credible coming from a State.” [78]

      DeSmog also examined the emails, noting that they reveal a close relationship with groups such as the Koch Industries-funded Americans for Prosperity and the Oklahoma Public Policy Council, the latter a member of the influential conservative State Policy Network (SPN). [79]

      CMD reports that the AG's office has withheld or redacted an undetermined number of additional documents pending review by the court. [78]

      January 18, 2017

      Scott Pruitt sat before the Senate's Environment and Public Works Committee for his confirmation hearing as a nominee to run the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Pruitt was introduced by his “mentor,” prominent climate change denier James Inhofe. In response to a question from Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders, Pruitt responded: [23]

      The climate is changing and human activity contributes to that in some manner. It is the ability to measure it and the extent of that impact, and what to do about it that is subject to continued debate and dialogue,” Pruitt said.

      DeSmog reported how Pruitt was grilled on his fossil fuel ties early in the hearing. Senator Sheldon Whitehouse held up a chart outlining how Pruitt has financially benefited from fossil fuel companies including Devon Energy, Southern Company, Koch Industries, and ExxonMobil. [30]

      Senator Jeff Merkley of Oregon pointed to a 2014 letter that Pruitt's office had sent to the EPA about methane rules, which had been almost entirely written by Devon Energy.

      There were 1,016 words in the letter, and all but 37 words were written by Devon Energy,” said Merkley.  “Do you acknowledge that you presented a private oil company's position, rather than a position developed by the people of Oklahoma?” Merkley pushed, “How can you present that as representing the people of Oklahoma when you simply only consulted an oil company to push its own point of view for its private profit?”

      Pruitt responded that the letter wasn't intended to represent only one company, but the whole industry. See footage of Pruitt's hearing below, from C-SPAN.

      EPA Confirmation Hearing Part 1)

      EPA Confirmation Hearing Part 2)

      Senator Jeff Merkley (D-OR) mentioned Pruitt's letter to the EPA, authored almost entirely by Devon Energy, that had been reported in the 2014 New York Times investigation, asking pruitt if he would acknowledge that acknowledge that he “presented a private oil company’s position, rather than a position developed by the people of Oklahoma.” To this, Pruitt replied that he “disagree[d]” with Merkley’s conclusion and asserted that the letter was “representing the interests of the state of Oklahoma” because it “was representing the interest of an industry in the state of Oklahoma, not a company.” He added that he belived the oil industry is “a very important industry to our state” for justification. [7], [48]

      Asked by Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI) whether he solicited fossil fuel contributions on behalf of the Republican Attorneys General Association (RAGA), Pruitt said that “I have not asked them for money on behalf of RAGA.” While Media Matters notes that Pruitt's claim may be true, it also points out that RAGA had sent out call sheets to Republican attorneys general for the purpose of soliciting funds from corporations, making this a point worthy of followup. [69]

      Later in the hearing, in what Media Matters describes as “setting up an apparent conflict of interest,” Pruitt said that he would not recuse himself from his ongoing litigation against the EPA. Responding to a question by Senator Markey, Pruitt answered that he would only recuse himself if “as directed by EPA ethics counsel.” Markey noted that Pruitt’s continued involvement in those lawsuits would create a “fundamental conflict of interest.”  [48]

      Some of since suggested that Pruitt may have made a false statement under oath to the Senate during his confirmation hearing, Business Insider reports. Pruitt, while referring to an ongoing environmental lawsuit involving several poultry companies in Arkansas. Pruitt's predecessor, Drew Edmondson, had brought a case against 13 poultry companies, accusing them of dumping over 300,000 tons of poultry waste into the Illinois River. During Pruitt's campaign for state attorney general, he had accepted $40,000 in donations from those companies and the law firms representing them, according to The New York Times. One in office, Pruitt did not pursue the case as his predecessor had done. [72]

      In response to questions from Democratic Sen. Cory Booker of New Jersey during his confirmation hearing, Pruitt said: “I have taken no action to undermine that case. I have done nothing but file briefs in support of the court making a decision.” Reporter Daniel Rivero found no evidence that Pruitt or his office had ever filed briefs in support of making a decision with the case, apparently contradicting his claim. [72], [73]

      January 12, 2017

      Senate Democrats raised conflict of interest concerns about Scott Pruitt. In a letter to the Office of Government Ethics, members of the Senate's environment panel requested more background on Pruitt's dealings with the Republican Attorneys General Association (RAGA), which Pruitt led for two years while coordinating with other state AGs to combat the Obama administration's Clean Power Plan. [31], [32]

      During his tenure as Attorney General of Oklahoma, Mr. Pruitt has blurred the distinction between official and political actions, often at the behest of corporations he will regulate if confirmed to lead EPA,” the letter said. “Public reporting based on documents produced by Freedom of Information Act requests illustrate how Mr. Pruitt and members of his staff have worked closely with fossil fuel lobbyists to craft his office's official positions.”

      November 1, 2016

      Among numerous ongoing legal challenges against the EPA's Clean Water Rule, Pruitt's name is included on a 2016 lawsuit issued in the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals. [68]

      October, 2016

      Scott Pruitt sued the EPAover standards for new, modified, and reconstructed power plants. Pruit and his PACs have received contributions from listed co-litigators including Murray Energy, Southern Company, Peabody Energy, American Coalition for Clean Coal Electricity, and Tri-State Generation and Transmission Association. [49], [67]

      September 15, 2016

      Scott Pruitt was a speaker at a Federalist Society Event titled “The Clean Power Plan Goes to Court,” discussing the case of West Virginia et al. v. EPA. Video below: [33]

      Speakers included:

      • David Bookbinder, Founder, Element VI Consulting
      • David Doniger, Policy Director, Climate & Clean Air Program, Natural Resources Defense Council
      • Hon. Scott Pruitt, Attorney General, Oklahoma
      • David B. Rivkin, Jr., Partner, Baker & Hostetler LLP
      • Moderator: Adam J. White, Research Fellow, The Hoover Institution

      August 2, 2016

      Scott Pruitt, along with a number of other Republican attorneys general, sued the EPA over standards limiting pollution from new, modified and reconstructed oil and gas facilities. [49], [61]

      June 15, 2016

      Scott Pruitt signed a letter (PDF), along with other Republican attorneys general, opposing the investigations of ExxonMobil discussing what it knew about climate change. The open letter criticized the coalition of state attorneys general working under the banner of “AGs United for Clean Power,”  which supported the Obama administration's Clean Power Plan, and also led the investigation into ExxonMobil. [34], [35]

      “We think this effort by our colleagues to police the global warming debate through the power of the subpoena is a grave mistake,” the letter reads.

      Signatories included the following:

      • Luther Strange — Attorney General, State of Alabama
      • Craig Richards — Attorney General, State of Alaska
      • Mark Brnovich— Attorney General, State of Arizona
      • Leslie Rutledge— Attorney General, State of Arkansas
      • Jeff Landry — Attorney General, State of Louisiana
      • Bill Schuette — Attorney General, State of Michigan
      • Doug Peterson — Attorney General, State of Nebraska
      • Adam Laxalt — Attorney General, State of Nevada
      • Scott Pruitt — Attorney General, State of Oklahoma
      • Alan Wilson — Attorney General, State of South Carolina
      • Ken Paxton — Attorney General, State of Texas
      • Sean Reyes — Attorney General, State of Utah
      • Brad Schimel — Attorney General, State of Wisconsin

      May 26, 2016

      Scott Pruitt testified (PDF) before the House Committee on Science, Space and Technology, Subcommittee on Environment on the “Impact of the EPA’s Clean Power Plan on States.” [27]

      According to Pruitt:

       “the EPA was never intended to be our Nation’s frontline environmental regulator. The States were to have regulatory primacy. The EPA was to be a regulator of last resort. That construct, a construct put in place by this body, has been turned upside down by the current Administration.”

      Pruitt also describes hydraulic fracturing (fracking) as having “ done more to reduce carbon emissions in this country than any other technological advancement of our time.” Pruitt added, “This didn’t happen as a result of the heavy hand of the EPA. Rather, it happened because of fracking and the positive market forces that those sorts of Oklahoma innovations create.” [27]

      May 16, 2016

      Scott Pruitt was featured on a Federalist Society podcast to discuss the investigation of state attorneys general into what ExxonMobil knew about climate change over the past decades. Also on the panel was climate change denier and lobbyist C. Boyden Gray. [36]

      In the podcast, Pruitt reiterated his belief that if climate change skeptics can be prosecuted for fraud, so can “alarmists.” Take this tweet he wrote in June, 2016: [37]

      April 22, 2016

      Scott Pruitt was among those suing the EPA, alongside Murray Energy Corporation, opposing an update to its national ambient air standard for ground-level ozone (smog pollution). [56]

      April 22, 2016

      In ongoing litigation, Scott Pruitt suited the EPA over the Clean Power Plan. This was the fourth lawsuit that Pruitt filed against the EPA regarding the CPP, with three previous lawsuits being summarily rejected as premature: first, in the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuitsecond in Oklahoma federal district court, this appealed in the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals; and third in D.C Circuit Court. [63], [64], [65], [66]

      March 16, 2016

      The Office of the Attorney General of Oklahoma sued the EPA (PDF) over a rule that protected against excessive emissions from power plants during startup, shutdown, or malfunction. Co-litigators included Southern Company, from whom Pruitt had received campaign contributions. [49], [59], [60]

      October, 2015

      While working as Oklahoma's Attorney General, Scott Pruitt filed a lawsuit against the EPA's Clean Power Plan (PDF). Assisting him were the attorneys from BakerHostetler, one of the United States's largest law firms. [38]

      Two attorneys working with Pruitt included David B. Rivkin Jr. and Andrew M. Grossman—the same two who in Mach 2016 recently established the Free Speech in Science Project to defend companies and groups over their climate science denial. 

      August, 2015

      DeSmog reported on that, in 2015, just one week before state attorneys general asked federal courts to reject the EPA’s Clean Power Plan (CPP), republican state attorneys general had met in private with energy companies Murray Energy and Southern Company. Bloomberg also noted that the timing of the secret meetings coincided with large contributions from the energy companies to the Republican Attorneys General Association. [39], [15]

      Representatives had attended the August 2015 Republican Attorneys General Association (RAGA) summit in West Virginia. The Center for Media and Democracy (CMD) identified Murray Energy and Southern Company as having shelled out extra money to secure private briefings with attorneys general at the annual RAGA summit. [39]

      That’s highly inappropriate for law enforcement officials in a majority of states to be holding private meetings with corporations that they are supposed to be holding to account,” Nick Surgey, CMD Research Director, told DeSmog

      Documents first obtained by the watchdog group Center for Media and Democracy (CMD revealed that Murray Energy and Southern Company had paid for the meetings with Republican attorneys general to discuss their opposition to the Clean Power Plan less than two weeks before the same GOP officials petitioned federal courts to block the CPP. [16]

      State attorneys general are supposed to enforce the law and serve the public interest, but instead these Republican officials have hung a ‘For Sale’ sale on their door, and the fossil fuel industry proved to be the highest bidder,” said Surgey. “It’s no coincidence that GOP attorneys general have mounted an aggressive fight alongside the fossil fuel industry to block the Clean Power Plan – that appears to be exactly what the industry paid for. Together, these documents reveal a sustained pattern of collusion between the fossil fuel industry and the Republican attorneys general on climate change obstructionism.”

      Scott Pruitt was on a RAGA panel named “The Dangerous Consequences of the Clean Power Plan & Other EPA Rules.” Other attorneys general on the panel included Patrick Morrisey of West Virginia, and Ken Paxton of Texas.  [39]

      July 1, 2015

      Scott Pruitt sued the EPA for what his Office press release describes as the “Unlawful Clean Power Plan Rule.” [40]

      The EPA does not possess the authority under the Clean Air Act to accomplish what it proposes in the unlawful Clean Power Plan. The EPA is ignoring the authority granted by Congress to states to regulate power plant emissions at their source. The Clean Power Plan is an unlawful attempt to expand federal bureaucrats’ authority over states’ energy economies in order to shutter coal-fired power plants and eventually other sources of fossil-fuel generated electricity. This would substantially threaten energy affordability and reliability for consumers, industry and energy producers in Oklahoma. Oklahomans care about issues of air quality and our state policy makers are best-suited and specifically granted the authority by federal law to regulate these issues. We are filing this lawsuit in order to ensure decisions on power generation and how to achieve emissions reductions are made at the local level rather than at the federal level,” Pruitt said.

      View the complete lawsuit here (PDF). [41]

      December 10, 2014

      Pruitt was among attorneys general who filed a lawsuit against the EPA opposing the Cross State Air Pollution Rule (PDF), after the U.S. Supreme Court had already upheld the standard. The EPA's program was designed to address soot and smog pollution that drifts across state lines. EDF Action notes that Pruitt and his associated PACs have received campaign contributions from a number of the energy companies included in the suit including Murray Energy, Peabody Energy and Southern Company. [50][49]

      Co-litigators Murray Energy, National Mining Association and a Peabody Energy subsidiary had also contributed to the Republican Attorneys General Association, of which Pruitt previously chaired.  [49]

      In 2011, Pruitt had submitted the comments of Western Farmers Electric Cooperative and the Oklahaoma Gas and Electric Company (PDF) regarding the implementation of the program. “[A]s the officer charged with the task of representing consumers and citizens within the State of Oklahoma, the Attorney General is greatly concerned about certain provisions in the current EPA proposal,” Pruitt's cover letter reads. In a seperate letter, he also submitted comments of the American Coalition for Clean Coal Electricity. [51], [52]

      December, 2014

      A 2014 investigation by The New York Times found that energy lobbyists had drafted letters for Pruitt to send on state-branded stationary to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the Interior Department, the Office of Management and Budget, and to President Obama outlining how environmental rules would negatively impact the economy. View sample letters here. [7], [42]

      The Times pointed to a three-page letter that was written by the lawyers for Devon Energy. They write how Pruitt's staff had taken the draft written by Devon Energy, copied it onto state government stationery with only a few word changes, and forwarded it with Pruitt's signature. [7]

      July, 2014

      Scott Pruitt spoke at the American Legislative Exchange Council's (ALEC) 2014 Annual Meeting where he criticized the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Keep It in the Ground campaign. See video and partial transcript below. [29]

      Partial Transcript: [43]

      This body called the EPA, this agency called the EPA, what is their role? What is their objective? Is it to pick winners and losers in the energy context? Is it to say renewables are good and fossil fuels are bad? So we’re going to use are regulatory power to penalize fossil fuels and to elevate other types of energy? […]

      This EPA and all the agencies associated with it, they’re trying to make electricity so costly that they are forcing conservation, for you to use less across this country or pay an exorbitant price. That’s what this country is facing in the years ahead […]

      Do you know under the know under the Clean Water Act that the EPA has no jurisdictional authority over hydraulic fracturing unless the frac fluid that is used in the extraction process has diesel in it? But despite that. FracFocus is something industry publishes and the fluids they use and if there’s no diesel EPA has no authority. But despite that what is the EPA doing today? They’re engaged in a study to do just what I mentioned, regulate and overtake the regulation of hydraulic fracturing at the state level. Either displace it or duplicate it to make it so time consuming that it affects production across this country. That’s picking winners and losers […]

      Beyond the regional haze case, we have something on the horizon something more troubling. And that’s the proposed rule under 111(d) with respect to CO2 regulation. We have an EPA that is engaged in rulemaking, proposed rulemaking, that seeks to exert itself in a way that the statute doesn’t authorize at all […]

      Again, another example that the EPA taking a statute and saying we’ll improve or fix or take a different approach than authorized by Congress.”

      The Center for Media and Democracy's (CMDPR Watch reported that Pruitt also spoke at a session on the proposed EPA's limits on carbon pollution. CMD writes: “In keeping with ALEC’s longtime denial of both the science and solutions to climate change, Oklahoma Attorney General Scott Pruitt, a Republican, spoke about proposed Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) limits on carbon pollution. That session was sponsored by the world’s largest publicly owned coal company, Peabody Energy, and the trade association for the coal industry, the American Coalition for Clean Coal Electricity (ACCCE), of which Peabody is a member.” [44]

      March, 2014

      Scott Pruitt's Office filed a lawsuit against Fish and Wildlife Services, alleging it had engaged in a practice he described as “sue and settle.” Pruitt argued that the federal government had emphasized threats on certain animal species, including the lesser prairie chicken, in order to limit oil and gas drilling. The Domestic Energy Producers Alliance was a partner in Pruitt's litigation. The nonprofit alliance of oil producers was run by Harold Hamm, CEO of Continental Resources, who The New York Times notes also served as the chairman of Pruitt's re-election campaign in that year. [45]

      May 3, 2013

      Scott Pruitt was a speaker at an American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC) event titled “Embracing American Energy Opportunities: From Wellheads to Pipelines” (PDF) in Oklahoma. Others who attended included event moderator Patrice Douglas, Chair of the Oklahoma Corporation Commission; Richard Muncrief, Senior Vice President of Operations, Continental Resources; and Corey Goulet, Vice President, Keystone Pipeline Projects, TransCanda Corporation. [46]

      2013

      Pruitt unsuccessfully sued EPA in an attempt to block Oklahoma air pollution rules to limit haze pollution in scenic areas. The 10th Circuit Court of Appeals rejected Oklahoma’s petition, and the U.S. Supreme Court rejected Oklahoma’s request for an appeal[49], [57], [58]

      October 23, 2012

      Pruitt sued to block a standard to limit mercury and other toxic emissions from power plant smokestacks. After the initial lawsuit, basic protections remained intact, so Pruitt sued the EPA a second time (PDF), even though the majority of U.S. powerplants had already achieved the standard, reported Forbes. [49][53], [54], [55]

      February 28, 2012

      Pruitt attempted to continue Oklahoma’s legal challenge to the EPA’s 2009 endangerment finding, which had found that research supported climate change's negative impact on human health, community welfare, and extreme weather events. [49], [62]

      The Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit unanimously rejected the lawsuit and the U.S. Supreme Court declined to review the decision.  [49]

      Co-litigators included the American Petroleum Institute, U.S. Chamber of Commerce, National Mining Association, National Association of Home Builders, as well as a Peabody Energy, which have contributed to the Republican Attorneys General Association[49]

      2010

      Working in support of the American Farm Bureau’s, Pruitt helped file a lawsuit to overturn federal pollution limits for the Chesapeake Bay.  Speaking with WYPR public radio, Ridge Hall, a former EPA attorney and vice chairman of the Chesapeake Legal Alliance, said Pruitt’s EPA appointment in 2016 would be bad for the bay. [28]

      He has consistently opposed air regulations, water regulations, and EPA generally,” Hall said. “So this is really a case of putting the fox in charge of the hen house.  So I hope very much that that nomination will be wither withdrawn or defeated.” 

      Affiliations

      Resources

      1. E. Scott Pruitt,” LinkedIn. Accessed January 23, 2017. Archived .pdf on file at DeSmog.

      2. About the Attorney General,” Oklahoma Office of the Attorney General E. Scot Pruitt. Archived January 20, 2017. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/27mCm

      3. Scott Pruitt,” National Association of Attorneys General. Archived January 20, 2017. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/PwZ0f

      4. Hon. Scott Pruitt,” The Federalist Society. Archived January 20, 2017. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/YCd18

      5. Q. Show me selected business classifications selected industries contributions to PRUITT, E SCOTT,” Followthemoney.org. Search performed January 20, 2017. Archived .csv on file at DeSmog.

      6. Benjamin Sorrow and Mike Soraghan. “Super PAC rules would keep Pruitt's corporate cash flowing,”E&E News, January 6, 2017. Archived January 23, 2017. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/7vzlk

      7. Eric Lipton. “Energy Firms in Secretive Alliance With Attorneys General,” The New York Times, December 6, 2014. Archived .pdf on file at DeSmog. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/yb7PX 

      8. Coral Davenport and Eric Lipton. “Trump Picks Scott Pruitt, Climate Change Denialist, to Lead E.P.A.The New York Times, December 7, 2016. Archived .pdf on file at DeSmog. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/Mwqop

      9. Graham Readfearn. “Donald Trump Confirms Climate Science Denier and Fossil Fuel Industry 'Stenographer' Scott Pruitt to Lead EPA,” DeSmog, December 7, 2016.

      10. Rule of Law Defense Fund,” Conservative Transparency. Accessed January 23 2017.

      11. Trump’s EPA Pick Steps Down From Group That Battled the Agency,” Bloomberg, January 6, 2017. Archived January 24, 2017. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/LZHAp

      12. Nick Surgey. “Scott Pruitt: Trump's Pick for EPA,” PR Watch, January 18, 2017. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/Ocq12

      13. RAGAANNOUNCESLEADERSHIP,” Republican Attorneys General Association. Archived January 23, 2017. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/WoTL6#selection-323.0-323.25

      14. Nick Surgey. “RAGAFOSSILFUELFUNDERS 2014-2016,” The Centre for Media and Democracy, January 6, 2017. Archived January 24, 2017. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/Rw9Dt

      15. Jennifer A. Dlouhy. “Battered Coal Companies Courted State AGs to Fight Climate Rules,” Bloomberg, September 7, 2016. Archived January 20, 2017. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/XKw7H

      16. Nick Surgey. “FOSSILFUELINDUSTRYPAIDFORMEETINGSWITHGOPATTORNEYSGENERALTOPLANATTACKONCLEANPOWERPLAN,” Centre for Media and Democracy, September 7, 2016. Archived January 20, 2017. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/1Cr57

      17. Alex Guilén and Esther Whieldon. “Energy executives, secretive nonprofit raise money to back Pruitt,” Politico, January 6, 2017. Archived January 23, 2017. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/pQgFP

      18. Elana Schor. “Democrats press EPA pick Pruitt on energy sector ties,” Politico, December 27, 2016. Archived .pdf on file at DeSmog. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/a4Lfo

      19. Ben Jervey. “Mapping EPA Nominee Scott Pruitt's Many Fossil Fuel Ties,” DeSmog, January 13, 2017.

      20. Civil Justice Task Force,” American Legislative Exchange Council. Archived February 14, 2003. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/6XD8O

      21. What Makes Alec Smart?” Governing, October, 2003. Archived October 11, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/CKVnv

      22. Pruitt v EPA: A Compilation of 14 Challenges of EPA Rules Filed by the Oklahoma Attorney General,” The New York Times. Retrieved from DocumentCloud archived .pdf on file at Desmog.

      23. Shawn McCarthy. “Trump EPA pick Scott Pruitt says climate change isn’t a hoax,” The Globe and Mail, January 18, 2017. Archived January 20, 2017. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/aJM8X

      24. Andrew Griffin. “Donald Trump environment boss Scott Pruitt admits climate change is not a hoax in U-turn,” The Independent, January 19, 2017. Archived .pdf on file at DeSmog. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/y29ov

      25. Scott Pruitt and Luther Strange. “The Climate-Change Gang,” National Review, May 17, 2016. Archived January 20, 2017. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/Q8hja

      26. Barney Jopson. “Obama’s climate change legacy at risk from conservative heartland,” Financial Times, April 15, 2015. Archived .pdf on file at DeSmog. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/rd7jG

      27. E. Scott Pruitt. “Impact of the EPA’s Clean Power Plan on States” (PDF), House Committee on Science, Space & Technology, May 26, 2016. Archived .pdf on file at DeSmog.

      28. Pick for EPA Administrator Opposed Federal Chesapeake Bay Cleanup,” WYPR, December 21, 2016. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/SVI6R

      29. Scott Pruitt 2014 ALEC Annual Meeting,” YouTube video uploaded by user American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC), August 5, 2014. Archived .mp4 on file at DeSmog.

      30. Ben Jervey and Steve Horn. “EPA Nominee Scott Pruitt Gets Grilled on Fossil Fuel Ties at Confirmation Hearing,” DeSmog, January 18, 2017.

      31. Elena Schor. “Senate Dems raise new conflict-of-interest charges against Pruitt,” Politico, January 12, 2017. Archived January 24, 2017. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/6JaQb

      32. “Dear Mr. Shaub:” (PDF)United States Senate, January 12, 2017. Retrieved from Politico. Archived .pdf on file at DeSmog.

      33. The Clean Power Plan Goes to Court - Event Audio/Video,” The Federalist Society, September 15, 2016. Archived .mp4 on file at DeSmog. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/C7Mcs

      34. “Dear Fellow Attorneys General:” (PDF), State of Alabama Office of the Attorney General, June 15, 2016. Retrieved from DocumentCloud. Archived .pdf on file at DeSmog.

      35. David Hasemyer. “Climate Fraud Investigation of Exxon Draws Attention of 17 Attorneys General,” InsideClimate News, March 30, 2016. Archived January 23, 2017. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/KVYck

      36. Governmental Power versus Free Speech? - Podcast,” The Federalist Society, May 16, 2016. Archived .mp3 on file at DeSmog. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/fQJpK

      37. Scott Pruitt. “From @WashTimes: GOPAGs warn Dems that if climate skeptics can be prosecuted for ‘fraud,’ so can alarmists -” Tweet by user Scott Pruitt, June 17, 2016. Archived .png on file at DeSmog.

      38. STATEOFOKLAHOMA ex re. E. Scott Pruitt, in his official capacity as Attorney General of Oklahoma; OKLAHOMADEPARTMENTOFENVIRONMENTALQUALITY, Petitioners, vs. U.S.ENVIRONMENTALPROTECTIONAGENCY, Respondent” (PDF), October 23 2015. Case No. 15-1365. Retrieved from E&E News. Archived .pdf one file at DeSmog.

      39. Ashley Braun. “To Fight Clean Power Plan, Fossil Fuel Companies Paid for Private Meetings with Republican State Prosecutors,” DeSmog, September 7, 2016.

      40. (Press Release). “AG Pruitt Sues EPA for Unlawful Clean Power Plan Rule,” Oklahoma Office of the Attorney General E. Scott Pruitt, July 1, 2015. Archived January 20, 2017. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/2m48a

      41. “(1) STATEOFOKLAHOMA ex rel. E. Scott Pruitt, in his official capacity as Attorney General of Oklahoma, and (2) OKLAHOMADEPARTMENTOFENVIRONMENTALQUALITY, Plaintiffs, v. (1) GINAMCCARTHY, in her official capacity as Administrator of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, and (2) U.S.ENVIRONMENTALPROTECTIONAGENCY, Defendants. ” (PDF), UNITEDSTATESDISTRICTCOURTFORTHENORTHERNDISTRICTOFOKLAHOMA, July 1, 2015. Case No. 15-CV-369-CVE-FHM. Archived .pdf on file at DeSmog.

      42. Devon Energy Scripted Letters,The New York Times, December 6, 2014. Archived .pdf on file at DeSmog.

      43. Matt Kasper. “Donald Trump Has Nominated Oklahoma AG Pruitt, ALEC and Fossil Fuel Industry Ally, To Lead EPA,” Energy and Policy Institute, December, 2016. Archived January 23, 2017. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/wXz6z

      44. Nick Surgey. “Coal and Oil Polluters Dominate ALEC Conference,” PR Watch, July 31, 2014. Archived January 23, 2017. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/eLmzH

      45. Oklahoma, Joining With Self-Interested Co-plaintiffs,” The New York Times, December 6, 2014. Archived .pdf on file at DeSmog.

      46. “Embracing American Energy Opportunities: From Wellheads to Pipelines” (PDF), American Legislative Exchange Council. Retrieved from PR Watch. Archived .pdf on file at DeSmog.

      47. Cliff Adcock. “New PACs Tied to Pruitt Cast National Net for Corporate Donors,” Oklahoma Watch, November 30, 2015. Archived January 23, 2017. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/hnUHT

      48. Andrew Seifter. “Eight Things We Learned From Scott Pruitt’s EPA Confirmation Hearing,” Media Matters, January 20, 2017. Archived January 24, 2017. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/LcXxp

      49. Scott Pruitt’s web of fundraising and lawsuits,” EDF Action. Archived January 24, 2017. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/SgbDm

      50. EME Homer City Generation, L.P., et al., Petitioners, v. Environmental Protection Agency, et al.,  Respondents. On Petitions for Review of a Final Order of the United States Environmental Protection Agency,” USCA Case #11-1302, December 10, 2014. Retrieved from EDFAction.og. Archived .pdf on file at DeSmog.

      51. RE: Comments of the Oklahoma Attorney General to the EPA on: 'Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Oklahoma; Interstate Transport of Pollution'” (PDF), Office of Attorney General, State of Oklahoma, November 16, 2011. Retrieved from Regulations.gov. Archived .pdf on file at DeSmog.

      52. “Oklahoma Attorney General Comments to the United States Environmental Protection Agency on the Proposed Federal Implementation Plan for Interstate Transport of Pollution Affecting Visibility and Best Available Retrofit Technology Determinations” (PDF), May 23, 2011. retrieved from Regulations.gov. Archived .pdf on file at DeSmog.

      53. WHITESTALLIONENERGYCENTER, LLC, et al., Petitioners, V. UNITEDSTATESENVIRONMENTALPROTECTIONAGENCY, et al., Respondents. On Petition for Review of Final Agency Action 77 FR 9304 (Feb. 16, 2012)” (PDF), USCA Case #12-1100. Retrieved from EDFaction.org. Archived .pdf on file at DeSmog.

      54. MURRAYENERGYCORPORATION, et al., Petitioners, V. UNITEDSTATESENVIRONMENTALPROTECTIONAGENCY, et al., Respondents. On Petitions for Review of Final Agency Action of the United States Environmental Protection Agency 81 Fed. Reg. 24,420 (Apr. 25, 2016)” (PDF), USCA Case #16-1127, November 18, 2016. Retrieved from Blogs.edf.org. Archived .pdf on file at DeSmog.

      55. Jeff McMahon. “Nearly All U.S. Coal Plants Now Comply With The EPA Mercury Rule That Was Shot Down By Supreme Court,” Forbes, July 10, 2016. Retrieved from Google cache, as it appeared Jan 19 2017. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/JPA8w

      56. MURRAYENERGYCORPORATION, Petitioner, v. UNITEDSTATESENVIRONMENTALPROTECTIONAGENCY, Respondent. On Petition for Review of Final Agency Action of the United States Environmental Protection Agency 80 FED. REG. 65,292 (OCT. 26, 2015)” (PDF), USCA Case #15-1385. Retrieved from azag.gov. Archived .pdf on file at DeSmog.

      57. OKLAHOMA v. U.S. E.P.A.” (Nos. 12-9526, 12-9527.)LEAGLE, 2013. Archived January 24, 2017. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/0VhaE

      58. Oklahoma, et al., Petitioners v. Environmental Protection Agency, et al.” Supreme Court of the United States, No. 13-921 (February 3, 2014). Archived January 24, 2017. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/m7Ttz

      59. WALTERCOKE, INC., et al., Petitioners, V. UNITEDSTATESENVIRONMENTALPROTECTIONAGENCY, et al., Respondents. On Petition for Review of Final Agency Action of the United States Environmental Protection Agency 80 Fed. Reg. 33,840 (June 12, 2015)” (PDF), USCA Case #15-1166, March 16, 2016. Retrieved from edfaction.og. Archived.pdf on file at DeSmog.

      60. Federal Register Vol. 80, No. 113 (June 12, 2015). Archived .pdf on file at DeSmog.

      61. STATEOFWESTVIRGINIA et al.  Petitioners. v. UNITEDSTATESENVIRONMENTALPROTECTIONAGENCY; and, REGINA A. MCCARTHY, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency; Respondents” (PDF), August 2, 2016. Retrieved from blogs.edf.org. Archived .pdf on file at DeSmog.

      62. COALITIONFORRESPONSIBLEREGULATION, ETAL., Petitioners, v. UNITEDSTATESENVIRONMENTALPROTECTIONAGENCYANDLISA P. JACKSON, ADMINISTRATOR, Respondents ONPETITIONSFORREVIEWOF 74 FED. REG. 66,496 (DEC. 15, 2009) & 75 FED. REG. 49,556 (AUG. 13, 2010) (CONSOLIDATED)” (PDF), USCA Case #09-1322, May 20, 2011. Retrieved from edfaction.org. Archived .pdf on file at DeSmog.

      63. STATEOFWESTVIRGINIA, et al., Petitioners, V. UNITEDSTATESENVIRONMENTALPROTECTIONAGENCY, et al.,
        Respondents. On Petitions for Review of Final Agency Action of the United States Environmental Protection Agency 80 Fed. Reg. 64,662 (Oct. 23, 2015)” (PDF)
        , USCA Case #15-1368, April 22, 2016. Retrieved from edfaction.org. Archived .pdf on file at DeSmog.

      64. STATEOFWESTVIRGINIA, et al. Petitioners, v. UNITEDSTATESENVIRONMENTALPROTECTIONAGENCY,
        Respondent, CITYOFNEWYORK, et al. Intervenors.” (PDF)
        , USCA Case #14-1146, November 26, 2014. Retrieved from Edfaction.org. Archived .pdf on file at DeSmog.

      65. “(1) STATEOFOKLAHOMA ex rel. E. Scott Pruitt, Attorney General of Oklahoma,  and (2) OKLAHOMADEPARTMENTOFENVIRONMENTALQUALITY,  Plaintiffs, v. (1) GINAMCCARTHY, in her official capacity as Administrator of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, and (2) U.S.ENVIRONMENTALPROTECTIONAGENCY,  Defendants.” (PDF), Case No. 15-CV-369-CVE-FHM, July 1, 2015. Retrieved from edfaction.org. Archived .pdf on file at DeSmog.

      66. INREWESTVIRGINIA, et al. Petitioner. On Petition for Extraordinary Writ to the United States Environmental Protection Agency” (PDF), United States Court of Appeals, No. 15-1277. August 13, 2016. Retrieved from edfaction.org. Archived .pdf on file at DeSmog.

      67. STATEOFNORTHDAKOTA, et al., Petitioners, V. UNITEDSTATESENVIRONMENTALPROTECTIONAGENCY, et al., Respondents. On Petition for Review of Final Agency Actions of the United States Environmental Protection Agency 80 Fed. Reg. 64,510 (Oct. 23, 2015) and 81 Fed. Reg. 27,442 (May 6, 2016)” (PDF), USCA Case #15-1381, October 13, 2016.

      68. MURRAYENERGYCORPORATION, et al., Petitioners, v. U.S.ENVIRONMENTALPROTECTIONAGENCY, et al., Respondents. In Re: Environmental Protection Agency and Department of Defense, Final Rule: Clean Water Rule: Definition of 'Waters of the United States,' 80 Fed. Reg. 37,054, published June 29, 2015 (MCP No. 135)” (PDF), Case No. 15-3822. Retrieved from edfaction.org. Archived .pdf on file at DeSmog.

      69. RAGA-AG-Call-Sheet,” Nick Surgey, Center for Media and Democracy. Retrieved from DocumentCloud. Archived .pdf on file at DeSmog.

      70. “Dear Senators,” (PDF), Competitive Enterprise Institute, January 12, 2017. Archived .pdf one file at DeSmog.

      71. Brady Dennis, Chris Mooney, and David Weigel. “Democrats boycott controversial EPA nominee Scott Pruitt’s committee confirmation vote,” The Washington Post, February 1, 2017. Archived February 8, 2017. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/XrB32

      72. Rafa Letzer. “Trump EPA pick Scott Pruitt may have made a false statement under oath to the Senate,” Business Insider, February 6, 2017. Archived February 8, 2017. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/HLVqx

      73. Daniel Rivero. “Trump’s EPA pick appears to have made a false statement under oath in Senate hearing; he denies,” Fusion, February 6, 2017. Archived February 8, 2017. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/Vkwzy

      74. Ken Kimmell. “The Man Who Sued the EPA Is Now Running It,” EcoWatch, February 17, 2017. Archived February 18, 2017. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/CgKe6

      75. Coral Davenport. “Senate Confirms Scott Pruitt as E.P.A. Head,” The New York Times, February 17, 2017. Archived February 18, 2017. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/F1jWU

      76. Andrew Tarantola. “Who is Scott Pruitt, the new EPA head? Engadget, February 17, 2017. Archived February 18, 2017. Archive.is URL:https://archive.is/nveOF 

      77. Court Orders EPA Nominee Scott Pruitt to Release Emails,” PR Watch, February 16, 2017. Archived February 23, 2017. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/pleMu

      78. (Press Release). “OKLAHOMAAGRELEASES 7,564 PAGESINRESPONSETOCMDREQUEST,” The Centre for Media and Democracy, February 22, 2017. Archived February 23, 2017. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/MhM1K

      79. Steve Horn. “Thousands of Emails from Oklahoma Office of Trump EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt Published,” DeSmog, February 22, 2017.

      80. New EPA head Scott Pruitt: You can be pro-growth and…,” CNBC, March 9, 2017. Archived .mp4 on file at DeSmog.

      81. Timothy Mama. “EPA chief: Carbon dioxide isn’t a ‘primary contributor’ to global warming,” The Hill, March 9, 2017. Archived March 9, 2017. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/eKGCB

      82. Farron Cousins. “EPA Chief Scott Pruitt Disputes Carbon Dioxide’s Role in Global Warming, Contradicting His Own Agency's Research,” DeSmog, March 9, 2017.

      83. Juliet Eilperin and Brady Dennis. “Scott Pruitt, outspoken and forceful, moves to the center of power within the Trump administration,The Washington Post, June 2, 2017. Archived June 2, 2017. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/OUfNT

      84. Administrator Scott Pruitt Speech On Paris Accord, As Prepared,” EPA, June 1, 2017. Archived June 2, 2017. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/JuV0B

      85. Sharon Kelly. “Trump Abandons Paris Climate Deal At Bidding of Fossil Fuel Interests,” DeSmog, June 1, 2017.

      86. White House Daily Briefing ,” C-SPAN, June 2, 2017. Archived .mp4 on file at DeSmog.

      87. Emails reiterate EPA chief’s ties to fossil fuel interests,” Associated Press, June 16, 2017. Archived July 21, 2017. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/72PHs

      88. Coral Davenport and Eric Lipton. “Scott Pruitt Is Carrying Out His E.P.A. Agenda in Secret, Critics Say,” The New York Times, August 11, 2017. Archived August 14, 2017. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/OtI8h 

      89. John Siciliano. “Trump administration lining up climate change 'red team',” Washington Examiner, July 24, 2017. Archived August 15, 2017. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/3SiNq

      90. Emily Holden. “Pruitt will launch program to 'critique' climate science,” E&E News, June 30, 2017. Archived August 15, 2017. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/wyjPz

      91. Scott Waldman. “'Red teams' gain prominence to question climate scienceE&E News.

      92. Daniella Diaz. “EPA chief on Irma: The time to talk climate change isn't now,” CNN, September 7, 2017. Archived September 18, 2017. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/AYlYR

      93. Stop the loose talk about hurricanes and global warming,” The Hill, September 15, 2017. Archived September 19, 2017. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/scdkT

      94. Brad Plumer and Coral Davenport. “E.P.A. to Give Dissenters a Voice on Climate, No Matter the Consensus,” The New York Times, June 30, 2017. Archived October 3, 2017. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/x3foH

      95. EPA Takes Another Step To Advance President Trump's America First Strategy, Proposes Repeal Of 'Clean Power Plan',” United Stated Environmental Protection Agency. October 10, 2017. Archived October 10, 2017. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/0HcBp

      96. Lisa Friedman and Brad Plumer. “E.P.A. Announces Repeal of Major Obama-Era Carbon Emissions Rule,” The New York Times, October 9, 2017. Archived October 10, 2017. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/E5cEn

      97. Eric Lipton. “E.P.A. Chief, Rejecting Agency’s Science, Chooses Not to Ban Insecticide,” The New York Times, March 29, 2017. Archived October 27, 2017. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/TIZZ6

      98. (News Release). “EPA Administrator Pruitt Denies Petition to Ban Widely Used Pesticide,Environmental Protection Agency, March 29, 2017. Archived October 27, 2017. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/XAUYw

      99. SCOTTPRUITT,” America First Energy Conference. Archived November 21, 2017. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/EogSM

      100. SPEAKERS,” America First Energy. Archived October 10, 2017. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/OJWeX

      101. James Osborne. “Trump officials to appear at Houston event hosted by climate skeptics,” Houston Chronicle, November 2, 2017. Archived November 20, 2017. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/XPtYc

      102. America First Energy Conference Stacked with Climate Change Deniers,” Climate Investigations Center, November 6, 2017. Archived November 20, 2017. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/mISrd

      103. At the Crossroads IV: Energy & Climate Policy Summit,” The Heritage Foundation, November 30, 2017. Archived .mp4 on file at DeSmog. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/jmAfj

      104. Rob Bluey. “Trump’s EPA Chief Charts a New Course: An Interview With Scott Pruitt,” The Daily Signal, October 20, 2017. Archived December 15, 2017. Archive.is URL:https://archive.is/FYxtp

      105. Kent Lassma. “President's Fall Policy Update,” Competitive Enterprise Institute, December 12, 2017. Archived December 28, 2017. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/eohIy

      106. Eli Stokols and Timothy Puko. “Scott Pruitt Aims to Accelerate His Efforts to Remake the EPA,” Wall Street Journal, January 17, 2018. Archived January 31, 2018. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/zOVuZ

      107. Scott Waldman and Niina Heikkinen. “Pruitt suggests warming can help humans,” E&E News, February 7, 2018.

      108. Gerard Ramahlo. “EXCLUSIVE: EPA Chief Scott Pruitt goes one-on-one with News 3,News3LV. Archived February 8, 2018. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/OUieF

      109. Ben Jervey. “Pruitt, Auto Industry, and Climate Deniers Retreat Behind Closed Doors to Weaken Fuel Efficiency Targets,” DeSmog, April 4, 2018.

      110. (Press Release). “EPA Administrator Pruitt: GHG Emissions Standards for Cars and Light Trucks Should Be Revised,EPA, April 2, 2018. Archived April 5, 2018. Archive.is URL:https://archive.li/fVELH

      111. EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt on Obama-Era Emissions Standards,” C-SPAN video, April 3, 2018. 

      112. Hiroko Tabuchi. “Calling Car Pollution Standards ‘Too High,’ E.P.A. Sets Up Fight With California,” The New York Times, April 2, 2018. Archive.is URL: https://archive.li/VcUls

      113. As pressure over his scandals builds, Scott Pruitt blacklists reporters from EPA announcement,” Media Matters, April 3, 2018. Archived April 5, 2018. Archive.is URL: https://archive.li/nNYwa

      114. Clare Foran. “How EPA's Scott Pruitt avoided tough questions on Tuesday,” CNN, April 3, 2018. Archived April 5, 2018. Archive.is URL: https://archive.li/dF5tA

      115. EXCLUSIVE: More Cabinet trouble for Trump? EPA chief lived in condo tied to lobbyist 'power couple',” ABC News, March 29, 2018. Archived April 5, 2018. Archive.is URL: https://archive.li/wrD8d

      116. White House, Dems seek EPA answers on Pruitt's rental deal,” ABC News, April 2, 2018. Archived April 5, 2018. Archive.is URL: https://archive.li/KiYlA

      117. Administrator Pruitt Promotes Environmental Cooperation with U.S. Partners in Morocco,” EPA, December 12, 2017. Archived April 5, 2018. Archive.is URL: https://archive.li/qLmJF

      118. Rushed EPA ethics ruling on Pruitt condo deal 'problematic,' experts say,” ABC News, April 2, 2018.

      119. EPA chief Scott Pruitt's long list of controversies,” CNN, April 6, 2018. Archived April 6, 2018. Archive.is URL: https://archive.li/2wnc8

      120. Scott Pruitt’s job in jeopardy amid expanding ethics issues,” The Washington Post, April 6, 2018. Archived April 6, 2018. Archive.is URL: https://archive.li/eA6tt

      121. EPA's Pruitt says pay raises for aides 'should not have happened',” CNN, April 4, 2018. Archived April 6, 2018. Archive.is URL: https://archive.li/8WAx1

      122. Elaina Plott and Robinson Meyer. “Scott Pruitt Bypassed the White House to Give Big Raises to Favorite Aides,” The Atlantic, April 3, 2018. Archived April 6, 2018. Archive.is URL: https://archive.li/oqgrH

      123. Jennifer A. Dlouhy and Jennifer Jacobs. “EPA Chief’s $50-a-Night Rental Raises White House Angst,” Bloomberg, March 30, 2018. Archived April 6, 2018. Archive.is URL: https://archive.li/jWYQa

      124. Pruitt Had a $50-a-Day Condo Linked to Lobbyists. Their Client’s Project Got Approved.” The New York Times, April 2, 2018. Archive.is URL: https://archive.li/qbBwz

      125. E.P.A. Officials Sidelined After Questioning Scott Pruitt,” The New York Times, April 5, 2018. Archive.is URL: https://archive.li/POLSQ

      126. All the Lavish Items on Scott Pruitt's Problematic EPA Wish List,” Fortune, April 6, 2018. Archived April 6, 2018. Archive.is URL: https://archive.li/trddu

      127. EPA chief Scott Pruitt took first-class, military, charter flights that cost taxpayers more than $163,000 in first year alone: Report,” CNBC, March 21, 2018. Archived April 6, 2018. Archive.is URL: https://archive.li/0P82M

      128. Scott Pruitt’s $25,000 soundproof phone booth? It actually cost more like $43,000.” The Washington Post, March 14, 2018. Archived April 6, 2018. Archive.is URL: https://archive.li/kbJUS

      129. Senator: Pruitt security included Disneyland, Rose Bowl trips,” CNN, April 3, 2018. Archived April 6, 2018. Archive.is URL: https://archive.li/0Yhiy

      130. Trump bemoans how Pruitt is ‘TOTALLY under siege’,” Politico, April 6, 2018. Archived April 6, 2018. Archive.is URL: https://archive.li/f0Kkf

      131. Conservatives rally behind Pruitt,” E&E News, April 3, 2018. Archived April 6, 2018. Archive.is URL: https://archive.li/KLH56

      132. EPA administrator under fire for travel and security choices,” Fox News, April 3, 2018.

      133. Eric Lipton and Lisa Friedman. “Lawmakers’ Letter Claims Further Spending Abuses by the E.P.A. Head, Scott Pruitt,” The New York Times, April 12, 2018. Archive.is URL: https://archive.li/YQ3SF

      134. Dear Administrator Pruitt,” Congress of the United States, April 12, 2018. Retrieved from DocumentCloud.

      135. Fox News' Ed Henry Won't Let Scott Pruitt Off The Hook In Testy Exchange,” HuffPost, April 4, 2018. Archived April 18, 2018. Archive.is URL: https://archive.li/N2oV7

      136. Full interview: Scott Pruitt pushes back on controversies,” Fox News, April 4, 2018. Archived .mp4 on file at DeSmog.

      137. (Press Release). “Scott Pruitt Is Now Being Investigated By The House of Representatives, Senate, White House, Office of Management and Budget, Government Accountability Office, and EPA Inspector General,” U.S. House of Representatives, April 18, 2018. Archived April 19, 2018. Archive.is URL: https://archive.li/TLESg

      138. Josh Siegel. “Scott Pruitt announces new EPA rule to combat 'secret science',” Washington Examiner, April 24, 2018. Archived April 24, 2018. Archive.is URL: https://archive.li/d7avT

      139. Pruitt to unveil 'secret science' effort today — sources,” E&E News, April 24, 2018. Archived April 24, 2018. Archive.is URL: https://archive.li/6eQLq

      140. Dear Administrator Pruitt,” United States Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works, April 24, 2018.

      141. (Press Release). “PRUITTEXPOSED: Sierra Club Secures 24,000 Pages of EPA Emails, Call Logs and Documents,” Sierra Club, May 7, 2018. Archived May 8, 2018. Archive.is URL: https://archive.li/IxSOr

      142. Eric Lipton and Lisa Friedman. “E.P.A. Emails Show an Effort to Shield Pruitt From Public Scrutiny,” The New York Times, May 7, 2018.Archive.is URL: https://archive.li/baIsf

      143. Ex-Lobbyist for Foreign Governments Helped Plan Pruitt Trip to Australia,The New York Times, May 2, 2018. Archive.is URLhttp://archive.is/rxyXn

      144. Emails show Heritage Foundation offered Pruitt flights, hotel, and talking points for its conference,” ThinkProgress, May 8, 2018. Archive.is URLhttp://archive.is/zvKhr

      145. Scott Pruitt Used a Military Helicopter to Visit a Coal MineThe New Republic, May 8, 2018. 

      146. Pruitt fast-tracked California cleanup after Hugh Hewitt brokered meeting,” May 7, 2018. Archive.is URL:  http://archive.is/dEQgs

      147. Rebecca Leber. “The 10 Biggest Revelations From the Massive Trove of Internal EPA Emails,” Mother Jones, May 8, 2018. Archived May 14, 2018. Archive.is URL: https://archive.li/wAgB0

      148. Pruitt’s Plan for Climate Change Debates: Ask Conservative Think Tanks,” The New York Times, May 8, 2018. Archived May 14, 2018. Archive.is URL: https://archive.li/onsj5

      149. Top Federalist Society official initially paid for Scott Pruitt’s costly dinner in Rome, EPA officials confirm,” The Washington Post, May 7, 2018. Archived May 14, 2018. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.li/YMCdm

      150. Influential outsiders have played a key role in Scott Pruitt’s foreign travel,” The Washington Post, May 3, 2018. Archived May 14, 2018. Archive.is URL: https://archive.li/0zdao

      151. Graham Readfearn. “EPA's Scott Pruitt Dined With Fellow Climate Science Denier and Vatican Treasurer Cardinal George Pell, Documents Show,” DeSmog, May 10, 2018.

      152. Eric Lipton, Lisa Friedman and Kenneth P. Vogel. “A Lobbyist Helped Scott Pruitt Plan a Morocco Trip. Then Morocco Hired the Lobbyist,” The New York Times, May 1, 2018. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.li/0yPSI

      153. Stephanie Ebbs. “EPA chief Scott Pruitt defends Italy trip after increased scrutiny of travel costs,” ABC News, March 22, 2018. Archived May 14, 2018. Archive.is URL: https://archive.li/tahk6

      154. Rebecca Leber. “The 10 Biggest Revelations From the Massive Trove of Internal EPA Emails.Mother Jones. May 7, 2018. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.li/wAgB0

      155. Jennifer A Dlouhy, Eric Roston. “Oil and Coal Executives Clamored for Time With Pruitt, Records Show,Bloomberg. May 8, 2018. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.li/wKDdS

      156. Adam Morton. “Climate sceptic group IPA suggested as co-host of Australian visit by Trump's environment chief,The Guardian, May 4, 2018. Archived May 24, 2018. Archive.is URL: https://archive.li/4bCYk

      157. Scott Pruitt Twice Introduced Anti-Abortion Bills Giving Men ‘Property Rights’ Over Fetuses,” HuffPost, May 24, 2018. Archived May 25, 2018. Archive.is URL: https://archive.li/VSiwD

      158. The Other Reason Trump Hasn't Fired Scott Pruitt: His Evangelical Christian Ties,” HuffPost, April 28, 2018. Archived May 25, 2018. Archive.is URL: https://archive.li/x1y4j

      159. Tim Huselkamp. “Letter From the Heartland Institute to EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt“ The Heartland Institute. June 7, 2018. .pdf Archived on DesmogBlog. 

      160. Brendan DeMelle. “Heartland Institute 'Red Team' Climate Lists Revealed, And Science Deniers Are Upset With Pruitt,” DeSmogBlog. October 25, 2017. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.li/qfvb5

      161. Scott Waldman. “Judge Orders EPA to Produce Science behind Pruitt’s Warming Claims,” Scientific American, June 5, 2018. Archived June 12, 2018. Archive.is URL: https://archive.li/XpVrx

      162. Scott Pruitt resigns: Trump's scandal-ridden EPA chief steps down,” The Guardian, July 5, 2018. Archived July 5, 2018. Archive.is URL: https://archive.fo/tJvYc

      163. EPA leader Scott Pruitt out after numerous scandals,” CNBC, July 5, 2018. Archived July 5, 2018. Archive.is URL: https://archive.fo/QW1OI

      164. Scott Pruitt's full resignation letter to President Trump,” Fox News, July 5, 2018. Archived July 5, 2018. Archive.is URL: https://archive.fo/KUupC

      165. Scott Pruitt Personally Involved in ‘Ratf*cking’ Ex-Aides Who He Feels Betrayed Him,” Daily Beast, June 28, 2018. Archived July 9, 2018. Archive.is URL: https://archive.fo/hIc4C

      Other Resources

      Jack N. Gerard

      $
      0
      0

      Jack N. Gerard

      Credentials

      • Bachelor’s degree in political science and a juris doctor from George Washington University. [1]

      Background

      Jack N. Gerard is former President, CEO, and a lobbyist for the American Petroleum Institute (API), a national trade association that “represents all aspects of America’s oil and natural gas industry.” Prior to working with API, Gerard was President and CEO of the American Chemistry Council (ACC), where he also served as a lobbyist for the chemical industry. Before that, he served in the same position at the National Mining Association (NMA). Gerard announced on January 24, 2018 that he would step down as API's president. He would find a successor by Sept 1, Axios reported[51][2][3][52]

      According to data from OpenSecrets.org, the American Petroleum Institute (API) spent over $94 million on lobbying for the oil and gas industry between 1998 and 2016. Since Gerard started working at API in 2008, they spent over $66 million on lobbying, or 70% of that total. Gerard has often advocated for Liquified Natural Gas (LNG) as an alternative fuel and solution to reduce CO2 emissions, while opposing renewable energy. He suggests a “market-based” approach to emissions reductions, rather than industry regulation. [4][5]

      While at API, Gerard has overseen campaigns under names like “Energy Nation,” “Energy Citizens,” “EnergyTomorrow,” or “the People of America’s Oil and Natural Gas Industry.” API's “Energy Citizens” portrayed itself as a “grass roots” initiative to combat climate change legislation.The Washington Post notes that in 2010, Gerard directed $63 million, one-third of API's budget, to an outside public relations firm for ad campaigns. [6], [7]

      According to a search of the U.S. House of Representatives' Lobbying Disclosure database, Gerard served as a lobbyist for the American Chemistry Council starting as early as 2006, and has been a lobbyist for the American Petroleum Institute (API) since 2008. Gerard has appeared numerous times before the White House to argue against greenhouse gas regulations that would impact the oil industry. [3]

      In 2012, The Huffington Post described Jack Gerard as a long-time backer and a close friend of Mitt Romney, while Roll Call described him as one of Romney's “most trusted advisers.” [8], [9], [10]

      Stance on Climate Change

      2016

      While Jack Gerard does not appear to have an official statement on his views on climate change, the American Petroleum Institute offered the following statement in March of 2016, acknowledging that climate change is a legitimate problem: [11]

      It is clear that climate change is a serious problem that requires research for solutions and effective policies that allow us to meet our energy needs while protecting the environment: that's why oil and gas companies are working to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions. “

      Key Quotes

      January 9, 2018

      “I think we’re at the point where we need to get over the conversation of who believes and who doesn’t, and move to a conversation about solutions,” Gerard said about climate change, reported the Washington Examiner. [50]

      September 22, 2016

      In a API leadership briefing, Gerard criticized divestment campaigns as unrealistic, reports The New York Times: [12]

      “There are those who would advocate for no fossil fuels at all, which is frankly irresponsible, since the United States depends on fossil fuels to meet 80 percent of its energy needs.” 

      January 7, 2014

      As reported at Huffington PostJack Gerard laid out API's agenda at a speech at Newseum, also calling on Obama to quickly approve the Keystone XL pipeline: [13]

      This has gone on far too long,” Gerard said. “I’d like to point out that the now five-plus year evaluation process of the Keystone XL pipeline has lasted longer than America’s involvement in the second World War, longer than it took our nation to put a man in space, and almost as long as it took to build the Transcontinental Railroad 155 years ago.”

      May 11, 2012

      The following is from Jack N. Gerard's speech at the City Club of Cleveland where he emphasized API's opinion on the importance of oil and natural gas (view video below): [14]

      “Many people don't realize that sixty-two percent of all the energy we consume in the United States today is oil and natural gas. The experts, even in the Obama administration, will tell you that 30 years from now, even with the most optimistic projections surrounding alternative and renewable forms of energy, 30 years from now we will still rely on oil and natural gas for 55% of all the energy consumed in the United States.”

      April, 2012

      Gerard is quoted in a April, 2012 article in The Washington Post:

      If we’re concerned about a particular member [of Congress], we will educate that constituency and encourage people to weigh in with their elected official,” he says in a conference room at API’s L Street office. “Congress is a lagging indicator. Congress is responsive to the American people. That’s why a well-educated electorate is a key to sound policy.” [6]

      “[E]nergy is not about Republicans, not about Democrats. It is not a partisan issue. It’s an issue that affects Americans at large.” [6]

      August, 2010

      Discussing a controversial “grass roots” advocacy program where API had worked in coordination with FreedomWorks, the American Conservative Union and Americans for Tax Reform to fight against House climate bill (H.R. 2454), Gerard told Greenwire:[15]

      We have always encouraged our employees to engage in political activities.”

      While critics had claimed most of those who attended were representatives of the energy industry, Gerard claimed this was false:

      “in most forums very few oil and gas people attended,” he said. 

      July 21, 2009

      In a July, 2009 interview with Politico, Gerard declared: [16]

      What we’ve learned is that the public probably doesn’t understand or appreciate us as much as we’d like them to.”

      December 7, 2009

      Reacting to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's formal declaration that greenhouse gas emissions endanger human health, Gerard said: [17]

      [The EPA Endangerment Finding] action poses a threat to every American family and business if it leads to regulation of greenhouse gases under the Clean Air Act. Such regulation would be intrusive, inefficient, and excessively costly.”

      August 12, 2009

      In a leaked memo to API affiliates (PDF), Gerard wrote: [18]

      To be clear, API will provide the up-front resources [for its Energy Citizens rallies] to ensure logistical issues do not become a problem.” 

      [W]e don’t want critics to know our game plan.”

      November, 2008

      In response to the November 2008 election of Barack Obama as President and Joe Biden as Vice-president, API released a statement in the name of their CEO, Jack Gerard, saying:

      The American people have spoken loud and clear that they want politicians to put aside partisan bickering… . The oil and natural gas industry stands ready to help put America's vast energy resources to good use, strengthening our nation's economy and energy security, and providing good jobs for Americans across the country.” [19]

      Gerard earlier criticized Obama's platform, saying “Obama's plan to impose a windfall-profits tax on oil companies would harm one of the few industries that are thriving” in the economic crisis.  [20], [21]

      June 17, 2008

      “When industries are confronted by challenges, they tend to get shellshocked and step back into the foxhole. […] My philosophy is the opposite. Industries need someone to step forward and make the case when people don't understand them. […] Because there's a lot of anxiety in the Congress about the industry, we have to step forward and be compelling in our advocacy. It's not a time to be bashful. The more transparent the discussion, the better off we'll be.” [22]

      Key Deeds

      March 31, 2018

      The Salt Lake Tribune reported that Gerard was appointed as a full-time leader of the The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (LDS Church). The Tribune noted that it is unclear of Gerard's appointment to the LDS Church as the reason for his departure from API. [53]

      January 24, 2018

      Gerard announced that he would step down as API's president. According to Axios, Gerard said he would step down in August and work to find a replacement by September 1. [51]52]

      January 4, 2017

      Jack N. Gerard delivered the American Petroleum Institute's “2017 State of American Energy” keynote, followed by a Q&A Session. View Jack Gerard's prepared speech here, or watch the video below: [23], [24]

      Gerard reiterates the common argument by the energy industry that fossil fuels will provide cheap fuel to help those in poverty:

      “And as the planet’s population continues to grow, demand for affordable and abundant energy will also grow, which will not only improve the standard of living for millions but will also lift many more out of poverty.”

      Responding to a question on what API would do on climate change under the Trump administration, Gerard said:

      API and the industry generally will probably continue doing what it has been doing. And that is reaching out and demonstrating solutions to the challenge.”

      According to Gerard claims that the energy industry is quite capable of managing itself despite “constraints imposed on the industry by regulations designed more to stifle domestic fossil fuel development than to benefit the American consumer.”

      He concludes that we must “break from the recent past” which includes the “the regulatory onslaught of the last few years,” with things like limits on offshore drilling.

      “We know we need more energy, but we haven’t seen any meaningful expansion of offshore access in decades,” Gerard said. “A small, vocal minority have taken it upon themselves to target these projects to advance their anti-fossil fuel political agenda,” he added.

      December 4, 2016

      Jack Gerard called on President-Elect Donald Trump to “restore the rule of law in our nation’s regulatory regime” by a fast approval of the Dakota Access Pipeline when he takes office.  [25]

      Moving forward, I am hopeful President-elect Trump will reject the Obama administration’s shameful actions to deny this vital energy project, restore the rule of law in the regulatory process, and make this project’s approval a top priority as he takes office in January,” Gerard said.

      August 12, 2016

      In an API Email to Gina McCarthy, Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Jack Gerard claims that no more studies are needed to confirm that fracking is safe: [26]

      “[A]mple work has already been undertaken to support the conclusion that there is no link between hydraulic fracturing and drinking water impacts,” Gerard writes.

      In conclusion, Gerard notes that “API continues to stand ready to assist EPA in whatever way we can to bring this study to a successful conclusion based on sound science.”

      May 18, 2016

      Jack N. Gerard wrote a letter on behalf of API (PDFencouraging Speaker Paul Ryan and Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi to support Section 1090 of H.R. 4909, the Fiscal Year 2017 National Defense Authorization Act, which would streamline liquefied natural gas (LNG) export permits. [27]

      Gerard sent a similar API letter in January, 2016 supporting S. 2012,  the Energy Policy Modernization Act, in particular provisions which “will require the Department of Energy to consider natural gas export permit applications in a timely manner.” [28]

      February 26, 2015

      Jack Gerard addressed the American Association of Blacks in Energy at a 2015 Energy Summit. In his remarks, Gerard introduced a report titled “Minority and Female Employment in the Oil & Gas and Petrochemical Industries,” which API had commissioned IHS Global to compile. [29]

      “The report emphasizes the fact that in the decades ahead the oil, natural gas and petrochemical industries will spur the creation of hundreds of thousands of new, well-paying jobs that require people with a wide range of skill sets, training and educational achievement levels,” Gerard remarked. “Our goal is to ensure that anyone who wants a well-paying career has that opportunity. Because that’s the only way we will seize America’s energy moment.”

      On September 17, 2014, Gerard presented the same report before the US. House of Representatives discussing H.R. 4526, The 21st Century Energy Workforce Development Jobs Initiative Act of 2014. [30]

      November 16, 2015

      In a press call, Jack Gerard outlined a “market-based emissions reduction model” in order to combat climate change. [5]

      Discussing the Paris climate conference, Gerard said, “There should be no place for dogmatic adherence to ideology. But rather science, economic reality and real-world proven results should guide the delegates’ deliberations.”

      Gerard goes on to denounce President Obama's Clean Power plan, claiming it “ignores the natural gas success story and pushes power plants to adopt sources like wind and solar” when it should be focusing on “natural gas, the energy source that is providing the greater benefit now.”

      He also denounces the Obama administration's decision to reject the Keystone XL pipeline, claiming it “demonstrates the administrations [sic] priority for perception over reality. […] Carbon emissions will actually be 42 percent greater without Keystone XL.”

      In conclusion, Gerard said that “America’s market-driven success should be the model for the Paris conference. […] That means avoiding massive, command-and-control government mandates.”

      January 12, 2015

      In an API press conference held before President Obama's State of the Union Address, Jack Gerard urges for repeal of the Renewable Fuel Standard: [31]

      “Like the recently repealed crude export ban, the RFS is a relic of a time of energy scarcity,” Gerard said. 

      Gerard goes on to suggest that Obama should reduce regulation on the energy industry: “Instead of pursuing a barrage of job-crushing new regulations – many of which are duplicative and unnecessary – President Obama has the opportunity to seize the initiative and embrace policies that recognize the value of the energy resurgence and acknowledge that the goals of environmental progress and energy production are not mutually exclusive,” he said.

      April 29, 2014

      Jack Gerard wrote a letter to Chairman Fred Upton and Ranking Member Henry Waxman of the Committee on Energy and Commerce of the U.S. House of Representatives, encouraging them to support H.R. 6, the Domestic Prosperity and Global Freedom Act. H.R. 6 would expedite approvals for LNG (Liquified Natural Gas) exports. [32]

      “Our industry is prepared to invest billions in LNG export terminals, each of which represent a multimillion dollar investment in infrastructure, as well as longterm investments in U.S. labor and materials. Yet, over 20 applications for export permits remain on hold at the Department of Energy (DOE),” Gerard lamented.

      July 30, 2012

      Jack N. Gerard wrote a pro-Keystone-XL letter (PDF) to Secretary Clinton on behalf of the American Petroleum Institute: [33]

      “I want to reiterate what API has stated in previous letters to DOS: it is in the best interests of all Americans to build the pipeline to ensure our long-term energy security, a dependable supply of Canadian oil to U.S. refineries and the creation of thousands of American jobs,” Gerard wrote.

      With regards to the final environmental impact statement (FEIS), Gerard added, “Additionally, given the extensive examination already given to the potential climate impacts in the prior FEIS, additional analysis of this topic is not warranted.”

      March 7, 2012

      In  testimony March 7 at a House Energy and Commerce Committee hearing, Jack Gerard suggested that President Obama could be blamed for high gas prices. The Washington Post reported that “The tale was an indictment of President Obama. But there’s one hitch, say oil experts. It doesn’t hold together.” They go on to cite industry experts, who explain other reasons for the fluctuations. [34]

      January 4, 2012

      Jack Gerard, in his capacity as President of the American Petroleum Institute, announced a new API campaign to promote approval for the Keystone XL pipeline and other energy industry ventures such as expanded offshore drilling, and opening up the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge and more federal lands to drilling. [35]

      In a January 4 speech, Gerard also denounced the Obama Administration for its delay of the Keystone XL pipeline, calling it “the largest shovel-ready project promising 20,000 construction-related jobs over the next two years, enabling more than half a million new U.S. jobs by 2035,” reported Greenpeace. [36]

      The “Vote for Energy” campaign was launched a day after the the Iowa caucus set the stage for the 2012 presidential election, and included ads on television, radio and print media. The campaign ran nation wide, but focused heavily on Ohio, Pennsylvania, Virginia, and other states where energy as a key issue, reports CNN Money. [37]

      Greenpeace created a parody website, vote-4-energy.com, outlining the API campaign. Greenpeace said in a statement:

      The Vote 4 Energy campaign is the latest effort by the oil industry to fake citizen support for its agenda. The American Petroleum Institute has repeatedly spent millions to block clean energy solutions and fake grassroots support for Big Oil.”

      When Greenpeace confronted Gerard about the funding behind the Vote for Energy campaign, he refused to provide a response: [38]

      You can view samples of API's “Vote 4 Energy” ads here, which include photos of, as The Washington Post put it, “ordinary looking folks” beside a pitch for how fossil fuel development will boost jobs.  [6]

      As of 2016, API was still sending out materials under the “Vote 4 Energy” heading. [39]

      November 11, 2011

      Jack Gerard sent a letter (PDF) on behalf of API to Lisa P. Jackson, Administrator of the U.S. Environmental Protection agency, opposing Tier 3 regulations and claiming that the need to cap sulphur emissions “isn't supported by reality.” [40]

      October 20, 2011

      Jack N. Gerard sent an open letter to Lisa Jackson (PDF), Administrator of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), criticizing the agency's approach to evaluating the impacts of Hydraulic fracturing (fracking) on drinking water. [41]

      Gerard claims the scientific validity of the studies would be in question if the EPA tested samples at their own facilities “using unapproved protocol.”  The letter was signed by representatives of major industry groups including: [41]

      • Independent Petroleum Association of America (IPAA)
      • American Petroleum Institute (API)
      • American Exploration & Production Council (AXPC)
      • US Oil & Gas Association
      • America's Natural Gas Alliance
      • Petroleum Equipment Suppliers Association

      August 16, 2011

      Jack Gerard, representing API, attended a White House meeting to lobby against ozone regulations. He appeared alongside members of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, the NPRA (Now the American Fuel and Petrochemical Manufacturers), the National Association of Manufacturers (NAM), and the American Chemistry Council to speak to top administration officials such as Cass Sunstein at OMB's information and regulatory affairs division and EPA's Gina McCarthy. [42]

      According to White House meeting records, those present included: [42]

      NameAffiliation
      Charles DrevnaNPRA
      Bruce JostenU.S. Chamber of Commerce
      Cal DooleyAmerican Chemistry Council
      Jack GerardAPI
      Jay TimmonsNAM
      Donna HarmanAmerican Forest & Paper Assn.
      John EnglerBRT
      Dan UtechDomestic Policy Council
      Gary GuzyCEQ
      Carl ShapiroCEA
      Michael FitzpatrickOMB/OIRA
      Cass SunsteinOMB/OIRA
      William DaleyWhite House
      Gina McCarthyEPA
      Dominic ManciniOMB/OIRA

      August 12, 2009

      A leaked memo (PDF) obtained by Greenpeace and written by Jack Gerard for the American Petroleum Institute (API), in cooperation with the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the National Association of Manufacturers  (NAM) revealed the coordinated campaign behind the “Energy Citizens” which had been designed as a “grass roots” effort to combat climate change legislation. [18]

      DeSmog reported on the API's “Fake 'Grassroots' Campaign” noting that the leaked memo asks API’s member companies to recruit employees, retirees, vendors and contractors to attend “Energy Citizen” rallies in key Congressional districts nationwide.  API is focusing on 21 states that have “a significant industry presence” or “assets on the ground.” [7]

      Grist noted that the majority of the Energy Citizens' rallies were organized by oil-industry lobbyists. They provided the following list of lobbyists who had been organizing the “grass roots” rallies: [43]

      • Greensboro, N.C., rally organizer Bill Weatherspoon is a registered lobbyist for API in North Carolina.
      • Lima, Ohio, organizer Terry Fleming is a registered lobbyist for the Ohio Petroleum Council.
      • Atlanta, Ga., organizer Ric Cobb is a registered lobbyist for the Georgia Petroleum Council.
      • Elkhart, Ind., organizer Maggie McShane lobbies on behalf of the Indiana Petroleum Council.
      • Nashville, Tenn., organizer Mike Williams is a registered lobbyist for API.
      • Bismarck, N.D., organizer Ron Ness is a former registered lobbyist for the North Dakota Petroleum Council.
      • Tampa, Fla., organizer David Mica registered lobbyist for the Florida Petroleum Council.
      • St. Louis, Mo., organizer Ryan Rowden is a registered lobbyist for the Missouri Petroleum Council.
      • Greenville, S.C., organizer Kay Clamp is a registered lobbyist for the South Carolina Petroleum Council.
      • Lincoln, Neb., point of contact Chris Abboud is a registered lobbyist for the Agri-Business Association of Nebraska.
      • Springfield, Ill., organizer Dave Sykuta is a registered lobbyist [PDF] for API.
      • Detroit, Mich., organizer John Griffin is a registered lobbyist for the Associated Petroleum Industries of Michigan.
      • Richmond, Va., organizer Mike Ward is a registered lobbyist for API in Virginia.
      • Philadelphia, Pa., organizer Rolf Hanson registered lobbyist for API in Pennsylvania.
      • Huron, S.D., organizer Tim Dougherty is a registered lobbyist.

      Gerard states that API is ready to bus in company members and provide logistical support, and reveals that API has retained “a highly experienced events management company that has produced successful rallies for presidential campaigns, corporations and interest groups.” [7]

      At the time, “Tentative venues” for the rallies included:

      • Perry GA 
      • Detroit MI 
      • Roswell NM 
      • Greensboro NC 
      • Farmington NM 
      • Ohio (venue being finalized) 
      • Greeley CO 
      • Nashville TN 
      • Indiana (venue being finalized) 
      • Bismarck ND 
      • Tampa FL 
      • Sioux Falls SD 
      • Greenville SC 
      • Anchorage AK 
      • Joliet IL 
      • Charleston WV 
      • Fairfax VA 
      • Philadelphia PA 
      • Lincoln NE 
      • Missouri TBD 
      • Arkansas TBD

      In addition to API“Energy Citizens” is supported by the National Association of Manufacturers, American Farm Bureau, American Highway Users Alliance, National Black Chamber of Commerce, Small Business and Entrepreneurship Council, FreedomWorksAmerican Conservative UnionAmericans for Tax Reform, and Council for Citizens Against Government Waste.  [44]

      O'Dwyer's Magazine wrote that Energy Citizens “has loudly protested the EPA’s decision to have greenhouse gas emissions regulated under the Clean Air Act,” also noting that API members include Chevron, ConocoPhillips, ExxonMobil, GE, Halliburton and Shell. [45]

      Promotional flyers for the campaign warned that “Climate change legislation being considered in Washington will cause huge economic pain and produce little environmental gain,” reported The Wall Street Journal. [46]

      The EPA had estimated the climate bill would only cost U.S. households “About a postage stamp a day.” [47]

      Affiliations

      Resources

      1. APIPRESIDENTANDCEO,” American Petroleum Institute. Archived January 16, 2017. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/DGDLe

      2. “Jack N. Gerard” (PDF), Utah State University, March 17, 2016. Archived .pdf on file at DeSmog.

      3. Search for Lobbyist Name “Gerard, Jack.” Office of the Clerk, U.S. House of Representatives. Search performed January 18, 2017. Archived .xlsx on file at DeSmog.

      4. American Petroleum Institute,” OpenSecrets.org. Archived .xlsx on file at DeSmog. Accessed January 17, 2017.

      5. JACKGERARDOUTLINESMARKET-BASEDEMISSIONSREDUCTIONMODELINPRESSCALL,” American Petroleum Institute, November 16, 2015. Archived January 19, 2017. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/rpvNp 

      6. Steven Mufson. “Jack Gerard, the force majeure behind Big Oil,The Washington Post, April 7, 2012. Archived January 18, 2017. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/FPXdX

      7. Kevin Grandia. “Leaked Memo: Oil Lobby Launches Fake 'Grassroots' Campaign,” DeSmog, August 13, 2009.

      8. Peter H. Stone. “Jack Gerard, Top Oil Lobbyist, Positioned To Be Key Player In A Romney Administration,” The Huffington Post, October 29, 2012. Archived January 19, 2017. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/R8k3W

      9. Paul Blumenthal. “Mitt Romney’s Lobbyist Donations Boom In First Half Of 2012,The Huffington Post, August 2, 2012. Archived January 19, 2017. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/q9Czx

      10. Eliza Newline Carney. “Beltway Bundlers Have Mitt Romney Sitting Pretty,” Roll Call, June 13, 2012. Archived January 17, 2017. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/qyaqP

      11. Climate Change,” American Petroleum Institute. Archived March 9, 2016. Archive.is URhttps://archive.is/HxtGh

      12. Justin Gillis and Nicholas St. Fleur. “Global Companies Joining Climate Change Efforts,” The New York Times, September 23, 2015. Archived .pdf on file at DeSmog. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/xWPqu

      13. Kate Sheppard. “Oil And Gas Lobby Lays Out 2014 Agenda,” The Huffington Post, January 25, 2014. Archived January 19, 2017. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/Mxl4G

      14. “Jack N. Gerard (5-11-12),” YouTube video uploaded by user The City Club of Cleveland, May 16, 2012. Archived .mp4 on file at DeSmog.

      15. Anne C. Mulkern. “Oil group, climate bill supporters clash in summer campaigns,” Greenwire, August 17, 2010. Archived January 16, 2017. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/jTuti

      16. Jeanne Cummings. “Oil, gas industries ripe for makeover,” Politico, July 21, 2009. Archived January 18, 2017. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/JeTRi

      17. FACTBOX: Reaction to EPA's climate change declaration,” Reuters, December 7, 2009. Archived January 18, 2017. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/igbmT

      18. Phil Radford. “Dear Mr. Gerard” (PDF), Greenpeace, August 12, 2009. Archived .pdf on file at DeSmog. 

      19. API: Oil, gas industry will work with new administration,“ Oil & Gas Journal, November 5, 2008. Archived August 11, 2015.

      20. Daniel Whitten. “Obama May Put Renewable-Energy Plan Ahead of Climate Package,” Bloomberg, November 5, 2008. Archived September 11, 2014. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/YFmCO

      21. Edward John Craig. “A New Day for Planet Gore,” National Review, November 5, 2008. Archived March 9, 2016. Archived .pdf on file at DeSmogBlog.

      22. Jeffrey H. Birnbaum. “A Rising Star in the Hold-Your-Nose Industries,” The Washington Post, June 17, 2008. Archived January 17, 2017. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/naLl0

      23. 2017 State of American Energy keynote plus Q&A,” YouTube video uploaded by user Energy Tomorrow, January 6, 2017. Archived .mp4 on file at DeSmog.

      24. JACKGERARDDELIVERS 2017 STATEOFAMERICANENERGYADDRESS,” American Petroleum Institute, January 4, 2017. Archived January 17, 2017. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/A89rL

      25. Michael Tadeo. “API’S JACKGERARDCALLSONPRESIDENT-ELECTTRUMPTOAPPROVETHEDAKOTAACCESSPIPELINE,” American Petroleum Institute, December 4, 2016. Archived January 20, 2017. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/4Y7hz

      26. Jack N. Gerard. “Dear Administrator McCarthy” (PDF), American Petroleum Institute, August 12, 2016. Archived .pdf on file at DeSmog.

      27. Jack N. Gerard. “Dear Speaker Ryan and Democratic Leader Pelosi:” (PDF), American Petroleum Institute, May 18, 2016. Archived .pdf on file at DeSmog.

      28. Jack N. Gerard. “Dear Majority Leader McConnell and Democratic Leader Reid:” (PDF), American Petroleum Institute, January 28, 2016. Archived .pdf on file at DeSmog.

      29. JACKGERARD'S REMARKSTOTHEAMERICANASSOCIATIONOFBLACKSINENERGY,” American Petroleum Institute, February 26, 2015. Archived January 18, 2017. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/ATGZd

      30. TESTIMONYOFJACKGERARDBEFORETHEU.S.HOUSEOFREPRESENTATIVESONH.R. 4526, THE21STCENTURYENERGYWORKFORCEDEVELOPMENTJOBSINITIATIVEACTOF 2014,” American Petroleum Institute, September17, 2014. Archived January 18, 2017. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/ZCQbv

      31. JACKGERARDHOLDSPRESSCONFERENCEAHEADOFPRESIDENTOBAMA’S STATEOFTHEUNIONADDRESS,” American Petroleum Institute, January 12, 2015. Archived January 18, 2017. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/k22fs

      32. Jack N. Gerard. “Dear Chairman Upton and Ranking Member Waxman:” (PDF), American Petroleum Institute, April 29, 2014. Archived .pdf on file at DeSmog.

      33. Jack N. Gerard. “RE: Notice of Intent to Prepare a Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (SEIS) and to Conduct Scoping and to Initiate Consultation Under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act for the Proposed TransCanada Keystone XL Pipeline Proposed to Extend from Phillips, MT (the border crossing) to Steele City, NE (77 Fed. Reg. 36032-36034, June 15, 2012)” (PDF), American Petroleum Institute, July 30, 2012. Archived .pdf on file at DeSmog.

      34. Steven Mufson. “Petroleum institute’s numbers on oil policy a matter of dispute,” The Washington Post, April 6, 2012. Archived January 19, 2017. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/DP9wr

      35. Brendan DeMelle. “API’s New ‘Vote 4 Energy’ Ad Campaign Is Thinly Veiled Election Year Bullying,” DeSmog, January 4, 2012.

      36. “Dear Ms. Schapiro:” (PDF), Greenpeace, January 26, 2012. Archived .pdf on file at DeSmog.

      37. Steve Hargreaves. “Oil industry launches big election PR push,” CNN Money, January 5, 2012. Archived January 17, 2017. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/KSZgS 

      38. Jack Gerard won't reveal how much API spends on the 'Vote 4 Energy' ad campaign” YouTube Video uploaded by user PolluterWatch, March 7, 2012. Archived .mp4 on file at DeSmog.

      39. “Vote4Energy” (PDF), American Petroleum Institute, January 7, 2016. Archived .pdf on file at DeSmog.

      40. Jack N. Gerard. “RE: Letter from Mitch Bainwol, Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers (AAM), dated October 6, 2011 concerning 'Changes to US Retail Gasoline'” (PDF), American Petroleum Institute,  November 11, 2011. Archived .pdf on file at DeSmog.

      41. “Dear Administrator Jackson:” (PDF), American Petroleum Institute, October 20, 2011. Archived .pdf one file at DeSmog.

      42. Meeting Record,” White House Office of Management and Budget, August 16, 2011. Archived May 4, 2012. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/qF8fF

      43. Kate Sheppard. “Majority of ‘Energy Citizens’ rallies organized by oil-industry lobbyists,” Grist, August 22, 2009. Archived January 19, 2017. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/5bGpZ

      44. Alex Kaplun, “'Energy Citizens' Take Aim at Climate Legislation,” The New York Times, August 12, 2009. Archived Aug 11, 2015.

      45. Jon Gingerich. “The Politics of Climate Change,” O'Dwyer's, February 2010. Archived January 17, 2017. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/sDAlF

      46. Ian Talley. “Lobby Groups to Use Town Hall Tactics to Oppose Climate Bill,The Wall Street Journal, August 11, 2009. Archived January 17, 2017. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/qfxfV

      47. Ian Talley, “Lobby Groups to Use Town Hall Tactics to Oppose Climate Bill,” Washington Wire (Wall Street Journal Blog), August 11, 2009. Archived August 11, 2015.

      48. Corporate Council,” The Conservation Fund. Archived September 20, 2010. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/kSX5E

      49. Leadership,” Congressional Coalition on Adoption Institute. Archived January 18, 2017. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/bPFXN

      50. Josh Siegel. “Oil group chief boasts of America's 'energy abundance' while promoting climate change 'solutions',” Washington Examiner, January 9, 2018. Archived January 11, 2018. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/cOLit

      51. Steven Mufson. “Jack Gerard to step down as head of powerful American Petroleum Institute,” The Washington Post, January 17, 2018. Archived January 25, 2018. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/iaPDw

      52. CEO of major U.S. oil trade group to step down,” Axios, January 17, 2018. 

      53. A new general authority for the LDS Church is also a longtime lobbyist for oil, mining companies,” The Salt Lake Tribune, April 5, 2018. Archived April 20, 2018. Archive.is URL: https://archive.li/SeL2b

      Other Resources


      Mick Mulvaney

      $
      0
      0

      Mick Mulvaney

      Credentials

      • B.S.F.S., Georgetown University, Washington, D.C. (1989). [1]
      • J.D., University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, N.C. (1992). [1]

      Background

      John Michael “Mick” Mulvaney is a Representative from South Carolina. He was a member of the South Carolina state house of representatives from 2007 to 2009, member of the South Carolina Senate from 2009 to 2010, and elected as a Republican to the One Hundred Twelfth and to the three succeeding Congresses (January 3, 2011-present). [1] Mick Mulvaney was elected during the 2010 “Tea Party” wave.

      He received a degree in international economics, commerce, and finance from Georgetown University and a law degree from the University of North Carolina. Before working in government, Mulvaney practiced law for several years and then joined his family's real estate business. [2]

      Mick Mulvaney, chosen by President Trump to lead the Office of Management and Budget, is known as a budget “hawk” who has historically wished to cut federal spending. Mulvaney said he would restore budgetary and fiscal sanity […] after eight years of an out-of-control, tax-and-spend financial agenda” under the Obama administration. [3]

      According to the League of Conservation Voter's “National Environmental Scorecard,” Mick Mulvaney has a lifetime score of 7%, and a 2015 score of 3%, with the majority of his votes classified as “anti-environment.”

      Mulvaney has historically opposed funding for planned parenthood. In 2015, he called on House Republicans “to use every available tool to strip this organization [Planned Parenthood' of any and all taxpayer funds.”

      He has called Social Security a “Ponzi Scheme,” a view that he did not renounce at his 2017 confirmation hearing. [4],[5], [6], [7]

      Trump Pick as Director of the Office of Management and Budget

      In December, 2016, Donald Trump selected Mick Mulvaney for the position of Director of the Office of Management and Budget. [8]

      He’s a tremendous talent, especially when it comes to numbers and budgets,”  Trump said in a statement.

      The Club for Growth applauded Trump's choice of Mulvaney as Director of the Office of Management and Budget, announcing that “The days of the White House producing massive, ridiculous budgets that are dead on arrival on Capitol Hill are over.” Club for Growth president David McIntosh described Mick Mulvaney as  “a leader among economic conservatives, and the Trump Administration’s selection is a major victory for taxpayers and for all who want to see the downsizing of the federal government. […]” [9]

      Mulvaney's nomination could face some challenges, given his disclosure that he failed to pay taxes for a household employee in the early 2000s. The Atlantic reported that He had failed to pay more than $15,000 in taxes, noting that such disclosures have threatened the nominations of high-profile presidential picks in the past. [10]

      During his confirmation hearing, Muck Mulvaney made a number of statements at odds with the views of President Trump. For example, Mulvaney believed that tax increases could be on the table. Associated Press reported that Mulvaney said he would be open to increasing the amount of wages subject to the Social Security payroll tax, in addition to gradually raising the retirement age and other benefit cuts. While as a member of Congress Mulvaney had signed a pledge not to raise taxes, he has said “I will not be bound by that.” [11]

      Stance on Climate Change

      January 24, 2017

      At his confirmation hearing as nominee for director of the Office of Management and Budget, Mick Mulvaney said he did not believe climate change is a major risk. Sen. Tim Kaine (D-Va.) pressed Mick Mulvaney on his climate change views (video below): [12]

      Climate change driven partly by human-generated CO2 emissions is a huge risk ― agree or disagree?” Kaine asked.

      After trying to avoid the question, claiming that climate change was not part of the responsibilities of the OMB director, Kaine still demanded an answer. 

      I’m not asking about OMB. I’m off OMB now,” Kaine said. “Statement of fact, agree or disagree ― you’re gonna follow the facts ― climate change driven partly by human-generated CO2 emissions is a huge risk, agree or disagree?”

      I’m not convinced we’re at the point where we have to start to require American citizens to pay high prices ―” Mulvaney began to reply, before Kaine interjected.

      I’m just asking, do you agree with the fact. Is climate change driven by human-generated CO2 emissions a huge risk?” Kaine repeated.

      Yeah, I challenge the premise of your fact,” Mulvaney said.

      2010

      On his congressional bid website, archived in 2010, Mulvaney described climate change as “questionable science”: [13]

      “Energy independence, green technology, and innovation is something we should pursue as a nation. However, we shouldn’t seek to accomplish that by taxing people based on questionable science. Neither should we ignore domestic energy resources – coal, natural gas, oil – because of baseless claims regarding global warming.

      “I believe that making it easier to drill for and use domestic resources, build nuclear power plants, and develop new technologies is the best formula for ending the current energy regime, which essentially has us empowering governments and groups that are markedly anti-American.”

      Key Quotes

      September 9, 2016

      Mother Jones reports that in a September 9 Facebook post, Mulvaney questioned whether the federal government should be spending any money on scientific research: [14]

      “[D]o we need government-funded research at all,” he wrote. Mother Jones notes that Mulvaney appeared to have deleted his Facebook page since then. In his post, Mulvaney tries to justify his position on government-funded research by questioning the scientific consensus that the Zika virus causes the birth defect microcephaly. Mulvaney wrote: 

      “And before you inundate me with pictures of children with birth defects, consider this:

      Brazil's microcephaly epidemic continues to pose a mystery – if Zika is the culprit, why are there no similar epidemics in countries also hit hard by the virus? In Brazil, the microcephaly rate soared with more than 1,500 confirmed cases. But in Colombia, a recent study of nearly 12,000 pregnant women infected with Zika found zero microcephaly cases. If Zika is to blame for microcephaly, where are the missing cases? According to a new report from the New England Complex Systems Institute (NECSI), the number of missing cases in Colombia and elsewhere raises serious questions about the assumed connection between Zika and microcephaly.”

      An image of the full post below:

       Mulvaney on Zika Virus

      April 27, 2011

      Speaking at a town hall meeting in Rock Hill, Mick Mulvaney declared: [15]

      “Medicare as it exists today is finished.” 

      Top Campaign Contributors

      According to data from OpenSecrets.org, Koch Industries was consistently a top donor to Mick Mulvaney and his related Leadership PACs. Duke Energy was another consistent backer. View top ten donors below, or see the attached spreadsheet for Mick Mulvaney's campaign donors by year (.xlsx). [16]

      Contributor201220142016Grand Total
      Blue Cross/Blue Shield$15,000$30,500$4,750$50,250
      Koch Industries$12,000$18,000$20,000$50,000
      American Financial Services Assn$5,000$18,000$15,000$38,000
      National Auto Dealers Assn$15,000$10,000$10,000$35,000
      Tucker Lumber$15,000$13,200$28,200
      Duke Energy$8,000$10,000$10,050$28,050
      American Bankers Assn$7,500$10,000$10,000$27,500
      Credit Union National Assn$10,250$10,000$5,000$25,250
      Delta Air Lines$2,500$12,100$10,200$24,800
      American Society of Anesthesiologists$7,500$10,000$6,000$23,500
      Investment Co Institute$12,000$10,000$22,000
      Scana Corp$6,500$9,000$6,000$21,500
      CM Tucker Lumber Companies$2,500$5,200$12,800$20,500
      AFLAC Inc$5,000$7,500$7,500$20,000
      National Assn of Insurance & Financial Advisors$10,000$10,000$20,000
      Ernst & Young$10,000$10,000$20,000

      Key Deeds

      January 24, 2017

      Mick Mulvaney appeared for his confirmation hearing to become director of the Office of Management and Budget. Full video below: [17]

      During his confirmation hearing, Mulvaney said that Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid would need significant changes. Mulvaney said that he would not propose cutting Social Security or Medicare benefits for those already receiving them. [18]

      I’m not making my parents go back to work,” Mulvaney said. [18]

      However, he also added that younger workers should expect to work longer than their parents. 

      I think folks on Social Security and Medicare ought to be really worried,” said Sen. Debbie Stabenow, D-Mich. “The alarm bells should be going off right now.” [18]

      Senator Bernie Sanders read quotes from Trump's campaign where Trump had said he would not cut the benefit programs.   

      The only thing I know to do is to tell the president the truth,” Mulvaney said. “I have to imagine that the president knew who he was getting,” he added. [18]

      On January 25, the Tea-Party-Affiliated FreedomWorks sent out social media advertising promoting Mulvaney as an OMB Director pick. The FreedomWorks ad reads: [19]

      “Yesterday, John McCain joined the Democrats to attack Rep. Mick Mulvaney, Trump's pick to head his OMB. This is wrong.

      Call John McCain at 202-883-5773 and tell him to stand with you and support Rep. Mick Mulvaney for OMB right now.”

      July, 2016

      Mich Mulvaney spoke at an event hosted by the John Birch Society, an “ultra-conservative” group known for its continued emphasis on the communist threat and described by some as an embarrassment for the right, reported Mother Jones. [20]

      Mulvaney's speech would address “the Federal Reserve's role in bailing out Europe.”

      Mother Jones obtained audio of the speech, noting that Mulvaney proceeded to criticize the Federal Reserve, saying its actions have “effectively devalued the dollar” and “choke[d] off economic growth.” He praised bitcoin as a currency that is “not manipulatable by any government.” He told his audience, “You all put out some really good stuff and it's always interesting.” He said he was “looking forward to reading The Shadows of Power,” a 1988 book by James Perloff with the subtitle “The Council on Foreign Relations and the American Decline.” The book advances conspiracy theories about the New York-based think tank, alleging that it advocates “the creation of a world government.” After referring to this book, he told the crowd, “Keep doing it.” [20]

      March 15, 2016

      Mick Mulvaney introduced a bill, H.R. 4745, that would allow nuclear waste to be stored in interim storage facilities. While Mulvaney didn't specify where the interim site would be, he said the material should not stay in South Carolina or at power plants in other states. [21], [22]

      Power plants “are in the power generation business,’’ he said. “They’re not supposed to be in the waste-management business. The whole idea is the best way to manage this stuff was to put it at one site.’’ [22]

      August 13, 2014

      Mick Mulvaney was one of 54 members of Congress to sign an letter to the House Leadership calling to end the Wind Production Tax Credit. [23]

      “[W]e believe Congress should stop picking winners and losers and finally end the wind PTC,” the letter concludes. ” We applaud Chairman Camp’s leadership on this important issue and urge you to stand firm with him in opposition to extending this provision and allow the wind energy to compete on its own.” [23]

      July 11, 2014

      Mick Mulvaney was a co-sponsor of bill H.R.5078, which would prevent the expansion of the Waters of the United States. [24], [25]

      May 12, 2011

      Mick Mulvaney was one of those who voted “yes” on Reversing President Obama's Offshore Moratorium Act (Bill H.1231). The bill would open up the outer Continental Shelf to drilling, an area containing an estimated 2.5 billion barrels of oil, and more than 7.5 trillion cubic feet of natural gas. [26], [27]

      April 7, 2011

      Mick Mulvaney voted “yes” to bar the EPA from regulating greenhouse gases. From the congressional summary, the Energy Tax Prevention Act (Bill H.910): [28], [29]

      • Excludes GHGs from the definition of “air pollutant” for purposes of addressing climate change.
      • Exempts from such prohibition existing regulations on fuel efficiency, research, or CO2 monitoring.
      • Repeals and makes ineffective other rules and actions concerning GHGs.

      July 27, 2010

      Mick Mulvaney signed the “No Climate Tax” pledge (PDF) sponsored by Americans for Prosperity, the Competitive Enterprise Institute, the National Taxpayers Union, and the Institute for Liberty. His pledge reads as follows: [30]

      “I, Mick Mulvaney, pledge to the taxpayers of the State of South Carolina and to the American people that I will oppose any legislation related to climate change that includes a net increase in government revenue.” [30]

      April, 2010

      Mick Mulvaney was a signatory to the 2010 Contract from America, a legislative agenda put forward by the Tea Party movement and unveiled the day before Tea Party Protests scheduled to be held across the country on April 15, Tax Day. The contract took inspiration from the Contract With America, released by Representative Newt Gingrich and fellow Republicans in the 1994 midterm elections, reports The New York Times. [31], [32]

      Oneof the contract's “agenda items” is to “Reject Cap & Trade” and “Stop costly new regulations that would increase unemployment, raise consumer prices, and weaken the nation’s global competitiveness with virtually no impact on global temperatures.” [33]

      Contract from America describes itself as a “a grassroots-generated, crowd-sourced, bottom-up call for real economic conservative and good governance reform in Congress.” The Contract from America website launched in September 1, 2009 and the final contract was revised until it was released in April, 2010. According to their website, the contract received support from individuals from groups including FreedomWorks, National Taxpayers' Union, Liberty Central, American Solutions, Regular Folks United, and various tea party groups. [34]

      “Founding Partners” listed on the Contract from America website include:

      Affiliations

      Social Media

      Publications

      Mick Mulvaney has published or co-published a range of Op-Eds and article. See some samples below:

      Resources

      1. MULVANEY, Mick, (1967 - ),Biographical Directory of the United States Congress. Archived February 10, 2017. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/Il74W 

      2. Rep. Mick Mulvaney,” Conservative Review. Archived February 10, 2017. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/zxREj

      3. Trump picks budget 'hawk' Mick Mulvaney to lead budget office,” The Guardian, December 17, 2016. Archive.is URL:  https://archive.is/yZATW

      4. Representative Mick Mulvaney (R),” League of Conservation Voters. Archived February 10, 2017. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/9b1dR

      5. Rep. Mulvaney Leads Letter to House Leadership in Defund Planned Parenthood Effort,”  United States Congressman Mick Mulvaney, July 29, 2015. Archived February 11, 2017. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/uYDJi

      6. Ben Weyl. “Mick Mulvaney: What to watch,” Politico, January 24, 2017. Archived February 10, 2017. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/mBAaE

      7. Michael McAuliff. “Trump’s Budget Nominee Still Thinks Social Security Is A Ponzi Scheme, The Huffington Post, January 30, 2017. Archived February 10, 2017. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/78NOz

      8. Michael D. Shear. “Trump Picks Mick Mulvaney, South Carolina Congressman, as Budget Director,” The New York Times, December 16, 2016. Archived .pdf on file at DeSmog. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/Ic6bN

      9. Doug Sachtleben. “CLUBFORGROWTHAPPLAUDSCHOICEOFMULVANEYTOHEADOMB,The Club for Growth, December 17, 2016. Archived February 7, 2017. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/K32L3

      10. Russell Berman. “Mick Mulvaney's Unpaid Taxes,” The Atlantic, January 18, 2017. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/1Bxhh

      11. Associated Press. “Mick Mulvaney, Trump's OMB pick, faces questions at Senate hearing,” CBS News, January 24, 2017. Archived February 8, 2017. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/CnEgO

      12. Daniel Marans. “Trump Budget Director Pick Does Not Believe Climate Change Is A Major Risk,The Huffington Post, January 24, 2017.  Archived February 7, 2017. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/8S0Lh

      13. Issues: Enough is Enough,” Mick Mulvaney. Archived July 22, 2010. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/ezh9P

      14. Pena Levy. “Trump's Pick for Budget Director Isn't Sure the Government Should Fund Scientific Research,” Mother Jones, December 19, 2016. Archived February 7, 2017. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/xrUGQ

      15. Jamie Self. “Mulvaney in York Co.: Budget a bipartisan mess,” The Herald, April 28, 2011. Archived February 11, 2017. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/yExXT

      16. Mick Mulvaney,” OpenSecrets.org. Data retrieved February 10, 2017.

      17. Andrew V. Pestana. “Watch live: Mick Mulvaney's budget director confirmation hearing,” UPI, January 24, 2017. Archived February 10, 2017. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/H1Dxu

      18. Stephen Ohlemacher. “Trump budget pick says benefit programs must be changed,“ The Seattle Times, January 24, 2017. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/Acvbm

      19. Yesterday, John McCain joined the Democrats to attack Rep. Mick Mulvaney, Trump's pick to head his OMB. This is wrong. […]” Facebook post by FreedomWorks, January 25 at 3:43 PM. Archived .png on file at DeSmog.

      20. Trump's Budget Director Pick Spoke at a John Birch Society Event,” Mother Jones, December 19, 2016. Archived February 8, 2017. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/9JE19

      21. H.R.4745 - Interim Consolidated Storage Act of 2016,” Congress.gov, March 15, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/t36Yn

      22. Mulvaney introduces bill to move nuclear waste,” The State, March 18, 2016. Archived February 17, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/0Z4sA

      23. (Press Release). “54 Members of Congress Write House Leadership In Support of Concluding Crony System,” U.S. Congressman Mike Pompeo, August 13, 2014. Archived July 8, 2015. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/Gx7cF

      24. Summary: H.R.5078 — 113th Congress (2013-2014),” Congress.gov. Archived February 10, 2017. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/g6rZh

      25. Cosponsors: H.R.5078 — 113th Congress (2013-2014),” Congress.gov. Archived February 10, 2017. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/yPHa4

      26. FINALVOTERESULTSFORROLLCALL 320,” Clark.house.gov, May 12, 2011. Archived February 8, 2017. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/wOG42

      27. H.R.1231 - Reversing President Obama's Offshore Moratorium Act” Congress.gov. Archived February 8, 2017. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/coFI9

      28. FINALVOTERESULTSFORROLLCALL 249,” Clerk.house.gov, April 7, 2011. Archived February 8, 2017. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/arPvo

      29. H.R.910 - Energy Tax Prevention Act of 2011: 112th Congress (2011-2012),” Congress.gov. Archived February 8, 2017. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/4uAvA

      30. “NoClimateTax.com Pledge” (PDF), Retried from NoClimateTax.com. Archived .pdf on file at DeSmog.

      31. WESUPPORTTHECONTRACTFROMAMERICA Contract from America. Archived February 10, 2017. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/SQCFV

      32. Bernie Becker. “A Revised Contract for America, Minus ‘With’ and Newt,” The New York Times, April 14, 2010. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/Ioe5T

      33. AMAZINGTHINGSTHATBRINGPOSITIVERESULTS,” Contract from America. Archived February 10, 2017. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/CYViB

      34. About Us,” Contract from America. Archived February 10, 2017. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/0IWqo

      35. Club for Growth PAC Endorses David Schweikert in AZ-05,” Club for Growth, September 7, 2010. Archived November 15, 2012. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/lqMUb 

      36. Lauren French. “9 Republicans launch House Freedom Caucus,Politico, January 26, 2015. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/GwRIm

      37. Susan Ferrechio. “Conservative lawmakers form House Freedom Caucus,” Washington Examiner, January 26, 2015. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/YmPeG

      38. Shannon Travis. “Who is the Tea Party Caucus in the House?CNN, July 29, 2011. Archived February 11, 2017. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/FqFLt

      Other Resources

      Rick Perry

      $
      0
      0

      Rick Perry

      Credentials

      • Rick Perry graduated Texas A&M University in 1972. He majored in animal science. [1]

      Background

      Former Texas Republican Governor James Richard (Rick) Perry is Donald Trump's pick to lead the U.S. Department of Energy, approved for the position in January 2017. [2], [3]

      Rick Perry served as the 47th governor of Texas, sworn in on December 21, 2000 and was elected to four-year terms in 2002, 2006, and 2010. Perry began his political career in 1985, working as a representative for a rural West Texas district in the state House of Representatives. He was elected to statewide office in 1990, and served as Texas Commissioner of Agriculture for two terms. Perry graduated Texas A&M University in 1972. [1]

      Following Rick Perry's appointment by Donald Trump as Energy Secretary, Perry resigned from his position on the board of Energy Transfer Partners, the company behind the controversial Dakota Access Pipeline. [4]

      In the past, Perry has said that global warming is an unproven scientific theory and that climate has changed since the Earth was formed. He has also opposed the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), suing the agency on the climate issue in 2010. He has also advocated to reduce restrictions on oil and gas drilling, saying that there is little proof that hydraulic fracturing (fracking) contaminates groundwater. Perry is the author of Fed Up!, a 2010 book where he speculated that the earth was “experiencing a cooling trend.” [5], [6]

      During his 14 years as governor, Texas filed 19 lawsuits agains the EPA. Perry has also called the EPA a “cemetery for jobs.” [7]

      Rick Perry & the U.S. Energy Department

      Rick Perry made what the Washington Post described as “the worst stumble of the presidential campaign” during a 2011 Republican presidential debate when he struggled to remember the name of the third federal agency he would eliminate if he became president (the Energy Department, which he now runs). Video below. [8]

      It is three agencies of government when I get there that are gone,” he said, beginning to lay out one of the staples of his stump speech. “Commerce, Education, and the — what’s the third one there? Let’s see,” Perry said.

      Commerce and, let’s see,” he continued. “I can’t. The third one, I can’t. Sorry. Oops.” [8]

      In 2016, The New York Times (NYT) discussed Perry as the pick as Energy Secretary, noting that Perry would be heading a post that he once wanted to eliminate. NYTnotes that the agency is far more devoted to national security than it is to the extraction of fossil fuels that is Perry's expertise. [9]

      The Rick Perry choice is so perplexing,” said former Senator Byron L. Dorgan, Democrat of North Dakota, who previously led the committee that oversees the Energy Department’s budget.

      I think very few people understand that the Energy Department, to a very substantial degree, is dealing with nuclear weapons,” he said. “And Rick Perry suggested the agency should be abolished. That suggests he thinks it doesn’t have value.”  [9]

      Mother Jones noted a potential conflict of interest in Perry's position on nuclear waste given his past association with Waste Control Specialists (WCS), a company eager to get in on interim storage for nuclear waste that applied for a license with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission in 2016. [10]

      WCS had formerly lobbied the Texas legislature for six years in order to pass legislation that would allow private companies to be responsible for low-level nuclear waste. That legislation passed in 2003 and was signed by Perry. When WCS applied for a state license to handle waste, a panel of state engineers and geologists found in 2007 that groundwater contamination at the proposed disposal sate was “highly likely.”   [10]

      Despite this, members on the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (appointed by Perry) signed off on the license. Three staffers at the agency resigned in protest over the decision. “We knew from the beginning that this permit was intended to be issued,” Glenn Lewis, a member of the review panel, said in a 2011 interview with NPR.  [10]

      Critics noted that Harold Simmons, since deceased, had been one of Perry's largest financial contributors over the years, contributing over $1.3 million to  his campaigns.  [10]

      “Lo and behold, the company that lobbied to get the legislation passed and gave lots of political contributions was the only applicant, so it was a real corporate sweetheart deal,” Cyrus Reed of the Texas Sierra Club said. [10]

      Climate change denier Kathleen Hartnett-White, whom Perry appointed to the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality from 2001 to 2007, called Perry’s leadership “a win for the environment and a win for the economy.” [11]

      Energy Industry Connections

      Some critics brought up potential conflicts of interest regarding Perry's appointment at the Energy Department, noting he sat as a board member for two pipeline companies that are part of Energy Transfer, the group behind the controversial Dakota Access Pipeline among others in South Texas. [12], [13]

      “I don't know if you could have a worse pick for Secretary of Energy than a person who is so much in bed with the fossil fuel energy sector,” said Robin Schneider, executive director of Texas Campaign for the Environment.

      Rick Perry has received more than $11 million from 1998 to 2010 in campaign contributions from the Oil and Gas industry. Top oil and energy industry contributors include $189,188 from ExxonMobil, $147,895 from Valero Energy, and $116,000 from Koch Industries[2], [14]

      In February, 2015, Rick Perry was named a board member of Energy Transfer PartnersDeSmog reported that while Perry promised he would not publicly advocate for the Dakota Access pipeline in Iowa, he had already promoted the pipeline just two days prior to his appointment on the board of the company. Energy Transfer Partners CEO Kelcy Warren, a major donor who contributed $250,000 to Perry's 2012 presidential super PAC, was on the advisory board of Rick PAC which helped fund Perry's 2016 presidential campaign. Warren contributed a total of $6 million to Super PACs supporting Perry. [15]

      Rick Perry & The EPA

      Rick Perry sued the EPA multiple times between 2009 and 2011. When 17 states sued the EPA over new regulations that would control global warming, Texas was the only state to pursue an “unfriendly” approach, as described by the National Journal. While other states simultaneously worked on plans of compliance with the EPA in case their lawsuits fell through, Texas was the only state that did not opt for what experts described as the “friendly FIP [federal implementation program].” Perry made it clear that Texas would not comply. [16]

      Talking with The Texas Observer, Ken Kramer of the Sierra Club compared Perry with George W. Bush's time as governor: [17]

      I never felt that Bush was anti-environmental so much as clueless about the environment,” said Kramer. “I see Perry as more proactively carrying out an anti-environmental agenda primarily for political purposes.”

      Perry said that, in suing the EPA, the state was “defend[ing] Texas’s freedom to continue our successful environmental strategies free from federal overreach.” [2]

      Stance on Climate Change

      January, 2017

      Speaking in prepared testimony on global warming, Perry said: [18]

      I believe some of it is naturally occurring, but some of it is also caused by man-made activity.”  

      The question is how do we address it in a thoughtful way that doesn’t compromise economic growth, the affordability of energy or American jobs,” he added. [18]

      Dallas News reports that he said flatly that “climate is changing” and that some of the cause is human activity. [19]

      June, 2014

      Speaking with reporters at a hotel near the White House, Rick Perry criticized Obama's policies on climate change and cutting carbon emissions. Speaking of oil and gas exploration, including the Keystone pipeline, Perry said: [20]

      “I don’t believe that we have the settled science by any sense of the imagination to stop that kind of economic opportunity.” [20]

      Perry also said that reducing the use of coal would “strangle our economy.” [20]

      “Calling CO2 a pollutant is doing a disservice the country, and I believe a disservice to the world,” he said. [20]

      I’m not a scientist,” he said. But “short term, I’m substantially more concerned about Iran changing the temperature of New York,” he said, alluding to potential nuclear conflict. [20]

      September 7, 2011

      Speaking at the 2012 Republican presidential debate, Rick Perry said climate change science was “not settled”: [21]

      “Well, I do agree that there is – the science is – is not settled on this. The idea that we would put Americans' economy at – at – at jeopardy based on scientific theory that's not settled yet, to me, is just – is nonsense. I mean, it – I mean – and I tell somebody, I said, just because you have a group of scientists that have stood up and said here is the fact, Galileo got outvoted for a spell. [21]

      But the fact is, to put America's economic future in jeopardy, asking us to cut back in areas that would have monstrous economic impact on this country is not good economics and I will suggest to you is not necessarily good science. Find out what the science truly is before you start putting the American economy in jeopardy.” [21]

      Responding to a followup question on whether there were “specific scientists or specific theories that you've found especially compelling,” Perry said: [21]

       “Let me tell you what I find compelling, is what we've done in the state of Texas, using our ability to regulate our clean air. We cleaned up our air in the state of Texas, more than any other state in the nation during the decade. Nitrous oxide levels, down by 57 percent. Ozone levels down by 27 percent. [21]

      That's the way you need to do it, not by some scientist somewhere saying, “Here is what we think is happening out there.” The fact of the matter is, the science is not settled on whether or not the climate change is being impacted by man to the point where we're going to put America's economics in jeopardy.” [21]

      August, 2011

      Speaking to an audience of voters in Bedford, N.H., Rick Perry claimed that global warming was an unproven theory and that scientists had been manipulating data: [5]

      We are seeing almost weekly, or even daily, scientists are coming forward and questioning the original idea that man-made global warming is what is causing the climate to change. Yes, our climate's changed — they've been changing ever since the Earth was formed.” [5]

      Without referencing sources, Perry said that implementing “anti-carbon programs” would cost billions of dollars. [5]

      “I don't think, from my perspective, that I want America to be engaged in spending that much money on what is still a scientific theory that hasn't been proven, and from my perspective is more and more being put into question,” he said. [5]

      Again, without citing sources, Perry claimed: [5]

      “[T]here are a substantial number of scientists who have manipulated data so that they will have dollars rolling into their projects.” [5]

      2010

      The Washington Post reported that Perry's book Fed Up! outlined a number of his views on climate change, where he mentioned things like “doctored data” and “so-called science.” [22]

      “It's all one contrived phoney mess that is falling apart under its own weight,” he declared. “Al Gore is a prophet all right, a false prophet of a secular carbon cult.”

      According to The Texas Observer, Perry also speculated that the planet was “experiencing a cooling trend.” [6]

      Key Quotes

      March 7, 2018

      During his speech at CERA Week Perry claimed it was “immoral” for poor nations to pivot away from fossil fuels: [51]

      Look those people in the eyes that are starving and tell them you can’t have electricity,” Perry said in his speech. “Because as a society we decided fossil fuels were bad. I think that is immoral.” [51]

      January 2017

      In 2017, after being chosen by President-elect Donald Trump to lead the Department of Energy, Perry said that he regretted his previous statements about eliminating the very department he sought to lead. In his confirmation hearing, Perry said: [23], [24] 

      My past statements made over five years ago about abolishing the Department of Energy do not reflect my current thinking,” Perry said during his confirmation hearing. “In fact, after being briefed on so many of the vital functions of the Department of Energy, I regret recommending its elimination.”

      February 27, 2015

      Speaking at the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC), Rick Perry said that he cares about “real pollution,” but not about reducing carbon dioxide emissions. He said Texas “decreased our nitrogen oxide levels, which by the way is real. It’s a real emission. He then highlighted emissions reductions that took place while he was governor. “Our carbon dioxide levels were down, whether you believe in this whole climate change concept or not,” he said. [25]

      December 18, 2011

      Rick Perry reacted after a student questioned his support for fracking during an event in Decorah, Iowa, Politico reported: [26]

      “We can have this conversation, but you cannot show me one place — not one! — where there is a proven pollution of groundwater by hydraulic fracturing,” Perry told 22-year-old Carrie Kaufmann, a student at Luther College. “I am truly offended that the American public would be hoodwinked by stories that do not scientifically hold up.” 

      October 12, 2011

      Speaking to a crowd of Hoosier State Republicans, Perry accused the Obama administration of pursuing an “activist agenda”: [27]

      “The next economic boom is right under our feet. Our own oil resources alone are vast enough to meet the next 300 years of energy demand at today's levels,” he said. “… And what has been this administration's response to our energy potential? They've thrown up every bureaucratic obstacle possible in order to advance an activist agenda.” [27]

      September, 2011

      Speaking with a Tea Party group, Rick Perry described the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as a “cemetery for jobs”: [28]

      ”[…] EPA, we don't need you monkeying around and fiddling around and getting in our business on every kind of regulation that you can dream up. You're doing nothing more than killing jobs. It is a cemetery for jobs, at the EPA.” [28]

      September, 2006

      In a September 2006 op-ed, Rick Perry accused an “extreme element of the environmental community” for opposing coal plants: [29]

      “ I would argue they want to return us to the era of horse and buggy except they would probably complain about the methane gas from horse manure, too,” Perry wrote. [29]

      2010

      The Texas Observer notes that in his book Fed Up!, Perry (or his ghostwriter) writes: [17]

       “EPA in particular illustrates how Washington’s command-and-control environmental bureaucracy is destroying federalism and individuals’ ability to make their own economic decisions.”  [17]

      Key Deeds

      March 16, 2018

      In an interview with the Washington Examiner, Perry said he didn't plan on leaving his post at the Department of Energy to replace Veteran Affairs Secretary David Shulkin[52], [53]

      “The president knows I like where I am,” Perry said. “He knows that we have done a really good job of keeping this agency focused, particularly in those areas he is interested in: selling American, running an agency effectively.”

      Perry said he and President Trump had discussed a range of issues, but did not talk about changing jobs. 

      We talked about a lot of different things,” Perry said. “What he didn’t talk about was me changing jobs. I know there is a lot of interest in that in the last 48 to 72 hours.”

      During the Washington Post interview, Perry became defensive when the topic of wind and solar power came up and he was asked about advancing coal:

      We're not here just to promote the fossil fuels,” Perry said. “We're here to promote wind, and solar, and hydro, and maybe some forms of energy that we haven't even dreamed up yet.”

      But for the foreseeable future, fossil fuels are going to play a really important role, not just in America, but in the world,” he said.

      March 7, 2018

      Perry was a speaker at CERA Week, an annual energy conference in Houston, Texas that attracts a range of energy company executives and leaders of oil producing countries. During his speech, Perry touted “enery realism,” ThinkProgress reported[51]

      We don’t need to choose between growing our economy and caring for our environment,” he said. “That is at the heart of this new energy realism.” [51]

      According to Perry, “clean” fossil fuels are the future, and a focus on renewables isn't the answer. “Listen, we support renewables,” he told the audience, but suggested that the focus under the Paris agreement was not the right approach. “What are we supposed to do in the meantime?” he asked, pointing to projections that fossil fuels aren't going anywhere soon. [51]

      During his speech, Perry claimed it was “immoral” for poor nations to pivot away from fossil fuels. [51]

      September 29, 2017

      Perry pushed for sent a proposed rule to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) to speed the approval of a proposal which would ensure that nuclear and coal plants received compensation for the “resilience” they give to the power grid,The Washington Examiner reported. [48]

      “A reliable and resilient electrical grid is critical not only to our national and economic security, but also to the everyday lives of American families,” Perry said in a letter accompanying the rule. “A diverse mix of power generation resources, including those with on-site reserves, is essential to the reliable delivery of electricity — particularly in times of supply stress such as recent natural disasters. My proposal will strengthen American energy security by ensuring adequate reserve resource supply and I look forward to the Commission acting swiftly on it.”

      Representatives from the coal industry approved Perry's move. [48]

      “We urge FERC to act swiftly on this important proposal,” said Hal Quinn, the president of the National Mining Association. “Secretary Perry's action today is a long-overdue and necessary step to address the vulnerability of America's energy grid.”

      Advocates for both natural gas and renewables were critical of Perry's proposal: [49]

      “We worry today's proposal would upend competitive markets that save consumers billions of dollars a year,” said Amy Farrell, a senior vice president for American Wind Energy Association.

      Don Santa of the Interstate Natural Gas Association of America said the plan would favor “a very limited set of fuels and technologies.”

      June 19, 2017

      In an interview with CNBC's “Squawk Box,” Rick Perry said that he doesn't believe man-made CO2 emissions are a primary driver of climate change. [45]

      Asked if carbon doixide was the main driver, Perry replied: [45]

      “No, most likely the primary control knob is the ocean waters and this environment that we live in.”

      “The fact is this shouldn't be a debate about, 'Is the climate changing, is man having an effect on it?' Yeah, we are. The question should be just how much, and what are the policy changes that we need to make to effect that?” he added. [45]

      The Washington Post notes that Perry's comments echo those of and Environmental Protection Agency administrator Scott Pruitt, who also said he didn't believe CO2 was a major driver of climate change on the program in March. [46]

      “Both men’s views contradict the conclusions of scientists at Pruitt’s own EPA as well as NASA, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and the United Nations’ Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change,” the Post adds. [46]

      ThinkProgress also covered Perry's announcement, accusing CNBC's host of having “failed to perform the most basic fact checking,”and writing that “Perry’s denial of the role of CO2 in global warming is wrong, according to science.” [47]

      January 19, 2017

      Rick Perry attended his confirmation hearing for his position to lead the U.S. Department of Energy where he addressed questions about his previous statements about eliminating the very department he sought to lead. Full video below. [30]

      Perry said that he regretted his past statements about the department: [23], [24] 

      My past statements made over five years ago about abolishing the Department of Energy do not reflect my current thinking,” Perry said during his confirmation hearing. “In fact, after being briefed on so many of the vital functions of the Department of Energy, I regret recommending its elimination.”

      August 15, 2014

      Rick Perry was indicted by a Travis Country grand jury (PDF) for two charges: The first was abuse of official capacity for threatening to veto $7.5 million in funding for the Public Integrity Unit. The second charge was coercion of a public servant, for seeking the resignation of Travis County District Attorney Rosemary Lehmberg. Perry pleaded not guilty to both charges, and has since been cleared on all charges. [31], [32], [33]

      June 23-26, 2011

      In his capacity as chairman of the Republican Governors Association, Rick Perry was an attendee of the Koch brothers' private retreat at the Bachelor Gulch. [34]

      According to Perry's spokesman, Mark Miner, Perry “discussed the need to elect more Republican Governor's around the country.”  Miner said that “This was no different than other speeches the governor gives talking about job creation and the economy in Texas.” He added that Perry “flew on a private plane and no taxpayer dollars were used.” [34]

      April, 2006

      Mother Jones reported, in an article titled “Rick Perry's Dirty Deals With Big Coal,” that Perry signed an executive order to fast-track the approval of new coal-fired power plants in Texas. The order shortened the process that previously took several years to a matter of months. At the same time, “Perry was raking in tens of thousands of dollars in donations from TXU,” the largest utility and CO2-emitter in the state. [35]

      “Perry is very pro-coal, and will bend over backward to do whatever the coal industry asks of him,” said Tom Smith, director of Public Citizen's Texas office. “He's the longest ongoing natural disaster in Texas history.”

      The Texas Observer noted that on the same day that Perry issued the order, retired TXU chairman Erle Nye gave $2,000 to Perry’s campaign while TXU sources donated a total of $104,000 to Perry during his 2006 re-election bid. Between 2001 and 2011, Perry took more than $630,000 in contributions from TXU. [17][2]

      Only three of the proposed 11 powerplants were eventually built. [2]

      April, 2014

      In 2014, Perry wrote a letter to the Texas House urging lawmakers “to develop a Texas solution for the long-term resolution of [high-level waste] currently residing inside our borders.” [36]

      While he did not specify Waste Control Specialists in the letter, he did mention to a local tv station that there was “a legitimate site in West Texas.” [36]

      Sure. I think there are a couple of sites in the State of Texas that the local communities actively are pursuing that possibility,” Perry told KCBD. [36]

      In addition to the letter, Perry forwarded a 49-page report by the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, outlining storage options for high-level nuclear waste in Texas. [37]

      Finding a site that has local and state support would greatly enhance the chance of a private centralized interim storage site being successfully sited and constructed,” the report concludes. [37]

      2003

      Rick Perry signed a bill to privatize nuclear waste disposal in Texas. The legislation was tailored for Waste Control Specialists, a company owned by Harold Simmons, a Dallas billionare (now deceased) who was also one of Perry's largest financial supporters over the years. A panel of eight sate employees reviewed a disposal site proposed by WCS, working for for years to make their report. However they said that they knew the permit would be issued regardless of their findings: [38]

      “We knew from the beginning that this permit was intended to be issued,” said Glenn Lewis, who was on the panel. “The realization that Harold Simmons was a top campaign contributor to Gov. Perry,” Lewis said. [38]

      The panel, still, found that the waste site should not be buried so close to large aquifers: [38]

      “I am frankly surprised even now that a team of engineers and geologists, knowing what the political expectations were, still worked up the nerve to say, 'No, it's not safe,'” Lewis said. [38]

      WCS had their license approved by the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality. All three commissions on the panel had been appointed by  Perry, and they chose to ignore the environmental review. [38]

      One commissioner, Larry Soward, said that there were numerous complaints and that a call for a public hearing had been denied by the other commissioners. [38]

      “They voted to issue the license without sending it to a hearing, and I voted against that,” Soward said. “I think that generations to come are going to have a real problem from that site that they're going to have to deal with,” he added. [38]

      Also in 2003, Perry also signed a bill making permanent a tax break for “high cost” natural gas. [39]

      Affiliations

      Publications

      Rick Perry has authored a number of books including the following:

      Resources

      1. Texas Governor Rick Perry,” Office of the Governor Rick Perry. Archived May 24, 2011. Archived .pdf on file at DeSmog.

      2. Naveena Sadasivam. “Get Ready, America: Rick Perry’s Environmental and Energy Record is Awful,” The Texas Observer, December 14, 2016. Archived January 30, 2017. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/OfxYC

      3. Rick Perry confirmation vote: former Texas governor heads to full Senate,” CBS News, January 31, 2017. Archived February 1, 2017. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/Zg15Q

      4. Patrick Svitek. “Rick Perry resigns from board of Dallas company building Dakota Access Pipeline,” The Texas Tribune, January 5, 2017. Archived January 31, 2017. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/5CD69

      5. Maeve Reston. “Rick Perry calls global warming an unproven, costly theory,” Los Angeles Times, August 17, 2011. Archived February 7, 2017. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/9L5Q8

      6. Forrest Wilder. “2012 was Hottest Year on Record for Texas, U.S.The Texas Observer,  January 10, 2013. Archived February 7, 2017. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/qYPLE

      7. Neon Satija. “Texas vs. the Feds — A Look at the Lawsuits,” The Texas Tribune, January 17, 2017. Archived February 7, 2017. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/mfzqE

      8. Amy Gardner and Philip Rucker. “Rick Perry stumbles badly in Republican presidential debate,” The Washington Post, November 10, 2011. Archived February 1, 2017. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/saPkU

      9. Coral Davenport. “Rick Perry, Ex-Governor of Texas, Is Trump’s Pick as Energy Secretary,New York Times, December 13, 2016. Archived .pdf on file at DeSmog. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/Fo8Oa 

      10. Ashley DeJean. “Will Rick Perry Privatize America's Nuclear Waste Storage? Mother Jones, January 24, 2017. Archived February 7, 2017. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/ILglM

      11. Neon Satija. “The Perry Legacy: Environment,” The Texas Tribune, December 28, 2014. Archived February 7, 2017. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/aRfas

      12. Sophia Stamas. “Some call Trump administration job conflict of interest for Perry,” CBS Austin, December 13, 2016. Archived February 1, 2017. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/NSHPE

      13. Leif Reigstad. “Examining Rick Perry’s and Rex Tillerson’s Potential Conflicts of Interest,” Texas Monthly, December 19, 2016. Archived February 1, 2017. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/iJlit

      14. Brad Johnson. “Rick Perry Is Big Oil’s $11 Million Man,” ThinkProgress, August 15, 2011. Archived January 30, 2017. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/Sqb1o

      15. Steve Horn. “Facing Felony Charges, Rick Perry Joins Board of Energy Transfer Partners, Owner of Proposed Oil Pipeline Across Iowa,” DeSmog, February 6, 2015. 

      16. Coral Davenport. “Rick Perry’s Air War,” National Journal, September 10, 2011. Archived October 21, 2012. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/RBjdC

      17. Forrest Wilder. “Examining Rick Perry’s Environmental Record,” The Texas Observer, September 6, 2011. Archived January 30, 2017. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/ssICr

      18. Reena Flores. “Rick Perry regrets push to eliminate Energy Department,” CBS News, January 19, 2017. Archived February 1, 2017. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/YYi1u

      19. Tom Benning. “Rick Perry clears first hurdle to becoming energy secretary, signalling easy confirmation,” Dallas News, January 31, 2017. Archived February 7, 2017. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/04TiT

      20. Todd J. Gillman. “In DC, Gov. Rick Perry talks 2016, Ted Cruz, climate change, border security,” Dallas News, June, 2014. Archived February 7, 2017. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/iSogp

      21. The Republican Debate at the Reagan Library,The New York Times, September 7, 2011. Archived February 7, 2017. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/5b0pt

      22. Washington Post Editorial: Perry is no champion of science,” The Salt Lake Tribune, December 15, 2016. Archived February 7, 2017. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/RQPVw

      23. Michael Collins. “Rick Perry: I've changed my mind about eliminating Energy Dept.”USA Today, January 19, 2017. Archived January 31, 2017. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/VL237#selection-5007.0-5007.63

      24. What we learned from Rick Perry's confirmation hearing,” The Hill, January 19, 2017. Archived February 1, 2017. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/bOJHg

      25. Rebecca Leber. “Rick Perry: I Care About 'Real' Pollution, Not Climate Change,” New Republic, February 27, 2015. Archived February 7, 2017. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/eTppB

      26. Patrick Reis. “House to reject Senate Keystone, payroll pact - Utility MACT on tap this week - Rig sinks off Russian coast - Industry angry over GOP's light bulb bluster,” Politico, December 19, 2011. Archived February 7, 2017. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/nImVW

      27. Michael Conroy. “Perry gives Indiana audience a preview of his energy proposal,” CBS News, October 12, 2011. Archived February 7, 2017. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/nUnFL

      28. Rick Perry: EPA is 'cemetery for jobs',” YouTube video uploaded by user League of Conservation Votors, September 12, 2011. Archived .mp4 on file at DeSmog.

      29. Support for Sustainable Energy,” Office of the Governor Rick Perry, September 8, 2006. Archived June 24, 2010. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/PMWNu

      30. WATCHLIVE: Rick Perry confirmation hearing,” YouTube Video uploaded by user PBS NewsHour, January 19, 2017.

      31. INDICTMENT: Count I - Abuse of Official Capacity 39.02 DPS 23990064…” (PDF), Retrieved from Cnn.com. Archived July 17, 2014. Archived .pdf on file at DeSmog.

      32. Arlene Saenz. “Rick Perry Pleads Not Guilty to Felony Charges,”ABCNews, August 30, 2014. Archived August 30, 2014. Archive.is URL:  https://archive.is/U1rbD 

      33. Angela Morris. “Texas Court of Criminal Appeals Dismisses Former Governor Rick Perry's Criminal Case,” Texas Lawyer, February 24, 2016. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/xaHJj

      34. Perry, McDonnell at latest Koch summit,” Politico. Republished by Seattle pi, June 27, 2011. Archived February 7, 2017. Archived .pdf on file at DeSmog.

      35. Andy Kroll. “Rick Perry's Dirty Deals With Big Coal,” Mother Jones, September 21, 2011. Archived February 7, 2017. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/x2DZ1

      36. Forrest Wilder. “Is Rick Perry Cheerleading for a Nuclear Trans-Texas Corridor?The Texas Observer, April 4, 2014. Archived February 7, 2017. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/BK0Nq

      37. “Assessment of Texas's High Level Radioactive Waste Storage Options,”Texas Commission on Environmental Quality. Retrieved from DocumentCloud. Archived .pdf on file at DeSmog.

      38. Peter Overby. “Perry Donor's Radioactive Waste Site Deal Scrutinized,” NPR, September 15, 2011. Archived February 7, 2016. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/Wlhp2

      39. Jim Malewitz and Kiah Collier. “Rick Perry’s energy legacy is more complicated than you think,” The Texas Tribune, December 13, 2016. Archived February 7, 2017. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/Z21Ar

      40. William Petroski. “Rick Perry, exploring Iowa caucus bid, joins pipeline board,” The Des Moines Register, February 8, 2015. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/SRpE5

      41. David Saleh Rauf. “Rick Perry received more than $365,000 in 2015 total compensation for two corporate board positions,” San Antonio Express-News, April 22, 2016. Archived February 7, 2017. Archived .pdf on file at DeSmog.

      42. Director & Officer Biographies,” Sunoco Logistics. Archived January 18, 2017. Archived .pdf on file at DeSmog.

      43. Jonathan Martin. “Rick Perry to lead RGA,” Politico, November 12, 2010. Archived February 7, 2017.  Archived .pdf on file at DeSmog.

      44. Governor's Information: Texas Governor Rick Perry,” National Governors Association. Archived April 30, 2011. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/iVzEK 

      45. Energy Secretary Rick Perry says CO2 is not the main driver of climate change,” CNBC, June 19, 2017. Archived June 19, 2017. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/Ac4Mo

      46. Steve Mufson. “Rick Perry just denied that humans are the main cause of climate change,” The Washington Post, June 19, 2017. Archived June 19, 2017. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/x5ZhU

      47. Joe Romm, “CNBC allows Rick Perry to spout nonsense on live TV without any fact checking,” ThinkProgress, June 19, 2017. Archived June 19, 2017. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/XRNuT

      48. John Siciliano. “Rick Perry urges FERC protect coal, nuclear power plants,” The Washington Examiner, September 29, 2017. Archived September 30, 2017. Archive.is URL: http://archive.is/qdPEl

      49. David Koenig. “Administration favors change in electricity pricing,” SFGate, September 29, 2017. Archived October 2, 2017. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/jm2ny

      50. Energy Secretary Rick Perry says moving from fossil fuels to renewables is ‘immoral’,” ThinkProgress, March 8, 2018. Archive.is URLhttps://archive.is/Ybk04

      51. Rick Perry touts ‘new direction’ for energy policy based on Obama-era achievements,” ThinkProgress, March 7, 2018. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/bBsms

      52. Daily on Energy: Perry says renewables are part of his energy agenda,” Washington Examiner, March 16, 2018. Archived March 17, 2018. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/nIO0o

      53. Embattled VA secretary: 'I deeply regret' distractions at agency,” CNN, March 15, 2018. Archived March 17, 2018. Archive.is URL: https://archive.is/g97RS

      Other Resources

      Climate Change Denier Jim Inhofe Says EPA Is 'Brainwashing' Our Children

      $
      0
      0
      Read time: 2 mins
      James Inhofe

      In August 2016, Republican Senator and noted climate change denier Jim Inhofe told conservative radio host Eric Metaxas that children were being “brainwashed” into believing in climate change in school, and that we needed to “un-brainwash” them once they come out. This entire exchange (available here) arose from a conversation Inhofe claims to have had with his granddaughter because she dared ask him why he doesn’t believe in climate change.

      On March 16, 2017, more than eight months after Inhofe told Metaxas about this alleged brainwashing scam, the Senator decided to double-down on his previous comments. He told CNN’s New Day that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) was in the business of “brainwashing our kids” by releasing “propaganda” about climate change and the role that human beings are playing in the destruction of the planet.

      Inhofe was appearing on the program to defend the proposed budget cuts that are looming for the EPA. During his response to the budget cuts, Inhofe said the following, as reported by The Hill: “We want to deliver the services. We ought to make things clean … But we ought to take all this stuff that comes out of the EPA that's brainwashing our kids, that is propaganda, things that aren't true, allegations.”

      Under the budget proposals laid out by President Trump on Thursday, the EPA’s budget will be cut by about 31 percent, which will include the complete termination of at least 50 EPA programs and result in the firing of at least 3,200 employees from the federal agency. The budget specifically cuts $100 million from climate change–related programs including research and international cooperation.

      While Inhofe was willing to admit during his interview about the EPA that efforts like the Clean Air Act have provided cleaner air, he maintained that the agency is trying to brainwash children.

      Inhofe’s statements are sure to draw the ire of both the scientific community and the concerned public, but perhaps the biggest critics he should fear are those in his own family tree.

      As he personally pointed out in August, his own grandchildren don't understand his anti-science views on climate change, and those are the people who will feel the brunt of his anti-environmental legacy (such as the devastation of the Great Barrier Reef) more than Inhofe ever will.

      Main image: Senator Jim Inhofe (R-OK) speaking at the 2012 CPAC in Washington, D.C. Credit: Gage SkidmoreCCBY-SA 2.0

      Michael Hintze

      $
      0
      0

      Michael Hintze

      Credentials

      • MBA, Harvard Business School. [1]
      • MSC. in Acoustics, University of New South Wales. [1]
      • Doctor of Business, University of New South Wales. [1]
      • BSc. Physics and Pure Mathematics, University of Sydney. [1]
      • BEng. Electrical Engineering, University of Sydney. [1]

      Background

      Australian hedge fund manager Michael Hintze is one of the biggest donors to the UK’s Conservative Party and has been dubbed the godfather of Tory donors by some in the British press. He also donated money to the Brexit campaign and is one of the key funders of UK climate science denial thinktank the Global Warming Policy Foundation. [2], [3], [4]

      In 1999 Hintze launched his hedge fund Convertible & Quantitative Strategies (CQS) in London after stints at Goldman Sachs and Credit Suisse First Boston. In 2011, Hintze was also revealed as one of Liam Fox’s closest supporters. Hintze helped to bankroll office space and trips for Fox and colleagues involved with the now defunct libertarian thinktank the Atlantic Bridge. Hintze was also a member of the Atlantic Bridge’s advisory council along with Boris Johnson and Michael Gove. [2]

      Hintze is also a trustee and funder of the UK neoliberal thinktank the Institute of Economic Affairs. Hintze and his charitable family foundation have also donated to charities of the UK's Prince Charles, to restoration works in the Vatican, and to various organisations in the arts and museums world. The Hintze Hall in London's Natural History Museum was so named after a $5 million donation from the Hintze foundation. [5], [2], [6]

      Charitable Giving

      According to a search for “Michael Hintze” at the Electoral Commission, he gave at least the following amounts to political parties and candidates between 2002 and 2018: [7]

      View the attached spreadsheet for more details on Michael Hintze's political donations by year (.xlsx).

      Permitted Participant£225,000
      No Campaign Limited£25,000
      Vote Leave Limited£200,000
      Political Party£3,886,386
      Conservative and Unionist Party£3,886,386
      Regulated Donee£89,200
      Mr Adam Holloway MP£1,500
      Mr Boris Johnson MP£5,000
      The Rt Hon David Davis MP£11,000
      The Rt Hon David Willetts MP£25,000
      The Rt Hon Dr Liam Fox MP£10,000
      The Rt Hon George Osborne MP£37,500
      The Rt Hon Patrick McLoughlin MP£2,000
      The Rt Hon Theresa May MP£1,200
      Grand Total£4,204,586 

      Stance on Climate Change

      While Hintze avoids public statements, he is reportedly one of the earliest financial backers of the UK’s only climate science denial thinktank the GWPF. A dedicated supporter, he attended the group’s 2017 annual invitation-only lecture delivered by former Australian Prime Minister Tony Abbott. [8], [9]

      Key Quotes

      January 1, 2015

      “Markets are a good thing and they are the best way of ensuring we have fairness,” Hintze said in an interview with the Daily Mail.[10]

      Key Deeds

      October 2017

      Hintze attended the GWPF’s annual lecture given by former Australian Prime Minister Tony Abbott. [8][9]

      July 2016

      Hintze donated £100,000 to the Vote Leave campaign group on 22 June, the day before Britain headed to the polls to vote in the EU Referendum. [11]

      May 2014

      Through a family trust, the Hintze Family Charitable Foundation, Hintze and his wife donated £5 million to the Natural History Museum in London. This was the largest donation the museum had ever received in its 133-year history, and saw the renaming of the central hall to Hintze Hall. [12]

      The money will be used for scientific research and to maintain collections, it was reported at the time. “We feel privileged to be able to make a contribution towards securing this centre of scientific knowledge and research for present and future generations,” Hintze said. [12]

      October 2013

      Michael Hintze’s £3m 60th birthday bash was attended by senior Tory politicians Theresa May, Boris Johnson, William Hague, and Chris Grayling. [3]

      2009

      In 2009 Theresa May, then Conservative shadow minister for work and pensions, was the beneficiary of £1,200 in “hospitality” from Michael Hintze. [7]

      2007-2009

      Between 2007 and 2009 Hintze donated £11,000 to David Davis (note one donation is under a misspelling of “Hitnze”). [7]

      2007-2008

      In the run up to Boris Johnson's 2008 May London Mayoral Election, Michael Hintze donated the following: £2,000 in December 2007, £2,000 in February 2008, and £1,000 in March 2008. [7]

      January 2007

      Hintze donated £10,000 to Liam Fox, who at the time was the UK’s Defence Secretary and founder of the Atlantic Bridge. [7]

      Affiliations

      Social Media

      Publications

      Michael Hintze does not appear to have published any articles in mainstream news publications.

      Resources

      1. Sir Michael Hintze, AM,” LinkedIn. Accessed January 8, 2019. Archied .pdf on file at DeSmog.

      2. About,” Michael Hintze. Archived January 8, 2019. Archive.fo URL: https://archive.fo/GC9M6

      3. James Lyons. “Cabinet ministers and Boris lord it up at Tory donor's £3 MILLION birthday bash,” Mirror, October 29, 2013. Archived January 8, 2019. Archive.fo URL: https://archive.fo/VhWS0

      4. Graham Readfearn. “Michael Hintze revealed as funder of Lord Lawson's climate thinktank,” The Guardian, March 27, 2012. Archived January 8, 2019. Archive.fo URL: https://archive.fo/uKrgA

      5. Trustees,“ IEA. Archived January 8, 2019. Archive.fo URL: https://archive.fo/7HGYF

      6. Alexandra Rucki. “Natural History museum receives £5 million donation from philanthropists Sir Michael and Lady Hintze,” Evening Standard, May 8, 2014. Archived January 8, 2019. Archive.fo URLhttps://archive.fo/3IbPZ

      7. Electoral Commission Search performed January 8, 2019. Archived data on file at DeSmog.

      8. 2017 Annual GWPF Lecture. Tony Abbott MP - 'Daring to Doubt',” YouTube video uploaded by user “GWPF,” October 10, 2017. Archived .mp4 on file at DeSmog.

      9. Graham Readfearn. “Climate Scientists Attack Tony Abbott's 'Misleading' Speech to Global Warming Policy Foundation,” DeSmog, Octobe 9, 2017.

      10. Alex Brummer. “Dropping Hintze on global markets,” Daily Mail, January 1, 2015. Archived .pdf on file at DeSmog. Retrieved from PressReader.

      11. Vote Leave Limited, Cash (C0243562),” The Electoral Commission. Accessed January 8, 2019. Archived .pdf on file at DeSmog.

      12. Natural History Museum receives £5m donation,” BBC News, May 8, 2014. Archived January 8, 2019. Archive.fo URL: https://archive.fo/TchjL

      Other Resources

      Photo: Wikimedia Commons | CC2.0

      Owen Paterson

      $
      0
      0

      Owen Paterson

      Credentials

      • Bachelor of Arts (BA), History, Cambridge University. [1]

      Background

      Owen Paterson is MP for North Shropshire and a former environment secretary. He was appointed to the role in 2012 but was sacked by then prime minister David Cameron for fear his view that climate change was not a serious problem would cost the Conservative party votes in the 2015 general election. [2], [3]

      Paterson’s brother-in-law is Matt Ridley, a hereditary peer and advisor to the climate science denial campaign group, the Global Warming Policy Foundation. Paterson’s annual lecture to the GWPF in 2014 – in which he called for the UK to scrap the climate change act – was actually written by Ridley, it later emerged. [4], [5], [6], [7]

      After being sacked from the cabinet, Paterson set up the pro-Brexit thinktank UK2020, which sought to cut regulations and targets related to climate change. [8], [9]

      Stance on Climate Change

      October 2014

      In his lecture to the GWPF, later revealed to have been partly written by climate science denier Matt Ridley, Paterson said: [10]

      I readily accept the main points of the greenhouse theory. Other things being equal, carbon dioxide emissions will produce some warming. The question always has been: how much? On that there is considerable uncertainty.

      For, I also accept the unambiguous failure of the atmosphere to warm anything like as fast as predicted by the vast majority of climate models over the past 35 years, when measured by both satellites and surface thermometers. And indeed the failure of the atmosphere to warm at all over the past 18 years – according to some sources. Many policymakers have still to catch up with the facts.

      I also note that the forecast effects of climate change have been consistently and widely exaggerated thus far.”

      Key Quotes

      April 25, 2016

      Delivering a speech on “The Future of Europe” at a UK2020 event, Paterson concluded: [11]

      “It is Remain that is the leap in the dark.

      To vote Leave is the safe option.”

      ” […] I want to explain what Remain really means. And to assure those of you who are undecided, that to Leave really is the safe and benign option.”

      October 2014

      In his GWPFlecture[10]

      We are the only country to have legally bound ourselves to the 2050 targets – and certainly the only one to bind ourselves to a doomed policy. In the absence of a legally binding international agreement, which looks unlikely given disagreement within EU member states and the position of the BRIC countries, the Climate Change Act should be effectively suspended and eventually repealed.”

      I remain open-minded to the possibility that climate change may one day turn dangerous. So, it would be good to cut emissions, as long as we do not cause great suffering now for those on low incomes, or damage today’s environment.

      July 19, 2014

      Following his being fired from his position as Environment Secretary, Paterson said: [12]

      “I have not been afraid to take on the greens on everything, from fracking to GM foods, the badger cull, even bees!”

      Key Deeds

      January 22, 2019

      A Guardian report revealed that unknown donors had funded nearly £39,000 worth of trips by Paterson via UK 2020, the thinktank he set up after leaving the cabinet in 2014. The trips included one to the US in November 2018 to campaign for a hard Brexit. [26]

      September 19, 2018 

      Paterson delivered a speech to the Heritage Foundation, a free-market think tank based in Washington DC which has repeatedly spread disinformation about climate change and received funding from ExxonMobil and the Koch Foundation. [13]

      According to the event description, Paterson made the case for how Brexit “can further strenghten the Special Relationship [between the UK and the US] as a powerful force for free trade and innovation on the world stage.” [13]

      During his visit to Washington DC, Paterson also visited The White House Writers Group, which describes itself as a “strategic communications” consulting company. Writing on Twitter, Paterson boasted to have met US government representatives, farmers and industry representatives and discussed “the downsides for the US of Chequers preventing a US-UK free trade deal and the spectacular gains which such a deal could provide for both countries.” [14], [15]

      October 4, 2017

      Paterson delivered a speech to an invited audience at the Competitive Enterprise Institute– a US thinktank infamous for spreading climate disinformation. In the speech, he said: [16],[17]

      The EU has single-mindedly pursued an overly prescriptive interpretation of the “Precautionary Principle,” smothering opportunities for innovation in thrall to the emotions of vocal activists rather than scientific evidence and advice.

      The green blob dominates thinking in Brussels, with generous grants given to green groups so that they will lobby it for regulations which then require large budgets to enforce.”

      Paterson was introduced by Myron Ebell, the institute’s Director for Energy and Environment. Ebell led President Donald Trump’s transition team on energy issues, despite Ebell’s assertions he’d never actually met Trump, and is known for spreading climate science denial. [18]

      March 2017

      Paterson signed a letter to the BBC complaining about its coverage of the Brexit referendum. The letter argued the BBC was biased to the “remain” side of the campaign. [19], [20]

      July 2016

      Paterson declared his support for Andrea Leadsom in the Conservative party leadership contest following David Cameron’s resignation. Both Paterson and Leadsom have strong ties to a trans-Atlantic network of individuals and groups spreading climate disinformation and pushing for Brexit. [21]

      May 2016

      Signed a letter calling for the UK government to delay setting a target for its fifth carbon budget, as required by the Climate Change Act, as it would hurt the UK’s international economic competitiveness. [22]

      January 2016

      Paterson declared his intention to campaign for Brexit alongside brother-in-law and GWPF advisor Matt Ridley as part of the Business for Britain group. [23]

      October 16, 2014

      Shortly after being sacked from government Paterson delivered the annual lecture for climate science denial campaign group, the Global Warming Policy Foundation, which it was later revealed was partly written by brother-in-law and GWPF advisor Matt Ridley[6], [7]

      November 2013

      Paterson met with the bosses of a number of oil and gas companies interesting in fracking in the UK. The Department of Environment, Food, and Rural Affairs (Defra) decided to withhold an internal briefing it prepared for Paterson in advance of the meeting. [24]

      Affiliations

      Government

      According to his profile at his website, Paterson has held the following positions: [2]

      • MP for North Shropshire, May 1997 – present
      • Conservative Whip, 1999-2001 
      • PPS to the Rt Hon Iain Duncan Smith, Sept 2001 – Oct 2003 
      • Shadow Minister for Agriculture, Oct 2005 – Nov 2006 
      • Shadow Minister of State for Transport, Nov 2006July 2007 
      • Shadow Secretary of State for Northern Ireland, July 2007 May 2010 
      • Secretary of State for Northern Ireland, May 2010 Sep 2012
      • Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, Sep 2012 – July 2014

      Social Media

      Publications

      Some sample publications by Owen Paterson below (view a larger list at his website):

      Resources

      1. Owen Paterson,LinkedIn. Accessed December 28, 2018. Archived .pdf on file at DeSmog.

      2. About Owen,” Owen Paterson MP. Archived December 28, 2018. Archive.fo URL: https://archive.fo/ZrGvK

      3. Andrew Sparrow. “I was sacked by David Cameron to appease 'the green blob', says Paterson,” The Guardian, July 20, 2014. Archived December 28, 2018. Archive.fo URLhttps://archive.fo/LIP50

      4. Certified Copy of an Entry of Marriage,” General Register Office, December 3, 2014. Retrieved from DocumentCloud. Archived .pdf on file at DeSmog.

      5. ACADEMICADVISORYCOUNCIL,” The Global Warming Policy Foundation. Archived December 28, 2018. Archive.fo URLhttps://archive.fo/NaWvA

      6. Brendan Montague. “Sacked Environment Secretary Attacks Climate Change Act,” DeSmog, October 13, 2014.

      7. Brendan Montague. “Sacked Paterson Turns to Broken Banker Ridley for Climate Speech Briefings,” DeSmog, October 16, 2014.

      8. Francis Elliott. “Sacked minister sets up think tan,” The Times, August 9, 2014. Archived December 28, 2018. Archive.fo URL: https://archive.fo/HbV2G

      9. Kyla Mandel. “Sacked Environment Secretary Dodges Question on Whether he Will Challenge Conservative Party Leadership,” DeSmog, November 12, 2014.

      10. Owen Paterson’s speech on abandoning the 2050 climate change targets – full text,” The Spectator, October 15, 2014. Google Cache as of December 19, 2018. Archive.fo URL: https://archive.fo/uMIeT

      11. The Future of Europe,” Owen Paterson MP, April 25, 2016. Archived .mp4 on file at DeSmog.

      12. Simon Walters. “You can't sack me! It's a smash in the teeth for 12million voters (and I even fought for you over bees): Former Environment Secretary Owen Paterson among a number of sacked ministers to react to 'male and pale' reshuffle with fury,” Daily Mail, July 19, 2014. Archived December 28, 2018. Archive.fo URLhttps://archive.fo/mV9Xw

      13. Brexit at the Crossroads: Why U.S. Support for a Far-Reaching Agreement is Vital,” The Heritage Foundation, September 19, 2018. Archived .mp4 on file at DeSmog.

      14. Strategic Communications for a Complex World,” White House Writers Group. Archived December 28, 2018. Archive.fo URL: https://archive.fo/62G66

      15. Great to be back in Washington. Many thanks @whwg for a fascinating discussion with US Govt representatives, farmers & industry on the downsides for the US of Chequers preventing a US/UK Free Trade Deal and the spectacular gains which such a deal could provide for both countries,” Twitter Post by user @OwenPaterson, September 18, 2018. Archived .png on file at DeSmog.

      16. Former U.K. Environment Secretary Owen Paterson Outlines the Environmental Benefits of Brexit,” Competitive Enterprise Institute, October 13, 2017. Archived December 28, 2018. Archive.fo URL: https://archive.fo/Lfwc4

      17. “Brexit: Good for the UK, good for the USA and good for the planet” (PDF), Competitive Enterprise Institute, October 4, 2017. Archived .pdf on file at DeSmog.

      18. Mat Hope. “UK Climate Science Denying GWPF Hosts Trump’s Fossil Fuelled ‘Environment Advisor’ Myron Ebell to Deliver Message to Britain,” DeSmog, January 30, 2017.

      19. Kyla Mandel. “MPs Who Complained About BBC's Brexit Coverage Linked to Network of Hardline Euro-Climate Sceptics,” DeSmog, March 23, 2017.

      20. RE: BBC Coverage of Brexit” (PDF), Julian Knight Member of Parliament for Solihull, March 20, 2017. Archived .pdf on file at DeSmog.

      21. Kyla Mandel. “Tory Leadership Race: The UKIP-ers and Climate Deniers Backing Gove and Leadsom,” DeSmog, July 5, 2016.

      22. Emily Gosden. “UK climate target will let rest of EU do less, MPs warn,” The Telegraph, May 14, 2016. Archived December 28, 2018. Archive.fo URL: https://archive.fo/5k21v

      23. Kyla Mandel. “UK Climate Deniers Ridley and Paterson Join the Campaign to Leave the EU,” DeSmog, January 6, 2016.

      24. Kyla Mandel. “Owen Paterson Meeting With Fracking Bosses Remains State Secret,” DeSmog, December 5, 2014.

      25. People,” UK2020. Archived December 28, 2018. Archive.fo URL: https://archive.fo/tSw1P

      26. David Pegg, Rob Evans, Felicity Lawrence. “Owen Paterson trips worth £39,000 funded by unknown donors,” The Guardian, January 22, 2019. Archived January 25, 2019. Archive.fo URLhttp://archive.fo/0ubKx

      Other Resources

      Photo: Wikimedia Commons | CC3.0

      Viewing all 74 articles
      Browse latest View live